logo
5 ways to keep your business ahead of tech disruption

5 ways to keep your business ahead of tech disruption

Fast Company5 hours ago

'The best laid schemes of mice and men [often go awry],' wrote the poet Robert Burns in 1785. In other words, even our most carefully crafted plans rarely unfold as expected. Nearly two and a half centuries later, in the fast-moving age of AI, that insight feels more relevant than ever.
For entrepreneurs, staying competitive means building a business plan that can keep pace with evolving technology. After nearly two decades as CEO of a SaaS company, I've learned that planning isn't about predicting the future with perfect clarity—it's about being ready and adaptable. Here are five planning strategies that have helped me make my company more tech-responsive and allowed me to future-proof our growth.
Building flexibility into budgets
If the past few years have taught us anything, it's that change is the only constant—and that rapid change is more likely than ever, whether in technology, the economy, or global health.
To keep up in a fast-paced and largely unpredictable tech landscape, leaders need to build flexibility into their budgets. At Jotform, that means factoring in a bit of slack for experimentation and unforeseen shifts. We make space for pilot programs, internal beta testing, and regular software updates—not as an afterthought, but as a core part of our planning process. This approach enables us to pivot as needed and stay open to emerging tools or trends, like AI agents, that could give us an edge.
In a landscape defined by constant evolution, adaptability can become a competitive advantage.
Revisiting the tech stack quarterly
It's essential to regularly revisit your tech stack—the software tools, frameworks, and infrastructure that keep the wheels of your company turning. An interface or database that worked well six months ago may be completely obsolete today. What's more, I've found that you can almost always identify ways to make your workplace more efficient.
While many companies revisit their tech stack annually or biannually as a rule of thumb, for businesses operating in environments where technologies are evolving fast, I'd recommend a quarterly check-in.
Conduct your review with an automation-first mindset. With the right tools and tech, you can streamline entire processes and eliminate tedious, manual tasks, freeing up employees for work that truly matters. Nowadays, I'm investing my time and energy in researching the latest AI agents to integrate into our tech stack. These are autonomous tools that can independently carry out tasks or entire workflows. You give them the goal, and they figure out how to execute it.
Think of it as regularly tuning your engine—and you don't want to cruise, you want to race.
Creating a cross-functional tech committee
At our company, cross-functional collaboration is second nature. Since most projects span multiple departments, we've found that bringing together diverse expertise not only builds momentum, but also leads to smarter, faster decision-making. By involving key stakeholders early, we avoid costly delays and hiccups down the road.
Today, most companies need a dedicated tech committee—one that keeps a pulse on emerging technologies, evaluates the company's existing tools, and offers strategic guidance on implementation.
To make the best decisions for the business, this committee should include representatives from across the organization: developers, designers, sales, HR, finance, and beyond. A cross-functional makeup ensures that all perspectives are considered when shaping the company's tech stack.
Investing in digital upskilling
As a growing body of research shows, professionals across the board are anxious about the impact of AI on their job security. A recent survey, for example, found that 74% of IT professionals fear AI will render their skills obsolete. And yet, many companies continue to take a wait-and-see approach when it comes to AI, mistaking a fundamental shift for a fad. But as each day makes more patently clear: AI isn't going anywhere.
To stay competitive—and to ease employee concerns—companies should adopt a top-down strategy for digital upskilling. Fortunately, AI itself can be a powerful solution. AI-powered tools offer scalable, cost-effective training tailored to each employee's role, skill level, and goals.
Take those AI agents, for example: They can design personalized learning paths, identify targeted materials, and conduct Socratic-style sessions to deepen understanding. Imagine a social media manager aiming to upskill in AI-generated content. An agent can provide curated lessons, recommend practice exercises, and schedule check-ins—making it easy to integrate learning into the workday without cutting into personal time.
Monitoring adjacent industries
Finally, monitoring industries adjacent to your company is not a planning tip—it's a strategy for survival nowadays. Consider the cautionary tale of Blockbuster. By ignoring advances in technology and e-commerce, and consumers' shift toward convenience, they missed the streaming revolution. They filed for bankruptcy in 2010. Meanwhile, Netflix is crushing it in 2025.
The takeaway? Leaders who track innovation beyond their own industry are quicker to adopt the right solutions for their companies. Identify the right thought leaders, check software review sites like G2, and stay plugged into emerging tech. Your plans still might not unfold as expected, but with the right tools, you'll be able to adapt.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Want to prepare for generative AI? Get your knowledge base up to par
Want to prepare for generative AI? Get your knowledge base up to par

