Trump administration considers selling OKC Federal Building
The topic has a lot of people talking, and has even sparked a heated response from at least one state lawmaker.
On their website, the U.S. General Services Administration calls the Oklahoma City Federal Building a 'national symbol of strength and resilience.'
But now, the same agency says the facility may be on the government's chopping block.
April 19 Remembrance Ceremony to honor those lost in 1995
'This building symbolizes the strength demonstrated on April 19, 1995,' said Stephen Perry, former GSA Administrator.
When it opened in 2004, the Oklahoma City Federal Building was labeled as a symbol of freedom by the then-administrator of the GSA.
However, according to a list released on Tuesday by the agency, the building is now considered a 'non-core asset' and is being considered to be sold.
Agency leaders say selling the federal building and other federal properties on the list would save the government more than $400 million a year.
A building that was once said to represent the 168 lives lost, and the thousands of others impacted.
'This building that we dedicate today is a part of the overall effort to honor their memory, and to honor America's resolve over the evil of terrorism,' said Perry.
According to a report by the GSA, more than 300 federal employees work at the federal building in agencies including the Food and Drug Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, and Department of Agriculture.
The news is frustrating for Democratic Senator Mark Mann (D-Oklahoma City).
Just a month away from the 30th anniversary of the Murrah bombing, this action by the Trump administration is tone-deaf, at best. The agencies and employees housed in the Oklahoma City Federal Building provide valuable services to Oklahoma, the region and the country.It's time for Oklahoma's congressional delegation to stand up to Trump. Decisions like this should only be made after conducting in-depth analysis and evaluation and should be data driven, not a political stunt.
Sen. Mark Mann (D-Oklahoma City)
The GSA says it will look at research and feedback before making a final decision on a sale.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
a minute ago
- CNBC
Red carpet for Putin, trade relief for China, penalties on India: Inside Trump's peculiar policy playbook
President Donald Trump is pursuing an unusual strategy — courting Russian President Vladimir Putin, holding fire on Beijing, all the while turning the screws on a close ally: India. Despite India being one of the earliest nations to engage in negotiations with the Trump administration, there is still no sign of it sealing a deal with the U.S. New Delhi is now also staring at a secondary tariff of 25% or a "penalty" for its purchases of Russian oil that is set to come into effect later this month. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Tuesday escalated criticism against India, accusing it of profiteering from cheap Russian oil imports and threatening to further raise tariffs on Indian goods. "We have planned to up the tariffs on India — these are secondary tariffs for buying the sanctioned Russian oil," Bessent told CNBC on Tuesday. Earlier this week, White House trade advisor Peter Navarro condemned the Asian giant's dependence on Russian oil as "opportunistic" and undermined international efforts to isolate Russia's war economy. "India acts as a global clearinghouse for Russian oil, converting embargoed crude into high-value exports while giving Moscow the dollars it needs," Navarro said in an op-ed for the Financial Times . By now the world is getting used to the ad-hoc and sometimes contradictory ways in which the Trump administration is pursuing its agenda. Professor at the East Asian Institute at the National University of Singapore Bert Hofman The sharp rhetoric threatens to unravel years of improving ties between Washington and New Delhi — with India saying the U.S. was targeting it unfairly over its Russian oil purchases. "By now the world is getting used to the ad-hoc and sometimes contradictory ways in which the Trump administration is pursuing its agenda," said Bert Hofman, professor at the East Asian Institute at the National University of Singapore. India has emerged as a leading buyer of Russian oil, which has been sold at a discount since some Western nations shunned purchases and imposed restrictions on Russian exports over Moscow's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. It was the second-largest purchaser of Russian oil, importing 1.6 million barrels per day in the first half of this year, up from 50,000 bpd in 2020, though still trailing China's 2 million bpd imports, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Washington has not placed secondary tariffs on China for its Russian oil purchases. India has reiterated that it was the U.S. administration that had asked it to purchase Russian oil to keep the markets calm, while pointing to the European Union and even the U.S.' existing trade with Moscow. The country has taken aim at Washington, saying U.S. continues to import uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for the