logo
Many Medicare Cancer Patients Now Have Much Lower Out-Of-Pocket Costs

Many Medicare Cancer Patients Now Have Much Lower Out-Of-Pocket Costs

Forbes3 days ago
Tens of thousands of Medicare beneficiaries who are cancer patients have substantially lower out-of-pocket costs for their prescription drugs, thanks to a key provision included in the Inflation Reduction Act.
When people think about the IRA's drug pricing measures, they're more likely to be familiar with the Medicare price negotiation aspect than the redesign of Medicare's outpatient drug benefit. The former entails Medicare's ability to negotiate prices of a select number of drugs. But the prices that apply to the first round of ten pharmaceuticals won't be implemented until next year. It's the wholesale restructuring of the pharmacy benefit that's far more comprehensive and already having an impact on Medicare recipients, especially beneficiaries who prior to 2024 incurred more than $3,300 in annual out-of-pocket costs. These include many cancer patients. Under the IRA law, annual out-of-pocket costs were capped at $3,300 in 2024 and lower still at $2,000 in 2025.
Upon enactment of the Medicare Modernization Act in 2006, the federal government health insurance program for seniors and disabled added a prescription drug benefit called Part D. This meant that Medicare beneficiaries who chose to purchase coverage from a prescription drug plan or a fully integrated insurer offering medical and pharmacy benefits under Medicare Advantage, could better afford their outpatient medicines.
Nevertheless, problems emerged with respect to gaps in Part D coverage and relatively high out-of-pocket costs in the so-called catastrophic phase of the benefit, especially for beneficiaries taking expensive medications.
The IRA, which passed in 2022, includes a provision that aims to decrease the out-of-pocket cost burden for Medicare recipients, putting a lid on annual expenses at $3,300 in 2024 and $2,000 in 2025. This means that after a patient has spent $2,000 out-of-pocket this year, they have $0 in co-payment. Because of how expensive most branded (and even some generic) cancer medications are, many patients may reach the $2,000 maximum as early as January in a given year. But unlike in the past, they won't incur any more out-of-pocket expenses the rest of the year.
A recently released report reveals the importance of a cap on out-of-pocket beneficiary expenses. The figure below from IQVIA shows that until 2024 when Part D instituted a cap of $3,300, the proportion of claims with zero dollars in patient co-payments was very small and nearly constant.
There was no maximum, and consequently patient co-payments could easily add up in a given year to many thousands of dollars.
The IQVIA report also demonstrates how immediate the impact was of capping annual patient out-of-pocket expenses at $3,300 in 2024: Oncology prescription volumes rose 50% year-over-year between 2023 and 2024. In 2025, the cap lowers to $2,000, which will likely boost utilization further.
At the same time, the management of costs in the catastrophic phase has shifted away from the federal government and towards plans that manage the pharmacy benefit as well as drug manufacturers. While patients nothing out-of-pocket once they reach the $2,000 threshold and the federal government only reinsures 20% of the cost rather than 80%, drug makers and insurers pick up the slack. Starting in 2025, pharmaceutical manufacturers must cover 20% of drug costs in the catastrophic phase of the pharmacy benefit—up from 0%. And Part D plans take on 60% of costs, up from 15%.
The IRA has its share of detractors, in particular, regarding Medicare drug price negotiations which critics claim will lead to reduced levels of research and development expenditures and less pharmaceutical innovation. On Part D redesign, some analysts point to unintended consequences, such as driving up insurance premiums for Medicare recipients in Part D and an exodus of stand-alone prescription drug plans leading to reduced choice for some beneficiaries.
There's also been an increase in the use of coverage restrictions, such as prior authorization, as payers attempt to control costs. Medicare Part D plans—managed by pharmacy benefit managers and Medicare Advantage insurers—receive a fixed payment per enrollee from the federal government and bear a portion of the financial risk for part of enrollees' drug expenditures. Accordingly, plan administrators are induced to control costs by managing drug utilization and negotiating lower net prices. IRA changes in the design of the pharmacy benefit have enhanced the incentives to contain costs as much as possible. However, because all cancer medications must be covered, plans have less leeway to impose restrictions.
It's hard to argue that Medicare Part D redesign doesn't help oncology patients with high out-of-pocket costs. Medicare beneficiaries who were once heavily burdened financially and sometimes abandoned scripts due to cost are now able to (re)start and stay on their medication regimen.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

"Never Has America Been More Vulnerable" — People Are Horrified After RFK Jr. Announced He's Cutting $500 Million In Funding For mRNA Vaccines
"Never Has America Been More Vulnerable" — People Are Horrified After RFK Jr. Announced He's Cutting $500 Million In Funding For mRNA Vaccines

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

"Never Has America Been More Vulnerable" — People Are Horrified After RFK Jr. Announced He's Cutting $500 Million In Funding For mRNA Vaccines

