Mashatile calls for increased Chinese investment as trade deficit with China surges
Banele Ginidza
Deputy President Paul Mashatile has issued a compelling invitation to Chinese corporations, advocating for increased investment in South Africa.
Speaking at the South Africa-China Investment Forum in Beijing on Thursday, Mashatile highlighted a significant shift in the trade dynamics between the two nations, revealing that the trade deficit with China has escalated dramatically from less than $1 billion in the period between 1988 and 2000 to an alarming $9.71bn by 2023.
Mashatile said ddressing these challenges necessitated expanding South Africa's export portfolio, encouraging value-added exports, and establishing a more balanced trade relationship.
"We need to develop a more coordinated and strategic approach. We need to address challenges such as access to the Chinese market due to factors like tariff and non-tariff barriers, distance, and competition from other countries," Mashatile said.
The essence of this trade imbalance, as Mashatile pointed out, stems from the current nature of the economic relationship where South Africa primarily exports raw materials and minerals while predominantly importing manufactured and capital goods from China.
This disparity has raised concerns regarding the sustainability of such a model, particularly as both South Africa and China navigate increasing tariff barriers imposed by the United States.
"As South Africa-China relations continue to deepen, new opportunities emerge for Chinese businesses seeking to enter the South African market, particularly in sectors such as renewable energy, green hydrogen, energy storage, infrastructure and logistics, our Special Economic Zones (SEZs), pharmaceuticals and medical devices, and the beneficiation of critical minerals, as well as in the digital economy," he said.
Mashatile said South Africa sought to attract investments to increase greenfield investments, infrastructure investments, unlock funding or financial support, partnerships with SOEs, technology transfer and innovation partnerships, investments in SEZs and industrial parks, black industrialist partnerships, as well as capacity and technical assistance for SEZs.
"Our SEZs offer an internationally competitive value proposition for the country with an attractive suite of incentives," Mashatile said.
"They are located across the country, and each SEZ has unique offerings for investors, some of which could include tax relief, reduced corporate rate taxes and reduced costs for key inputs such as land, water and electricity."
Mashatile highlighted the infrastructure investment plan as being in place to drive a range of projects in energy, water and sanitation, transport, digital infrastructure, human settlements, and agriculture and agro-processing.
"The plan is supported by an Infrastructure Fund, offering investment opportunities in water development and irrigation projects across nine provinces, a road network expansion, a rehabilitation and maintenance program for construction companies, and high-demand spectrum," he said.
Mashatile said South Africa's mineral exports, agricultural commodities, and manufactured items have achieved significant penetration in the Chinese market, aided by a steady flow of investment from Chinese companies since the announcement of President Cyril Ramaphosa's investment mobilisation drive.
He said some of the existing partnerships included a major significant investment by the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC), which purchased a 20% stake in the assets and earnings of Standard Bank for $5.5bn.
Another major Chinese electronics manufacturer, Hi-Sense, entered the South African market in 1997. In 2013, the company established an industrial park.
Mashatile cited other Chinese flagship companies such as Zhong Xing Communications (ZTE) and Huawei Technologies that were also expanding their presence in South Africa.
"Over the last decade, 48 Chinese companies invested in South Africa with a capital investment of over $11.69bn," he said.
