logo
This Woman Filed False Dowry, Domestic Violence Cases Against Husband. She Regrets Now

This Woman Filed False Dowry, Domestic Violence Cases Against Husband. She Regrets Now

News1822-07-2025
Last Updated:
Now 37 and divorced with two children, the woman claims that her own family, including her parents, brother, and sister-in-law, now mistreats her.
A woman who filed false domestic violence and dowry cases against her husband and sought divorce is regretting her decision now. The now-deleted post, originally shared by a Reddit user along with the caption 'When temporary anger leads to permanent consequences," includes a screenshot of a woman's confession.
In the post, the woman claims she filed domestic violence and dowry charges against her husband after a 'small fight." She did it under pressure from her politically influential father. 'I had a small fight with my Husband. My father was a politically influential guy, and my brother works in an MNC. Both compelled me to file a dowry and domestic violence case against my husband. Case ran for 4 years. Then got settlement," reads the post.
What's even more surprising? In the post, the woman revealed that she had a love marriage. The woman continues that the case reportedly dragged on for four years before ending in a legal settlement.
Now 37 and divorced with two children, the woman says she deeply regrets her decision. She claims that her own family, including her parents, brother, and sister-in-law, now mistreat her.
Describing feeling like a 'failure,' the woman concluded saying, 'I thought of going to my husband and apologising for all the cases I filed on him and his family. But he got married. I am 37 years old now, a complete failure in my life."
The story, which has since been widely circulated on platforms like Instagram and Reddit, has triggered strong reactions from social media users.
'What goes around comes around. PERIOD," a comment read.
Another added, 'Temporary anger, manipulative relatives, and just being plain greedy and gullible."
'Tough truth: parents are toxic too. The only thing permanent is just us, so we have to be careful before taking any advice," said a user.
An individual pointed out the larger issue of family pressure and legal misuse, 'No one has to stay in a bad marriage, men or women. But the decision to split should be made by the man and wife only. In an ideal world, all splits should be amicable as when you have decided to part ways, why do it on a bad note? But the world is not an ideal place."
'Love marriage also can end up badly. LM or AM is not a certificate of good marriage. It requires efforts from both sides. Love marriage will automatically make your life happy is a wrong idea being propelled on Reddit. The true idea is efforts should be made from both sides. Am or I'm, both would work," expressed another.
view comments
Location :
Delhi, India, India
First Published:
July 22, 2025, 15:28 IST
News viral This Woman Filed False Dowry, Domestic Violence Cases Against Husband. She Regrets Now
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

High Court takes BIG decision on Kohli's RCB teammate Yash Dayal in minor's rape case
High Court takes BIG decision on Kohli's RCB teammate Yash Dayal in minor's rape case

India.com

time14 minutes ago

  • India.com

High Court takes BIG decision on Kohli's RCB teammate Yash Dayal in minor's rape case

Virat Kohli and Yash Dayal. (PIC - X) New Delhi: The Rajasthan High Court has dismissed a stay on the arrest of Virat Kohli's RCB teammate, fast bowler Yash Dayal in the case of the rape of a minor girl. What were the rulings of the High Court? The court held that as the victim is a minor, no interim relief is possible to the accused cricketer against arrest. Justice Sudesh Bansal hearing the case in Jaipur also ordered the case diary and fixed the next hearing on August 22. What did Yash Dayal's attorney say? Yash Dayal's lawyer, Kunal Jaiman, in the course of the hearing contended that the case was a part of a bigger conspiracy to tarnish the image of the cricketer. He contended that the same case of rape had previously been lodged in Ghaziabad, which was stayed by the Allahabad High Court. 'Just seven days after that, another FIR was registered in Jaipur. A gang seems to be involved in blackmailing by filing such cases,' Yash Dayal's lawyer alleged. What is the Jaipur case? But Sanganer police station in-charge Anil Jaiman revealed the Jaipur case details, adding that the complainant, who was a minor at the time of the incident, had met Yash Dayal while watching a cricket match. She then blamed Yash Dayal for sexually assaulting her nearly two years ago on the assurance of assisting her in her cricket career. The police also said Yash Dayal raped the girl for the second time in Sitapura hotel, Jaipur, during the season of IPL 2025 after the girl was invited to the room by Yash Dayal. Since the girl was 17-years-old at the time of the first rape, an FIR was registered under Sections of IPC and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. Interestingly, Dayal had earlier created a commotion by claiming to have posted communal content on his Instagram handle two years back. He later clarified that while two contentious reports were posted from his account, but he did not post them from his account.

'I have 25,000 followers': Peter Nguyen threatens American Airlines air hostess after she catches him vaping in toilet
'I have 25,000 followers': Peter Nguyen threatens American Airlines air hostess after she catches him vaping in toilet

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

'I have 25,000 followers': Peter Nguyen threatens American Airlines air hostess after she catches him vaping in toilet

