Federal grand jury indicts man accused of killing former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman
MINNEAPOLIS — A federal grand jury indicted a Minnesota man Tuesday on charges that he fatally shot a prominent Minnesota state representative and her husband and seriously wounded a state senator and his wife while he was allegedly disguised as a police officer.
The indictment handed up lists murder, stalking and firearms charges against Vance Boelter. The murder counts in the deaths of former Democratic House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, could carry the federal death penalty.
The chief federal prosecutor for Minnesota has called the killings a political assassination.
Prosecutors initially charged Boelter in a complaint with six counts, including murder, stalking and firearms offenses. But under federal court rules they needed a grand jury indictment to take the case to trial.
Prosecutors say Boelter, 57, was driving a fake squad car, wearing a realistic rubber mask that covered his head and wearing tactical gear around 2 a.m. on June 14 when he went to the home of Sen. John Hoffman, a Democrat, and his wife, Yvette, in the Minneapolis suburb of Champlin. He allegedly shot the senator nine times, and Yvette Hoffman eight times, but they survived.
Prosecutors allege he then stopped at the homes of two other lawmakers. One, in Maple Grove, wasn't home while a police officer may have scared him off from the second, in New Hope. Boelter then allegedly went to the Hortmans' home in nearby Brooklyn Park and killed both of them. Their dog was so gravely injured that he had to be euthanized.
Brooklyn Park police, who had been alerted to the shootings of the Hoffmans, arrived at the Hortman home around 3:30 a.m., moments before the gunman opened fire on the couple, the complaint said. Boelter allegedly fled and left behind his car, which contained notebooks listing dozens of Democratic officials as potential targets with their home addresses, as well as five guns and a large quantity of ammunition.
Law enforcement officers finally captured Boelter about 40 hours later, about a mile (1.6 kilometres) from his rural home in Green Isle, after what authorities called the largest search for a suspect in Minnesota history.
Sen. Hoffman is out of the hospital and is now at a rehabilitation facility, his family announced last week, adding he has a long road to recovery. Yvette Hoffman was released a few days after the attack. Former President Joe Biden visited the senator in the hospital when he was in town for the Hortmans' funeral.
Friends have described Boelter as an evangelical Christian with politically conservative views who had been struggling to find work. At a hearing July 3, Boelter said he was 'looking forward to the facts about the 14th coming out.'
In an interview published by the New York Post on Saturday, Boelter insisted the shootings had nothing to do with his opposition to abortion or his support for President Donald Trump, but he declined to discuss why he allegedly killed the Hortmans and wounded the Hoffmans.
'You are fishing and I can't talk about my case…I'll say it didn't involve either the Trump stuff or pro life,' Boelter wrote in a message to the newspaper via the jail's messaging system.
It ultimately will be up to Attorney General Pam Bondi, in consultation with the local U.S. attorney's office, to decide whether to seek the federal death penalty. Minnesota abolished its state death penalty in 1911. But the Trump administration says it intends to be aggressive in seeking capital punishment for eligible federal crimes.
Boelter also faces state murder and attempted murder charges in Hennepin County, but the federal case will go first.
Biden and former Vice President Kamala Harris joined mourners at the Hortmans' funeral June 28. Gov. Tim Walz, Harris's running mate on the 2024 Democratic presidential ticket, eulogized Melissa Hortman as 'the most consequential speaker in Minnesota history.'
Hortman led the House from 2019 until January and was a driving force as Democrats passed an ambitious list of liberal priorities in 2023. She yielded the speakership to a Republican in a power-sharing deal after the November elections left the House tied, and she took the title speaker emerita.
