UK-France deal on migrants takes effect
The interior ministry said that British authorities were 'operationally ready' and that migrant detentions were expected to begin 'within days' following ratification of the agreement. 'Today we send a clear message—if you come here illegally on a small boat you will face being sent back to France,' Prime Minister Keir Starmer said in a statement after striking the deal with French President Emmanuel Macron last month.
The agreement seeks to curb record levels of irregular Channel crossings that are causing discontent in Britain and helping fuel the rise of the hard-right Reform UK party. Under the arrangement—for now a pilot scheme set to run until June 2026 -- irregular migrants arriving on UK shores could be detained and returned to France if they are deemed ineligible for asylum.
In exchange, the UK will accept an equal number of migrants from France who can apply for asylum via an online platform, giving priority to nationalities most vulnerable to smugglers and to people with ties in Britain. The two governments signed the final text last week, with the EU Commission giving its 'green light on this innovative approach', Britain's Home Office said in a statement late Monday.
'The unscrupulous business model of smugglers must be broken,' the European Union's migration commissioner Magnus Brunner wrote on X Tuesday. But refugee charities have criticized the deal, urging the British government to provide more safe and legal routes for asylum seekers instead.
The number of migrants making the dangerous journey in flimsy dinghies this year crossed 25,000 at the end of July, the highest tally ever at this point in the year. The rise, which the government has partly attributed to extended periods of good weather, means Labour leader Starmer is struggling to fulfil one of his main pledge's before winning last year's general election.
Social media ads
In recent weeks, anti-immigration protesters and counter-protesters have clashed outside hotels housing asylum seekers in Britain, with some demonstrations turning violent. Starmer has tried to portray the deal as a diplomatic victory after years of faltering cooperation between France and the UK on the politically sensitive issue. 'This is the product of months of grown-up diplomacy delivering real results for British people as we broker deals no government has been able to achieve,' he said.
While the agreement has also met with criticism in northern France, where some officials say the scheme is too favorable to the UK, Nigel Farage's anti-immigrant Reform UK party says it does not go far enough to secure Britain's borders. Interior minister Yvette Cooper said Tuesday that she would not put a number on how many migrants would be deported under the deal.
'Of course, it will start with lower numbers and then build, but we want to be able to expand it,' she told BBC radio. The Home Office this week pledged £100 million ($132 million) for law enforcement, including additional staff and technology, to 'tackle' gangs who organize the crossings. Starmer's government also said it would make it an offence to promote on social media dangerous immigration routes into the UK, including via the Channel.
Under the new provision, which will be part of a border security bill making its way through parliament, those found advertising such crossings could be fined and face up to five years in prison. According to a Home Office analysis, 80 percent of migrants arriving via small boats told officials they used social media during the process. – AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Kuwait Times
3 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
Prince Harry cleared of ‘bullying' in African charity row
LONDON: The UK charity watchdog Wednesday cleared Prince Harry of accusations of bullying in a row with an African charity he founded, but criticized 'all parties' for letting the bitter internal dispute play out in public. The charity Sentebale was at the centre of an explosive boardroom dispute in March and April when chairperson Sophie Chandauka publicly accused Harry, the youngest son of King Charles III, of 'bullying'. Days earlier, Harry and co-founder Prince Seeiso of Lesotho had announced they were resigning from the charity they established in 2006, after the trustees quit when Chandauka refused their demand to step down. Harry, also known as the Duke of Sussex, launched the charity in honour of his mother, Princess Diana, to help young people with HIV and AIDS in Lesotho and later Botswana. After a months-long inquiry, the Charity Commission 'found no evidence of widespread or systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or misogynoir at the charity,' it said in its conclusions published Wednesday. But it 'criticized all parties to the dispute for allowing it to play out publicly' saying the 'damaging internal dispute' had 'severely impacted the charity's reputation'. It found there was 'a lack of clarity in delegations' which led to 'mismanagement in the administration of the charity' and issued the charity with a plan to 'address governance weaknesses'. Sentebale said in a statement it 'welcomes' the findings. Chandauka, who was appointed to the voluntary post in 2023 and remains the charity's chair, said she 'appreciated' the conclusions, saying that they 'confirm the governance concerns I raised privately in February 2025'. She did not address the fact that claims of systemic bullying had been dismissed. A spokesperson for Prince Harry said the probe 'falls troublingly short in many regards. 