logo
I ordered the cheapest breakfast combo at Denny's and IHOP. The food was similar, but the prices were not.

I ordered the cheapest breakfast combo at Denny's and IHOP. The food was similar, but the prices were not.

It turns out that, when it comes to breakfast, not all chains are created equally, especially if you're an early riser.
In search of the best value and taste, I recently ordered the same affordable combo (two sausages, two pancakes, two eggs) at breakfast chains IHOP and Denny's.
They've always seemed quite similar to me, but I found myself shocked when I paid dramatically different prices in each place for near-identical meals.
I also learned a frustrating lesson about timing — it really is everything.
I started at Denny's, where the pancakes were massive and the sausage links tiny
I arrived at a Denny's in Queens, New York, at 7 a.m. on a weekday. I was the only customer aside from a small family.
My order was the cheapest meal on the Denny's menu, which proved to be the Everyday Value Slam.
It consists of two eggs cooked however you like, bacon or sausage, and a choice of two pancakes, two slices of French toast, or a biscuit and gravy. I chose pancakes, eggs over medium, and sausage.
When my food arrived, I was immediately struck by two things: The pancakes were huge, and the sausages were not.
Topped with whipped, airy butter, the pancakes were so big that they even had their own plate. They were fluffy and slightly spongy with more of a pleasant bready flavor than the sweetness I expected. I wish they'd come with a bit more butter, though.
The sausages were quite small — I could easily have eaten both of them in one generous bite. They were tasty, with a good savory profile, albeit a bit too salty for me.
As for the eggs, they were cooked perfectly, with a bit of browning on the whites but with the unbroken yolks still partially runny.
I paid under $10 for my meal at Denny's — and that's with a 22% tip
The Everyday Value Slam meal at Denny's was priced at $6.99. The tax was $0.62, and I tapped for a 22% tip for a total price of $9.28.
I doubt I could've sourced the ingredients to make the breakfast at home for less than that. The satisfying meal felt so well-priced that I knew I would return to Denny's even if IHOP blew me away.
The food at IHOP felt completely on par with Denny's, though the pancakes were smaller
The day after I ate at the Denny's in Queens, I went to an IHOP in Long Island on a weekday morning.
I got there at about 6:20 a.m. and was seated alongside four or five other tables of guests.
Once again, I wanted the cheapest meal, the same one I'd had at Denny's: two pancakes, two eggs cooked over medium, and two sausages.
Once served, I was surprised to find all of my food nestled onto one plate. At Denny's, the pancakes were large enough to merit their own.
I was surprised that the pancakes at the International House of Pancakes were markedly smaller than the pair I'd been served the morning before.
The good news was that the sausage links appeared to be at least 40% larger than those I'd received at Denny's.
IHOP's pancakes were sweeter than those from Denny's and were served with twice as much fluffy butter.
I appreciated the generous portion of butter, though I slightly preferred the taste of Denny's pancakes since I'm not much of a fan of sweet breakfast foods. That's a totally subjective thing — many people would surely hold the opposite opinion.
The eggs at IHOP were also cooked perfectly over medium. The long, narrow sausage links didn't taste nearly as salty as the ones at Denny's.
I was charged $15.20 for my IHOP breakfast — before tip
Coming on the heels of my Denny's dining experience, I was genuinely shocked to be handed a $15 check covering two eggs, two pancakes, and two sausage links.
I added $3 for a 20% tip, so the entire affair cost me $18.20.
This means my meal at IHOP was almost twice as expensive as the breakfast from Denny's, despite the two being almost identical.
In terms of value, Denny's was my clear winner — but my IHOP meal could've been half the price if I'd dined later
In terms of food, the meals at IHOP and Denny's were very comparable and almost a perfect match. Price-wise? Not so much.
The breakfast from Denny's was so cheap it almost felt like I was getting away with something — while the same meal at IHOP was so expensive (relatively speaking) that I almost felt like I was being swindled.
My feelings were further complicated when I realized this meal is part of IHOP's House Faves deal, which runs on weekdays from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. With it, popular combos at the chain cost just $6 or $7.
In fact, I ordered a meal almost identical to this one for $7 when reviewing the deals at this very location a few months ago.
So, had I arrived 40 minutes later, I would've paid half the price for my IHOP breakfast.
At certain times, I expect to pay a premium for food — the room-service cheeseburger at a five-star hotel, beer at a baseball game, or even popcorn at Disney World.
In those instances with limited choices or added convenience, elevated costs feel acceptable to me. However, it's frustrating to know how much less the chain could've charged me if I'd eaten during what I'd argue are more popular dining hours.
In terms of just taste and quality, I can't say I prefer one chain over the other. Denny's had smaller sausages but bigger pancakes. My eggs at both chains were cooked perfectly, and I enjoyed all that I ate.
However, if I'm planning to get a basic breakfast before 7 a.m., my money will go much further at Denny's.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What if AMC Motors had survived? How it could've changed the auto industry
What if AMC Motors had survived? How it could've changed the auto industry

