Donald Trump's mysterious obsession with Ukraine's shale gas reserves
Donald Trump has softened his plan to seize the commodity resources of Ukraine very slightly. The draft remains a coercive document, a pseudo-contractual expropriation of a victim nation with its back to the wall.
Ukraine's leaders finally seem resigned to accepting an ultimatum that has no peacetime precedent in modern state relations, putting the best face on the lesser of two evils. 'The basic legal stuff is almost ready. If everything moves constructively, the agreement will bring economic gains to both our countries,' said Volodymyr Zelensky.
He can reasonably hope that the political weather will have changed in Washington long before the offending clauses start to bite, or at least that the American people will remember their noble tradition of generosity and fair play.
The White House has at last understood that Ukraine's critical minerals are an enormous red herring. The $24 trillion (£18 trillion) figure floated by fantasists is for comic books. 'This whole story is insanity. There are no rare deposits of any commercial value in Ukraine,' said Jack Lifton, head of the Critical Minerals Institute.
'The claims are based on Soviet information that we can't trust. The country has never mined rare earths or developed the processing industry, and without that the rock is worthless. The same goes for Greenland, where there is no power, no water, no skills, and it is so expensive that the Chinese gave up trying,' he said.
'America already has the world's richest deposits at Mountain Pass, and we have Canada next door loaded with rare earths. What the US needs for national security is to develop its own downstream industry and to stop sending our output to China for processing,' he said.
The real resource prize in Ukraine is natural gas. Andríy Kóbolyev, ex-head of Ukraine's energy giant Naftogaz, told me that exploitable shale reserves in the Dnipro-Donetsk basin may be much larger than generally thought. 'We could replace half the lost Russian gas exports to Europe,' he said.
'The conventional plays are depleted but we are sitting on the best shale table in the world. It is even better than the [American] Permian Basin in thickness and porosity,' he said.
He added: 'The potential is huge if the right companies come in to explore and drill with new technology. You can do 30 to 50 fracks per well these days. We're still just doing one or two.'
Kóbolyev said Ukrainian Energy conducted a detailed study of the Yuzivska basin in north-east Ukraine and concluded that gas could be extracted at one third of the cost of liquefied natural gas (LNG) imported from Qatar or the US. 'All the pipeline infrastructure is already there from Soviet days so it is a very attractive play,' he said.
The organic carbon content of the best Ukrainian field is 7.6pc and the porosity is 9pc. Both are well above levels in the prolific Marcellus basin in the US. The layers are 100 metres thick.
'Whoever is advising the Americans knows this country very well. My impression is that they are probably Russian: they know exactly what they are doing, and where to apply political pressure,' he said.
The mystery is what Trump hopes to gain from a shale boom in Ukraine. The gas would undercut and knock out expensive American exports of LNG to Europe, which Trump is also pushing hard.
It sits oddly with parallel US-Russian talks to revive the Baltic Nord Stream pipelines and restore Siberian gas flows to Europe, with Trump-friendly companies taking a big slice of the business.
The story makes sense only if there is fast-growing demand for gas in Europe and the world. But the EU's energy agency says Europe's gas use has peaked and will go into mechanical decline as the region adds 70 gigawatts of renewable power each year.
China is moving at breakneck speed to end reliance on seaborne hydrocarbons as a national security imperative. It is instead marrying coal with wind, solar and nuclear, aiming to achieve total energy independence as an electro-state.
The International Energy Agency predicts a global gas glut by the late 2020s. It says LNG will never be competitive at scale for power plants in India or much of the global south. In my view, data centres will not change the equation once superconducting technology hits the market.
It is one thing for Zelensky to swallow the bitter pill and let the Trump administration play its dirty commercial game, whatever that may be. It is another to persuade feisty Ukrainian lawmakers to ratify what looks to many like a double injury: a colonial land grab and a strategic sell-out wrapped in one.
Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff has business ties to Russian oligarchs. He has already endorsed the sham referenda of the four annexed oblasts of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhia, and Kherson, and has rhetorically ceded large swaths of territory that Putin is not close to conquering.
'It is going to be a very hard sell,' said Tim Ash, from Chatham House. 'I can't see the Rada [Ukraine's parliament] voting for a deal that is nothing more than extortion, and gives Ukraine nothing in terms of its security.'
The document says the US-Ukraine investment fund will control all infrastructure in Ukraine linked to natural resources, including roads, rail, pipelines, ports, terminals, refineries, LNG facilities, etc.
It will control 'critical minerals, oil, natural gas, fuels or other hydrocarbons and other extractable materials'.
The US will have three of the five board members and the first right of refusal on all projects. It has authority to examine the books of any Ukrainian agency whenever it wants. It can veto sales of Ukraine's resources to Europe. The US puts up no money. It offers no security guarantee.
It is still unclear whether the final draft splits the royalties 50:50 between the US and Ukraine from the outset, or whether the Americans will receive all the revenue until Ukraine has paid off a putative 'war debt' of $100bn to the US, with 4pc interest added.
This war debt clause in the earlier drafts was self-evidently absurd. No company will invest billions upfront if the entire profit for years to come goes to the US government.
The sorry saga is a strategic debacle. Russia is in scarcely better shape than it was in early 1917. The US defence intelligence agency says Vladimir Putin's motley forces are facing operational disintegration and cannot keep going for more than a few months.
The Kremlin's rainy day fund has run out of money. Oil is in a structural bear market. Analysts are pencilling in $50 a barrel. Russia's deformed Keynesian war economy coming apart at the seams. Sir Richard Dearlove, ex-head of MI6, says the West just has to wait a little, tighten the screws at the right moment, and Putin will be forced to the table on our terms.
Instead Trump has offered him a real estate joint venture.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What UK's Strategic Defense Review means for Ukraine
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced on June 2 that the United Kingdom is moving to "warfighting readiness," in large part in response to the full-scale invasion of Ukraine and the threat Russia poses to Europe. He made the comment as his government unveiled its latest Strategic Defense Review, which U.K. General Richard Barrons, one of the review's authors, described as the "most profound" change in U.K. defense in 150 years. The review sets out ambitious new targets, including at least 12 new attack submarines, fleets of drones and autonomous vehicles, as well as 7,000 new long-range weapons. Yet it also comes with urgent warnings. The review reveals that the U.K.'s Armed Forces are currently unprepared to fight adversaries such as Russia or China, nor could they conduct high-intensity warfare in a war like that in Ukraine. Insufficient munition stockpiles, low troop numbers, and ageing equipment are just a few of the weaknesses underpinning its assessment. "The speed of development in Ukraine is so far ahead of what countries like the U.K. is capable of." But as well as committing to bolstering its own defense capabilities, the U.K. must also manage the commitments already made to Kyiv, which it has vowed to support with a "100-year partnership." The U.K. has been one of Kyiv's closest supporters since the start of the full-scale invasion, and the review reiterates long-term support for Ukraine, committing 3 billion pounds ($4.06 billion) annually in military aid. "The bottom line is that all of this is about defending the U.K. after the conflict moves on from Ukraine primarily," Keir Giles, a senior consulting fellow at Chatham House, a U.K.-based think tank, told the Kyiv Independent. "Whether it's positive, negative, or catastrophic, either way, that's when the U.K. and its allies need to be ready for Russia's next move." The U.K. wants to create a more flexible procurement process, as demonstrated by that developed by Ukraine throughout the full-scale invasion, a dynamic it says would be vital should the U.K. deploy troops in support of a ceasefire. The review urges deeper defense industrial collaboration, including joint ventures and helping Ukraine access global markets, as well as rebuilding and sustaining its defense sector. This could include helping Ukraine service Soviet-era equipment still used abroad. The U.K. also aims to learn from Ukraine's experience in