'Primarily the fact that the consequences of the current chair's actions will not be borne by her—but by the children who rely on Sentebale's support,' the spokesperson said in a statement. 'The Duke of Sussex will now focus on finding new ways to continue supporting the children of Lesotho and Botswana.' Harry said in an April statement that the events had 'been heartbreaking to witness, especially when such blatant lies hurt those who have invested decades in this shared goal'. Speaking to British media after accusing the prince of trying to force her out, Chandauka criticised Harry for his decision to bring a Netflix camera crew to a polo fundraiser last year. She also objected to an unplanned appearance by his wife Meghan at the event. The accusations were a fresh blow for the prince, who kept up only a handful of his private patronages, including with Sentebale, after a dramatic split with the British royal family in 2020. That was when he left Britain to live in North America with his wife and children. Harry chose the name Sentebale as a tribute to Diana, who died in a Paris car crash in 1997 when the prince was just 12. It means 'forget me not' in the Sesotho language and is also used to say goodbye. 'Moving forward I urge all parties not to lose sight of those who rely on the charity's services,' said the commission's chief executive David Holdsworth. In her statement, Chandauka added: 'Despite the recent turbulence, we will always be inspired by the vision of our Founders, Prince Harry and Prince Seeiso.' –AFP
Kuwait Times
a day ago
- Kuwait Times
UK-France deal on migrants takes effect
LONDON, UK: A 'one-in, one-out' deal in which Britain can return some migrants who cross the Channel in small boats back to France came into force on Tuesday, the UK government announced. The interior ministry said that British authorities were 'operationally ready' and that migrant detentions were expected to begin 'within days' following ratification of the agreement. 'Today we send a clear message—if you come here illegally on a small boat you will face being sent back to France,' Prime Minister Keir Starmer said in a statement after striking the deal with French President Emmanuel Macron last month. The agreement seeks to curb record levels of irregular Channel crossings that are causing discontent in Britain and helping fuel the rise of the hard-right Reform UK party. Under the arrangement—for now a pilot scheme set to run until June 2026 -- irregular migrants arriving on UK shores could be detained and returned to France if they are deemed ineligible for asylum. In exchange, the UK will accept an equal number of migrants from France who can apply for asylum via an online platform, giving priority to nationalities most vulnerable to smugglers and to people with ties in Britain. The two governments signed the final text last week, with the EU Commission giving its 'green light on this innovative approach', Britain's Home Office said in a statement late Monday. 'The unscrupulous business model of smugglers must be broken,' the European Union's migration commissioner Magnus Brunner wrote on X Tuesday. But refugee charities have criticized the deal, urging the British government to provide more safe and legal routes for asylum seekers instead. The number of migrants making the dangerous journey in flimsy dinghies this year crossed 25,000 at the end of July, the highest tally ever at this point in the year. The rise, which the government has partly attributed to extended periods of good weather, means Labour leader Starmer is struggling to fulfil one of his main pledge's before winning last year's general election. Social media ads In recent weeks, anti-immigration protesters and counter-protesters have clashed outside hotels housing asylum seekers in Britain, with some demonstrations turning violent. Starmer has tried to portray the deal as a diplomatic victory after years of faltering cooperation between France and the UK on the politically sensitive issue. 'This is the product of months of grown-up diplomacy delivering real results for British people as we broker deals no government has been able to achieve,' he said. While the agreement has also met with criticism in northern France, where some officials say the scheme is too favorable to the UK, Nigel Farage's anti-immigrant Reform UK party says it does not go far enough to secure Britain's borders. Interior minister Yvette Cooper said Tuesday that she would not put a number on how many migrants would be deported under the deal. 