Strip club forced to remove posts about women suing firm
Seven women are currently pursuing an application in the Employment Court for a declaration of their employment status.
A non-publication order was issued in May suppressing their identities after they raised concerns about their safety and damage to their reputations due to the stigma attached to the work they had been doing.
One of the women has now returned to court alleging breaches of the order by Calendar Girls NZ Ltd, the company named as the defendant in their case.
Chief Employment Court Judge Christina Inglis hastily scheduled a hearing this week to hear the woman.
"I accorded urgency to the application given the nature of the alleged breaches and the concerns that had underpinned the making of the orders of non-publication in the first place," the judge said in a recent judgment. Lawyers get together
The urgent hearing was set down for Thursday but was cancelled after lawyers for both sides got together and agreed non-publication orders should be respected.
"The defendants confirm that they have removed all offending posts," Judge Inglis said.
However, her judgment did not detail what was in the posts.
The seven women are seeking a declaration that they were employees of Calendar Girls NZ Ltd under the Employment Relations Act 2000.
Being an employee, rather than a contractor, gives entitlement to a wider range of legal protections, including minimum conditions, protection from discrimination, health and safety, and the ability to bargain collectively.
In 2023, dancers from the Wellington Calendar Girls club attempted to bargain collectively after being offered a contract that they said was "manipulative".
Nineteen were told to clear out their lockers and not to come back to work through a Facebook post after asking for changes to the way they were being paid.
In seeking non-publication orders in the current case, filed in the Wellington Employment Court, the seven women raised several concerns about having their identities made public.
Women in the clubs use a professional name while working there, and are instructed not to give their real names to customers.
However, their case in the Employment Court has been taken using their real names.
The women involved in the case feared publication of their identities would "severely impact" their employment and housing prospects, and their ability to travel.
They said the stigma attached to their work at Calendar Girls had already led to judgments about their morality and respectability.
The women are all young and fear damage to their reputations and the impact on their families.
They also said they had safety concerns about former clients and members of the public. Dismissed from a government job
One of the women is a member of a church and is worried about others in the congregation finding out.
Others have had tenancy applications declined, and another woman said she was dismissed from a government agency when it became known she had worked in the sex industry.
Judge Inglis has now made orders instructing Calendar Girls not to disclose the names, identifying particulars, or photographs of the seven women who have taken the case.
She said this applied to "all forms of communication, including oral, written, electronic and any other medium".
The substantive case has been set down to be heard in a five-day fixture in February 2026.
Calendar Girls NZ Ltd is a Christchurch-based company which operates clubs in Christchurch, Auckland, Wellington and Queenstown.
- Ric Stevens, Open Justice reporter
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Spinoff
a day ago
- The Spinoff
Which is worse: advertising two-for-one drinks or selling Class A drugs on Facebook?
Or more pragmatically, which will land you in more trouble? Emma Gleason finds out. For The Golden Mile's bars battling through decline, revitalisation and those fearsome Courtenay Place gulls, getting punters in the door in the first place can be a hurdle. You're competing with every other watering hole in the neighbourhood, trendy green beverages, pigeon poo, and the grim fact that some people would rather stay home and watch TikToks. What's a proprietor to do? In the case of The Residence Bar, a blackboard chalked up with jaunty martini glasses and a two-for-one happy hour offer seemed to be a good idea – until it wasn't. Owner Jose Ubiaga scrubbed it off after an email from the Wellington City Council, but six months later, it landed him in front of the Alcohol Regulatory and Licensing Authority for the 'irresponsible promotion of alcohol'. The offer had breached the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012, which deems it an offence to promote a discount that 'leads people, or is likely to lead people, to believe that the price is 25% or more below the price at which the alcohol is ordinarily sold'. And because the sign could be seen outside the premises – also deemed 'irresponsible' by law – that was another no-no. The Authority decided on a 48-hour suspension and a negative holding for The Residence, while dismissing the complaint against Ubaiga's other business, The Dakota Bar, which promoted a similar deal on social media. These online platforms have their own codes of conduct, and if you were to advertise the sale of alcohol or, better yet, magic mushrooms on Facebook, you'd risk having your listing removed. Offline, the consequences of breaking the