🚨Welcome Miguelo, Boca confirm Russo's return
Without a doubt, his arrival took longer than expected. Unblocking his situation at San Lorenzo was not easy. Now, the coach made it clear that Boca appeared after he was eliminated by Platense.
Advertisement
"Boca appeared after I was eliminated with San Lorenzo, it didn't appear before. So you have an idea and a norm of the football codes."
This will be Russo's third cycle at the helm of the La Ribera club and his second in the era of Juan Román Riquelme as president. Will it be the one to win the seventh title?
This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇪🇸 here.
📸 Pool - 2020 Getty Images
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
12 minutes ago
- Newsweek
How to Watch Chelsea vs Crystal Palace: Live Stream Premier League, TV Channel
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. FIFA Club World Cup champion Chelsea is back on English soil and gets its Premier League season started at home to Crystal Palace on Sunday. Pedro Neto of Chelsea in action during the pre-season friendly match between Chelsea and AC Milan at Stamford Bridge on August 10, 2025 in London, England. Pedro Neto of Chelsea in action during the pre-season friendly match between Chelsea and AC Milan at Stamford Bridge on August 10, 2025 in London, England. Photo byHow to Watch Chelsea FC vs Crystal Palace Date: Sunday, August 17, 2025 Time: 9:00 AM EDT Location: Stamford Bridge, London, England Channel: USA Network Stream: Fubo (TRY FOR FREE) A clash between London giants will bring together two teams who have already claimed silverware this summer as Chelsea hosts Crystal Palace on the opening weekend of the Premier League season. The Eagles travel to Stamford Bridge on Sunday, having defeated Liverpool on penalties to clinch the FA Community Shield last weekend, while Chelsea got its hands on the FIFA Club World Cup last month. Enzo Maresca appears to be going from strength to strength as Blues boss and made his presence felt in front of American crowds over the summer. President Donald Trump was even on hand to award the west London giants their prize in New Jersey, but there's a far greater prize at stake as England's top flight gets back to business. FA Cup holder Palace shows no sign of letting up in its pursuit of bigger and better things after twice coming from behind to get the better of Premier League champion Liverpool last Saturday. Manager Oliver Glasner has largely managed to retain the same squad that surged to title glory back in May, though he has admitted captain Marc Guehi, who came through Chelsea's academy, could be on the move after entering the final year of his contract. The England defender is highly unlikely to be involved here amid rumors of a move to reigning champion Liverpool. Meanwhile, Chelsea will look to unleash a new-look XI featuring the likes of Joao Pedro, Estevao, Jamie Gittens, Liam Delap, and Jorrel Hato. Live stream Chelsea FC vs Crystal Palace on USA Network with Fubo: Start your subscription now! Regional restrictions may apply. If you purchase a product or register for an account through one of the links on our site, we may receive compensation.
Buzz Feed
3 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
Why Millennials Love Subtitles
Fellow millennials, I need to get your honest opinion on something. How do you *really* feel about having the subtitles on when you watch TV? Reddit user Some_Kinda_Username recently posed this same question, and people couldn't help but rave endlessly about how great closed captions are. While I might not be a fan of reading while watching my favorite TV show or movie, others just can't get enough! Here's what they had to say on this polarizing topic: "I love me some subtitles! Warning, though, they are addictive. Once you get used to them, it's nearly impossible, or at least quite infuriating, to watch anything without them." "I was using subtitles before it was cool." "Sound mixing is a lost art. Gotta make sure everyone hears the explosions over the actors advancing the plot by whispering." "I love subtitles! Everyone in my house starts talking the second the shows we want to watch come on. I feel that subtitles are a nice compromise. They talk during the show, but I can still enjoy it by reading the captions. Problem solved!" "Subtitles are real-time spoilers." "My late wife was Romanian, and while her English was perfect and much better than mine (I'm British/Canadian), she always wanted subtitles to help her follow along. Something about her brain's ability to translate speech was more tiring than reading. Now I keep them on by default." "I can't watch anything without subtitles anymore. 😭" "I usually have my kids or wife trying to talk to me at the same time I'm watching anything, so if I want to know what's going on, I have to have them on." "How else am I supposed to hear my show over the crunching of this bowl of cereal I'm eating as my fourth meal?" "My husband got me into the whole 'subtitles or bust' thing, and now my anxiety levels elevate if someone is watching something and there are no subtitles." "I have a household of people, and it helps when they don't want to quiet down." "Having been hard of hearing my whole life, the fact that we now have captions on nearly all streaming media has been a godsend for me." "I want it on, and my wife wants it off. It's a real battle." "90% of the time I watch shows or movies, the kids are asleep. Subtitles are mandatory when playing at a low volume." "I feel like I miss too many things without captions." "It's like lowering the volume on your radio when you're lost driving around. I know I'm not the only one." "I've been using subtitles since the '90s. You can pry them from my cold, dead hands." "But like, why does the TV sound different when the subtitles are off?" OK, now I need to know what you feel about this:
