
The mystery of the LA mansion filled with surrogate children
The investigative trail led them to six more children at other homes in the Los Angeles area. A Chinese-born man and woman living in the mansion said they were the parents of all 22 children. Birth certificates list them as such. What mystified police was that the children appeared to have been born all over the U.S., and in rapid succession.
Local authorities removed the children from the homes, placed them in foster care, and called in the FBI.
The mansion, it turned out, was listed as the headquarters of Mark Surrogacy, which had arranged many of the children's births and was managed by Silvia Zhang, the woman living there. Zhang said she was the mother of all the children.
The surrogates who carried some of the children said in interviews with The Wall Street Journal that Zhang deceived them about the family she was trying to have, and that they had spoken with federal agents in recent weeks. The investigation is focusing, they were told, on whether the couple was selling babies whose births the agency had arranged.
Zhang denied that in an interview with the Journal, saying that she and a man she described as her husband just wanted to have as many children as they could. 'We never sell our babies," she said. 'We take care of them very well."
Vanity McGoveran, who gave birth to a baby girl for Mark Surrogacy in March, said she was shocked to learn that Zhang had so many children. Now, she said, she is wondering whether Zhang 'has something that she doesn't want people to know."
The website of the company, Mark Surrogacy, said it is in the business of connecting surrogates with American and international couples who need them. The surrogates, who live across the U.S. and were paid tens of thousands of dollars each, said Zhang and people working with the agency recruited them on Facebook, telling them they would be carrying children for a Chinese couple in Los Angeles struggling with infertility.
The probe is raising alarm in the commercial surrogacy industry, a fast-growing and multibillion-dollar market that connects aspiring parents with women willing to bear children for them. Surrogacy professionals worry that the couple's ties to China and the large number of children they had through surrogacy could prompt heightened scrutiny on what is now a lightly regulated industry. An FBI spokesman declined to comment.
The industry has been fueled in recent years by money from China, where surrogacy is illegal. In the U.S., one-third of intended parents were from other countries between 2014 and 2020, and 41% of those were Chinese nationals, according to researchers at Emory University. Some U.S. surrogacy agencies marketing their services to Chinese parents explicitly tout American citizenship for the newborns as a benefit.
It's unclear whether the Arcadia mansion had any direct ties to China. Among the many mysteries surrounding the couple are how many children they had in total, why a surrogacy business was operating out of their home and whether that business had any outside clients. Over the course of numerous conversations in English and Mandarin, Zhang either declined to respond or gave conflicting answers to those and other questions.
McGoveran, a Los Angeles beautician, said she received a Facebook message early last year asking whether she would be interested in becoming a surrogate for a Chinese couple struggling with infertility.
The message came from an account named 'Lin Hui," but McGoveran soon learned the person she was talking to was Zhang.
On 2021 business filings, Zhang, 38, is listed as a manager of Mark Surrogacy. To McGoveran, she represented herself as a prospective mother who wanted to have a child with a man she described as her husband, Guojun Xuan.
Zhang told McGoveran that she and Xuan, who is 65, didn't have any children, McGoveran recalled. That was a main reason McGoveran, who had hoped to carry a child for a couple who couldn't have children of their own, agreed to work with her.
Zhang promised to pay McGoveran $55,000, and said that during the pregnancy, McGoveran and her toddler could stay rent-free in a house Zhang owned. At the time, McGoveran didn't have a place to live. The stability was attractive enough, she said, that she overlooked red flags.
During the pregnancy, McGoveran said, she communicated mainly with two women she later learned were employees of Mark Surrogacy. Zhang and Xuan, listed in the contract as parents, didn't come to her prenatal doctors' appointments. The only time she met Xuan, she said, was at the Office Depot where they notarized her contract.
Late in her pregnancy, Zhang showed McGoveran photos of a girl who she said was her daughter. She appeared to be a teenager. McGoveran was shocked. She had wanted to help a woman who couldn't have kids herself, but was learning that Zhang had been a mom all along.
McGoveran gave birth in March to a baby girl.