electric-vehicle industry, as well as fertilizers and chemicals from Russia. U.S. bilateral trade with Russia in 2024 stood at $5.2 billion, down from nearly $36 billion in 2021, government data showed. Bilateral trade between New Delhi and Moscow reached a record $68.7 billion for the year ended March 2025. In comparison, the European Union's trade with Russia stood at 67.5 billion euros ($78.1 billion) in 2024, while its services trade in 2023 was at 17.2 billion euros, according to European Commission data . "India has been victimized by these pressure tactics that that the Trump administration is trying to carry out. Trump is clearly using tariffs as a pressure tactic against Russia," Michael Kugelman, director of the South Asia Institute at Washington-based think tank Wilson Center, told CNBC's " Squawk Box Asia ." Another factor determining the U.S. approach to India is that Trump feels "aggrieved," over how Modi undercut his bid to claim credit for playing a role in the India-Pakistan ceasefire, Kugelman emphasized. Adding to Trump's grievances is India's "unwillingness to lower barriers" to exports of American agricultural products such as soybeans and corn, Kevin Chen Xian An, associate research fellow at S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies pointed out. Oil trade for ceasefire Trump's true agenda has little to do with Washington's stated goal of curbing Moscow's oil revenues, but extracting leverages from the trading partners, according to several geopolitics experts. "The overarching objective for the Trump administration is to extract concessions from countries to figure out some justification for levying taxes on trade so that the government can fund its tax reductions on American citizens' income," said Drew Thompson, senior fellow at the think-tank RSIS. "It's not based on foreign policy principles [but] on power politics and gaining leverage," Thompson added. Last week, Trump rolled out a red carpet to greet Putin on his first visit to the U.S. in about a decade, sharing a ride with him in the presidential limousine to the venue. While the meeting did not appear to have produced meaningful steps toward a ceasefire in Ukraine — a goal Trump had set ahead of the summit — both leaders described the meeting as "productive." Speaking at the joint news briefing following the talks , Putin reiterated that "for the conflict resolution in Ukraine to be long-term and lasting, all the root causes of the crisis ... must be eliminated; all of Russia's legitimate concerns must be taken into account." Kirill Dmitriev, one of Putin's top negotiators, hailed Monday's talks in Washington as an "important day of diplomacy," emphasizing Moscow's opposition to any short-term ceasefire deal with Ukraine. Trump is trying to "maximize his leverage ... pressuring India, and Russia via India," to get a trade deal with the former and a ceasefire pact with the latter, said Matt Gertken, chief geopolitical and U.S. strategist at BCA Research. These will eventually help boost Republicans' prospects in the upcoming midterm election, Gertken added. Not provoking China While India faces steep tariffs for its purchases of Russian crude, China, which has remained the largest importer of Russian crude, has been spared such levies. Trump said last Friday he was not considering retaliatory tariffs on China for buying Russian oil, but might consider it in two or three weeks. China's purchases of Russian oil have risen to 46% of overall exports from Russia in the first half of this year, from 34% in 2022, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, followed by India which imported around 36% of Russia's supplies. When asked about China's role in Russian oil purchases, Bessent suggested that Beijing's imports were less egregious in the eyes of the Trump administration because it had already been a big buyer even before Russia invaded Ukraine. Going soft on China may also reflect Trump's desire not to scuttle a potential high-profile summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping in the coming months and the conclusion of a lasting trade deal, said Stephen Olson, a senior visiting fellow at ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute. The secondary tariffs on India may be intended as "a shot across Russia's bow" to show that the U.S. could turn up the pressure by extending similar tariffs to China, if Russia is not more compliant, Olson added. Following weeks of escalating tensions, Beijing and Washington agreed in May to suspend the hefty duties and loosen several punitive measures imposed in April, as both sides continued to work on hammering out a durable deal. Beijing has leveraged its sheer dominance of rare-earth minerals crucial for military and industrial use in its negotiations with Washington, maintaining a tight control on exports of the critical minerals. The relationship with China is complicated, and the Trump administration has not yet come out with "a clear, coherent policy toward China. Sometimes it seems like it wants to compete with China economically. Other times it seems like it wants to reach some type of understanding or a or a detente," Kugelman said.