'Of course, it will start with lower numbers and then build, but we want to be able to expand it,' she told BBC radio. The Home Office this week pledged £100 million ($132 million) for law enforcement, including additional staff and technology, to 'tackle' gangs who organize the crossings. Starmer's government also said it would make it an offence to promote on social media dangerous immigration routes into the UK, including via the Channel. Under the new provision, which will be part of a border security bill making its way through parliament, those found advertising such crossings could be fined and face up to five years in prison. According to a Home Office analysis, 80 percent of migrants arriving via small boats told officials they used social media during the process. – AFP
Arab Times
a day ago
- Arab Times
The compassionate captain of Kuwait Airways
I did not expect to return to writing about Kuwait Airways so soon, but a message from a reader of my recent article in the Arab Times, along with an interview I came across with a former Kuwait Airways captain, compelled me to revisit the topic. The reader, a European, wrote, 'I read your article about Kuwait Airways in The Arab Times and appreciated its insight. I especially enjoyed the story about the dead horse. Your words resonated with me as both a regular flyer and someone working in aviation. 'I wanted to share this thought - We must learn from the experiences of other Gulf Cooperation Council countries. 'Their companies generate high profits and operate with clear efficiency. I work closely with them, and all have professional CEOs and management teams with extensive airline industry experience, drawn from a range of international backgrounds. 'The truth is that few industries are as global and professionally demanding as aviation, so airline management must be global in both mindset and expertise. 'I understand this may conflict with the goals of 'Kuwaitization,' but if the government wants to stop subsidizing a loss-making national carrier, while other Gulf airlines thrive, earn billions in profits, build strong reputations, and operate from world-class airports, then the only viable solution is to place the airline in the hands of professionals who adhere strictly to sound business rules.' I replied by saying I understood his perspective, and that I had previously advised more than one Kuwait Airways CEO to seek government approval to amend the regulations that prohibit hiring highly qualified foreign experts, even temporarily, until a capable Kuwaiti CEO can be trained to take over and manage the company efficiently before the foreign expert's contract ends. This is exactly what Kuwaiti banks did, and I personally witnessed both the foreign expertise phase and the rise of national talent. In the early days, most bank leadership teams were American, British, or French. But over time, and through proper training, dozens of outstanding Kuwaiti professionals emerged, including figures like Yousef Al-Awadhi, Yousef Al-Hussaini, Abdullah Al-Sumait, Adel Al-Majed, Imad Al-Saqr, Walid Mandani, and others. I apologize to those I may have unintentionally omitted. --- On another note, I recently listened to a podcast interview with a former Kuwait Airways captain. When asked by the host about the reasons behind the national carrier's decline in performance compared to other Gulf airlines, he responded without hesitation by explaining that he had served as a pilot at Kuwait Airways for 42 years, and described the company as one filled with compassion, warmth, and generosity. He emphasized that Kuwait Airways is not a profit-driven entity, but rather a service-oriented one. As an example, he pointed to the airline's humanitarian role during emergencies and natural disasters in various countries, where Kuwaiti citizens were stranded. In such cases, Kuwait Airways stepped in to rescue and return them home free of charge. He concluded by saying that Kuwait Airways is the best airline in the Gulf and proudly noted that it maintains a spotless safety record, unlike some of its regional counterparts. The captain either forgot or chose to overlook that his remarks amounted to an implicit criticism of the reputation and safety records of other Gulf airlines. By doing so, he suggested they lacked the 'love, compassion, and generosity' that Kuwait Airways reportedly shows, including failing to rescue their stranded citizens abroad. Moreover, his comparison of Kuwait Airways' safety record with those of other Gulf carriers was flawed, as if implying negligence on their part. This comparison is unfair and unrealistic. Naturally, there will be differences in performance and safety between an airline operating 20 or 30 aircraft and those managing fleets of hundreds. Kuwait Airways is our national carrier, and we all hope it achieves the highest standards. To do so, it needs to be privatized or at least granted its board of directors greater autonomy to hire international experts to manage the airline, without unnecessary interference by the relevant minister.
