I put an iPhone, Samsung Galaxy and Google Pixel through a 6-round AI assistant face-off — and here's the winner
With Apple, Samsung and Google all heavily promoting their latest phones with the enhanced intelligence of their AI tools, it's had us questioning who has the most capable digital assistant as we hit the halfway point of 2025. Is the reinvented Siri and Apple Intelligence powerful enough to take on Google and Gemini? And where does Samsung's blend of Gemini and its proprietary Galaxy AI tools fit into all of this?
That's what the following comparisons hope to answer. Using the same prompts, covering a number of common actions you may want to do on a daily basis, we'll show you which phone and which AI assistant does the best job of automating things and hopefully making your life easier.
A simple prompt to start with: make a reminder so I don't forget to grab some groceries later on. It's something digital assistants were capable of even before generative AI came in, so we shouldn't see any of the phones struggle here.
To nobody's surprise, the iPhone, Galaxy and Pixel are all able to do this easily. There are however some interesting limitations to note. For instance, Siri was only able to place the reminder in Apple's own Reminders app, not my usual TickTick app, nor Google Keep, nor even Apple Notes. Not a problem per se, but unfortunate if you were hoping to make Siri work with non-Apple apps.
Gemini on the Pixel set up the reminder in Google Tasks, an app which any Google Account owner can use, but one which I didn't have downloaded on my phone. Tapping the reminder after setting it opens Tasks in a Chrome tab, which would be a fair compromise if Gemini had then actually set up a task as commanded. So make sure you download the apps you need before trying to get Gemini to take care of important reminders for you.
It's a similar story on the Galaxy, except you can ask Gemini to place the reminder in either Google Tasks or Samsung Reminder. It can even transfer tasks between the two, albeit slightly clunkily by deleting one and recreating the same text and alert time in the other.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Fortunately, unlike the Pixel, Samsung Reminder is automatically installed on the Galaxy S25 Ultra, meaning no weird Chrome shenanigans like on the Pixel.
Winner: Galaxy S25 Ultra
A good AI assistant should be able to accurately identify things on-screen or through your camera lens. So I opened up an image of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge on each phone, and then asked what device I was looking at.
On the Galaxy and Pixel, the optimal way to do this is to call up Circle to Search and draw around the item you're interested in. And sure enough, with a tap and a swirl of your finger, Circle to Search was able to ID the phone, providing some basic detail and lots of matching images.
I did try to use Gemini and a screenshot on the Samsung to ID the phone as well. This didn't go well, with the chatbot declaring the phone was in fact a flash drive.
Siri needed to tag in ChatGPT to find an answer to my question. This is normally effective, but relying on an alternative service when you could simply have opened up ChatGPT yourself is a bit of a cop-out. But unfortunately for the iPhone, the short response and limited context of the image lead Siri to tell me it's a different Samsung phone.
Winner: Galaxy S25 Ultra/Pixel 9 Pro XL
Knowing oneself is perhaps the hardest thing, including for smartphone assistants. So we checked which of our testing phones could tell us how to change the brightness of the device's screen, or even take care of it for us.
The only one that was able to complete the task in full was, surprisingly, the iPhone. While it doesn't come across in the screengrab, my brightness was on about 50% before asking, and 75% afterwards, with Siri also popping up a slider so I could adjust things more precisely myself.
The Galaxy and the Pixel both gave the same response — that Gemini couldn't help me directly, but could provide a link to the relevant Settings page. That's still pretty useful, especially if you wanted full manual control over the brightness, but it's not as full a response as Siri could give.Winner: iPhone 16 Pro Max
It's only natural to change your mind sometimes, so I wanted to see how well our candidates would adapt to a command with an update midway through, specifically one about setting a timer. Everyone misreads the cooking time in recipes sometimes.
Siri and the Gemini twins both took this in their stride when I updated my request partway through making it. So as an additional test, I tried to see what would happen if I wanted to modify a timer.
This showed some interesting differences in capabilities. On the iPhone, Siri deleted the one-hour timer and then started a 30-minute one instead.
The Galaxy phone produced an error, perhaps because Gemini doesn't have the means to make a change like this in Samsung's Clock app, only the Google-made one. This seems likely since the Pixel was able to complete the same request in full, updating the one-hour timer so that it still had its original name while running for a different length of time. You could consider this a draw for Apple and Google or a win for the Pixel depending on which outcome you personally prefer for overwriting timers. But either way, Samsung loses here.