USA Today

time41 minutes ago

  • USA Today

What if AMC Motors had survived? How it could've changed the auto industry

American Motors Corporation was an absolute mess by the mid-1980s, and its financial problems in the U.S. market were compounded by infighting at its European corporate parent, Renault, where executives went back and forth about how much money they were willing to pour into their trans-Atlantic subsidiary. The assassination of Renault's chairman in 1986 by French terrorists caused AMC to lose its most powerful supporter, and a hasty sale to Chrysler ultimately condemned it to the dustbin of automotive history. Chrysler hoovered up the tastiest bits of the American Motors portfolio — namely, Jeep — and slowly phased out the rest of the AMC's offerings over the course of the next decade. In retrospect, however, AMC was holding not one, not two, but three aces up its sleeve that could have seen it weather the financial storm throughout the '80s. It's entirely possible that had a few key moments in the company's timeline gone a different way, it would have been American Motors and not Chrysler enjoying the fruits of Jeep's mainstream renaissance in the early 1990s — a rebirth that AMC in fact already had in development when it was scooped up by the suits in Auburn Hills. Our favorite iconic vehicle eras: The most significant cars of the 2000s How different would the car industry have looked at the turn of the millennium if AMC had never changed hands? It turns out that this ripple in the chronological pond had the potential to upset big chunks of established history, not just in America, but in nearly every corner of the established automotive hegemony. Here's our alternative timeline in which AMC not only survives but thrives — and what the resulting fallout would have likely meant for one of Detroit's longtime stalwarts. After intense lobbying by American Motors, the U.S. government carves out an exception to a law forbidding foreign ownership of defense contractors, contingent on Renault spinning off AM General (the builder of the Humvee owned at the time by AMC) as an independently managed concern under the AMC umbrella. The continued, steady flow of government contracts acts as a lifeline for American Motors, and it cancels plans to take out a significant loan from its corporate parent to fund operations. The Renault Espace arrives in AMC showrooms, where it is rebadged as the 'Space Van,' an Americanized take on the literal translation of the French vehicle's European identity. Surprisingly, the funky badge helps give the people-mover some personality, which, combined with its genuine practicality and roomier interior versus rivals from Ford (the Aerostar) and Chevrolet (the Astro), helps put it alongside the Dodge Caravan and Plymouth Voyager as a popular and affordable family ride. In case you missed it: Jeep dealer offers 99-cent lease on Wagoneer EV Following the introduction of the redesigned Jeep Cherokee the year before, this gives AMC a presence in two of the highest-growth segments in the American auto industry, and for the first time in years the company is cash-flow positive. This convinces American Motors to accelerate investment in a larger sport utility vehicle that would complement the Cherokee, called the Grand Cherokee, the design of which is already well underway. Renault chairman Georges Besse's chauffeur is surprised to see two armed women in front of the home of his boss while driving back from the office on a cold November evening. He immediately hits the gas, slamming the rear door shut before Besse can exit the vehicle, and the pair escapes with just a few bullet holes in the rear quarter panel. After surviving the assassination attempt, Besse is given carte blanche at Renault to move forward with his plans for focusing on Jeep as the automaker's piggybank to fund not only AMC, but to also further the expansion of the French brand onto American shores. Chrysler, on a brash spending spree that includes buying a controlling stake in Lamborghini and an expansion of its partnership with Mitsubishi to form Diamond Star Motors, sees exactly the same potential in Jeep as Georges Besse. An offer is made to Renault not just for the off-road brand but for all of AMC, with Chrysler trying to cloak its true intentions about what it considers the real prize of the transaction. Besse won't be bought, however, and Chrysler returns hat-in-hand to Auburn Hills. Ambitious planning begins for the upcoming decade in the American market. With Jeep as its crown jewel, both Eagle and AMC are slated for repositioning beneath Renault. The French badge is no longer interested in its role as an entry-level brand hawking low-spec Le Cars and lays the groundwork for leveraging existing dealerships to form a stronger toehold for the revitalized company. The Jeep Grand Cherokee breaks cover as a 'concept' at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit. The response from both the media and show attendees is overwhelmingly positive, leading to a brief spike in compact Cherokee sales from customers too impatient for what they assume will be a lengthy wait for the production version. No one realizes that Besse's pressure to keep pumping cash into Jeep has dramatically accelerated the Grand Cherokee's timeline. The Grand Cherokee makes its debut in showrooms to universal acclaim. On top of offering a choice of either AMC's old faithful inline six-cylinder engine or a newly developed, 5.9-liter fuel-injected V-8, it also provides a turbodiesel option borrowed from the Renault parts bin. The latter choice positions the Jeep in its higher trim levels as something more than an off-roader, pushing it onto the radar of Europhiles who have become used to parking Range Rovers in their driveways. This opens a second front of European sales for Jeep in the luxury sphere. The Ford Explorer joins the midsize SUV scene, splitting the difference between the Grand Cherokee's off-road chops and the practical character prized by family buyers now tempted to abandon their minivans. SUV sales are soaring, leaving General Motors and Chrysler playing catch-up. Chevrolet and GMC