Newsom says Trump is deploying another 2000 guards just to satisfy his ‘Presidential ego'
California Governor Gavin Newsom on Monday strongly condemned the Trump administration's decision to send another 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles, calling it 'reckless' and 'pointless.'
President Donald Trump had already deployed 2,000 guardsmen to the city over the weekend in response to widespread demonstrations that erupted following an ICE-led crackdown.
'At the order of the President, the Department of Defense is mobilizing an additional 2,000 California National Guard to be called into federal service to support ICE & to enable federal law-enforcement officers to safely conduct their duties,' Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell announced.
'The first 2,000? Given no food or water. Only approx. 300 are deployed -- the rest are sitting, unused, in federal buildings without orders. This isn't about public safety. It's about stroking a dangerous President's ego,' Newsom wrote on X (formerly Twitter.)
'This is Reckless. Pointless. And Disrespectful to our troops.'
ALSO READ| Donald Trump calls for California governor's arrest amid LA protests, Gavin Newsom reacts: 'A day I hoped…'
However, while defending the POTUS, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump authorised the deployment to 'address the lawlessness.' But Newsom sees it differently, accusing the administration of undermining California's sovereignty. He and State Attorney General Rob Bonta have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, arguing that federalising the state's National Guard without consent violates long-established constitutional boundaries.
Newsom added that Trump's actions were 'inflaming tensions,' not easing them. What's more, the situation took another turn Monday when news broke that 700 U.S. Marines were also being sent into Los Angeles, without any clear communication or coordination with local authorities.
'The arrival of federal military forces in Los Angeles -- absent clear coordination -- presents a significant logistical and operational challenge for those of us charged with safeguarding this city,' LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell said.
He stresses the need for 'open and continuous lines of communication between all agencies to prevent confusion, avoid escalation, and ensure a coordinated, lawful, and orderly response during this critical time.'
ALSO READ| Barron's friend shares video of LA rioter holding mock severed head of Trump, waving Mexican flag: 'Pure evil'
'U.S. Marines have served honorably across multiple wars in defense of democracy. They are heroes,' Newsom echoed those worries. 'They shouldn't be deployed on American soil facing their own countrymen to fulfill the deranged fantasy of a dictatorial President.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's military move: Was it in response to Los Angeles riots or a long-planned strategy against Democrates and Kamala Harris?
President Donald Trump has signaled that the military deployment in Los Angeles may just be the beginning, hinting at similar actions across other Democrat-led cities as protests intensify over his immigration crackdown. Speaking from the Oval Office on Tuesday, Trump defended the deployment of 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles, where demonstrators have clashed with law enforcement in recent days. 'This is the first—perhaps of many,' Trump said. 'If we didn't hit this hard, you'd see the same thing erupt across the country. But let me be clear: If others try this, they'll be met with equal or greater force.' Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Indonesia: New Container Houses (Prices May Surprise You) Container House | Search ads Search Now Undo The president added that his administration would not tolerate violent protests targeting ICE operations and vowed strict enforcement of deportation policies. Notably, Trump had floated the idea of using military force in Democrat-led cities during his 2024 campaign, proposing federal intervention to combat unrest or gang violence. 'In cities where there's been a total breakdown of law and order, I won't hesitate to send in federal assets, including the National Guard, until safety is restored,' he said at the time. Live Events According to The New York Times , nearly 5,000 troops are already present in the Los Angeles area. Reuters reported that 700 Marines were in a staging area in Seal Beach, about 30 miles south of the city, awaiting specific deployment orders. As of Tuesday, 2,100 National Guard members had been activated in the region—more than half the planned total. Both Marines and National Guard personnel are restricted from making arrests and are tasked solely with protecting federal facilities and personnel. Trump's remarks and actions have sparked fears of broader federal crackdowns in Democrat-controlled cities across the U.S., raising questions about the political motivations behind the military mobilization.