I'm not sure if you've heard, but everyone's least favorite Health and Human Services Secretary, RFK Jr., recently announced that he's cancelling $500 million in funding for mRNA vaccine development. mRNA vaccines, which stand for messenger ribonucleic acid (RNA), are "highly effective" and "safe," according to the National Council on Aging, a nonprofit organization that works to improve the health of older adults in the US. According to the Cleveland Clinic, the mRNA vaccine helps teach your body to fight infectious diseases. More specifically, mRNA technology is utilized in the COVID-19 vaccine, which infectious disease experts say is what helped to slow the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak in the US. In a now-viral X video, RFK Jr. tried to explain the funding cuts saying, "HHS has determined that mRNA technology poses more risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses." Twitter: @SecKennedy According to CBS News, RFK Jr. reiterated that "HHS supports safe, effective vaccines for every American who wants them." Related: In response to the news, Mike Osterholm, a University of Minnesota expert on infectious diseases and pandemic preparations, recently said, "I don't think I've seen a more dangerous decision in public health in my 50 years in the business." Following these vaccine funding cuts, millions have expressed deep concern for the future of medicine, as well as the impact of future pandemics in the US. Here's how medical professionals, lawmakers, and citizens are reacting: Commonly, people threw some personal digs at RFK Jr., with one person calling him a "despicable quack." ...and a pediatric MD calling him an "anti-vaxx weirdo." Related: While other medical professionals directly contradicted RFK Jr.'s claims about the mRNA vaccine, calling them "simply false." And called out RFK Jr.'s "fundamental misunderstanding of immunology." Another infectious disease doctor argued that RFK Jr.'s decision came from "ideology" and "online anti vax talking points." Related: And this medical professional and health writer called mRNA vaccines "one of the most important tools we have for preventing future pandemics." Another person expressed their anger about "throwing away" years of research: Even politicians have weighed in, with Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock calling the funding cuts a "tragedy." Related: "Whatever your reason for not voting or voting 3rd party, I promise it wasn't worth destroying our country over," this person wrote. And this person made a scary observation, writing: "A diseased population is easier to control..." And finally, this Reddit user summed up what many are feeling: "Imagine being so privileged to have lived in a tiny slice of human history when MILLIONS of people have been spared from pyrogens at the hands of vaccines……only to be somehow convinced the answer to the threat humanity faces going forward is to stop researching the most proven and effective medicine mankind has ever known." What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:

‘Going To Cost Lives': Former Surgeon General Shocked By RFK's Latest Move
‘Going To Cost Lives': Former Surgeon General Shocked By RFK's Latest Move

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘Going To Cost Lives': Former Surgeon General Shocked By RFK's Latest Move

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s shock decision to cancel nearly half a billion dollars' worth of research projects because they're based on mRNA technology horrified vaccine experts Tuesday, among them President Donald Trump's own former surgeon general. Jerome Adams, who served as the nation's 20th surgeon general during Trump's first term, warned on social media that the decision will have very real negative consequences. 'I've tried to be objective & non-alarmist in response to current HHS actions – but quite frankly this move is going to cost lives,' he wrote. 'mRNA technology has uses that go far beyond vaccines… and the vaccine they helped develop in record time is credited with saving millions.' Adams ended the missive with the 'head exploding' emoji. I've tried to be objective & non-alarmist in response to current HHS actions – but quite frankly this move is going to cost lives. mRNA technology has uses that go far beyond vaccines… and the vaccine they helped develop in record time is credited with saving millions. 🤯 — Jerome Adams (@JeromeAdamsMD) August 6, 2025 In another thread, Adams blamed politicized messaging around vaccination during the coronavirus pandemic for leading to a widespread public misunderstanding of what vaccines actually accomplish. People believed that 'if you get this vaccine you won't get COVID,' said Adams, when the real aim was to prevent severe cases of the disease. Messenger RNA, or mRNA, technology has potential far beyond COVID. At Emory University, for instance, researchers are looking into using mRNA technology to train the immune system to cure cancer and chronic infections, thanks to a $24.8 million federal grant. The three-year program was funded by the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health, or ARPA-H, which Kennedy merged with the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, or BARDA, in March — only to announce Tuesday he'd be pulling the funding for BARDA's mRNA investments. The inaugural director of ARPA-H, Dr. Renee Wegrzyn, was fired by the Trump administration in February amid mass layoffs at the Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tiba Biotech, another research company that saw its HHS contracts terminated Tuesday, is investigating using mRNA to combat tick-borne diseases. Thanks to climate change, more ticks are surviving through warmer winters, leading to a sharp increase in tick-borne illnesses. Mike Osterholm, a University of Minnesota expert on infectious diseases and pandemic preparations, told The Associated Press the decision on mRNA research is a historically bad one. 'I don't think I've seen a more dangerous decision in public health in my 50 years in the business,' he said. Related... RFK Jr. Cancels $500 Million In Funding For Vaccine Development 800,000 Vaccine Doses The U.S. Pledged To Send To Africa Are About To Expire Instead RFK Jr.'s Stunning Claim About Black People And Vaccines Sparks Concern From Medical Experts RFK Jr. Keeps Telling A Flat-Out Lie About Childhood Vaccines — And Doctors Are Sick Of It

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Solutions That Go Beyond CPAP
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Solutions That Go Beyond CPAP

Medscape

time4 minutes ago

  • Medscape

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Solutions That Go Beyond CPAP

This transcript has been edited for clarity. Hi, everyone. Dr Chandrasekaran here, and today I am going to talk to you about obstructive sleep apnea. One in five American adults complain of obstructive sleep apnea symptoms in one way or another. This disease is now becoming more recognized, and more awareness is being brought to obstructive sleep apnea, as this can lead to significant long-term consequences, such as right heart failure, cor pulmonale, essential hypertension, or atrial fibrillation untreated. Our mainstay is usually diet, weight loss, and once these fail, we then place a patient on a PAP machine. This is usually a noninvasive mechanical ventilator, whether it's a BiPAP, a CPAP, an AVAPS machine, or even auto-CPAP. These can help patients get the comfortable sleep that they need; however, this has been associated with some issues, such as anxiety and claustrophobia, as the mask can preclude this. The FDA has now recently approved Zepbound for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea patients that do meet criteria with a diagnosis of morbid obesity or hypertension associated with a diagnosis of sleep apnea, defined with a sleep study, with apnea-hypopnea index greater than five. The FDA has also approved Inspire, which is a device that can be implanted and can control the hypoglossal nerve, which can decrease the obstruction that is associated with sleep apnea.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store