Ringgit rebounds on softer US stance towards China
At 8 am, the ringgit rose to 4.2335/2550 against the greenback, compared to Wednesday's close of 4.2400/2490.
Bank Muamalat Malaysia Bhd chief economist Dr Mohd Afzanizam Abdul Rashid said the US Dollar Index (DXY) fell 0.23 per cent to 98.392 points as Trump reportedly adopted a less hawkish stance towards China, despite the ballooning trade deficit with the world's second-largest economy.
"At the same time, news is circulating on the possible termination of Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell by President Trump, which also seems to fuel positive sentiment in the market," he told Bernama.
As such, Mohd Afzanizam said the ringgit could gain some traction today after weakening slightly by 0.07 per cent to 4.2445 yesterday.
At the opening, the ringgit was traded lower against a basket of major currencies, except for the British pound.
It strengthened against the British pound to 5.6767/7055 from 5.6786/6907 at yesterday's close. However, it slipped against the Japanese yen to 2.8603/8750 from 2.8508/8569, and fell versus the euro to 4.9257/9507 from 4.9248/9352 previously.
The local note was mostly higher against most ASEAN currencies.
It rose vis-a-vis the Singapore dollar to 3.2987/3159 from 3.2999/3071, appreciated against the Indonesian rupiah to 259.9/261.3 from 260.3/260.9 and edged up versus the Philippine peso to 7.41/7.46 from 7.43/7.45.
But it fell against the Thai baht to 13.0322/1076 from 13.0301/0630 at Wednesday's close. - Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
US ambassadors wanted: Diplomatic experience optional
IN diplomacy, it's not always what you know – it's who you serve. The White House has tapped a self-professed Hooters fan and an orthopaedic surgeon for two key postings in South-East Asia, a front line in the battle for influence between the United States and China. The inexperienced candidates for Singapore and Malaysia are raising eyebrows in a region Washington is already alienating with its trade war. In the short term, a political appointee close to US president Donald Trump could be positive. Longer term, Washington risks losing out on decades of carefully crafted diplomacy and relationship-building that have served to advance American interests. The nominations came as Secretary of State Marco Rubio made his first official visit to Asia, where he attended the 10-member Asean gathering in Kuala Lumpur earlier this month. His trip also coincided with the renewal of tariff threats on regional economies, which Trump would impose on Aug 1, Rubio confirmed, if countries don't strike agreements by that deadline or shortly after. An ambassador who has the president's ear could – in theory – help carve out a better deal. But are bonhomie and being a golf buddy all that matter? Diplomacy is a blend of analytical thinking, meticulous attention to detail, and historical knowledge – along with many other attributes. Anyone watching the often-comical exchange between Singapore envoy-nominee Anjani Sinha and Democratic Senator Tammy Duckworth of Illinois at his recent confirmation hearing would've struggled to find these qualities. Sinha, who has been described as 'a friend of President Trump for over a decade,' couldn't answer Duckworth's questions about trade surpluses, military exercises or tariff rates. Videos of the exchange have gone viral in South-East Asia, with the senator chastising him for not doing his 'homework,' and accusing him of treating Singapore like a 'glamour posting.' Despite the pushback, Republicans hold the majority in the Senate and have enough votes to approve the nomination. But probably the more contentious nomination is that of Nicholas Adams, Trump's pick as ambassador to Malaysia. The 40-year-old, originally from Australia, became a US citizen in 2021. In his native country, Adams courted some controversy: He was the youngest-ever deputy mayor when he served on a council in Sydney's inner western suburbs, where he made headlines for calling for the eradication of pigeons and proposing DNA testing dog poo. The right-wing influencer has a strong conservative following, many of whom adore him for his alpha-male persona. 'Nick is an incredible Patriot and very successful entrepreneur, whose love of, and devotion to, our Great Country is an inspiration,' Trump wrote in a June 10 Truth Social post. 'Nick graduated from the University of Sydney and, since then, has made it his life's mission to extol the Virtues of American Greatness. Congratulations Nick!' In his enthusiasm, the president may have overlooked Adams's history of Islamophobic remarks, which is already raising concern in Muslim-majority Malaysia. His nomination has to go through the Senate confirmation process before the appointment can be formalised, but many in Malaysia are calling for Adams to be rejected because he's viewed 'as an insult to the country's dignity and foreign policy.' The decision is being seen as a broader erosion of American soft power in the region, Shahril Hamdan, a former visiting fellow with the Malaysia Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, and host of a popular podcast, told me. 'It reinforces the perception that South-East Asia remains an afterthought in Washington's strategic calculus – which only plays into the hands of its great rival, China.' Political appointees aren't unusual in US diplomacy. It's been common practice for decades for presidents to fill roughly 30% of chief-of-mission positions with them – far higher than any developed country. (The last ambassador to Singapore, appointed by the Biden administration, was Jonathan Kaplan, a wealthy businessman with no prior foreign policy experience.) That's despite research showing that career officials are on average more effective leaders who oversee higher performance. If confirmed, Adams will replace Edgard Kagan, a seasoned diplomat who has only served in the position for about 16 months. This decision comes at a difficult time for US-Malaysian relations, with Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim criticising Trump's long-threatened tariffs as 'sharpened instruments of geopolitical rivalry.' South-East Asia has long been wary of being caught in the geopolitical power play between the US and China. These nominations will cement the view that Beijing is a better partner – notwithstanding concerns over the muscle it's been flexing in the Indo-Pacific and the South China Sea. So far, the reactions from Asian capitals have been restrained. But privately, some diplomats have expressed no small degree of bewilderment. Ultimately, the choices reflect the priorities of the White House. In the Trump era, it's not expertise in a region that lands you the job – it's access to the man at the top. — Bloomberg Opinion/TNS
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
‘Frightening': How Trump is testing the limits of US presidential power like no modern leader before