NBC News
a minute ago
- NBC News
Trump administration's newest allegation against political foes: Mortgage fraud
In recent weeks, President Donald Trump's administration has targeted Democratic officials over allegations of mortgage fraud, a new front in an effort to undermine critics. The latest one came Wednesday, when Trump, who has been sharply critical of the Federal Reserve's interest rate policies, posted to his Truth Social platform that Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook 'must resign, now!!!' His post came after William Pulte, the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, alleged in a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi that Cook, who was nominated by President Joe Biden, 'falsified bank documents and property records to acquire more favorable loan terms, potentially committing mortgage fraud.' Pulte's letter claimed that Cook falsified her residence statuses for her properties in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and Atlanta. The move followed recent efforts targeting Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., who was a leading figure in Trump's impeachments, and New York Attorney General Letitia James, who successfully sued Trump and his company over what her office said were fraudulent misrepresentations of his wealth and financial statements that he used to get favorable rates on bank loans and insurance policies that he otherwise would not have been able to obtain. (A judge awarded James' office over $300 million in the case, an amount that has since ballooned to over $500 million with interest. Trump has called the case 'a fraud on me' and is appealing the judgment.) This month, NBC News reported that Bondi appointed Ed Martin, a conservative activist and former interim U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C., as a 'special attorney' to probe mortgage fraud allegations against Schiff and James. At the time, a senior law enforcement official told NBC News that a grand jury in Virginia will investigate the allegations against James, while a grand jury in Maryland will take up the Schiff allegations. Trump had called for both officials to be prosecuted over the allegations. Schiff, James and now Cook have all denied any wrongdoing. The White House referred questions to the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which declined to comment. Making an allegation of mortgage fraud has long been a common tactic in opposition research on political campaigns. A Republican campaign veteran told NBC News that searching for inconsistencies in where candidates declare their 'primary' residences is among the first tasks for opposition researchers. It is an issue relevant to elected officials who split their time between their home states and Washington. This person said it is a frequent issue in campaigns on both sides, and the penalty tends to be a fine, not jail time. Last year, Sen. Angela Alsobrooks, D-Md., then a candidate for office, faced a $47,000 bill in Washington, D.C., after it was discovered she wrongly received property tax credits she improperly claimed on a home she had rented out. 'It looks sloppy,' this person said. 'But I don't think we've ever had anyone screw up their life on this. It just looked bad.' Now, the Trump administration is giving such allegations against Democrats special attention. At the same time, The Associated Press reported that Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Trump ally who is running for the Senate, and his wife, Angela, made inaccurate statements on mortgage applications claiming that three separate properties were each their primary residence. The Trump administration has not said whether Paxton is under similar investigation. In a letter to Martin on Monday, James' lawyer, Abbe Lowell, pointed out the potential inconsistency in enforcement actions. 'Notably, absent from your mandate is Kenneth Paxton (Republican Attorney General of Texas). Given that the same news reports raising questions about Ms. James and Mr. Schiff have reported that, somehow, Mr. Paxton has three different properties that he claims to be his 'primary residence,' it seems to indicate your title ought really be, 'Special Assistant for Mortgage Fraud [Alleged Against Democrats Adverse to President Trump],'' he wrote. Pulte said in an interview with CNBC on Wednesday that the administration's probes of the allegations of mortgage fraud were free from political considerations. 'We will look at any allegation of mortgage fraud,' he said. 'And we do not care whether you're a Republican, a Democrat. We do not care whether you're wealthy. We don't care whether you're a prosecutor. We don't care whether you're a Fed governor, if you commit mortgage fraud and you present an existential threat to the Federal Home Loan Banks, Fannie or Freddie, we are going to prosecute it, period.' Cook, the first Black woman to serve on the Fed's Board of Governors, said in a statement Wednesday that she learned from news reports that Pulte had made a criminal referral against her 'based on a mortgage application from four years ago, before I joined the Federal Reserve.' 'I have no intention of being bullied to step down from my position because of some questions raised in a tweet,' she said. 'I do intend to take any questions about my financial history seriously as a member of the Federal Reserve and so I am gathering the accurate information to answer any legitimate questions and provide the facts.' Later Wednesday, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., said the episode amounted to the latest example of the Trump administration's trying to pressure the Federal Reserve. 'I've long been an advocate for holding Fed officials accountable,' Warren, the ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee, said in a statement. 'But anyone can see that for months now, President Trump has been scrambling for a pretext to intimidate or fire Chair Powell and Members of the Federal Reserve Board while blaming anyone but himself for how his failed economic policies are hurting Americans. The President and his Administration should not weaponize the Federal government to illegally fire independent Fed Board members.'