Xuan is prominent in Los Angeles's Chinese-American business community. He and Zhang ran a real-estate company called Yudao Management, which they operated with a group of businessmen based in China, according to business filings and court records in legal proceedings involving the company. Using shell companies, Yudao purchased more than 100 properties in the Los Angeles area, many at foreclosure auctions, according to former employees, as well as property records and company documents reviewed by the Journal.
Xuan had come to the U.S. from Xinjiang, where he and his family had business interests, according to Chinese business filings.
Yudao workers called Xuan 'teacher," and he monitored them on feeds from surveillance cameras at the Arcadia residence, where Yudao was briefly headquartered, former employees said.
Mark Surrogacy operated out of a bedroom in the same Arcadia home, according to the former Yudao employees.
It isn't clear when Zhang and Xuan became a couple. Zhang was pregnant with her first child, a girl, in 2011 when she met a man 40 years her senior who she later married. They moved to the U.S., but the marriage fell apart a decade later, divorce records indicate.
Zhang and Xuan, who also divorced his wife around the same time, began having children together using surrogates in 2021. She said that as a child in China she had seen how that country's one-child policy had hurt families, so as an adult, she was determined to have as many as she could afford. 'We can provide for our children," she said. 'Plus, nowadays few people want to give birth, so we've decided to have many."
Xuan didn't respond to requests for comment. In an interview with a Chinese-language outlet, he cited similar motivations and said that he and Zhang are U.S. citizens.
Questions about the couple began cropping up two years after the surrogacy business was founded. In 2023, a surrogate under contract with the company was startled when people she hadn't met arrived with power-of-attorney documentation to pick up the infant she had just delivered, according to a lawyer for the surrogate.
When the client told her she'd heard other surrogates might have had the same experience with Mark Surrogacy, the lawyer, Rijon Charne, said she found the situation so odd that she asked law enforcement to examine whether it was related to human trafficking.'If I was wrong, I was wrong," Charne said. 'But it needed to be brought to somebody's attention if I was right."
Around the same time, a Los Angeles judge sent a child-safety investigator to Zhang and Xuan's home after being asked to approve surrogacy documents that named the couple as intended parents of numerous children. The investigator gave them a clean bill of health, according a person familiar with the hearing.
Lei Bai, a surrogacy lawyer who drafted contracts for Zhang and Xuan, said, 'It's not our responsibility" to investigate parents. 'It's not a requirement, and it's not anybody's obligation, to disclose how many surrogates you have," she said. Bai declined to comment on whether she still represents the couple.
A patchwork of state laws governs how surrogacy contracts are negotiated and enforced. Only one state, New York, requires surrogacy agencies to be licensed.
Agencies can certify that they comply with a roster of ethical guidelines published by an industry group, the Society for Ethics in Egg Donation and Surrogacy, but not every agency does so. Mark Surrogacy didn't.
On Facebook, Mark Surrogacy said that it was 'dedicated to help heterosexual couples, same-sex couples, international couples, single parents, etc."
'We know other agencies may have misled, but here you will know everything there is to know before making your decision," the company's website said.
U.S. law doesn't bar foreign couples from having children through U.S. surrogates. One potential surrogate was told by a Mark Surrogacy representative that the owners wanted to 'help couples" in places where surrogacy is illegal, according to a Facebook message reviewed by the Journal.
In an interview, though, Zhang said: 'Mark Surrogacy only helps our family, no others."
Zhang told different stories to different surrogates.
Early last year, Zhang sent some potential surrogates a document titled 'Intended Parent Profile," which described Xuan and her as the parents of just one daughter, according to copies reviewed by the Journal.
'We are very kind and caring, it would be an honor if you carry the baby for us," the profile said.
Months earlier, Zhang had told a Los Angeles court that she and Xuan had at least one dozen children, according to the person familiar with the hearing. Zhang didn't respond to questions about why she misrepresented to surrogates how many children she had.
In messages to another potential surrogate, Zhang said she had been working with an agency called Mark Surrogacy, but decided to pursue an 'independent journey" because Mark was charging her too much money. She didn't disclose that she was a manager of Mark Surrogacy, or that it operated out of her home.
