White House National Security Council hit by more departures, sources say
Ian Bennitt, the senior director for maritime and industrial capacity, and Brian McCormack, the NSC's chief of staff, both departed last week, said the sources, who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive personnel moves.
Bennitt is expected to leave for the private sector, the sources said, while McCormack is slated to become chief of staff for Republican Senator Bill Hagerty, a Trump ally.
Hagerty's office had already said last week that McCormack would soon take up the chief of staff role for the senator, indicating his departure from the NSC was imminent. Bennitt's departure has not been previously reported.
While it was not clear what immediate impact the moves would have on national security policy, the departures follow multiple waves of firings that have at times dented morale and left the NSC a shell of its former self.
Some sections of the NSC have been eliminated, while others - such as those overseeing the Middle East and Africa - have been combined, according to several people familiar with the moves.
Very few senior officials at the NSC who were hired at the beginning of President Donald Trump's administration remain. McCormack and Bennitt were among the last holdouts.
Bennitt's departure is particularly significant given the Trump administration's early focus on revitalizing the U.S. Navy and rebuilding the country's maritime capacity.
Trump signed an executive order to bipartisan applause in April aimed at reviving domestic shipbuilding and reducing China's grip on the global shipping industry. The White House had pointed to the establishment of a maritime office at the NSC as a sign of its commitment to the industry.
But by early July, five of that office's seven workers had departed, the Wall Street Journal reported.
A White House official told Reuters there was now a greater emphasis on maritime affairs at the State Department and at the Office of Management and Budget, a separate White House agency that helps decide the president's policy priorities and how to pay for them.
Anna Kelly, a White House spokesperson, did not directly comment on the departures, but indicated the administration is still focused on shipbuilding.
"American shipbuilding was neglected for decades under failed presidents like Joe Biden, but President Trump is prioritizing this vital industry to strengthen our country's economic and national security," she said in a statement.
The tumult at the NSC began in late March and early April, when several staffers were let go after right-wing influencer Laura Loomer presented Trump with a list of national security officials she perceived to be disloyal.
Trump's first national security adviser, Mike Waltz, was ousted in May. His standing was diminished after he accidentally added a journalist to a group chat about an imminent bombing campaign in Yemen.
After a slow bleed of firings throughout the spring, the NSC was decimated by a mass purge of employees of various ranks in late May. Upon taking office in January, the Trump administration dismissed almost all NSC holdovers from the administration of former President Joe Biden, meaning the subsequent purges targeted people the White House itself hired.
The NSC, which plays a central role in formulating and coordinating national security policy in some administrations, has now taken a back seat to the Pentagon, the State Department and the intelligence community, according to several U.S. officials.
In recent weeks, the NSC has begun to make some hires in an attempt to rebuild, according to the sources. But senior departures could complicate the administration's ability to refill ranks promptly.
The voluntary departure of some additional NSC staffers is expected in the coming days and weeks, the two sources said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Nearly 1 in 4 Americans over 50 are delaying retirement due to economic concerns, survey finds
About one-quarter of Americans over the age of 50 have been pushing back their retirement plans due to economic uncertainty and their financial readiness, a new survey finds. The survey, conducted by ROI Rocket for F&G Annuities & Life, polled 2,000 U.S. adults aged 50 and older who are financial decision-makers and have at least $100,000 in financial savings. Of this group, 23 percent said they are delaying their planned retirement date — a figure that shot up 14 percent from 2024. Half of the respondents cited economic volatility as the reason for considering pushing back their retirement. Last year, only 40 percent said the same, according to the survey. Asked why they plan to push back their retirement plans, 44 percent of respondents said they were concerned about inflation, 34 percent said they were worried about a recession, the survey found. Meanwhile, 48 percent voiced they were worried they won't have enough money for retirement and 42 percent said they wanted a larger safety net. The survey was taken in May, just one month after President Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs rocked the stock market. The market tanked after the president unveiled an across-the-board tax on all imported goods purchased by Americans. Days later, he announced a 90-day pause on the levies, prompting the market to surge. Now, Trump has threatened to impose tariffs once again, with many expected to go into effect on August 1. Meanwhile, 29 percent of retirees are considering returning to work, according to the poll. That figure increases with age; 28 percent of retirees in Baby Boomers, those aged 61 to 80, are weighing 'unretiring' compared to 54 percent of retirees in Gen X, those aged 45 to 60. The group cited both personal finances and economic turbulence as to why they are considering rejoining the workforce. About one-third cited not wanting to feel a lack of purpose as their reason for returning to the workforce, while 36 percent said they are worried about inflation, down from 44 percent last year. "The current economic environment is creating significantly more stress and uncertainty for younger American investors, leading many to rethink their timelines for retirement as our third annual study shows," Chris Blunt, CEO of F&G, said in a statement. The earliest age one can file for social security retirement benefits is 62, but waiting longer to file leads to larger monthly payments, according to AARP. These benefits are designed to be largely resistant to inflation due to cost-of-living adjustments. To be safe, saving anything, even small amounts, if possible, David John, a senior policy adviser at AARP, told CBS News. "Save and continue to save," he told the network. "Because any amount of retirement savings is going to be better than no retirement savings."