Winner: Google Pixel 9 Pro/iPhone 16 Pro Max
As we reach the end of our comparisons, it's time to see how Apple Intelligence, Galaxy AI and Gemini handle multi-part requests. This is a recently advertised addition to Gemini's capabilities, and could be a powerful time-saver if it works properly.
This two-action prompt should give me the date of the next Crystal Palace soccer game (against Liverpool in August at the start of the next Premier League season) and add that to my calendar, ideally my Google one since I use that more, but I would have accepted an Apple Calendar invitation as a compromise from the iPhone.
Unfortunately for the iPhone, it failed to recognise that I'm asking it to add a calendar event, not asking about one I already have. When I split the prompt into two, Siri offered up a link to Google Search results, which didn't directly tell me the date of the match, or to a ChatGPT response, which offered me the date of Palace's last game, not the next one. Disappointing all around.
This works flawlessly on the Galaxy S25 Ultra and Pixel 9 Pro XL, thank to Gemini's Cross-App Actions capability. Both parse the command in one go, reading out the date to me and setting up a Google Calendar event.
Winner: Galaxy S25 Ultra/Pixel 9 Pro XL
I've saved the most complicated task for last, one that requires finding and passing information between at least three different apps. This took a couple of tries for all three phones, and none of them did exactly as I asked. But in the end, there was a clear winner.
The iPhone only offered a ChatGPT response to the question. With the help of the third-party AI, Siri was the only assistant to ask what kind of gluten-free meal I wanted (I picked dinner to match the others). It then provided a transcribed recipe and method, but admitted it couldn't make a note or message with this information. It also didn't provide a link to the source of the recipe, which is a rough deal for whoever came up with it, but an unfortunately consistent problem with all AI chatbots.
The Pixel initially only tried to send a link to my work number, rather than creating a note as well. When I asked it to add a Google Keep note before sending the message, it was not able to do so. Breaking the tasks down into two separate prompts eventually got me the required result.
It was the Samsung that got the closest, setting up a Google Keep note (after asking if I wanted a Keep or Samsung Notes note) and a message to my work number with a recipe link. My only complaint was that the link that Gemini used in this instance was to the Gemini conversation, rather than to the website itself. The message link was to the actual recipe, which is more important for sharing purposes.
Winner: Galaxy S25 Ultra
I began my testing assuming that Siri was going to come in dead last in this comparison, with Samsung and Google, both using the same underlying Gemini chatbot, would be joint winners. But as we've found, things are more complicated.
Siri is not great at dealing with multi-part commands, and is obviously still tied firmly into Apple's app ecosystem. However, it was just as competent at understanding my more complicated queries as Gemini was on the other two phones, even if it couldn't always deliver or had to run to ChatGPT for help.
Gemini, be it on a Pixel or a Galaxy, is definitely the better AI assistant, with the Galaxy version perhaps slightly better overall due to it offering support for Samsung apps as well as Google ones. It also seemed to understand my multi-part queries better too, although that could be down to luck of the draw with the way Gemini happened to understand my queries at a given moment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
26 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
One UI 8 could make setting your Samsung Galaxy phone up much simpler — here's how
Usually, setting up a new phone is a pretty straightforward process, but even the best Samsung phones still have one annoying tendency when it comes to picking navigation preferences. However, that could soon change with One UI 8. In a recent report, SammyGuru discovered evidence that future releases of One UI 8 could allow users to choose between gesture and button navigation options while setting up the phone. This would give users the freedom to choose alongside the rest of set-up, rather than Samsung defaulting to the three-button option in the current version. This forces users to go into the display settings to change to gestures themselves if they wish to do so. Not only would this make setting up the phone less of a hassle, but it would also make it much easier when migrating from another brand. Currently, Samsung is one of the few brands that don't offer this option at the start, with most Android phones offering users the choice at the start. One UI 8 is in an interesting place, as most Samsung phones only have access to the beta. However, both the Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 are now on sale with the new OS pre-installed. As such, we have a good idea of what most phones can expect when the stable version launches, which is a focus on improving the overall quality of life for Samsung users over big new features. Part of that involves noticeable improvements to features introduced in One UI 7, including changes to how useful the Now Bar is, thanks to the addition of live call handling and do-not-disturb functions to the Bar. However, not every feature we've heard of has appeared yet. For instance, there are rumors that Samsung is bringing a major improvement for Live Captions that will allow it to translate speech, matching what is available on rival devices, like Google's Pixel 9 Pro with its Live Translate feature. If you don't have one of the most recent Samsung foldables then you can download the One UI 8 beta to test many of these new features if you have a recent flagship or mid-priced Galaxy phone and live in the U.S. or U.K. Alternatively, the stable release is expected around September 2025. If you do plan on trying the beta, we'd recommend backing up your Samsung phone, as there can be issues when trying to run certain apps. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Fast Company