In interviews and text messages, Zhang said she was being improperly targeted, and that there is nothing illegal about wanting a large family. 'There's nothing showing anything I do is human trafficking," she said. 'They can do the investigation. They will find nothing."
The trouble with authorities began after reports to police of fighting at the address, call logs show. In July 2024, one caller reported suspecting children at the home were being abused: 'There are six to seven children, and the women at the location yell and shout at the children." It isn't clear how police responded to that call.
On May 6 of this year, a Los Angeles hospital received a two-month-old baby with intracranial bleeding, a condition sometimes consistent with child abuse. The hospital asked local police to investigate.
When police arrived at the Arcadia mansion, they found 15 babies and toddlers, 'all with buzzed haircuts," in the care of six nannies, a detective said in an affidavit. Police seized video footage from Xuan's surveillance cameras, which showed that toddlers were spanked, slapped and forced to do squats, the affidavit said. The footage also showed a nanny shaking the baby that was later hospitalized.
Authorities removed the children from the home and arrested Zhang and Xuan, holding them for four days before releasing them without charges. By then, the FBI had gotten involved.
Zhang told the Journal she thought the children had been wrongfully removed. 'How would you feel if someone falsely claimed that your child had different parents, and triggered an investigation by Family Services?" she said in a text message. She declined to say how many children she had.
Meanwhile, surrogates who had worked with Mark were finding one another—and realizing they had been deceived.
McGoveran, the Los Angeles beautician, said she called one of Mark Surrogacy's employees, who told her that 'something bad" happened with a nanny employed by Zhang.
McGoveran phoned Zhang, who said her children had been taken by the county. That was when McGoveran learned that Zhang had even more children than her teenage daughter and the baby McGoveran had just delivered.
She joined a group chat with other surrogates who had worked with Mark in the past year. Some surrogates shared their stories on TikTok.
None of them said they had known that Zhang and Xuan had simultaneously contracted with so many surrogates, and most hadn't been aware that Zhang was a manager of Mark Surrogacy. It's rare for couples to employ multiple surrogates at the same time, particularly in the numbers Zhang and Xuan did.
The revelations left them wondering: Did they know anything about the people for whom they had carried children?
One surrogate, Kayla Elliott, a Texas mother of four, said she asked Zhang: 'What is going on? Who are you?"
Zhang responded with an image of a letter she said one of her daughters sent her while she was in jail over Mother's Day. 'You're the best mom that anyone can wish for," the letter said.
Around the time Zhang and Xuan were arrested, a surrogate they had contracted with in Florida was having issues with her pregnancy, early in her second trimester.
Toward the end of May, it became clear that the pregnancy was becoming dangerous for the woman, and that the baby had slim chances of survival. According to the surrogate, Zhang told her that she had done research and felt even if the baby survived the delivery, it was likely to have serious health issues. Zhang said she couldn't care for the child in that situation, the surrogate said, and left the decision on whether and how to deliver up to her.
Ultimately, the surrogate decided to induce labor. It was a difficult delivery. The baby was stillborn.
The surrogate said she held the baby's lifeless body for hours. She said she texted Zhang to let her know the baby was born dead.
Arcadia police Lieutenant Kollin Cieadlo said authorities continue to review video footage seized from the Arcadia home. The department, he said, would rearrest Zhang and Xuan if the district attorney decides to pursue child abuse charges.
The children remain in foster care. By law, Zhang and Xuan are their parents. Several of the surrogates are speaking with an attorney, though it's unclear whether they have any standing to sue the couple, family planning attorneys said.
Earlier this year, a baby born after a Mark-arranged surrogacy was taken into custody in Pennsylvania after Zhang failed to pick it up, according to people familiar with the matter.
At least two other women are still carrying children in pregnancies arranged by Mark Surrogacy. Zhang contacted one of the pregnant surrogates last month about arranging a legal document called a prebirth order that would allow Zhang to take the child home from the hospital when it is born later this year, people familiar with the matter said.
