Trump tariffs take a $1bn bite out of GM earnings; shares fall
The largest US carmaker by sales said it expects the tariff impact to worsen in the third quarter and stuck to a previous estimate that trade headwinds threaten to hit the bottom line by $4bn (R70,198,998,400) to $5bn (R87,748,748,000). GM said it could take steps to mitigate at least 30% of the impact. Shares fell about 6% in early trading.
The carmaker's revenue in the quarter ended June 30 fell nearly 2% to about $47bn (R824,838,231,200) from a year ago. Its quarterly adjusted earnings per share fell to $2.53 (R44.40) compared with $3.06 (R53,71) a year earlier. Analysts on average expected adjusted profit of $2.44 (R42,82) per share, according to data compiled by LSEG.
GM's adjusted earnings before interest and taxes was among corporations that revised annual guidance due to the impact from US President Donald Trump's tariffs, lowering it to an annual adjusted core profit of between $10bn (R175,501,993,000) and $12.5bn (R219,377,491,250). The company on Tuesday stood by the forecast.
Beyond tariffs, GM's underlying business in the quarter was solid. Sales in the US market – its main profit centre – rose 7%, while the company continued to command strong pricing on its pickup trucks and SUVs. GM swung back to a small profit in China, after losing money there a year before.
Analysts said GM may need to cut investment in future projects or find other ways to trim spending to offset the effect of tariffs. Jeep-maker Stellantis on Monday warned tariffs would significantly affect results in the second half of 2025, and said tariffs cost it about €300m (R6,177,180,000) in the first half of the year.
Shares of rival Ford Motor and US-traded shares of Stellantis fell about 1% on Tuesday morning. The carmaker took steps in recent months to bolster its combustion-engine operations through increased investment in its US factory base, calling into question its goal of ending the production of petrol-powered cars and trucks by 2035.
GM announced in June it would invest $4bn at three US facilities in Michigan, Kansas and Tennessee, including a plan to move production of the Cadillac Escalade and increase output of its two big pickup trucks. It added production of its previously Mexico-produced Chevy Blazer to the Tennessee plant. The carmaker imports about half the vehicles it sells in the US, mainly from Mexico and South Korea. Crosstown rival Ford produces about 80% of its US-sold vehicles domestically.
Car companies are increasingly shifting their focus to bolstering the core lineup of petrol trucks and SUVs as the growth rate of EV sales has slowed. Demand for battery-powered models has slowed after rapid growth earlier this decade.
The trend is intensified by the pending disappearance of government support for the battery-powered models. Sweeping tax and budget legislation approved by the US Congress will eliminate $7,500 (R131,658) tax credits for buying or leasing new electric vehicles and a $4,000 (R70,217) used-EV credit at the end of September.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
Political pressure mounts for banking sector regulation in South Africa
SA's big banks' trade policies in the spotlight Image: IOL HEATED calls for a body to regulate the practices of the country's banking sector, especially from political circles, have emerged once again. They are dismayed with the wanton power that banks currently possess, which included cherry-picking which clients' accounts could be shut without justification. Parties such as the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) and Umkhonto WeSizwe Party (MKP) were very vocal about the establishment a formal adjudication body to oversee banks. Donald Trump's tough stance on US banks has got South Africans thinking Image: Lee Ronganger Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The conversation resurfaced yet again after US President Donald Trump's plans to have their nation's banks powers reviewed for what he called 'politicising or unlawful banking practices'. However, unlike the US, the South African Constitution does not give President Cyril Ramaphosa such leverage to regulate the powers of the country's banks, due process must be followed. Earlier this year, the South African banks came under strong criticism at a Parliamentary standing committee on finance meeting. The meeting focused on issues pertaining to competition, the provision of credit for productive activities, and transformation. The South African Reserve Bank (SARB), along with its Prudential Authority Institute, the Banking Association South Africa (BASA), Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA), Standard Bank, FNB, Absa, Investec, Nedbank, and Capitec were in attendance. In the latter part of 2023, there were reports that banks were charging clients rates based on the colour of their skin. That revelation caused people to ask pertinent questions about the regulation of banks. The move by Trump's got people asking similar questions as well as why doesn't Ramaphosa implement similar policies as his US counterpart. Labour expert Michael Bagraim responded that the country's Constitution doesn't allow for Ramaphosa to exercise absolute authority and interfere with the banking sector. 'There is no possibility that our president can do something similar to what the Trump presidency has done. We are governed by a much more inclusive constitutional democracy and our laws would not allow such horrific powers to be given to an individual. "The American system gives despotic power to the American presidency,' Bagraim explained. His sentiments were echoed by Professor Siphamandla Zondi, who said the constitutional and political system does not give the president such executive power to punish such wrongdoings. 'In our case, the president should be reporting these matters of debanking and banks' misdemeanors to the regulators and the reserve bank. "The fact these issues continue in our banking sector means those tasked with supervisory and oversight roles are weak and ineffective,' said Zondi. Previously the MK Party had expressed its concerns about banking issues through its member of parliament, Sanele Mwali. Mwali raised concerns that the banks were displaying and "perpetuating unfairness and neo-apartheid systems of racist practices post-1994". He accused banks of exercising double standards when dealing with clients. "We have seen that there were companies covered in controversy in the financial sector, for instance Tongaat, Steinhoff, and Glencor, but they still have accounts with the major banks. "But Sekunjalo and others have already faced their day in court and they've already experienced closure of their accounts. Mwali said such actions by the country's major banks was a concern and he supported the notion that there discrimination within the financial sector still existed. DAILY NEWS

IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
After US action on political debanking, #RacistBanksMustFall calls for reform in South Africa
#RacistBanksMustFall, applauded the recent move by US President Donald Trump to combat debanking practices, urging South Africa to follow suit and introduce similar protections for its citizens. Image: Ayanda Mdluli The #RacistBanksMustFall movement in South Africa has called for immediate legislative intervention in the wake of a US executive order designed to prevent banks from closing accounts based on political or religious beliefs. The Trump administration's executive order, expected to be signed this week, aims to tackle the controversial practice of debanking, where financial institutions deny services to individuals or businesses based on political affiliation. The order directs federal banking regulators to remove vague "reputational risk" guidelines that have often been used to justify account closures, particularly targeting conservative and crypto industry figures in the US. Reuters reported Trump as saying he believes that banks, including JPMorgan and Bank of America discriminate against him and his supporters. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ In South Africa, banks, including major institutions like Nedbank, have come under fire for selectively closing accounts under the guise of "reputational risk". Nedbank's 2023 annual report revealed that it had closed accounts for nearly 200 individuals and businesses, a practice that critics argue is politically motivated and disproportionately targets dissenting voices. Among the most high-profile cases is that of Sekunjalo Group, which has fought against the closure of its bank accounts, claiming that the action is part of an ongoing effort to silence politically inconvenient businesses and individuals. Campaign leader of #RacistBanksMustFall, Crown Prince Adil Nchabeleng, said: "South African banks have been selectively racist and are using the banking institution to target and silence political dissents." He pointed to the case of Dr Iqbal Survé, prominent businessman and media mogul, whose companies have faced repeated account closures by South African banks, claiming they were seen as a "reputational risk" due to Survé's political views and media influence. According to the current regulatory frameworks, banks are obliged to notify customers and provide them with the opportunity to make representations before terminating their accounts. In South Africa, the Supreme Court of Appeal in Bredenkamp v Standard Bank set the standard for the unilateral termination of the bank-customer relationship on the grounds of reputational risks. The judgement sets out several principles South African banks have relied on when terminating relationships with their customers. Over the years these principles have been challenged in courts, where customers have instituted legal proceedings to prohibit banks from closing their accounts, requiring banks to keep accounts open against the banks' wishes. Cosatu Parliamentary Coordinator, Matthew Parks said, 'The rights of banking consumers in South Africa is guided by the Financial Intelligence Centre Act. It is critical that such legislation is clear with regards to consumers' rights and banks' obligations." The Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) is moving forward with the Conduct of Financial Institutions (COFI) Bill, which aims to provide a fair process for bank account closures, following a series of delays. Cape Argus

IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
Call for South Africa to act on 'debanking' as Trump moves to ban closures in the US
#RacistBanksMustFall, applauded the recent move by US President Donald Trump to combat debanking practices, urging South Africa to follow suit and introduce similar protections for its citizens. Image: SoraAI/IOL The #RacistBanksMustFall movement in South Africa has urged urgent legislative reforms following the announcement of a new US executive order that seeks to ban banks from closing accounts based on political or religious views. As reported by Business Report, the group praised the decision by former US President Donald Trump to address what is known as "debanking" - a practice where banks withdraw services from individuals or organisations for ideological reasons. The executive order, expected to be signed soon, directs US regulators to discard the "reputational risk" clause often used to justify such closures. Trump alleges that institutions like JPMorgan and Bank of America discriminated against him and his supporters. Debanking, broadly defined, refers to banks refusing services to customers for a variety of reasons. In the US, there is no legal right to a bank account, and banks often cite regulatory or compliance concerns. In an interview with CNBC, Trump accused major lenders of rejecting his deposits post-presidency, asserting: "They told me, 'I'm sorry sir, we can't have you. You have 20 days to get out.'" In South Africa, the debate around debanking has intensified, with local institutions, particularly Nedbank, under scrutiny. Nedbank's 2023 annual report revealed the closure of nearly 200 accounts, a move critics claim disproportionately affects politically vocal individuals and businesses. One of the most high-profile cases involves the Sekunjalo Group, which argues that its account closures are politically driven attempts to silence dissent. #RacistBanksMustFall campaign leader Crown Prince Adil Nchabeleng said South African banks are guilty of similar discriminatory practices. He cited the example of businessman and media mogul Dr Iqbal Survé, whose companies have had accounts closed over perceived "reputational risk" linked to his political influence and media ownership. Nchabeleng called Trump's executive order a 'positive development' and urged South Africa to implement similar safeguards. 'For long now, the banks have been doing as they wish,' he said. He further alleged that banks are targeting politically inconvenient individuals and that this practice also impacts society's most vulnerable. 'Local banks have unilaterally bankrupted families and auctioned off homes without sufficient cause,' said Nchabeleng, who believes the process violates constitutional protections for access to financial services. He added: 'It is high time the banking institution stops its discriminatory practices.' Current South African regulations require banks to give notice and allow customers to respond before closing accounts. Legal precedent set in Bredenkamp v Standard Bank allows terminations on reputational grounds but has faced multiple legal challenges.