Steve Karnowski, The Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
3 hours ago
- National Post
Adam Pankratz: Roberts and McAfee are right — no one cares what sports personalities think about politics
Major League Baseball rolled into Atlanta, Ga., this past week for the playing of the 2025 All-Star Game. Amid the usual fanfare that accompanies the game and the Home Run Derby, there was a slightly awkward moment on Media Day when ESPN personality Pat McAfee was asked by a reporter why the game was in Atlanta at all, after it had been pulled from the city in 2021 due to voter suppression laws that president Joe Biden had described as 'Jim Crow in the 21st century.' Further adding to the awkward nature of the question was the fact that Dave Roberts, the National League manager for the game, had said in 2021 that he might boycott the game if it remained in Atlanta. Article content Article content Neither McAfee nor Roberts wanted to answer the question this year however, with McAfee's initial reply being, 'I don't know if any of us are the experts or the ones that should be giving the answers on that.' Roberts followed with, 'I'm not a politician … but right now I really choose to just focus on the players and the game …' Article content Article content How times have changed since 2021, and probably for the better. It would be a positive step if the incident reminded us that not everything has to be about politics and, in general, we should not expect in-depth and expert social commentary from sports personalities on all that ails society. Article content It is indeed a curious thing that we even look to a baseball manager or a sports reporter for their views on newly implemented state voting laws. Consider the reverse: asking a politician to explain the infield fly rule or what pitch to throw a batter in a 2-2 count with a man on second and two outs when the last pitch you threw was a cutter. It would be theatre of the most absurd kind. 'I don't know,' would a refreshing answer, although most politicians would likely take a blind stab at it for fear of being caught out for not knowing everything. Article content Article content For this reason, McAfee and Roberts deserve a certain kind of credit for their avoidance of the question. While it is easy to be cynical and say they simply toed the company line (they probably did, by the way), McAfee's assertion that 'I don't know if any of us are the experts …' is nonetheless a refreshingly honest admission that he and his fellow sports experts wouldn't have any idea what they were talking about if they began discussing Georgia's voting laws. Society would be better off if more people could boldly make that statement. Article content Article content Article content In our world today, self-identifying as a non-expert is rare. Rarer still is saying you don't have a political opinion on any given issue. Much of this is likely due to our ability to access second-hand information online or via social media. If someone is not an expert, they can likely find enough information to form a strongly held opinion by quickly brushing up on a few facts for their five minutes in the spotlight, when their true grasp of an issue is actually rather tenuous. Kudos to McAfee and Roberts for not doing that.
CBC
5 hours ago
- CBC
Digital contracts are the norm today. Is there still power in a written signature?
Some of the most powerful people in the world can be recognized by their signatures. Prime Minister Mark Carney's signature adorns Canadian currency, from his time as head of the Bank of Canada. And U.S. President Donald Trump regularly displays his oversized, sloping signature for the cameras with each new executive order. But these days, it's far more common for most of us to sign our names on a touch screen, or to simply click a box on an online form, than to sign your name with a pen on paper. Author Christine Rosen isn't happy about it. "We're actively choosing to go back to a way of life where a mark is the same as a signature. So it's a devolution in terms of our skills as human beings," she told The Sunday Magazine's Peter Mitton. Rosen's book The Extinction of Experience looks at how the onslaught of digital life is hollowing out real-life experiences, like the act of physically signing your name. "I fear that our willingness to suspend that small, everyday action is sort of symbolic of some of the other important things we've discarded in our haste to embrace digitally mediated forms of communication," she said. Despite their relative rarity in most people's lives today — and the legal ambiguity that came with the introduction of electronic signatures — written signatures still carry power as a personal artistic expression, whether you've carefully designed your own or paid a professional to do it for you. E-signatures around for decades E-signatures are just over 25 years old in the U.S. In June 2000, then-U.S. president Bill Clinton signed the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act into law. The act allowed for electronic records, including digital versions of a signature, to be used for business transactions that earlier required a person's written signature for validation. In Canada, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, which became law in April 2000, outlines the use of e-signatures. Provinces and territories have followed suit with similar legislation. John Gregory, a retired lawyer in Toronto, says when Clinton signed that bill, some worried that the signature's "ceremonial function" might lose some of its power. "It makes you take it seriously. Oh, jeez, I'm signing this. This is important. I should know what I'm doing. Do I really agree to this?" said Gregory, who previously worked in the U.S. on developing government policies around what happens legally when paper trails become increasingly digital. While personal opinions on an e-signature's weight may