Another, Alexa Fasold, said she is unsure of what will happen to the child she is carrying and is evaluating legal options, including whether she and her husband could serve as its foster parents.
'This baby has nothing to do with any of this," Fasold said. 'This child we're carrying is completely innocent of all of this."
Write to Katherine Long at katherine.long@wsj.com, Ben Foldy at ben.foldy@wsj.com and Sara Randazzo at sara.randazzo@wsj.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scroll.in
24 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
‘Weapons' review: Ample chills in a demonic tale of missing children
Seventeen out of 18 children studying in the same class in an American town vanish one night at the same time. What happened to them? Why is Alex (Cary Christopher) not among them? Alex's house, occupied by his elderly aunt Gladys (Amy Madigan) apart from his parents (Whitmer Thomas and Callie Schuttera), is a good place for the police to start. They do drop in, but their investigation is cursory. They are similarly lax in talking to the other parents. There are no clue beyond spooky doorbell camera footage of the children flying out their homes in identical fashion. The image – the first of many gorgeous visuals by cinematographer Larkin Seiple – lingers. Suspicion mounts about Justine (Julia Garner), the young teacher of the missing students. Although Justine has the support of the school principal (Benedict Wong), a missing boy's father Archer (Josh Brolin) leads a campaign to expose Justine as a witch. The evidence is scanty. Everybody is looking in the wrong place. This wilful oversight suits Zach Cregger just fine. The Barbarian writer-director's new movie Weapons is excellent with creeping scares, nightmarish sequences and grisly gore. Cregger dips into a compendium of horror movie tropes while also toying with perspective. By replaying the same event from different viewpoints, Cregger stretches out the suspense of what has actually happened to the children, and why. A motiveless Pied Piper appears to be at work in luring the children – the film's most compelling idea. There is no shortage of chills at the right places, as well as ample evidence of craft, especially in the terrifying night scenes. But Weapons is also too cold and clinical to make its revelation stick. The tragedy of young children wrenched from their families and weaponised for a demonic purpose scarcely matters, rendering the ending flat. Austin Abrams provides comic relief as a drug addict; the climax supplies possibly unintentional laughs. The lack of involvement or even bare-minimum interest by nearly all the affected parents beggars belief. Among the actors, Cary Christopher is wonderful as the beleaguered Alex and Amy Madigan is terrific as his eccentric aunt. Play


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Kapil Sharma Gets Warning From Lawrence Bishnoi Gang: 'Next Karwai Jaldh Hi...'
Last Updated: Shots were fired at comedian and actor Kapil Sharma's cafe in Canada on Thursday morning, the second such incident in a month. Goldy Dhillon of the Lawrence Bishnoi gang has allegedly claimed responsibility for the shooting at comedian Kapil Sharma's Kap's Cafe in Surrey, Canada. A Facebook post has surfaced on social media in which Dhillon is seen admitting the gang's role behind attacks at Kapil Sharma's cafe and sending a stern warning to the comedian. 'JAI SHRI RAM, Satshriakal ram sare bhaiyo ko aj jo y kapil sharma k kaps m firing hui iski jimevari, Goldy dhillon, Lawrence bishnoi gang lete h isko hamne call ki thi isko ring nhi Sunai di to karwai krni pdi ab b ring n sunegi to next karwai jaldi hi Mumbai krege"(sic) the post read. This roughly translates to, 'We take responsibility for the firing in Surrey. We had called him, but he did not hear the ring, so we had to take action. If he still does not hear the ring next action will be in Mumbai," the purported post read. However, the Mumbai police is still verifying the authenticity of the Facebook post. What Happened At Kapil Sharma's Canada Cafe? Shots were fired at comedian and actor Kapil Sharma's cafe in Canada on Thursday morning, the second such incident in a month. Kap's Café, located in Surrey, British Columbia, is owned by comedian Kapil Sharma and his wife Ginni Chatrath. A purported video of the attack surfaced on social media in which at least 25 gunshots were heard. The cafe came under a similar attack on July 10, which authorities believe was orchestrated by the Laddi gang linked to the banned Khalistani terrorist outfit Babbar Khalsa International (BKI). When Kapil Sharma Reacted To The Attack At His Cafe Last week, Kapil Sharma, in a collaborative post with his wife, Ginni, shared a video of officials visiting his café as they enjoyed a peaceful meal. However, what caught everyone's attention was the caption of the post, in which Kapil made it clear that they do not support any sort of violence. 'Thank you Mayor Brenda Locke, @surreypoliceservice and all the officials who visited @thekapscafe_ to show their love and support. United we stand against violence. We're truly grateful," the comedian wrote. Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