are at least able to soak up some sales thanks to the four-door compact Blazer/Jimmy and full-size four-door Suburbans sitting on full-size truck platforms, but the two-door Dodge Ramcharger remains in a distant fourth place as it plays out the string on a dated pickup chassis. Buoyed by strong Jeep sales, Renault launches the initial phase of its ambitious American strategy. First, it spins off AMC as a value-focused brand selling cars on a 'no-haggle' model: What you see advertised is what you pay at the dealership. Along with a redesigned Espace, an entirely new lineup of hatchbacks, small wagons, sedans and budget coupes are gradually deployed over the course of the next few years, some sharing components with Renault's European offerings while others benefit from AMC's next-generation four-cylinder engine program. This puts AMC in direct competition with GM's Saturn brand, which arrived on the scene in mid-1990. Next, a revitalized Eagle steps out of the AMC shadow and becomes its own brand. The focus remains on what are now being called 'crossovers,' automobiles that sit between a wagon and a sport utility vehicle. Eagle also benefits from Renault's technical prowess in the form of unibody models that feature sophisticated all-wheel-drive systems in place of their earlier, low-range four-wheel drive setups. The new Eagles are an immediate hit in regions like Colorado and New England. Chrysler, facing considerable financial strain as sales of the Grand Caravan and Voyager slow in the face of the SUV onslaught, are forced to sell Lamborghini to MegaTech, an Indonesian company owned by Tommy Suharto, the son of that country's president-for-life. The automaker takes a loss on the deal, but it helps stem some of the financial bleeding that's beginning to concern both executives and Wall Street alike. Dodge introduces a new Ram pickup that instantly makes it a player in the full-size segment after years of disappointing sales. Unfortunately, that same success doesn't translate to its revised version of the SUV, which updates the two-door Ramcharger with the new pickup's underpinnings. As the market continues to move toward family-friendly four-door haulers, many of them taking their cues from Eagle's crossovers, the Ramcharger is out of step with what customers are actually looking for in a sport utility. Renault implements the next stage of its U.S. transformation by introducing the second generation of what had originally been planned as the Eagle Premier sedan. Originally kept exclusive to the European market, where it was sold as the Medallion, the new Renault Premier pushes the automaker into a higher class than it had previously enjoyed among American buyers, leading some to compare the car to offerings from Oldsmobile and even Audi. After a fraught development process, the Dodge Viper concept car makes a late debut at the Detroit auto show. Although it was originally hoped that Lamborghini's engineers could be more involved in the design of the vehicle's drivetrain, the early sale forced Dodge to move on from its planned V-10 and instead supercharge the company's long-standing 5.9-liter V-8. Heart-stopping styling doesn't make up for the lack of an exotic engine, making it harder for the public to stomach the no windows/no roof inconveniences of its cabin. Production plans for the Viper are quietly scuttled. The Viper team is diverted to focus on the Dodge Durango, a four-door, Grand Cherokee–sized SUV that the company hopes will turn its fortunes around. Subaru, in the face of strong sales from Eagle eating into its core customer base, makes a product cancellation of its own. The Outback, a tall-riding version of its Legacy wagon, is deemed too derivative of the Eagle lineup to make a dent in the market, and its development is halted. Facing dwindling revenues, and unable to finance new product development, Subaru's leadership initiates back-channel talks with Toyota about a possible merger. Renault, emboldened by the money pouring into its coffers from the success of AMC, Jeep and Eagle, makes the surprise move of purchasing Volvo, scooping Ford who had planned on making overtures for the Swedish brand to join its nascent Premier Automotive Group. After decades of working together on various shared projects, Renault hopes to leverage Volvo's dealer network and customer base to continue its colonization of the near-luxury space in the United States. Talks also begin with Nissan about a potential alliance. Two new premium models emerge on American roads bearing the Renault badge: the Megane sport hatch and the Laguna hatchback sedan, with the latter praised for its near-crossover utility and excellent handling. Concerned by Renault's burgeoning acquisition portfolio, Toyota signs a deal to bring Subaru in-house. At the same time, executives announce a new subbrand called Scion that's intended to take on both AMC and Saturn, which have split much of the entry-level market between them in the United States. Chrysler, looking for a savior of its own, begins talks with Daimler about a potential 'merger of equals.' The German automaker's boardroom doesn't see much of value in Chrysler's mishmash of cheap cars, fading minivans and almost-luxury sedans, and while the Dodge Ram is appealing, it's too far outside the Daimler playbook to integrate properly into its American operations. Discussions never advance past the initial stages. Emboldened by its newfound partnership with Nissan (which involved a stock share and co-investment in each other's companies), Renault has the cash to add the missing piece to its U.S. portfolio: Dodge, which it plucks from a flailing Chrysler as part of a general takeover bid. While the Ram pickup fills an important void, the Ramcharger is quietly put out of its misery, along with any plans to bring the stillborn Durango to market. The Chrysler brand is relegated to special trim levels on several Renault models, specifically those sold to livery companies for use as limousines. The Walter P. Chrysler package becomes a popular choice in the black car business over the course of the next decade. Photos by Getty Images, MotorTrend Archive, Ryan Lugo