WASHINGTON, July 20 — Donald Trump has spent six months testing the limits of his authority like no other modern US president, say analysts — browbeating Congress and the courts in a power grab that may come to define his second term. Since January, the Republican leader has repeatedly pushed to secure more power for himself, calling for judges to be axed, firing independent watchdogs and sidestepping the legislative process. Barbara Perry, a University of Virginia professor and an expert on the presidency, called Trump's successes in shattering the restraints on his office 'frightening.' 'All presidents have been subject to Congress's and the Supreme Court's checks on their power, as well as splits in their own political parties,' she said. 'Trump has faced almost none of these counterpoints in this second term.' It is all a far cry from his first stint in office, when Trump and his supporters believe he was hamstrung by investigations and 'deep state' officials seeking to frustrate his agenda. But those guardrails have looked brittle this time around as Trump has fired federal workers, dismantled government departments and sent military troops into the streets to quell protest. He has also sought to exert his influence well beyond traditional presidential reach, ruthlessly targeting universities and the press, and punishing law firms he believes have crossed him. Checks and balances The US system of checks and balances — the administration, the courts and Congress as equal but separate branches of government — is designed to ensure no one amasses too much power. But when it comes to Trump's agenda — whether ending diversity efforts and birthright citizenship or freezing foreign aid — he has largely dodged the hard work of shepherding bills through Congress. Policies have instead been enacted by presidential edict. Six months in, Trump has already announced more second-term executive orders than any American leader since Dwight Eisenhower in the 1950s. He has even sought to bend the economy to his will, escalating attacks on the chief of the independent central bank in a bid to lower interest rates. Once a robust restraining force against presidential overreach, the Republican-led Congress has largely forsaken its oversight role, foregoing the investigations that previous presidents have faced. That has left the judiciary as the main gatekeeper. But Trump has managed partly to neuter the authority of the federal bench too, winning a Supreme Court opinion that mostly reduces the reach of judges' rulings to their own states. In his first term the high court made Trump immune from prosecution for actions taken as part of his official duties — no matter how criminal. And almost every time Trump has turned to the country's highest legal tribunal to rein in the lower courts in his second term, it has obliged. Sole authority His long shadow has extended far beyond Washington's institutions, pushing into private realms his predecessors avoided. Trump has picked fights with elite universities, prestigious law firms and the press — threatening funding or their ability to do business. The arts haven't escaped his clunking fist either, with the 79-year-old taking over the running of the Kennedy Center in Washington. Trump has claimed falsely that the US Constitution gives him the right to do whatever he wants as the ultimate authority over government activities. This so-called 'unitary executive theory' was pushed in the 'Project 2025' blueprint for government produced by Trump's right-wing allies during last year's election campaign. Although he disavowed 'Project 2025' after it became politically toxic, Trump's own platform made the same claims for expansive presidential powers. Pessimistic about the other branches' ability to hold the administration to account, the minority Democrats have largely been limited to handwringing in press conferences. Political strategist Andrew Koneschusky, a former senior Democratic Senate aide, believes the checks on Trump's authority may ultimately have to be political rather than legal or constitutional. He points to Trump's tanking polling numbers — especially on his signature issue of immigration following mass deportations of otherwise law-abiding undocumented migrants. 'It's not entirely comforting that politics and public opinion are the primary checks on his power,' Koneschusky said. 'It would be better to see Congress flex its muscle as a co-equal branch of government. But it's at least something.' — AFP
The Star
9 hours ago
- The Star
Japan heads to polls in key test for PM Ishiba
Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, leader of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), raises his fist from atop the campaigning bus on the last day of campaigning for the July 20 upper house election, in Tokyo, Japan July 19, 2025. REUTERS/Manami Yamada TOKYO (Reuters) - Japanese voters could unleash political turmoil as they head to the polls on Sunday in a tightly contested upper house election, with rising prices and immigration concerns threatening to weaken Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's grip on power. Opinion polls suggest Ishiba's Liberal Democratic Party and coalition partner Komeito may fall short of the 50 seats needed to retain control of the 248-seat upper house of parliament in an election where half the seats are up for grabs. The polls show smaller opposition parties pushing for tax cuts and increased public spending are set to gain, among them the right-wing Sanseito, which vows to curb immigration, oppose foreign capital inflows and reverse gender equality moves. A poor showing by the coalition could shake investor confidence in the world's fourth-largest economy and disrupt critical trade talks with the United States, analysts said. Ishiba may have to choose between making way for a new LDP leader or scrambling to secure the backing of some opposition parties with policy compromises, said Rintaro Nishimura, an associate at the Asia Group in Japan. "Each scenario requires the LDP and Komeito to make certain concessions, and will be challenging, as any potential partner has leverage in the negotiations." After the election Japan faces a deadline of August 1 to strike a trade deal with the United States or face punishing tariffs in its largest export market. Such import levies could squeeze the economy and further pressure the government to give financial relief to households already reeling from inflation, such as a doubling of rice prices since last year. With an eye on a jittery government bond market, the LDP has called for fiscal restraint, rejecting opposition calls for major tax cuts and welfare spending to soften the blow. Ishiba's administration lost its majority in the more powerful lower house in October. As the LDP's worst showing in 15 years, the outcome roiled financial markets and left the prime minister vulnerable to no-confidence motions that could topple his administration and trigger a fresh general election. Ruled by the LDP for most of the post-war period, Japan has so far largely avoided the social division and fracturing of politics seen in other industrialised democracies. Voting ends at 8 p.m. (1100 GMT), when media are expected to project results based on exit polls. (Reporting by Tim Kelly; Editing by Clarence Fernandez)