BUSINESS REPORT
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
FSCA cleared to go global and pursue R50m fine for Viceroy over Capitec report
Following a high court ruling, South Africa's market cop has grown a new set of teeth that can pierce across borders. In a landmark ruling on 9 July, the Pretoria High Court handed the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) a powerful new weapon: the ability to fine foreign entities that mess with South Africa's markets, even if they've never set foot in the country. The FSCA said that it considers this a significant legal victory and believes that it is an 'essential part of protection of the public in an interconnected, digital global financial environment'. For the likes of Viceroy Research, which became a household name in 2018 after detonating a bomb under Capitec with a dodgy research report, the rules of the game have changed. The next time a hedge fund hit squad fancies nuking a JSE-listed stock with dubious 'research', they might want to budget for a fight in a South African court. How to burn R9.3-billion before lunch In January 2018, Viceroy lit a match in the form of a report titled Capitec: A wolf in sheep's clothing. The report accused the bank of 'predatory lending practices', pushing clients into debt spirals and called for an immediate curatorship by the South African Reserve Bank (SARB). The report went on to claim that Capitec had to write off more than 42% of the gross collectible principle due to it in the 2017 financial year, even suggesting the loan book was an 'irreconciliable R3-billion'. Twitter went feral, media outlets amplified the claims, and by closing bell, Capitec's price share had plummeted 23%, erasing R9.345-million in market value, according to a FSCA newsletter sent out in September 2021. The SARB scrambled to calm markets, assuring everyone that Capitec was solvent, capitalised and had adequate liquidity. The stock might have bounced back, but the reputational shrapnel lingered. The FSCA later warned that Viceroy's falsehoods 'posed a clear and present threat to the stability of the South African financial system'. Capitec told Daily Maverick that the bank has 'consistently maintained the 2018 report was misleading and caused unwarranted harm'. A calculated hit and a big payday The watchdog eventually pieced together that Viceroy was executing a targeted hit. A transcript of a hearing held by the Financial Services Tribunal (FST) in October 2022, reveals that Viceroy had a deal with a hedge fund, Oasis. It would $100,000 a month for tailor-made hit pieces plus 12.5% of the profits from short positions. Oasis banked an estimated R82-million, and Viceroy's cut was estimated by the FSCA to be close to $744,482 (R10-million at the time). All while ignoring legal obligations to correct falsehoods under the Financial Services Act. Dodging the net The FSCA initially slapped Viceroy with a R50-million fine for breaching Section 81 of the Financial Markets Act, which bans false or misleading statements about listed securities. FSCA commissioner Unathi Kamlana hoped the penalty would be 'a deterrent to those hoping to make a quick buck by peddling false information'. Viceroy cried foul, basically saying, 'You can't touch us, we're not in South Africa'. Shockingly, the Financial Services Tribunal largely agreed. The tribunal admitted that Viceroy's actions 'had an effect' on South Africa. But under common law, they said, you need to serve a foreigner in person while they're in the country to establish jurisdiction. The fine was set aside and the case was closed. Or so Viceroy thought. Closing the loophole The FSCA fought back and launched an application to review the decision to scrap Viceroy's fine. The Pretoria High Court ruled on 9 July 2025 that clinging to an area of physical service would 'hamper and frustrate the effective regulation of financial activity that takes place extra-territorial and digitally'. Citing section 173 of the Constitution, the court developed the common law. The FSCA can fine a foreigner if: Notice is delivered by any means (including electronically); and The conduct's link to South Africa is 'sufficiently close'. 'The court remitted the reconsideration application brought by Viceroy Research and partners back to the Financial Services Tribunal, so that a decision can be made on the merits,' the FSCA said. The case is not yet closed, but the R50-million penalty is back on the table. The FSCA remains confident that it made a clear and compelling case against Viceroy. 'The public can take confidence from the fact that the FSCA will not shy away from taking appropriate action to protect its investigation and enforcement powers to ensure appropriate investor protection and the integrity of financial markets,' it said. DM


Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
The Finance Ghost: Why mining is a tough industry