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Want to prepare for generative AI? Get your knowledge base up to par

This story was originally published on CX Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily CX Dive newsletter. The rise of generative AI-powered search engines and agents is poised to change how people interact with brands, from buying products to seeking customer service. The technology is still in the early days, and no one can say just how the generative AI future will pan out. However, experts encourage CX leaders to prepare for however AI models evolve by putting a proper knowledge sharing strategy in place. 'Inaction is a big risk,' Brett Leary, generative AI transformation and global retail lead at Accenture, told CX Dive. 'You do have the opportunity to do something now in terms of making sure your site is accessible to these models.' Third-party customer service is already immensely popular. Consumers say that, on average, they successfully find the answers they need through third parties like YouTube or Google 62% of the time, according to a Gartner survey of more than 5,800 people released earlier this month. Generative AI is making its mark as younger customers add AI tools to their third-party customer service mix. Gen Z, for example, uses ChatGPT as often as video sites like YouTube before they interact with customer service channels, according to Gartner's research. Consumers have interest in AI shopping agents as well, with three-quarters saying they would be open to using a trusted AI-powered personal shopper that understands their needs, according to a June Accenture survey of 18,000 people in 14 countries. Generative AI adoption is on the rise among consumers, and CX leaders have an opportunity to prepare their operations to keep up with how customers are viewing their information. Information is the lifeblood of AI tools whether they are first or third party, which makes it paramount for leaders to prepare their knowledge base with AI in mind, according to Keith McIntosh, senior principal quantitative researcher on the customer service and support team at Gartner. 'It's the common denominator, whether a customer is accessing knowledge through a third-party aggregator, gen AI third-party aggregator, or whether they're going to your site and using your company search, they need knowledge, and they need the right knowledge,' McIntosh told CX Dive. The large language models behind third-party AI tools act similarly to the web crawler bots that power traditional search engines, according to Leary. They visit brand sites and capture information that can be used to train AI models, which influences the results provided to end users. As a result, CX leaders need to think about how LLMs as well as customers will read their pages, according to Leary. One way to appeal to both people and machines is to make sure the information featured on a site is presented clearly and confidently. 'Are we answering people's questions in an authoritative type of view?' Leary said. 'These LLMs, as we're learning, are looking for that type of content to use as they go and respond to questions, and so you start to think about the impact on your content strategy.' Ensuring product and service knowledge is both comprehensive and accurate a top priority whether customers discover it on the brand website, a search engine or a generative AI assistant, according to McIntosh. 'We're encouraging organizations to make themselves the main source of truth on their products and services, and to invest in a quality knowledge management system because it's relevant regardless of where customers are getting their answers,' McIntosh said. Perhaps the biggest challenge of consumers turning to third-party AI tools is dealing with the loss of control. Individual companies have little to no control over the experience of customers who use Google or ChatGPT to seek out information. However, this may not be as big a problem as it appears. There is no correlation between the amount of effort a customer puts into solving a problem via third-party services and the satisfaction with the service provided by the company, according to Gartner's survey. Customers simply don't penalize companies for the effort they put into resolving an issue through external sites. While brands won't have complete control over what third parties do with their content, partnerships with AI providers can help companies ensure the information AI agents provide customers is accurate, according to Leary. Retailers like Target are working with OpenAI to test its Operator agentic AI, which can shop directly on behalf of customers. Such partnerships could help these companies join the upcoming AI ecosystem with the right foot forward. Content in general will be important as well, according to Leary. Brands will still control the information they put on their sites, and that is what generative AI will draw from even as it acts on behalf of customers. Leaders can't police the internet, according to Leary. As a result, their best bet is to deliver accurate content to third-party LLM providers to help ensure their output provides a good experience. 登入存取你的投資組合

Celestica vs. Flex: Which EMS Stock Has Better Growth Potential?
Celestica vs. Flex: Which EMS Stock Has Better Growth Potential?

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Celestica vs. Flex: Which EMS Stock Has Better Growth Potential?

