logo
Drug prices likely to rise with tariffs on EU

Drug prices likely to rise with tariffs on EU

Axios4 days ago
The trade deal between the U.S. and the European Union could hit the pharmaceutical industry with billions in new costs and ultimately drive up prices and limit access.
Why it matters: Drugmakers have been heavily reliant on foreign countries' manufacturing and raw materials, most of it duty-free. Those free-trade policies are on the way out as the U.S. prepares to impose a 15% tariff on U.S.-bound imports of branded drugs from Europe.
Driving the news: Wall Street analysts estimated the tariff deal could cost the industry between $13 billion and $19 billion, Reuters reported on Monday.
"The big picture is: The cost of imported drugs is about to become more expensive for all Americans," Joe Brusuelas, principal and chief economist for RSM US, told Axios.
Europe is among the biggest sources of branded drugs and their ingredients for the U.S. Ireland alone accounted for about $50 billion of U.S. pharma imports last year.
Pharma giants like Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson have made Ireland a major manufacturing hub and source of cancer drugs, insulin, Viagra and Botox.
Denmark is home of Novo Nordisk, which makes the blockbuster GLP-1 drugs Ozempic and Wegovy as well as much of the U.S. insulin supply.
The immunosuppressive drug Humira is made in Germany, while Bavarian Nordic's Jynneos, a vaccine for smallpox and mpox, is largely made in Denmark, per Reuters research.
Between the lines: The details of the trade deal with the EU still are being hammered out. The new tariffs wouldn't apply to certain generic drugs, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said on Sunday.
The announcement left the door open for President Trump to impose even higher tariffs. Trump had recently threatened to impose 200% tariffs on pharma.
"I think the PBMs are going to start to have conversations with manufacturers about increasing those prices," said Ryan Maizel, senior director of advisory services at Model N.
But there are too many unknowns for any real action yet.
"I don't see anyone doing anything until we see that these deals are worth the paper that eventually they're going to be written on," Marc Busch, a Georgetown University authority on international trade policy, told Axios.
Manufacturers will have to game out whether to take on major one-time expenses of moving their production, as well as whether to pass along future higher costs for certain drugs.
That's a process that will almost certainly take place between industry lobbyists and policymakers in Washington, Brusuelas said.
"The inside-the-Beltway horse trading is going to go on," he said.
Industry trade group PhRMA did not return a request for comment.
The new EU tariffs will affect items like packaging or plastics used for bottles or blister packs, which could influence the cost of low-priced generics and over-the-counter products made in the EU, Maizel said.
What to watch: The industry is still closely watching the administration's Section 232 investigation that could end with a recommendation to put a certain tariff rate on drug imports from China and India.
Oral arguments will also be heard this week in a lawsuit challenging Trump's authority using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose sweeping "reciprocal" tariffs, CNBC reported.
"If the IEEPA tariffs are taken down then I don't even know what the status of these deals will be," Busch said. "Trump will obviously get very angry, and I don't know how he backfills."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

These regulations must be met by tech products starting in August
These regulations must be met by tech products starting in August

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

These regulations must be met by tech products starting in August

Goods in Germany and elsewhere are subject to various rules and regulations. As of now, new EU-wide regulations for certain tech products are in effect. Manufacturers must ensure their products comply with the new requirements. Otherwise, they cannot sell them in the European single market. The Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) announced this at the end of January. Now, these regulations for tech products have come into force. Regulations for Tech Products on Cybersecurity Specifically, the regulations apply to all tech products that can connect to the Internet and have a wireless interface via Bluetooth or Wi-Fi. The requirements are clear rules on cybersecurity. Since August 1, a CE mark should indicate that the respective devices fundamentally meet cybersecurity requirements. This means networks and privacy should be adequately protected against fraud and other attacks. This is to be achieved, among other things, by securing confidential communication. The ability to update is also included. New Requirements Mandatory Manufacturers must meet these legally binding requirements. Otherwise, a sales ban within the European Union looms. However, the proof of compliance is expected to be simplified thanks to clear testing criteria and harmonized standards. The goal is to increase the level of cybersecurity in Germany and Europe. Although the BSI's January announcement did not specify the devices in question, it is clear that smartphones, smartwatches, or smart TVs fall under these new regulations for tech products, as they involve Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and Internet connections. This development is welcome, as security in the virtual space becomes increasingly important with growing connectivity. Recently, the BSI warned of vulnerabilities in iOS. Reports of hacking attacks and Internet fraud cases also regularly make the rounds. The post These regulations must be met by tech products starting in August appeared first on TECHBOOK.