Mining is hard because even if you get the minerals out of the ground safely and efficiently, your fortunes are primarily tied to global commodity prices. This week, we saw several updates from the mining sector. This included some of the industry giants, as well as junior miners – companies that are much earlier in their journeys. Before we go any further, it's useful context that Valterra Platinum (previously Anglo American Platinum) has enjoyed an increase of 44% in its share price over 12 months, while BHP is down 10% over the same period. Based on that, you would think that BHP is struggling in its operations, while Valterra is shooting the lights out, right? advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads GOOGLE GRAPH HERE Mining isn't hard just because of how difficult it is to get the stuff out of the ground, both safely and efficiently. No, it's hard because even if you do that perfectly, your fortunes are primarily tied to global commodity prices for whatever commodity you happen to be extracting from Mother Nature. And if your operations hit a rough patch, those prices can save you (if you get lucky). It's like training your heart out for a 400-metre race and then waiting to find out if someone has added a greyhound to the mix that day, with a result that is out of your control no matter how hard you try. You see, BHP has just reported record production in both copper and iron ore for the year ended June 2025. Thanks to this excellent outcome, it also expects to hit its unit cost guidance across almost all its operations, as a period of efficient production is always great news for unit costs. But it hardly matters, as the average realised price for iron ore was down 19% for the period, while steelmaking coal fell 27% and energy coal was down 11%. Copper was the only positive story, with a 7% increase in the average realised price. Copper, much like Hansel all those years ago in Zoolander, is so hot right now. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads Alas, if the market had positive feelings about the trajectory for iron ore prices, then the BHP share price would've already started turning higher. Instead, there are worries about global demand in an environment of tariff uncertainty and substantial risks to global trade and consumption. The domestic Chinese market remains a serious headache as well. For a commodity such as iron ore to be doing well, the engine rooms of the global economy need to be in overdrive. Instead, they are spluttering. Conversely, Valterra Platinum (and the rest of the PGM sector) is having a grand old time thanks to an upswing in PGM prices. Every dog has its day in the mining sector, with this dog now basking in the sunshine and being fed organic biltong from Woolies after a long night in the cold. If you look at the share price, you would never believe that Valterra released a trading statement this week that headline earnings per share (HEPS) will plummet by between 76% and 88% for the first half of the year. What on earth happened? And how is the share price still doing so well? The main reason for this collapse in profitability is that there was flooding at the Tumela Mine at Amandelbult in February. Sure, there were some other issues as well (such as substantial once-off demerger costs related to the separation from Anglo American), but the bulk of the problem is thanks to factors way beyond management's control. If you exclude Amandelbult, then own-mine production was up 1%. That's little comfort when PGM sales volumes fell 25% thanks to this issue. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads We've now answered the first question about the reason for the drop in earnings, but what about the second one? Why is the share price still doing so well? To begin with, 'so well' is a relative term. Over the same period that Valterra experienced a 44% upswing in the share price, Northam Platinum is up 72%, Impala Platinum is up 98% and Sibanye Stillwater is up more than 102%. So, in reality, Valterra is actually significantly underperforming the peer group. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads Then, it's important to keep in mind that PGM sector sentiment is generally positive at the moment. With Valterra promising the market that it can reach the lower end of full-year production guidance, there's a chance that it has a decent year overall – and the market is very willing to forgive tough periods at the moment. The demerger costs are also behind it, while recent cost saving initiatives should continue. These factors are supportive of a much stronger second half of the financial year, with the market inclined to believe in that outcome, thanks to strength in the PGM basket price. We finish off with another rampant success story: AngloGold Ashanti. The share price is up 65% in the past year on the JSE, with the market continuing to back the yellow metal. The dollar gold price is up almost 40% in the past year, driven by worries about inflation and weakness in the dollar. It's incredible to be able to write about a weaker dollar and stronger PGMs in the same piece – what year are we in anyway? AngloGold certainly isn't looking this gift horse in the mouth. In fact, it is using the strength in gold to take advantage of opportunities to grow, with the latest example being the acquisition of Augusta Gold. This company is listed in Toronto, but the underlying assets are in the Beatty District in Nevada – and they just so happen to be alongside AngloGold's existing assets in that district. This is a regional consolidation play, with the market not even batting an eyelid at AngloGold paying a 37% premium to the 20-day Volume-Weighted Average Price of Augusta Gold. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads Gold looks easy right now, but it hasn't always been that way. PGMs are doing much better, but that comes after a terrible period. And although iron ore looks tough right now, BHP was trading at a vastly higher share price just a couple of years ago. Mining is about cycles. And that's what makes it hard. DM


Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Eastern Cape needs action, not another decade of planning, says acting premier
This moment calls on us to pause and ask: has the Eastern Cape Socio-Economic Consultative Council truly lived up to its founding vision? Are we doing enough to reconfigure this strategic entity to meet the evolving socioeconomic challenges and opportunities of our time? The ECSECC was birthed in 1995, a period of deep transition and transformation in our country, following South Africa's protracted struggle for liberation and a more just and equitable society. It was born of a progressive idea: that socioeconomic development must be inclusive, co-created by government, labour, civil society, and business, and tailored to the real developmental needs of our people. It was a powerful and necessary vision for a province emerging from the scars of colonial neglect, apartheid-induced underdevelopment, and systemic marginalisation. The ECSECC was never meant to be a bureaucracy unto itself. It was meant to be the developmental conscience of the province, a think-tank and catalyst, mobilising evidence, strategy, social partners towards alignment of the integrated development agenda. Three decades on – a mixed report card Thirty years later, we must engage honestly. We have made strides, yes, but the gains made have not been without challenges. The Eastern Cape is still one of the poorest provinces in South Africa, with high levels of poverty, unemployment and inequality, particularly among youth and women. Yet we are also a province of immense potential. The Eastern Cape is emerging as South Africa's hub in automotive manufacturing, green energy infrastructure, agriculture, coastal tourism, and digital innovation. We host two of the most competitive Special Economic Zones (SEZs) in the country, Coega and East London, with an ever-expanding export footprint. Our province is fast becoming South Africa's green energy corridor, with vast solar and wind assets attracting global attention. We are home to some of the country's top agricultural regions, yet large tracts of arable communal lands remain underutilised. The Eastern Cape also produces top talent, yet we lose many of our brightest to urban migration and a lack of economic opportunities. This is a tale of two Eastern Capes. One is striving, rising and investing. The other is stuck in the cycle of structural poverty. The question before us, and indeed before ECSECC, is simple: How do we close this gap? If ECSECC is to remain relevant, it must undergo a fundamental strategic renewal, from passive research to catalytic implementation support. The ECSECC must become more than just a research institution. It must be embedded into the implementation machinery of the province, tracking delivery, aligning strategies across departments and municipalities, and ensuring policy coherence. From policy advice to strategic foresight and risk anticipation The world is changing rapidly. ECSECC must equip the province to anticipate and prepare for future shocks — be it climate disruption, geopolitical shifts, AI-driven job displacement or energy transitions. From consultation to true social compacting The founding mandate of ECSECC placed it at the heart of social partnership. But dialogue without follow-through has bred consultation fatigue. ECSECC must restore trust by ensuring that the voices of workers, the unemployed, the youth, rural women and communities directly influence planning and delivery. From provincial focus to global connectivity The ECSECC must help position the Eastern Cape not just as a South African opportunity zone, but as an African frontier for investment, innovation and sustainable development. What must the ECSECCs do now? This critical institution in our developmental quest as a province must undertake a candid audit of its impact with ruthless honesty, with clarity as to where it has made a difference and where it has fallen short of expectations. The ECSECC must be bold in renewing its leadership ethos and attract bold thinkers, implementers and connectors of ideas to opportunity. It must build technical depth in areas like climate finance, smart agriculture, digital economies, and labour market reforms. This entity must strengthen its data systems to support evidence-based decision-making at all levels of government. And most crucially, ECSECC must align every strategy to the needs of the people, not the architecture of bureaucracy. The province will match this ambition As the executive council, we are committed to supporting the ECSECC's repositioning. We want it to serve as a key arm in helping the Office of the Premier monitor impact, fast-track priority interventions and work more closely with municipalities, the private sector and academia. We are also reviewing the Provincial Growth and Development Plan (PGDP) and will require ECSECC to lead the integration of climate resilience, spatial justice, inclusive industrialisation and digital transformation in this strategy. We want an ECSECC that is lean but sharp, nimble but grounded, and visionary but rooted in the realities of our people. In closing, it is time to be bold As we engage in this dialogue, I urge all of us to speak frankly and think boldly. This is not just about ECSECC's future, it is also about the Eastern Cape's future. We dare not waste another decade on planning alone. We must do. We must deliver. We must develop.