26 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Cloudflare vs. Perplexity: a web scraping war with big implications for AI
When the web was established several decades ago, it was built on a number of principles. Among them was a key, overarching standard dubbed 'netiquette': Do unto others as you'd want done unto you. It's a principle that lived on through other companies, including Google, whose motto for a period was ' Don't be evil.' The fundamental idea was simple: Act ethically and morally. If someone asked you to stop doing something, you stopped—or at least considered it. But Cloudflare, an IT company that protects millions of websites from hostile internet attacks, has published an eye-opening exposé suggesting that one of the leading AI tools today isn't following that principle. Cloudflare claims Perplexity, an AI-powered ' answer engine,' is overriding website requests not to crawl their content by spoofing its identity to hide that the requests are coming from an AI company. Cloudflare launched its investigation after receiving complaints from customers that Perplexity was ignoring directives in files, which are used by websites to signal whether they want their content indexed by search engines or AI crawlers. Perplexity's alleged behavior highlights what happens when the web shifts from being rooted in voluntary agreements to a more hard-nosed business environment, where commercial goals overrule moral considerations. 'The code of honor around crawling and files is a charming remnant from when the web was collaborative and based on community standards,' says Eerke Boiten, a cybersecurity researcher at De Montfort University in the U.K. Cloudflare's position as a market leader in web protection means that, for now at least, it's still possible to preserve some remnants of that morality, Boiten says. Boiten believes the sense of ethical cooperation online is fading fast, noting that many large AI companies show little regard for where or how they obtain their training data, often operating in murky ethical territory. While he sees OpenAI as generally respectful of the established norms, he's far less optimistic about others. 'Perplexity trying to scrape their way around any defenses feels like it will be the norm rather than the exception,' he says. Perplexity's alleged conduct stands out as particularly bold, especially given that the company is already facing a lawsuit over unauthorized content scraping. Dow Jones Company—the parent of the Wall Street Journal and New York Post — filed a lawsuit in October 2024, alleging that Perplexity 'copies on a massive scale' their content. (The case is ongoing.) The BBC also sent a letter in June to Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas, threatening legal action for scraping its content without permission unless the company stops and either compensates for the data already accessed or deletes it entirely. Perplexity told the Financial Times that the BBC's case was 'manipulative and opportunistic' and reflected a 'fundamental misunderstanding' of copyright law. Perplexity did not respond to Fast Company 's request for comment on this story. But Boiten, for his part, anticipates an escalating arms race between those trying to protect online content from AI-driven web scraping and the companies attempting to do just that to improve their models. 'Cloudflare applying machine learning to spot Perplexity's patterns, and acknowledging that publication of all this likely means Perplexity will come up with new decoys,' he says. Cornell Law professor James Grimmelmann says the legal limits of scraping content without permission—or bypassing files—remain unclear, but Cloudflare's findings could expose Perplexity to more lawsuits. 'There is a loose judicial consensus that it is okay to scrape sites when their files allow it,' says Grimmelmann, 'but Perplexity seems determined to fuck around and find out whether the reverse is true.'
TechCrunch
26 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Google's NotebookLM is now available to younger users as competition in the AI education space intensifies
Google's AI note-taking app is now open to younger users, having previously been limited to users 18 and older. The tech giant announced that NotebookLM is available to Google Workspace for Education users of any age and for consumers ages 13 and up. The removal of age restrictions is intended to provide younger students with access to the AI research tool, allowing them to better understand their class materials. Now, students can access features such as the ability to convert notes into podcast-like Audio Overviews, visually summarize ideas with interactive Mind Maps, and more. NotebookLM recently released Video Overviews to let users turn notes, PDFs, and images into visual presentations. This expansion comes amid increasing concerns about the use of AI in education regarding data privacy and potential misuse. Google says that NotebookLM enforces stricter content policies for users under 18 to prevent inappropriate responses, and user chats and uploads are not reviewed by humans or used for AI training. The availability of NotebookLM for younger users follows OpenAI's introduction of a study mode for ChatGPT, indicating that companies are ramping up competition in the AI education sector.
