EU announces sanctions on Rosneft-backed Nayara Energy, lowers price cap on Russian crude
The action would mean that Nayara Energy would not be able to export petroleum fuels and products to Europe, and potentially hit any of its dealings with European companies. It could also hit Rosneft's plan to exit Nayara as the EU sanctions could spook prospective investors. To be sure, Nayara Energy is not a big fuel exporter to Europe, and is estimated to have accounted for around 4 per cent of India's total fuel exports to Europe so far in 2025, according to industry data. Reliance Industries (RIL) is the biggest fuel exporter in the country, and accounted for around 90 per cent of fuel exports from India to Europe so far this year.
The lower price cap on Russian crude, which has not been specified yet, could be beneficial for India if the new cap is strictly enforced. This is because India is a major importer of Russian crude and if the price of Russian barrels reduces due to a lower price cap, it could potentially lower the cost of imports for India. Currently, Russian crude accounts for around 40 per cent of India's total oil import volumes.
Industry insiders said that the likely impact of the EU actions is not clear yet, and clarity is likely only when details of the sanctions and the new price cap emerge. Importantly, it has to be seen whether the United States will join the EU in these measures, as US action could have far greater consequences in terms of enforcement of the sanctions.
'We are standing firm. The EU just approved one of its strongest sanctions package against Russia to date. We're cutting the Kremlin's war budget further, going after 105 more shadow fleet ships, their enablers, and limiting Russian banks' access to funding. Nord Stream pipelines will be banned. A lower oil price cap. We are putting more pressure on Russia's military industry, Chinese banks that enables sanctions evasion, and blocking tech exports used in drones. For the first time, we're designating a flag registry and the biggest Rosneft refinery in India. Our sanctions also hit those indoctrinating Ukrainian children. We will keep raising the costs, so stopping the aggression becomes the only path forward for Moscow,' Kaja Kallas, the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice-President of the European Commission, posted on social media platform X.
In her social media posts, Kallas did not provide additional details of the EU's latest sanctions package against Russia. The EU and the US are increasing pressure on Moscow to reach a peace deal with Kyiv and end the Russia-Ukraine war that began in February 2022. Energy exports are the biggest revenue generators for Moscow and Western powers have been targeting this revenue stream to force the Kremlin's hand into ending the Ukraine war.
The US, EU, and a few other powers had imposed a price cap of $60 per barrel on Russian crude, as per which Western shippers and insurers cannot participate in Russian oil trade if the price of Moscow's crude is above that level. Payment for oil cargoes in breach of the price cap cannot be in US dollars or Euros.
According to industry sources, significant volumes of Russian crude imported by India are transported by the so-called shadow fleet—vessels effectively controlled by Russia—that doesn't rely on Western shipping and insurance, which means that such shipments need not adhere to the price cap. The price cap is adhered to for cargoes that depend on Western shipping and insurance. To be sure, Indian refiners buy Russian crude on a delivered basis, which means that transportation and insurance are arranged by the seller.
Sukalp Sharma is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express and writes on a host of subjects and sectors, notably energy and aviation. He has over 13 years of experience in journalism with a body of work spanning areas like politics, development, equity markets, corporates, trade, and economic policy. He considers himself an above-average photographer, which goes well with his love for travel. ... Read More
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Had ceasefire due to common sense of both govts: Pakistan ex-foreign minister
'We had a ceasefire because both governments had the common sense, and they decided that enough was enough,' said former Pakistan foreign minister Khurshid Mahmud Kasuri, while addressing a seminar virtually on India-Pakistan relations in New Delhi on Saturday. 'Give credit where it is due. It was not any DGMO. It was the highest level of India and Pakistan that wanted the war to an end,' added the former minister, who served under President Pervez Musharraf. On statements of President Donald Trump regarding mediating a ceasefire, Kasuri said that 'this wasn't the first time, but the fifth time (that the US had intervened between India and Pakistan),' starting from former US defence secretary Robert Gates, former President Bill Clinton, former US Secretary of State Colin Powell and former President Barack Obama. Ever since the ceasefire on May 10, President Trump has repeatedly claimed that he brokered peace between India and Pakistan after the four-day military hostilities. New Delhi has consistently maintained that the two sides halted their actions following direct talks between their militaries without any mediation by the US. The seminar, titled 'India Pakistan Relations: Dialogue For Peace', organised by Delhi-based Centre for Peace and Progress, came in the wake of the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor, and had speakers from India and Pakistan interacting virtually on the future of ties. It also came just a day after the US designated The Resistance Front — a shadow outfit of banned terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba, which had claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam attack — as a foreign terrorist organisation. Kasuri also batted for 'discreet, back-channel National Security Advisor-level talks' between the two countries. 'If NSAs are not acceptable, anybody who has the confidence in the two governments, the two Prime Ministers should be (holding talks)… with the sole purpose of preventing the next war,' he said. Tanvir Sadiq, NC MLA from J&K, among the speakers from the Indian side, said there is stalemate right now in the ties, with the two countries just coming back from the brink of war. However, he said, 'Do you think this is an appropriate time for India and Pakistan to talk? Sadly, no. But do India and Pakistan have to talk? Definitely, yes.' However, without naming any third country, Sadiq batted for 'friends' of both countries to bring them together for talks. 'If you think India and Pakistan will sit on the table and discuss things that won't be possible. We will have to get friends of both India and Pakistan to make sure the two neighbours sit on the table,' added the legislator from Srinagar's Zadibal. Former Indian High Commissioner to Pakistan, T C A Raghavan, said that the present crisis comes from a problem of a structural nature. 