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kamala Harris election dispute joins a long list of controversial US presidential results from Thomas Jefferson to George W Bush Jr
Historical parallels to Kamala Harris election dispute As questions surrounding the Kamala Harris election result continue to unfold in court, the controversy draws on a long history of disputed US presidential elections. From the earliest years of the republic to the modern era, contested outcomes, allegations of fraud, and constitutional ambiguity have repeatedly tested the resilience of American democracy. The latest case, allowed to proceed in New York's Rockland County, challenges the validity of several voting machines used in the 2024 election. Filed by SMART Legislation, the lawsuit alleges that votes for Kamala Harris were undercounted or missing entirely from machines in towns like Ramapo. Affidavits from poll workers and voters suggest ballots showed zero votes for president while including votes for other contests, raising concerns about possible machine malfunctions or tampering. Also read: Kamala Harris election result: Trump's victory under scrutiny as lawsuit filed - here's what could happen next by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas In Dubai | Search Ads Get Rates Undo This case, while unlikely to affect Donald Trump's presidency, brings renewed focus on electoral transparency and echoes the legacy of past presidential contests that reshaped US election law and public trust. From Jefferson to Bush: six disputed presidential elections In 1800, the Electoral College delivered a tie between Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr, both receiving 73 votes. The House of Representatives required 36 ballots to award the presidency to Jefferson. The deadlock prompted the Twelfth Amendment, which separated presidential and vice-presidential votes to avoid future stalemates. Live Events A similar issue surfaced in 1824 when Andrew Jackson secured the most popular and electoral votes but lacked a majority. The House chose John Quincy Adams instead, triggering Jackson's accusations of a 'corrupt bargain.' His eventual win in 1828 led to reforms demanding greater voter participation and scrutiny of elite political deals. Abraham Lincoln's 1860 victory with only 40 per cent of the popular vote triggered Southern secession. His win, reflecting a deeply divided electorate over slavery, came despite his absence from ballots in several Southern states. The dispute ultimately cascaded into the Civil War, underscoring how electoral fractures can deepen national crises. Also read: Kamala Harris voters 'erased' in Rockland? New York lawsuit to probe vanishing ballots: What we know so far In 1876, Democrat Samuel Tilden won the popular vote and led in the Electoral College, but 20 electoral votes from four states were contested. A bipartisan commission awarded them to Republican Rutherford B. Hayes. In return, Hayes agreed to withdraw federal troops from the South, a deal known as the Compromise of 1877. This political resolution ended Reconstruction and enabled state-level disenfranchisement of Black voters. Fast forward to 1960, John F. Kennedy's razor-thin win over Richard Nixon raised concerns over vote manipulation in Illinois and Texas. Allegations pointed to organized political machinery in Chicago and strategic ballot management in Texas. Nixon declined to challenge the result, citing national unity, though doubts persisted. In 2000, George W. Bush and Al Gore's battle hinged on Florida's 25 electoral votes. Machine errors like 'hanging chads' and inconsistent ballot designs such as the 'butterfly ballot' caused major confusion. The US Supreme Court halted recounts in Bush v. Gore , awarding Florida, and the presidency, to Bush by a margin of just 537 votes. Rockland County lawsuit: new scrutiny on voting machines The Kamala Harris election result lawsuit centers on irregularities in Rockland County, where five voting machines in Ramapo reportedly recorded zero presidential votes despite ballots including selections for down-ballot races. Voters and poll workers submitted affidavits confirming they cast votes for president. Also read: Kamala Harris won the U.S elections: Bombshell report claims voting machines were tampered with before 2024 Election integrity advocate Susan Greenhalgh cited the rarity of such discrepancies, questioning whether software updates made before the election contributed to machine errors. The updates were made by Pro V&V, a private firm, with minimal public disclosure. Judge Rachel Tanguay's decision to allow full discovery will enable attorneys to access internal machine logs and request sworn testimony. The case's next hearing is scheduled for September 22, 2025. What the Kamala Harris election result case could mean While the lawsuit is unlikely to affect the 2024 presidential outcome, it may influence broader election reforms. Legal experts say a full hand recount could expose vote-counting inconsistencies and spark legislative changes on machine certification, ballot design, and voter access laws. Also read: 2024 US Presidential election is under scrutiny as lawsuit claims discrepancies in Rockland County, New York The case also offers an opportunity for officials to improve voter confidence by ensuring transparent and verifiable election systems. As with previous disputed elections, the outcome may shape how future contests are administered and perceived, especially in an era of intense partisanship and evolving technology.
News18
26 minutes ago
- News18
'Went Too Far': Elon Musk Regrets His Social Media Posts Against Donald Trump
Last Updated: Elon Musk admitted he "went too far" with his recent social media posts targeting US President Donald Trump. Posting on X, Musk expressed regret over his remarks made last week. Elon Musk on Wednesday expressed regret over some of his social media posts against US President Donald Trump last week, and said his posts 'went too far". 'I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far," Musk wrote on X. Trump and Musk began exchanging insults last week on social media, with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO describing the President's sweeping tax and spending bill as a 'disgusting abomination". On Saturday, Trump said his relationship with Musk was over and that there would be 'serious consequences" if the world's richest man decided to fund US Democrats running against Republicans who vote for the tax and spending bill. Musk bankrolled a large part of Trump's 2024 presidential campaign. Trump named Musk to head an effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending. About the Author