vary, the law has since moved on. Gregory pointed to a 2017 case in Saskatchewan where a man who injured himself in a go-kart crash said a digital waiver he signed by checking a box shouldn't absolve the company who owned the track of any liability. The court ruled that, in fact, that check was as valid as a pen-and-paper signature. And, in 2024, Saskatchewan's Court of King's Bench upheld a decision that a thumbs-up emoji was confirmation of a contract between two agricultural companies. One of the companies involved asked the Supreme Court of Canada to rule on that decision; it's unclear if the Court will do so. Do young people care about signatures? Filomena Cozzolino, 27, styled her signature after her paternal grandmother, with whom she shares her name. "When I was maybe 12 or 13, I found one of her IDs and I wanted to try to copy her signature," said the publishing and creative writing student at Sheridan College in Mississauga, Ont. "Not only do we share a name, but we can share our signatures, since she's no longer here to share hers anymore." Some of her classmates had a more business-like approach to them. "I have very messy handwriting, actually, because I'm left-handed. So everything smudges and ... once I learned cursive, just went with the flow," said Mikayla Nicholls, 28. Zainab Bakjsh, 24, writes her signature in Arabic, which she says looks better and is easier to write than when she does it in English. But beyond that, she's not given it much thought. "It's just a signature. When I need to do something at the bank, or like renewing my health card, is probably the only time that I sign," she said. Boutique signature craft While the age of correspondence via fountain pen on parchment may be long gone, there's still a niche of people interested in using signatures as a personal flourish — and even a market if you're looking for a professional to craft one for you. "I believe that your signature is literally your face. I mean, regardless of your profession, you can impress people around you with this beautiful signature," said Elena Jovanovic, head calligrapher at Florida-based MySign Studio. The business crafts custom signatures for patrons, offering options in multiple script styles. Their calligraphers will then teach you how to draw them on your own. But it'll cost you, with services ranging from $100 to $200 US. "Many people around the world create their first signature during their teenage years and continue to use it throughout their lives. Typically, these signatures lack creativity and elegance," Jovanovic said. Sometimes patrons request certain artistic effects, such as adding a lion or butterfly to the signature. Other requests are more esoteric. Jovanovic recalled one customer who asked that they customize his signature by introducing a four-letter profanity into his surname — presumably only for the signature, and not as part of a legal name change. "And I was like, why not?" she said.
CBC
5 hours ago
- CBC
Trump is slashing public radio funding. Here's why it will hit rural communities hardest
Every morning, Gwen Johnson, a resident of the small Appalachian community of Jackhorn, Ky., wakes up to the voices and sounds of her favourite public radio station. Johnson, 67, listens to FM over breakfast as she gets ready for work, while driving in her car and throughout the day. "Through the highs and lows of my life, it's always been a real comfort to me — when you can just flip on the radio and maybe get a human voice," said the non-profit professional and former radio programmer. "It's really added a lot of happiness in dark times." Johnson's preferences are mountain community radio station WMMT 88.7 and NPR affiliate WEKU. But now, they're among the stations set to lose crucial financial support as the administration of President Donald Trump rescinds congressional funding to public media. Trump argues the cuts will save the U.S. government billions of dollars a year in wasteful spending. The rollback, however, will have a serious impact on rural communities, where public radio is a disseminator of news and entertainment, and a lifeline during public emergencies and natural disasters, according to residents, media interests and others who spoke to CBC News. Johnson thinks public spending probably needs to be "reined in" in certain areas. "But this is an area that has been very troublesome," she said. "I am greatly concerned." She added she's worried about whether this move infringes on freedom of speech and freedom of the press. "I feel like one of our freedoms, our First Amendment rights, is being upheld with the radio station." 'It's pretty overwhelming' Federal funding to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) is part of the $9.1 million US worth of cuts outlined in the Rescissions Act, which rescinds congressionally approved funding allocated to public broadcasters and foreign aid. Congress approved the cuts on Friday morning, sending the package to Trump's desk for his final signature. The CPB, a private corporation, disseminates some $1.1 billion to NPR, PBS, and local TV and radio stations across the country every year, with the bulk of its operating budget set aside for direct grants to local public radio stations. Senator Mike Rounds said last week that he had secured a carve-out for more than a dozen Native American radio stations in which they'd receive funding from the Interior Department. But it's unclear if that has been approved or how much it would help. Already, some community radio stations are looking at different funding models and revenue streams to offset the blow of the cuts. One of them is the aforementioned Kentucky station, WMMT 88.7. Based in the heart of coal country, it has operated for nearly 40 years. Outside Kentucky, its signal stretches into Virginia, West Virginia, parts of East Tennessee and a bit of Southeast Ohio, reaching 18,000 people weekly, according to the station's