NBC News
a minute ago
- NBC News
Appeals court allows Trump to end temporary protections for migrants from Central America and Nepal
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal appeals court on Wednesday sided with the Trump administration and halted for now a lower court's order that had kept in place temporary protections for 60,000 migrants from Central America and Nepal. This means that the Republican administration can move toward removing an estimated 7,000 people from Nepal whose Temporary Protected Status designations expired Aug. 5. The TPS designations and legal status of 51,000 Hondurans and 3,000 Nicaraguans are set to expire Sept. 8, at which point they will become eligible for removal. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco granted the emergency stay pending an appeal as lead plaintiff National TPS Alliance alleges that the administration acted unlawfully in ending Temporary Protected Status designations for people from Honduras, Nicaragua and Nepal. 'The district court's order granting plaintiffs' motion to postpone, entered July 31, 2025, is stayed pending further order of this court,' wrote the judges, who are appointees of Democrat Bill Clinton and Republicans George W. Bush and Donald Trump. Temporary Protected Status is a designation that can be granted by the Homeland Security secretary, preventing migrants from being deported and allowing them to work. The Trump administration has aggressively sought to remove the protection, thus making more people eligible for removal. It's part of a wider effort by the administration to carry out mass deportations of immigrants. Secretary Kristi Noem can extend Temporary Protected Status to immigrants in the U.S. if conditions in their homelands are deemed unsafe for return due to a natural disaster, political instability or other dangerous conditions. Immigrant rights advocates say TPS holders from Nepal have lived in the U.S. for more than a decade while people from Honduras and Nicaragua have lived in the country for 26 years, after Hurricane Mitch in 1998 devastated both countries. 'The Trump administration is systematically de-documenting immigrants who have lived lawfully in this country for decades, raising U.S.-citizen children, starting businesses, and contributing to their communities,' said Jessica Bansal, attorney at the National Day Laborer Organization, in a statement. Noem ended the programs after determining that conditions no longer warranted protections. In a sharply written July 31 order, U.S. District Judge Trina L. Thompson in San Francisco kept the protections in place while the case proceeds. The next hearing is Nov. 18. She said the administration ended the migrant status protections without an 'objective review of the country conditions,' such as political violence in Honduras and the impact of recent hurricanes and storms in Nicaragua. In response, Tricia McLaughlin, the assistant secretary at DHS, said, 'TPS was never meant to be a de facto asylum system, yet that is how previous administrations have used it for decades.' The Trump administration has already terminated TPS designations for about 350,000 Venezuelans, 500,000 Haitians, more than 160,000 Ukrainians and thousands of people from Afghanistan and Cameroon. Some have pending lawsuits in federal courts. Lawyers for the plaintiffs argued that Noem's decisions are unlawful because they were predetermined by President Donald Trump's campaign promises and motivated by racial animus. But Drew Ensign, a U.S. deputy assistant attorney general, said at a hearing Tuesday that the government suffers an ongoing irreparable harm from its 'inability to carry out the programs that it has determined are warranted.' Honduras Deputy Foreign Minister Gerardo Torres said Wednesday that the appellate decision was unfortunate. He said the government hopes to at least buy time for Hondurans with the temporary status so they can seek out another way to stay legally in the U.S. 'We're going to wait to see what the National TPS Alliance decides, it's possible the case could be elevated to the United States Supreme Court, but we have to wait,' he said. In May, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to end TPS designations for Venezuelans. The justices provided no rationale, which is common in emergency appeals, and did not rule on the underlying claims.