rules are a bit harsher. Ubiaga closed the bar for two days and reckons he lost thousands of dollars in potential earnings. While he accepted the mistake, he's been critical about the council's licensing policies in the past, calling them a contributing factor in the liquidation of his other bars, Rubix and SugarWoods, last year. He's not the only one; another Courtenay Place bar owner accused the council of 'ganging up' on the party precinct. Licensing standoffs in the country's cities and regions make regular headlines (news reports explain grievances and rebuttals, while dutifully pointing out the harm caused by alcohol in communities) as communities and agencies try to curtail the social impacts of getting on the piss. Selling booze is more complicated than a moustachioed mixologist's most inventive concoction. Bars, pubs and restaurants need an 'on-licence' licence. Getting one requires supporting documentation (including scale plans of the venue, menus, and host responsibility policies) and a fee, which ranges from three to four figures, depending on the business risk category and region. A sprawling Amohia Te Waiora flowchart outlines the complex process, including public notifications, consideration by District Licensing Committees and the Alcohol Regulatory and Licensing Authority, judgements and appeals and hearings. Some businesses have to wait months for approval. Others are flat-out declined. The Sale and Supply of Alcohol (Community Participation) Amendment Act 2023 now allows anyone, excluding trade competitors, to object to an application, and is geared at giving communities a voice and minimising harm. In Gisborne, a kura principal appealed the licence granted to a new tavern located 30 metres away from the school. Once a business gets a licence they have to keep it, a process that includes renewals. Rules are strict (don't serve anyone wasted or under 18) and someone with a manager's certificate has to be on duty whenever alcohol is being sold or consumed. A pub in Tauranga lost its liquor licence after repeated breaches, including serving someone underage. Some, like the infamous Edinburgh Castle, appear to have given up altogether. Those that secure a licence are faced with promoting a relatively pricey, non-essential category of beverages with highly publicised health risks (and out-of-date guidelines) amidst shifting public perception and habits. Happy hour deals are a common format with a long history, offering cheap drinks and food, appealing to anyone who wants a bargain or had a bad day. It's winter, everything feels awful, and people are looking to ingest mood-altering substances of one kind or another to take the edge off. But rather than visit the staunchly regulated neighbourhood bar, many are turning to the wild west of Facebook Marketplace. A recent investigation by the Herald's Michael Morrah found 56 different listings for illegal drugs advertised on the platform (which requires only slightly more effort than chucking sneakers on the power lines). Want mushrooms? Go on Facebook Marketplace. Weed? Same answer. There's even apparently cocaine and ketamine to be found amidst the secondhand beds, dehumidifiers and pre-owned engagement rings. Slinging controlled substances on there isn't without its risks. Meta may take your post down if someone complains or their moderators find it. If your side hustle is heroin, fentanyl or cocaine and they sniff it out, you're looking at the grim outcome of a disabled account. (Get caught selling Class-A drugs on the street and, according to sentencing guidelines, you'll likely be facing imprisonment if convicted.) The ads the Herald investigated remained up until it flagged them with Meta, which removed them for violating its community standards. But, like blue meanies in an optimal growing environment, more had reportedly sprung up by the next day. Entrepreneurial Kiwis who hate admin will find no complicated forms, flowcharts or even fees (unlike Trademe) when listing on Facebook Marketplace. Anyone with a Facebook account can simply click on Marketplace, hit 'sell' and 'create listing', chuck up a picture of that air fryer your mum gave you, decide on price, category and condition (description is optional) and hit publish. The process would be the same for the mushrooms, gummies 'and more!' unearthed by the Herald. A not-stoked justice minister Paul Goldsmith declared the whole thing 'outrageous' and told Morrah he'd be asking the tech giant some 'tough questions', but acknowledged the 'global context' of regulating the platform, which isn't liable for third-party content. Buying drugs online has seen a 'surge' in Aotearoa; the 2024 New Zealand Drug Trends Survey showed an increasing number of transactions were taking place on digital platforms like Facebook/Messenger and Snapchat. The marketing and commerce of controlled substances has been reshaped by digital convenience, much like entertainment, retail and hospitality. How easy is it? I stumbled through the tumbleweed and cowboys of Facebook Marketplace and found plastic sandwich bags stuffed with dried mushrooms and carefully labelled as golden teachers (aka psilocybe cubensis) being sold in New Plymouth, with similar listings for Auckland. Booze is harder to find, but if it's 13 litres of ethyl alcohol you're after, there's some in Mt Eden. You might have to drive past some plaintive happy hour signs to get it though.