Celestica Inc. CLS and Flex Ltd. FLEX are two leading players in the electronics manufacturing services (EMS) industry. Celestica is one of the largest EMS companies in the world, primarily serving original equipment manufacturers, cloud-based and other service providers, and business enterprises across several industries. It offers a comprehensive range of manufacturing and supply-chain solutions that support various customer requirements, from low-volume, high-complexity custom products to high-volume commodity the other hand, Singapore-based Flex offers advanced manufacturing solutions to customers through a wide array of services, including design and engineering, component services, rapid prototyping, fulfillment and circular economy solutions. The company has also expanded its service offerings in software, robotics, artificial intelligence (AI), factory automation, simulation, digital twins and other emerging domain-specific expertise in core areas, both Celestica and Flex are strategically positioned in the EMS landscape, serving similar markets such as cloud computing, automotive, healthcare and industrials. Let us delve a little deeper into the companies' competitive dynamics to understand which of the two is relatively better placed in the industry. With more than 25 years of experience in manufacturing, backed by a simplified and optimized global network, Celestica is committed to delivering next-generation, cloud-optimized data storage and industry-leading networking solutions to help customers balance performance, power efficiency and space as technologies evolve. The company had benefited from the ongoing generative AI boom, thanks to the solid demand trends for AI/ML (machine learning) compute and networking products from hyperscale is benefiting from the 800G family of network switches, which are vital for data centers that power AI applications and storage solutions like the SC6100 controller and SD6200 platform (which provide efficient and scalable data storage for AI). This transformational solution offers a foundational technology to advance AI while maintaining scalable, sustainable and profitable business models. The data center switches combined with optical transceivers have the potential to handle and sustain high volumes of both inbound and outbound network traffic and cater to the demand for data center bandwidth for supporting AI/ML and data analytics applications. These state-of-the-art products have translated into solid top-line growth in recent the company remains plagued by margin woes. Celestica's products are highly sophisticated and typically based on the latest technological innovations, which have historically led to high research and development costs. High operating expenses have contracted margins. Moreover, Celestica faces stiff competition from industry giants like Foxconn, Jabil Inc. JBL and Sanmina Corporation SANM. The highly cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry further remains an overhang, particularly in the aftermath of reciprocal tariffs. With a diverse workforce across 30 countries, Flex is well-positioned to cater to the evolving demands arising from the proliferation of the Internet of Things (IoT), autonomous/connected cars, industrial automation, augmented & virtual reality (AR/VR) and 5G technologies. The company's technology and vertical integration capabilities serve many applications, like hyperscale data centers, renewables and next-generation mobility. Strategic initiatives undertaken by the company are driving growth across multiple business fiscal 2025, Flex's cloud and data center power business expanded 50% from the prior-year period. The company continues to anticipate strong growth in the cloud and data center power business in fiscal 2026. Its innovative suite of power products and services enhances customer satisfaction. All these factors favorably position Flex for the AI-powered technology shift prevalent in the industry, from grid to chip and from the cloud to the edge. However, Flex operates in a highly competitive environment, facing competition from both domestic and international electronic manufacturers, manufacturing service providers and designers like Jabil and Sanmina. The tense geopolitical situation between the United States and China and the wars in Europe and the Middle East remain headwinds. Against the backdrop of this global uncertainty, low demand in some consumer-centric markets is negatively impacting its margins. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Celestica's 2025 sales and EPS implies year-over-year growth of 13.1% and 30.1%, respectively. The EPS estimates for 2025 have been trending northward over the past 60 days. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Flex's 2025 sales implies a year-over-year rise of 0.4%, while that of EPS suggests growth of 9.4%. The EPS estimates for 2025 have been trending northward over the past 60 days. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Over the past year, Celestica has gained 119.8% compared with the industry's growth of 51.7%. Flex has gained 36.6% over the same period. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Flex looks more attractive than Celestica from a valuation standpoint. Going by the price/earnings ratio, Flex's shares currently trade at 14.49 forward earnings, lower than 22.72 for Celestica. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research While Celestica carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), Flex has a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks Celestica and Flex expect sales and profits to improve in 2025. Celestica has shown sharp revenue and EPS growth over the years, while Flex has been facing a topsy-turvy road. Celestica boasts a better price performance, but Flex's valuation metrics appear comparatively more attractive. However, based solely on the Zacks Rank, Flex is relatively better placed than Celestica. Hence, Flex seems to be a better investment option at the moment. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Jabil, Inc. (JBL) : Free Stock Analysis Report Flex Ltd. (FLEX) : Free Stock Analysis Report Celestica, Inc. (CLS) : Free Stock Analysis Report Sanmina Corporation (SANM) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Is CoreWeave Stock Expensive After A Whopping 4x Rise?
Is CoreWeave Stock Expensive After A Whopping 4x Rise?

Forbes

time24 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Is CoreWeave Stock Expensive After A Whopping 4x Rise?

