logo
US team investigating foreign bribery dwindles, sources say

US team investigating foreign bribery dwindles, sources say

Hindustan Times3 hours ago

WASHINGTON, - The U.S. Justice Department's team dedicated to investigating allegations of foreign bribery has dwindled as President Donald Trump's administration reviews its enforcement of a decades-old law aimed at preventing corruption, according to three people familiar with the matter.
The DOJ's Fraud Section unit tasked with enforcing the anti-bribery law has shrunk to about 15 prosecutors, according to two of the sources. That number is down from 32 as of a January report published on the department's website.
The cuts follow Trump's executive order in February calling for a pause in enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, a 1977 law that prohibits companies that operate in the U.S. from bribing foreign officials and has become a cornerstone of federal efforts to combat corruption.
A spokesperson for the Justice Department declined to comment.
The DOJ launched a 180-day review of its enforcement of the FCPA following Trump's order, which kicked off an exodus of staff from the unit. Prosecutors largely moved elsewhere in the Justice Department's Criminal Division, including its Healthcare and Marketplace Fraud units, two of the sources said.
New guidance on how prosecutors are to handle FCPA cases is being drafted and expected to be released soon, one of the sources said.
Attorney General Pam Bondi in February directed foreign bribery prosecutors to prioritize cases related to drug cartels, a Trump administration emphasis that has not traditionally been a focus of the unit.
A memo from the Criminal Division last month listed foreign bribery below issues such as fraud in government programs and tariff evasion as corporate enforcement priorities for the Trump administration.
The DOJ has been scaling back its enforcement against white-collar crimes and focusing on different types of cases. It has also dropped other initiatives aimed at preventing corruption.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Troops Deployed, Teargas Fired – Is LA Under Trump's Martial Law? California Guv To Sue US Prez Over Immigrant Raids
Troops Deployed, Teargas Fired – Is LA Under Trump's Martial Law? California Guv To Sue US Prez Over Immigrant Raids

India.com

time31 minutes ago

  • India.com

Troops Deployed, Teargas Fired – Is LA Under Trump's Martial Law? California Guv To Sue US Prez Over Immigrant Raids

Los Angeles (United States): Governor Gavin Newsom has announced a lawsuit against President Donald Trump over what he calls an 'illegal and authoritarian' deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles. The decision has led to an escalation of the already strained relationship between California and the federal government. What began as a wave of protests against immigration raids has now snowballed into a full-blown constitutional showdown between Sacramento and Washington. Over the weekend, Los Angeles erupted as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents arrested dozens of undocumented immigrants from city streets. The sweeping raids triggered mass protests. Demonstrators blocked freeways and clashed with the police – demanding an end to what they called a 'militarised war on migrants'. By Monday, nearly 2,000 National Guard troops had been dispatched to the city under direct orders from the White House – a move Governor Newsom says was made without his knowledge or consent. 'This is not only about California. This is about a president who believes he can federalise any state's National Guard, bypassing governors, the Constitution and the people. It is illegal. It is immoral. And we are going to court,' Newsom said in an appearance on MSNBC. The governor took to social media as well and warned that Trump's executive order could set a dangerous precedent. 'What he has done in L.A., he can now do in any state. We will not allow California to be his testing ground for tyranny,' he wrote on X (formerly Twitter). Former Vice President Kamala Harris, who is a California native, too joined the chorus and accused Trump of 'manufacturing a crisis to inflame division and distract from his own failures'. The protests began last Friday after ICE conducted raids in several neighborhoods. The crackdown led to the arrest of at least 44 undocumented immigrants. Demonstrators quickly flooded the streets and accused federal authorities of targeting vulnerable communities and acting with little regard for due process. The police responded with tear gas, flash-bang grenades and rubber bullets. The unrest intensified over the weekend and prompted Trump to invoke what he called a 'necessary federal intervention'. 'These are not protesters, they are insurrectionists. Governor Gavin Newsom and 'Mayor' Bass have lost control of their city. They should apologise to the people of Los Angeles for this disaster,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. However, city officials flatly rejected Trump's narrative. While coordinating emergency response efforts, LA Mayor Karen Bass condemned the federal intervention as 'reckless and inflammatory'. Legal experts say Newsom's lawsuit could spark a constitutional battle over the limits of federal power. While the president does have authority to federalise the National Guard in rare situations, doing so without state consent – particularly for domestic law enforcement – is legally murky. 'Trump is testing the boundaries of presidential power in ways we have not seen in decades. If the courts side with Newsom, it could rein in executive overreach. If they don't, it could open the door to more unilateral deployments in the future,' said Dr. Emily Serrano, a constitutional law professor at UCLA. As tensions continue to rise in the streets and now in the courts, Los Angeles has become the latest flashpoint in the nation's deepening political divide. Whether this battle is resolved by judges or ballots remains to be seen. But for now, California is sending a message it will not back down.

‘We're suing him': California Governor slams Trump's National Guard move as protests continue across LA
‘We're suing him': California Governor slams Trump's National Guard move as protests continue across LA

New Indian Express

time31 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

‘We're suing him': California Governor slams Trump's National Guard move as protests continue across LA

California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, told MSNBC that he plans to file suit Monday against the Trump administration to roll back the National Guard deployment, which he called 'an illegal act, an immoral act, an unconstitutional act.' In a post on X, Newsom said, 'This is exactly what Donald Trump wanted. He flamed the fires and illegally acted to federalise the National Guard. The order he signed doesn't just apply to CA. It will allow him to go into ANY STATE and do the same thing. We're suing him.'

Explained: Trump's Troops in Los Angeles: What the National Guard Can — and Can't — Legally Do
Explained: Trump's Troops in Los Angeles: What the National Guard Can — and Can't — Legally Do

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

Explained: Trump's Troops in Los Angeles: What the National Guard Can — and Can't — Legally Do

explained-video LA Protest: President Donald Trump has deployed thousands of National Guard troops to Los Angeles amid escalating protests over immigration raids — bypassing California's governor and invoking federal law. Why is this move controversial? What exactly is the National Guard, and how much power does the president have to deploy it? In this deep explainer, we break down everything — from Title 10 powers to the political backlash, including protests, property damage, and the looming threat of more federal force.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store