Nielsen survey data. "It's hard to imagine," said Roger May, director of artistic programs at Appalshop, an independent Appalachian media company. WMMT is its flagship radio station. "I mean, I'm looking at it through the lens of our community radio station, and when I pull back and try to imagine what that's like for all the other stations, it's pretty overwhelming." About a third of the station's funding comes from the CPB, and a clawback on that money would drastically impact its operations over the next two fiscal years, according to May. It currently has one full-time employee and relies on a network of local disc jockeys to run its programming. The station's development team is looking for ways to source the money from elsewhere. It has long received support from within the community — some small businesses, including a bakery that Johnson manages, serve as underwriters for the station. "It isn't a political issue. It's a community service issue, one that everyone is going to be impacted by who relies on community radio stations and public radio in the country," said May. "We're just one example of many in the country of rural spaces that really do rely on something as simple sounding as community radio. It really is a vital key in how we share information." An emergency service When widespread flash flooding hit eastern Kentucky three years ago, WMMT — after being briefly knocked offline — became a vehicle for disseminating public service announcements, news and "a slice of normality" as people recovered from the disaster, said May. When Hurricane Helene made landfall in the U.S. last year, devastating parts of North Carolina, another community radio station shared a constant stream of updates and emergency guidance from the government. "We hear stories upon stories of people telling us, 'OK, well, we got a crank radio or we had a crank radio, and we knew you'd be on,'" said Ele Ellis, CEO and general manager at Blue Ridge Public Radio in Asheville, N.C. Some would crank up the volume and put the radio on a mailbox, and neighbours would gather to listen, as the story goes, while the station reported on water distribution sites — Asheville's water system had shut down. "That's what they had to do to get information that was going to help them live," said Ellis. Blue Ridge covers more than a dozen counties in the western part of the state, reaching about 90,000 listeners on a weekly basis. "We hit every valley and every mountain in this 14-county area. So there are people that wouldn't get any other public radio if they didn't have us," she said. The station stands to lose about six per cent of its budget, or $330,000 a year, because of the cuts. That could lead to job losses or taking down signals in communities where it's more expensive to keep signal towers operating, said Ellis. The U.S. uses an emergency alert system that blares out over the radio's AM and FM channels, overriding other programming to deliver crucial information during a national emergency. But the integrity of that system is at risk without public funding, critics of the Rescissions Act have argued. "If there's a tornado watch, tornado warning, a flood watch, a flood warning, a blizzard, anything Mother Nature could dole out — people can know it's coming," said Ellis. That would change without the funding, and if people don't notice a change right away, they might not understand the role that public radio plays in a community, she added. "But they don't think about what happens in eight months, when one of our towers fails for some fairly fixable reason, that we're going to have to make a decision about whether we want to spend money on that tower." Trump's battle with public media In May, Trump signed a separate executive order calling on the CPB to cease funding to NPR and PBS, though the organization has argued it's not a federal agency subject to Trump's authority. The president has also frequently criticized NPR and PBS for what he characterizes as left-wing bias, framing funding cuts as an end to " taxpayer subsidization of biased media." The leaders of both organizations testified before a House oversight committee in March in response to the allegations of ideological bias. NPR's CEO has argued the cuts would be a risk to public safety, and Rep. Lisa Murkowski — one of two House Republicans to vote against the Rescissions Act — argued that public broadcasting saves lives. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt disagreed, saying, "I am not sure how NPR helps the public safety of our country, but I do know that NPR, unfortunately, has become really just a propaganda voice for the left." Public radio plays a vital role in the small communities where these cuts would hit hardest, both on a daily basis and in emergency scenarios, said Laura Lee, a former NPR producer and editorial director of NC Local, a statewide media organization in North Carolina. "We're talking about communities where local news outlets have shuttered, where there's not access to quality, vetted, independent news and information that people need about their school board, about their city council, about the agriculture industry in their communities." While a 2023 Pew research paper showed public radio audiences had been steadily declining in the years prior, it found that a fifth of U.S. adults get local news from the radio. "The word 'news' has even gotten somewhat politicized, but people need information and these outlets are very consciously conduits of that information for people," Lee added, noting many journalists and editors who report on these communities also live in them and understand their needs. "The Trump administration has been vocal in their explicit criticism of the media, and I've watched as local journalists have sort of set that aside and continued about the business of getting the community the information that they need. And so, I'm heartened by that diligence."