How Democrats can stop talking past each other and start winning
How Democrats can stop talking past each other and start winning

Boston Globe

time30 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

How Democrats can stop talking past each other and start winning

A second group of moderates, including important donors, are libertarians who endorse ' Advertisement The third group of moderate Democrats yearns to turn back the clock to the New Deal coalition. A chief spokesperson is Ruy Teixeira of the Liberal Patriot newsletter. '[T]he New Deal Democrats were moderate and even small-c conservative in their social outlook,' he Advertisement Beginning in the 1970s, college-educated progressives began to focus on issues involving race, gender, the environment, and sexual freedom. Teixeira This brings us to the only moderate position that holds promise for Democrats: defining moderate as being pragmatic, rather than doctrinaire. College-educated progressives need to recognize that their priorities and their cultural values don't match those of most Americans. In 2024, inflation and the economy were Advertisement Centering that economic message is the first pragmatic step in rebuilding Democrats' brand to appeal to both college grads and noncollege grads. The second step is to recognize that cultural preferences differ across class lines. Non-elites value self-discipline because they need to get up every day, on time, without an attitude, to work at jobs with little autonomy. Consequently, they highly value traditional institutions that anchor self-discipline: religion, the military, the family. Those same institutions offer non-elites sources of social status independent of their subordinate positions in a capitalist economy. Blue-collar values reflect blue-collar lives. That's why, on cultural issues, college-educated progressives need to stop demanding a mind-meld with the Democratic Party. If you're playing to win, politics requires not purity but an ability to build coalitions with people whose values may differ from yours in fundamental ways. Democrats need to treat voters without college degrees as respected coalition partners, making tradeoffs. Advertisement This doesn't mean that progressives need to abandon their values; it means they have to act on them. Here are two uncomfortable facts: Progressive activists as a group are much

I didn't want to need free groceries
I didn't want to need free groceries

Boston Globe

time30 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

I didn't want to need free groceries

So I share Kidder's lament that feeding the hungry is on track to be a growth industry in Donald Trump's America. The Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Experience first. Before 2009, as the son of a judge and the privileged middle class, I'd never been unemployed and in need of charity in three decades of working. I loved what I did, even though freelance writing is a constant scramble for income. I've always read a book before bed; as a freelancer, I chose only books for which I was earning a reviewer's paycheck. Advertisement When the recession and its double-digit unemployment hit, the 'subprime mortgages,' 'mortgage-backed securities,' and unregulated 'shadow banks' that underlay them — and that many Americans had never heard of — unleashed work-killing forces too devastating for individual initiative to counter. Even wealthy Harvard scrapped a lucrative project (by my bank account's standards) that I'd done for four straight summers. My then-wife's part-time job invaluably backstopped the family income. But after a year of little work and with no idea how long I'd be idle, I despaired of ever being employed again. Free groceries to stretch our household resources seemed the only responsible path, especially with a child to feed. Advertisement The other folks in St. Paul's basement made for an interesting cross-section of people. Some were fellow baby boomers. The age and dress of others suggested they were students, presumably not destitute but nevertheless on a budget as they contended with Greater Boston's formidable living costs. No one dressed in rags. (Neither did the recipients Kidder observed, which he attributes to their efforts 'to ward off disgrace' from having to seek charity.) My anxious heart beat fast during my first time at the pantry. Normally a chatterbox, I made little small talk with others. It took a number of weeks before the habitual visits and the saintly volunteers' freedom from judgment thawed some of my embarrassment. I also found psychic balm in the relief of free food for my household's budget. Not everyone adjusted as easily. At least one person at the pantry teared up at having to seek aid in public. I never saw her return. Advertisement The volunteers who set out and distributed food never questioned who we were or why we were there. Hard hearts will call that poor quality control. Those who know better, who relied on the kindness of these strangers, recognize it as mindfulness of recipients' dignity. Today, those who do such work can't fully backfill the Beautiful Bill's shrinkage of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly called food stamps). Kidder notes that the national food bank network Feeding America says SNAP supplied nine times as much food as its own agency's food banks do. That the bill's backers had not just food support but the broader safety net in their sights is clear from the legislation's attaching work requirements to Medicaid. Two years ago, perhaps anticipating this dark American moment, Republican Representative Steve Scalise Yet do work. Work requirements Perhaps if our leaders saw who goes to food pantries and why — perhaps if they spent a week or two living as pantry patrons — the mythic myopia would lift from their eyes. But there are none so blind as those who will not see. Advertisement

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store