Peter Nguyen threatened to call the police when he was caught vaping on an American Airlines plane. Peter Kobe Nguyen, an Internet personality and a self-described pickleball coach, created a scene that included some social media flexing on board an American Airlines plane after he was caught vaping inside the toilet of the aircraft. Nguyen, in the viral video, accused the air hostess of harassing him by opening the bathroom door on him, and then he went on to say that he has 25,000 followers and they will watch this. Nguyen recorded the video and posted on Instagram claiming that the airhostess put her hands on him but it backfired as his followers told him that he was at fault and was now trying to gain sympathy. 'I was actually sitting on the toilet and you were opening the door,' he said in the video. 'I don't care,' the crew member replied. 'You can keep saying you're sorry but I care about all these passengers.' View this post on Instagram A post shared by Kobe Peter 'Twoey King' Nguyen (@ "I have a lawyer, I am a lawyer," Nguyen said, forcing the airhostess to apologize. Then he threatened to call the police when he landed. In a follow-up post, Nguyen wrote that 'American Airlines customer service' had called to tell them they were conducting 'internal investigation' of the incident and that 'similar instances had happened in the past.' 'Justice is about to be served,' he wrote in the caption. American Airlines acknowledged the incident and said: "A customer on American Airlines flight 2860 with service from Phoenix (PHX) to San Francisco (SFO) was removed from the aircraft upon arrival at SFO due to disruptive behavior. We thank our customers for their patience and apologize for any inconvenience." "The San Francisco Police Department met the flight upon arrival and escorted the customer out of the concourse." "What a sorry attempt to portray yourself as a victim. Stop Vaping in the airplane, case closed," the top comment of the Instagram post read. 'I have a lawyer. I AM a lawyer' lmao. No dude you play pickleball," another mocked him. "You should go to federal prison for vaping on a plane and endangering all the passengers on the plane," a third user wrote.

‘Father, uncle gave 18-yr-old milk laced with sedatives, killed her'
‘Father, uncle gave 18-yr-old milk laced with sedatives, killed her'

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

‘Father, uncle gave 18-yr-old milk laced with sedatives, killed her'

Police investigation in the mysterious death of 18-year-old Chandrika Chaudhary, an MBBS aspirant from Banaskantha, has confirmed that it was neither suicide nor a heart attack but a premeditated 'honour killing'. The probe revealed that she was allegedly killed by her father and uncle for daring to dream of building her future with a man they did not approve of. Chandrika had been declared dead by her family two days before the Gujarat high court was scheduled to hear a habeas corpus petition by her partner Haresh Chaudhary. According to the FIR lodged by Tharad police of Banaskantha, Chandrika was given milk laced with sedation pills by her uncle, Shivram Chaudhary, on the evening of June 24, on the instruction of her father, Sendha Chaudhary. She was told to drink it and rest. You Can Also Check: Ahmedabad AQI | Weather in Ahmedabad | Bank Holidays in Ahmedabad | Public Holidays in Ahmedabad "Have milk and rest well. Sleep well," were the last words Chandrika heard from her father before she was offered the glass of milk, according to the FIR. But that night, while she was drowsy having taken the pills, her uncle and father lifted her and took her to a storeroom. There, they strangled her with a dupatta, later staging the scene to make it look like suicide. "She drank the milk and lay down. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Is Why Smart People Put Baking Soda in Their Shampoo Read More Undo That was the last time she was seen alive," the FIR reads. Shivram, her uncle, is stated to have confessed that they wanted to make it appear as if Chandrika had taken her own life. Her father is absconding. The motive, as detailed in police statements, was rooted in "family honour". Chandrika, who aspired to become a doctor, was in a relationship with Haresh whom she first met at a bus stand in Feb this year. While she wished to continue her studies and live independently, away from family, they disapproved of police officials said the family initially declared the cause of death as a heart attack and quickly cremated the body without a postmortem. A probe followed after Haresh approached Banaskantha police with his application, seeking a fair investigation into her death and submitted Instagram messages, witness accounts and background details of their relationship. "She signed a live-in agreement with me just two weeks before she died," Haresh said. "She wanted to study medicine. We were not harming anyone. We just wanted to live peacefully." After the couple's live-in arrangement became known to her family, she was forcibly taken back to her village in the last week of June. A habeas corpus plea was filed by Haresh, but Chandrika was found dead on June 25, just two days before the court was to begin hearing the case. Initially suspected to be either a cardiac arrest death or a suicide, the case took a serious turn after investigation found inconsistencies in the versions of her family members. Statements from Shivram and other relatives, along with circumstantial evidence, led police to conclude that the death was in fact a planned murder. "The girl brought dishonour to the family," Shivram reportedly told police. "My brother and I decided that evening itself that this should end." The FIR records that the conspirators tried to mislead everyone by hanging her body from a ceiling fan to simulate suicide. "To our close relatives, we made it look like she took her own life. We told others that it was a suicide but requested them not to disclose it to anyone it as it would bring dishonour to the family since she was a young woman who had eloped with another man and then killed herself. We told some other villagers that she died due to a heart attack and that is what we told the court as well," Shivram is quoted as saying in the FIR. Box 1: Mother still unaware her daughter was murdered Police sources said Chandrika's mother was not aware of how she died. Her father presented the case as a natural death due to a heart attack. Officials said the mother has not been in a stable mental state since the incident and remains unaware that her daughter was killed by her own family members. Box 2: Wanted to become either a gynaecologist or a general physician Having scored 80% in her Class 12 exams, Chandrika cleared NEET 2025 with 490 marks, bettering the score of 380 in the previous attempt. Her partner Haresh told police she wanted to become a gynaecologist or general physician. She was staying in a hostel and was preparing for further studies when she was taken back home by her family and allegedly killed. Box 3: 'She asked for a lift and became part of my life' "She just walked up to me and said, 'Are you going to Palanpur? Can I come along?'" Haresh recalled, speaking about the first time he met Chandrika at the Tharad bus stand in Feb this year. "That was it. I didn't know back then that one ride would change everything." Haresh said they began talking during that short drive and exchanged numbers. "She told me she was preparing for NEET and wanted to become a doctor. She was full of dreams. I don't know when those small chats evolved into something bigger." They started messaging on WhatsApp and Instagram. "We would talk every day. She would tell me about her studies, her parents, how they didn't want her to study or be with me. But she never wanted to give up," he said. "She is gone, but I will never forget that smile on her face the day we first met," Haresh said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store