3 hours ago
With the Bayeux Tapestry that tells of their long rivalry, France and Britain are making nice
BAYEUX, France -- For centuries, the storytelling masterpiece has been a source of wonder and fascination. In vivid and gruesome detail, the 70-meter (230-foot) embroidered cloth recounts how a fierce duke from France conquered England in 1066, reshaping British and European history. The Bayeux Tapestry, with its scenes of sword-wielding knights in ferocious combat and King Harold of England's famous death, pierced by an arrow to an eye, has since the 11th century served as a sobering parable of military might, vengeance, betrayal and the complexity of Anglo-French relations, long seeped with blood and rivalry but also affection and cooperation. Now, the medieval forerunner of today's comic strips, commissioned as propaganda for the Normandy duke William known as 'the Conqueror' after he took the English throne from Harold, is being readied for a new narrative mission. Next year, the fragile artistic and historic treasure will be gingerly transported from its museum in Bayeux, Normandy, to star in a blockbuster exhibition in London's British Museum, from September 2026 to July 2027. Its first U.K. outing in almost 1,000 years will testify to the warming latest chapter in ties across the English Channel that chilled with the U.K.'s acrimonous departure from the European Union in 2020. The loan was announced in July when French President Emmanuel Macron became the first EU head of state to pay a state visit to the U.K. since Brexit. Bayeux Museum curator Antoine Verney says the cross-Channel trip will be a home-coming of sorts for the tapestry, because historians widely believe that it was embroidered in England, using woolen threads on linen canvas, and because William's victory at the Battle of Hastings was such a major juncture in English history, seared into the U.K.'s collective consciousness. 'For the British, the date — the only date — that all of them know is 1066,' Verney said in an interview with The Associated Press. Moving an artwork so unwieldy — made from nine pieces of linen fabric stitched together and showing 626 characters, 37 buildings, 41 ships and 202 horses and mules in a total of 58 scenes — is further complicated by its great age and the wear-and-tear of time. 'There is always a risk. The goal is for those risks to be as carefully calculated as possible,' said Verney, the curator. Believed to have been commissioned by Bishop Odo, William the Conqueror's half-brother, to decorate a new cathedral in Bayeux in 1077, the treasure is thought to have remained there, mostly stored in a wooden chest and almost unknown, for seven centuries, surviving the French Revolution, fires and other perils. Since then, only twice is the embroidery known to have been exhibited outside of the Normandy city: Napoleon Bonaparte had it shown off in Paris' Louvre Museum from late 1803 to early 1804. During World War II, it was displayed again in the Louvre in late 1944, after Allied forces that had landed in Normandy on D-Day, June 6th, of that year had fought onward to Paris and liberated it. The work, seen by more than 15 million visitors in its Bayeux museum since 1983, 'has the unique characteristic of being both monumental and very fragile,' Verney said. 'The textile fibers are 900 years old. So they have naturally degraded simply due to age. But at the same time, this is a work that has already traveled extensively and been handled a great deal.' During the treasure's stay in the U.K., its museum in Bayeux will be getting a major facelift costing tens of millions of euros (dollars). The doors will close to visitors from Sept. 1 this year, with reopening planned for October 2027, when the embroidery will be re-housed in a new building, encased on an inclined 70-meter long table that Verney said will totally transform the viewing experience. How, exactly, the treasure will be transported to the U.K. isn't yet clear. 'The studies required to allow its transfer to London and its exhibition at the British Museum are not finished, are under discussion, and are being carried out between the two governments,' Verney said. But he expressed confidence that it will be in safe hands. 'How can one imagine, in my view, that the British Museum would risk damaging, through the exhibition, this work that is a major element of a shared heritage?' he asked. 'I don't believe that the British could take risks that would endanger this major element of art history and of world heritage.'