CANADA - 2025/05/23: In this photo illustration, the CoreWeave (Core Weave) logo is seen displayed ... More on a smartphone screen. (Photo Illustration by Thomas Fuller/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images) You've likely seen some extreme fluctuations in the stock markets recently. However, few have been as striking as CoreWeave's (NASDAQ: CRWV) path since its IPO in late March. The cloud computing company's stock has dramatically surged, soaring from $40 to $147 – a remarkable 3.6x return in just a few months. So what's fueling this astronomical rise, and more importantly, is it sustainable? We'll explore these questions. But, if you're looking for potential profits with reduced volatility, the High Quality portfolio has significantly outperformed the S&P 500, yielding over 91% returns since its inception. Separately, check out – Will Adobe Stock See Higher Levels? CoreWeave is not your average cloud provider. While Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure provide a broad range of computing services, CoreWeave concentrates specifically on high-performance GPU-accelerated infrastructure tailored for AI and machine learning workloads. Consider them as the equipment rental service in a scenario where everyone suddenly requires advanced, specialized machinery without wanting to purchase it outright. Do they have clients? Microsoft, their largest customer, accounts for over 60% of their revenue. For organizations embarking on AI development, it makes complete sense to rent CoreWeave's computing capabilities instead of committing tremendous capital expenditures for their own GPU farms or opting for a hybrid approach between purchasing and leasing. Why purchase when renting is an option, especially as technology evolves so quickly? However, it's the numbers that make things intriguing—and somewhat concerning. CoreWeave operates 250,000 NVIDIA GPUs across 32 data centers. That sounds impressive until you find out that Microsoft allegedly owns 485,000 GPUs, and Meta is projected to have a staggering 1.3 million by year-end. CoreWeave is competing at high levels, but they're still a relatively small player. The demand is so overwhelming that CoreWeave is aggressively expanding, resulting in significant debt levels. But here's a crucial point: NVIDIA owns 7% of CoreWeave and maintains a solid partnership with them. The growth metrics are nearly unbelievable. CoreWeave's revenue soared by 12,000% – increasing from just $16 million in 2022 to $1.9 billion in 2024. The forecasts are astounding: $5 billion anticipated in 2025, with $12 billion predicted for the following year. This kind of expansion accounts for why investors are ready to pay 25 times the trailing twelve-month revenue for the stock. Yet interestingly, the average analyst price target is about half of the current market price, indicating that even the experts believe things might be getting somewhat overheated. Having Microsoft constitute 60% of your revenue is both a boon and a prospective drawback. If Microsoft chose to decrease its dependence on CoreWeave tomorrow, it could pose a serious issue. However, here's the critical question – in today's AI-driven market, would CoreWeave genuinely struggle to attract other clients? The demand for AI infrastructure is skyrocketing across sectors. From startups crafting the next ChatGPT competitor to established enterprises incorporating AI into their operations, everyone requires computing power. The more significant question may be whether CoreWeave can scale quickly enough to satisfy demand, rather than if demand exists in the short term. Indeed, aggressive growth comes with sacrifices. CoreWeave is depleting cash with a net income margin of -39%. They're prioritizing expansion over profits, wagering that gaining market share today will lead to profits tomorrow. It's a high-stakes endeavor that demands solid determination and substantial financial resources. The elevated debt required for acquiring more GPUs adds another layer of complexity. Yet if the revenue forecasts are accurate, this debt should become more manageable over time. In summary, CoreWeave is an intriguing example of timing and specialization. They've positioned themselves impeccably for the AI surge, but they're also wagering heavily that this boom will persist. The stock's sharp ascent mirrors both the potential and the risks embedded in this strategy. For investors, the concern isn't whether AI infrastructure is critical – it undoubtedly is. The concern is whether CoreWeave can preserve its growth trajectory while navigating its risks, especially regarding client concentration and debt levels. And perhaps most crucially, whether the current valuation provides any margin for the inevitable bumps along the road. One thing's for certain: CoreWeave's narrative is far from concluded, and it's set to be an intriguing journey for anyone daring enough to strap in at the present lofty valuations. Now, taming valuation contextually is just one of the many methods we utilize while constructing the Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio which, with a collection of 30 stocks, has a proven track record of comfortably outperforming the S&P 500 over the last 4-year period. Why is that? As a group, HQ Portfolio stocks delivered superior returns with less risk compared to the benchmark index; less of a roller-coaster experience, as evident in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store