The Spinoff
2 days ago
- The Spinoff
I can't stop thinking about the Christchurch kimono frenzy
10,000 kimonos… 10,000 unanswered questions. On Saturday morning at 9.57am, I joined a humming, 20-strong throng of Cantabrians champing at the bit for the City Mission op shop on Barbadoes Street to throw open their doors. 'It's like a Black Friday sale,' one woman mused, adjusting her empty tote bags in anticipation. 'Let us in, let us in,' another guy quietly chanted, raising an invisible pitchfork in jest. We were all united by one sweeping affliction that suddenly had Ōtautahi in a chokehold: kimono madness. It began with a Facebook post made by the Christchurch City Mission in the middle of an idle Tuesday afternoon. 'Life is full of surprises and topping our list this week is … thousands of kimonos,' the post reads. 'A generous donation of three packed truckloads of kimonos are coming to our Barbadoes Street op shop. Thousands! They are going out the door fast at $2 a pop, so this is your big chance if you have ever fancied owning/wearing one. Arigato!' Soon enough, the post had hundreds of comments and shares, with IRL queues forming out the door of both the Barbadoes Street and Sydenham City Mission stores. 'It's a kimono frenzy,' City Mission retail team leader Josie Cox told RNZ. 'We're selling them for $2 each and they've just gone mad. This morning there were probably 40 people waiting to come in.' The stock arrived by way of three trucks and two vans, and staff couldn't restock the bins fast enough. Any seasoned op shopper is always chasing the dream of stumbling across a rare or weird find, be it a war relic, a treasured timepiece, or even a purse containing a family mystery. But this opshop drop was on another scale of novelty and luxury entirely – 10,000 unique pieces, all in perfect condition, from a mysterious private donor. Where did they all come from? Why so, so, so many? Why central Christchurch? Why now? And, once again, why so, so, so many? I contacted a local kimono historian – who wished to stay anonymous but described themself as 'a detective analysing each and every kimono' – to see what they reckoned. 'A very unusual story,' they wrote, positing the collection may have recently come into the ownership of someone seeking 'a quick resolution.' As for the value, they estimated the total collection would have cost between $10,000-$30,000 to buy in Japan, and at least $5000 to import. Beyond the monetary value, they also explained the historical and cultural significance. 'Kimono were refined over the past 1000 years to the garment we see today,' they said, explaining how the garment is now mostly used as formal wear for the wealthy on special cultural occasions in Japan. 'No fashion designer has ever been able to improve it. The design is perfect,' they wrote, adding that each one is also completely unique: 'your kimono has no copies.' Karen Healey was one of the Cantabrians lucky enough to nab a couple of the peerless $2 pieces for herself from the Barbadoes Street op shop, after hearing about the donation from a fellow customer at The Fabric Store. 'The second you walked in, there were all these people clustered around these two big bins right at the front – anyone opening the door was hit with kimono,' she described. 'It was a brief little miracle… a dusty, noisy, magical experience.' While Healey says everyone was being 'very kind and considerate' when she visited, Anissa Trinder, aka vintage seller Spice Kotiro, told a different story. Trinder was there 'on a whim' as the multiple trucks arrived, and says that people 'immediately just started going crazy' for the kimonos. She picked up a kimono that she liked the look of, and another woman snatched it right out of her hands. 'I just thought, 'man, fuck this. I do not need a kimono that bad'.' Being a reseller herself, I asked Trinder about the $2 price point and the fact that several are already being resold on Facebook Marketplace for much more. 'The City Mission obviously just wanted to move them through, and they sold them all within the week, which is really beneficial for them,' she said. 'I think it's crazy that lots of them are on Marketplace, especially because it was such a public Christchurch phenomenon and everyone was talking about them.' Healey purchased three kimonos, one yukata and a haori. 'The fabric and the patterning is really what I'm after, so they will be reborn as garments that will be loved and treasured in a slightly different form,' she said. 