FBI may aid hunt for Texas Democrats dodging redistricting session: US Senator
The FBI has agreed to help track down Democratic Texas lawmakers who fled their state to thwart Republican efforts to redraw congressional districts, Republican US Senator John Cornyn said on Thursday, but it was unclear whether federal agents would take FBI has not deployed any resources yet, a source familiar with internal discussions said. A Justice Department official, granted anonymity to discuss internal conversations, said the FBI had committed to provide help if asked by Texas law enforcement. Such a request had not yet been made as of Thursday afternoon, the official experts expressed scepticism that the FBI has any legitimate authority to step in. A spokesperson for Cornyn referred questions to the FBI, which declined to comment. The Democratic lawmakers, who have mostly been open about their whereabouts, have not been charged with any crimes. Earlier this week, the Republican speaker of the Texas House of Representatives issued civil warrants for the absent lawmakers - most of whom have gone to Democratic-led states, including Illinois, New York and Massachusetts, in part to escape Texas jurisdiction - to be brought back to warrants apply only within the state and are based on House rules, not criminal law. Texas officials on Thursday asked a court in Illinois to make the warrants enforceable who represents Texas, said in a statement that FBI Director Kash Patel had approved his request for the agency's help locating the absent Pritzker, the Democratic governor of Illinois, has brushed off the idea that the FBI could be deployed to round up legislators in his state, calling it "grandstanding" and warning that state troopers "protect everybody in Illinois."Barbara McQuade, a University of Michigan Law School professor and former US attorney, said talk of involving the FBI appeared to be saber-rattling."Although federal agents do have authority to assist local law enforcement officials in tracking down fugitives, that requires a filed criminal charge," she than 50 Democrats from the Texas legislature left the state ahead of Monday's legislative session, denying Republicans a quorum necessary to vote on the redistricting plan that has been championed by President Donald rare mid-decade redistricting is intended to flip five Democratic seats in next year's midterm elections, when Republicans will defend their razor-thin majority in the US Texas fight has spread to other states, with the balance of power in Washington at stake. Democratic governors in states including California, Illinois and New York have threatened to redraw their own congressional maps to counteract INDIANA EFFORTSThe Republican speaker of the Florida House of Representatives, Daniel Perez, announced on Thursday he would create a select committee for congressional redistricting, according to local media President JD Vance visited Indiana on Thursday, where he was expected to discuss redistricting with Republican leaders, a White House official said. Other Republican states that could target Democrats include Missouri, Ohio and New Governor Greg Abbott has suggested that Democrats who raise money to help pay for fines levied due to their absence could be violating state bribery laws that prohibit officials from accepting money in exchange for avoiding their a letter to Patel on Tuesday urging the FBI to assist the state's local law enforcement in tracking the absent Democrats down, Cornyn wrote that he feared "legislators who solicited or accepted funds to aid in their efforts to avoid their legislative duties may be guilty of bribery or other public corruption offences."The FBI has tools to help state law enforcement when parties cross state lines to flee "a scene of a crime," Cornyn of the Texas Democrats who left the state, Armando Valle, told reporters on Thursday during a briefing organised by advocacy group Sabotaging Our Safety that the FBI has "no authority" to Froomkin, a professor at the University of Houston Law Centre, said Abbott's threat was an "egregious violation of the separation of powers" and called the bribery theory "laughably weak." He noted that the Texas Supreme Court has previously ruled that legislators are legally permitted to break quorum."If there's no legal duty, then there's no criminal bribery," he said.- Ends