'Across the political spectrum in both countries, every shade of political opinion at some point of time or the other has been in government, and during those times, there has been an India-Pakistan problem,' he said, adding that it is not something which has happened only now. For 35 years, the nature of the structural problem has focussed itself on terrorism, he said. 'No formula can resolve it; you can live with it or work around it… There was a greater understanding of that problem in Pakistan 20 years ago than it is now,' he said, referring to ex-Pakistan President Musharraf assuring India of not using terrorism to advance his political aims. Divya A reports on travel, tourism, culture and social issues - not necessarily in that order - for The Indian Express. She's been a journalist for over a decade now, working with Khaleej Times and The Times of India, before settling down at Express. Besides writing/ editing news reports, she indulges her pen to write short stories. As Sanskriti Prabha Dutt Fellow for Excellence in Journalism, she is researching on the lives of the children of sex workers in India. ... Read More
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Embassy: Students to US should keep social media public for visa duration
With the new academic season in the US starting next month, all international students applying to study in the country will need to keep their social media profiles public not only while applying for a visa but also during its validity period — in effect, during their entire study course. 'All student and exchange visitor visa applicants (F, M and J visa classes) are requested to adjust the privacy settings on all of personal social media profiles to 'public' in order to facilitate vetting necessary to establish the applicant's admissibility to the United States,' said a spokesperson from the US Embassy in New Delhi in response to a query from The Indian Express. 'Security vetting runs from the time of each application, through adjudication of the visa, and afterwards during the validity period of every issued visa, to ensure the individual remains eligible to travel to the United States,' the spokesperson said. Last month, the Embassy had cited 'public safety and national security' in the visa process while mandating those applying to study in the US to make their social media profiles public. The F category visa in the US refers to the F-1 student visa, meant for international students who wish to pursue academic studies at a US institution, while the M visa (M-1) is a non-immigrant visa for individuals pursuing vocational or other nonacademic studies. The J-1 enables foreign nationals to come to the US to teach, study, conduct research, or receive on the job training for periods ranging from a few weeks to several years. In 2023-24, Indian students formed the largest cohort of international students in the US, with 3.31 lakh enrolments. In the Financial Year 2024, the US issued 4,00,737 F-1, 6,322 M-1 and 3,22,820 J-1 visas, according to State Department data. In May, the Donald Trump administration had asked US embassies around the world to stop scheduling appointments for student visas as it expanded scrutiny of applicants' social media posts following widespread protests on campuses against Israel's bombing in Gaza. At the time, The Indian Express had reported that the decision had led to anxiety among Indian students preparing to begin their studies in the US and those already enrolled in American universities. Several of these students had said they were reviewing their digital footprints to secure their academic future. On June 18, the State Department announced the resumption of student visa interviews. 'Our overseas posts will resume scheduling F, M and J non-immigrant visa applications soon. Applicants should check the relevant embassy or consulate website for appointment availability,' it had said. Asserting that 'US visa is a privilege, not a right', it had said: 'We use all available information in our visa screening and vetting to identify visa applicants who are inadmissible to the US, including those who pose a threat to US national security. Under new guidance, we will conduct a comprehensive and thorough vetting, including online presence, of all student and exchange visitor applicants in the F, M and J non-immigrant classifications.' According to the Embassy, the rule is mandated for all countries and, since 2019, the US has required visa applicants to provide social media identifiers on immigrant and non-immigrant visa application forms. Divya A reports on travel, tourism, culture and social issues - not necessarily in that order - for The Indian Express. She's been a journalist for over a decade now, working with Khaleej Times and The Times of India, before settling down at Express. Besides writing/ editing news reports, she indulges her pen to write short stories. As Sanskriti Prabha Dutt Fellow for Excellence in Journalism, she is researching on the lives of the children of sex workers in India. ... Read More
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Fishers' body slams Govt for allowing deep-sea vessels
The All India Deep Sea Fishers' Association has come out against the Union Fisheries Ministry's decision to allow large vessels to operate in deep-sea areas beyond India's sovereign maritime zone. In a letter to Union Minister for Fisheries, Animal Husbandry & Dairying and Panchayati Raj Rajeev Ranjan Singh, the association said the decision will impact the fortunes of small-scale traditional fishing vessels. Association chief Charles George said the decision to allow Indian-owned vessels in deep sea was part of the Blue economy policy of the Union Government unveiled in 2020. 'We request the Union government… revitalise small-scale and traditional fishermen through modernisation, cooperative strengthening and fair subsidies.'' Urging the government to reject the push for industrial deep-sea vessels, the association said such a move will only worsen ecological and economic crises. George said as per Central government data, 3,14,677 fishing vessels operate within India's Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). 'However, sustainable fishing practices require only 93,287 vessels… Yet, we cannot outright claim that we have crossed sustainability thresholds because we have predominantly small-scale and traditional vessels.'' The body rejected the government stand that allowing large vessels for deep-sea fishing will help tap the hitherto untapped resources. 'Only 4 per cent of India's fish wealth lies in deep waters… due to scarcity in deep waters, these vessels eventually encroach into near-shore zones. Now, with 1.5 to 4 lakh-watt LED lights at the huge vessels attracting fish from coastal waters, the pressure on already strained near-shore ecosystem will intensify… devastate thousands of small-scale boats operating in deep waters, where 64,000 fishermen are working,'' said the association chief.