modern warfare, particularly in land combat, drones, and hybrid threats. However, the review highlights challenges — U.K. stockpiles of weapons such as Storm Shadow long-range missiles have been depleted through its support to Ukraine, and years of underinvestment have weakened domestic defense capacity. The U.K. has announced that it will build six new munition factories. This indicates a significant attempt to address one of the key criticisms of European defense, which is its lack of industrial base and reliance on U.S. support. While U.K. Defense Secretary John Healey has said that "we should expect to see new factories opening very soon," it is not clear how quickly this will translate into meaningful battlefield assistance for Ukraine's Armed Forces. "The speed of development in Ukraine is so far ahead of what countries like the U.K. are capable of, the best-case outcome for Ukraine would just be sending the money there to build stuff," Giles said. When asked how Ukraine could be best supported outside of the recommendations in the review, Giles said the "maximum support" should be given to Ukraine, without the hesitancy about doing damage to Russia." We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NATO secretary general: Russia may attack NATO within five years
Russia is building up its military capabilities and will be ready to use military force against NATO states within five years. Source: European Pravda; NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte during a speech at Chatham House in London on 9 June Quote: "Russia could be ready to use military force against NATO within five years. Russia has teamed up with China, North Korea and Iran. They are expanding their militaries and their capabilities. Putin's war machine is speeding up, not slowing down. Russia is reconstituting its forces with Chinese technology and producing more weapons faster than we thought," Rutte explained. The NATO secretary general said that Russia produces as many munitions in three months as all NATO countries produce in a year. "And its defence industrial base is expected to roll out 1,500 tanks, 3,000 armoured vehicles and 200 Iskander missiles this year alone. Let's not kid ourselves. We are all on the eastern flank now. The new generation of Russian missiles travel at many times the speed of sound. The distance between European capitals is only a matter of minutes. There is no longer east or west. There is just NATO," Rutte said. Background: Andrius Kubilius, European Commissioner for Defence and Space, shared the assessment of Western intelligence that a Russian attack on EU states could occur within the next few years. The German Federal Intelligence Service believes that Russia sees itself in a systemic conflict with the West and is preparing for a major war with NATO. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Russia sentences 2 Azov fighters to over 20 years in prison
A Russian court has sentenced two Ukrainian soldiers of the Azov Brigade to more than 20 years in prison for allegedly killing civilians in the city of Mariupol in Ukraine's Donetsk Oblast, Russia's Investigative Committee announced on June 9 on Telegram. Russia has held a number of sham trials with Ukrainian prisoners of war (POWs) over the past years, focusing in particular on Azov fighters captured during the war. Azov has been demonized by Russian propaganda for years. Russian authorities accuse sniper Ruslan Orlov and paramedic Artem Novikov of shooting three civilians in Mariupol in April 2022. The Russian court sentenced Orlov to 26 years in a strict regime colony, and Novikov to 24 years. Ukraine has not yet commented on the Russian Investigative Committee's statement. Russia's months-long siege of Mariupol between February and May 2022 reduced the port city to a landscape of rubble and killed thousands. In the meantime, the Azovstal Steel Plant in Mariupol became a symbol of Ukrainian resistance at the onset of the all-out war, as Ukrainian soldiers valiantly defended the plant under the Russian siege. On May 16, 2022, Azovstal defenders were ordered to surrender to the encircling Russian forces after nearly two months of constant bombardment of the besieged plant. The evacuation from Azovstal ended on May 20, 2022, with Ukrainian soldiers transferred to a penal colony in Russian-occupied Olenivka, Donetsk Oblast, now infamous as the site of the mass killing of Azov fighters. On July 28, an explosion killed 54 Ukrainian prisoners of war and injured over 150 at the Olenivka penal colony. Many of them were members of Azov. While hundreds of Azov fighters have been released since 2022, hundreds more remain in captivity. Read also: War's unseen isolation: A Ukrainian officer's story of survival and hope We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.