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Trump administration imposes limits on Mexican flights and threatens Delta alliance in trade dispute
The Trump administration imposed new restrictions Saturday on flights from Mexico and threatened to end a longstanding partnership between Delta Air Lines and Aeromexico in response to limits the Mexican government placed on passenger and cargo flights into Mexico City several years ago. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said Mexico's actions to force airlines to move out of the main Benito Juarez International Airport to the newer Felipe Angeles International Airport more than 30 miles away violated a trade agreement between the two countries and gave domestic airlines an unfair advantage. Mexico is the top foreign destination for Americans with more than 40 million passengers flying there last year. "Joe Biden and Pete Buttigieg deliberately allowed Mexico to break our bilateral aviation agreement,' Duffy said of the previous administration. 'That ends today. Let these actions serve as a warning to any country who thinks it can take advantage of the U.S., our carriers, and our market. America First means fighting for the fundamental principle of fairness.' All Mexican passenger, cargo and charter airlines will now be required to submit their schedules to the Transportation Department and seek government approval of their flights until Duffy is satisfied with the way Mexico is treating U.S. airlines. It's not immediately clear how Duffy's actions might affect the broader trade war with Mexico and negotiations over tariffs. A spokesperson for Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum didn't reply immediately to a request for a comment, and she didn't mention the restrictions at an event Saturday. Delta and Aeromexico have been fighting the Transportation Department's efforts to end their partnership that began in 2016 since early last year. The airlines have argued that it's not fair to punish them for the Mexican government's actions, and they said ending their agreement would jeopardize nearly two dozen routes and $800 million in annual consumer savings. 'The U.S. Department of Transportation's tentative proposal to terminate its approval of the strategic and pro-competitive partnership between Delta and Aeromexico would cause significant harm to consumers traveling between the U.S. and Mexico, as well as U.S. jobs, communities, and transborder competition," Delta said in a statement. Aeromexico's press office said it was reviewing the order and intended to present a joint response with Delta in the coming days. But the order terminating approval of the agreement between the airlines wouldn't take effect until October, and the airlines are likely to continue fighting that decision. ___ Associated Press writer Amaranta Marentes in Mexico City contributed to this report.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
HAMISH MCRAE: Why ARE we so scared of investing?
On to 10,000? The FTSE 100 share index spent Friday flirting with the 9,000 mark, pushing through it twice before closing at 8,992. It makes you think. If shares can do this well with all the chaos for world trade, plus the miserable performance of our economy, and I'm afraid our own Government, what on earth might they do as and when the clouds lift? And not just here. The S&P 500 hit an all-time high, with Germany's DAX just about there too. Actually, the clouds over world trade did lift a little on Thursday. Jensen Huang, chief executive of the US chip-maker, Nvidia, met China's commerce minister, Wang Wentao, and there was a hint that China and America might start to co-operate on trade in semiconductors, rather than head into a full-scale trade war. As a result, the shares of what was already the world's most valuable firm shot up further, giving it a market value of $4.25 trillion and leading to talk of it becoming the first $5 trillion enterprise. That pulled up some other US giants, including Microsoft, now worth $3.8 trillion. This pattern of uneven economic news but booming share prices was given a new twist last week by Rachel Reeves. In her Mansion House speech, the Chancellor urged people to invest in equities, arguing that the benefits outweighed the risks. Now, you may think that many of her actions have had quite the reverse effect by discouraging anyone from putting their savings into the market: increases in capital gains tax, making pension pots liable for inheritance tax from 2027, and so on. We will have to wait and see what she plans to do about cash Isas – whether she will try to cut or end them – but if she really wanted to get more people investing in shares, she would at the very least allow the capital gains tax allowance to be indexed against inflation. True to form, there was a yawning gap between what she says and what she does. But actually, she's right. We have written here about the relentless selling of UK shares by pension funds and insurers since 1997, when they owned nearly half the market. By 2022 they were down to owning 4.2 per cent of it. But private investors have also been in headlong retreat. In the 1960s more than half the shares on the London Stock Exchange were owned by individuals. By the 1990s, they owned 20 per cent, and in 2022, 10.8 per cent. Foreigners, who accounted for less than 10 per cent of the market in 1979, had 57.7 per cent of quoted shares, an all-time high. Those figures are two and a half years out of date. Why the Office for National Statistics can't give us a more recent tally of who owns British enterprises, I don't know. I would have thought it was rather important. However, it is just possible that, despite the negativity of this Government, black holes in its finances and all that, interest among ordinary savers is starting to pick up. We do know that there are nearly 5,000 Isa millionaires. Indeed, this most recent uplift in the markets has probably pushed the number well above that level. It also seems that Generation Z is prepared to risk money by buying cryptocurrencies. The most stunning statistic I have found on this is that the Financial Conduct Authority reckons that as of August last year, 12 per cent of UK adults owned cryptoassets. That's seven million people. Since the prices have doubled since then, with Bitcoin up from about $60,000 to close to $118,000 now, they have done well out of it. As we all know, there is nothing there: no physical assets, no commercial entity, no products or services, no dividends. But whatever you think about investing in crypto – I think it's nuts – it does at least show seven million Britons aren't afraid to take a punt. What we need to do is to harness this spirit by hammering home the message that successful investment is a long game. Yes, there are risks, including that governments like this one will clobber savers with yet higher taxes. But keep putting money into solid companies, reinvest the dividends, and you will eventually have a nice nest egg. For once, our Chancellor is right.