'And it will make a good story – this shirt came from one of the kimono.' After snatch-gate, Trinder didn't buy anything. 'I am very specific with my style and the things that I sell,' she said. 'I'm also wary of cultural appropriation and all that stuff.' That's another interesting consideration to mull over – is it a risk to have this many kimonos unleashed in a place which still boasts an alarming number of white dreadlocks? While my mystery kimono historian maintained that anyone from 'DJs to traditional Japanese housewives' can now wear a kimono, opinions differ on the mainstream popularisation of the garment. (I also reached out to the Japanese Society of Canterbury for comment, but am yet to hear back). For those who were lucky enough to nab one (or, as Healey observed in one customer, one hundred) of these pieces, there's also delicate care concerns. The kimono expert recommended they are stored flat, ideally in kimono-friendly paper, in a drawer with silica gel and mothballs. As for washing? Go for a hand wash in cold water. 'Must be immersed in a bath to avoid bubbles,' they added. 'Wet area will transfer dye to any dry area, so bubbles are the enemy.' All of the above info would have been useful if, when the doors of the op shop swung open like a saloon on Saturday morning, there had been any of the elusive kimonos left. Alas, we were all about 48 hours too late. I poked about the rest of the store, nabbing a pristine $1 rubber chicken, as multiple bereft women with sharp grey bobs and statement glasses processed the news. 'The kimonos have all sold out, I'm so sorry,' the shopkeeper said gently. 'Now they are just a distant memory.'
Otago Daily Times
3 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Playcentre forced to find new home
A Canterbury playcentre is looking for a new premises for next year after its landlord, the school next door, opted not to renew its lease. The Longbeach Playcentre in Willowby, south of Ashburton, has planned a community meeting on Tuesday night at 7.30pm to find a solution. Its landlord, the Longbeach School Board of Trustees, cited the reason for the decision was a growing school roll and increased pressure on existing spaces. The playcentre, which has had a building next to the rural school for the past 20 years, said "we need your help" on its Facebook page. "Longbeach School have chosen not to renew our lease and so we need a new home. "To say we are gutted is an understatement. "Playcentre has limited funds to buy us a new building or property. But we are determined to move forward, however that may look, and need all the support we can muster to do that. "We are holding a meeting at playcentre on Tuesday the 5th of August at 7.30pm for everyone who would like to see Longbeach Playcentre remain in our community into the future." In a statement, Longbeach School BOT said: "Following extensive discussions and careful considerations, the Longbeach School Board of Trustees has confirmed its decision not to renew the lease for the Longbeach Playcentre building. "The current lease will conclude at the end of 2025. "This decision follows a thorough review process, which began in February of this year, involving consultation with the Ministry of Education, engagement with key community members, and input from former Board of Trustees members. "As a board, we understand the significance of this decision for our community and want to assure everyone that it was not made lightly. Our priority remains the well-being and educational needs of our students. "The decision is driven by changing demographics, a growing school roll, and increasing pressure on existing spaces. The school is currently facing a shortage of teaching spaces, which has led to the repurposing of the library and arts centre for classroom use. "The staff room, offices and other breakout spaces are also being used for tutoring, Mana Ake student support and music lessons, limiting their availability for teacher aides to work with groups and therefore impacting the learning. "These compromises are not ideal for our students or staff. "As a board we must prioritise creating a supportive and effective learning environment for all children at Longbeach School. "We are committed to supporting the Playcentre through this transition. Assistance will be provided to explore alternative venues. "We value the role the playcentre has played in our community over the past twenty years and will do what we can to support a smooth transition."