Dine Brands CEO talks 'continued momentum' of Applebee's & IHOP
Dine Brands CEO talks 'continued momentum' of Applebee's & IHOP

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Dine Brands CEO talks 'continued momentum' of Applebee's & IHOP

Applebee's parent company, Dine Brands (DIN), reported mixed second quarter results. Dine Brands CEO John Peyton joins Market Catalysts with Julie Hyman to explain how value promotions across both Applebee's and IHOP are driving results without sacrificing profitability. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Catalysts here. Related videos MAS's S$1.1 Billion Injection into Small & Mid-Cap Companies: Another 5 Singapore Stocks That Stand to Benefit 5 Singapore REITs Sporting Dividend Yields of 5.4% or Higher Singapore Airlines is Encountering Turbulent Skies: Can the Carrier Recover? Earnings Spotlight: 4 Singapore Blue-Chip Stocks That Grew Their Profits Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Interactive Brokers Jumps 41.8% in 3 Months: How to Play the Stock?
Interactive Brokers Jumps 41.8% in 3 Months: How to Play the Stock?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Interactive Brokers Jumps 41.8% in 3 Months: How to Play the Stock?

Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.'s IBKR shares have rallied 41.8% in the past three months, outperforming the industry's 20.3% growth and the S&P 500 Index's 13.1% rise. Moreover, IBKR's price performance has been better than that of its peers, Charles Schwab SCHW and Tradeweb Markets Inc. TW. The Schwab stock has gained 14.8%, whereas shares of Tradeweb Markets have declined 2.2% in the same time frame. Price Performance Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Does the Interactive Brokers stock have more upside left despite showing recent strength in share price? Let us try to find out. What's Aiding IBKR's Performance? Technological Excellence: Interactive Brokers' technological superiority remains one of its strongest aspects. The company processes trades in stocks, digital assets, futures, options and forex on more than 150 exchanges across several countries and compensation expense relative to net revenues (10.9% in the first half of 2025) remain below its industry peers due to its superior technology. Further, the company has been emphasizing developing proprietary software to automate broker-dealer functions, leading to a steady rise in revenues. Over the last five years (2019-2024), total net revenues witnessed a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 21.8%, with the momentum continuing in the first half of 2025. Revenue Growth Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Given the company's solid Daily Average Revenue Trade (DART) numbers, along with a robust trading backdrop, its net revenues are expected to improve in the quarters Expansion Through Product Diversification: Interactive Brokers has been undertaking several measures to enhance its global presence. In May 2025, it extended the trading hours for Forecast Contracts to nearly 24 hours a day. In April, it launched the prediction markets hub in Canada to capitalize on the rising demand for event November 2024, IBKR introduced Plan d'Epargne en Actions accounts to boost its offerings for its French clients. Also, the launch of IBKR GlobalTrader has enabled investors worldwide to trade stocks through mobile was one of the first brokers to introduce Overnight Trading on U.S. stocks and ETFs nearly 24 hours a day, five days a week. IBKR Lite has enabled investors to trade commission-free. Moreover, the launch of Impact Dashboard, an innovative sustainable investing tool, has made the company the first major brokerage firm to allow investors to easily align their portfolio with their values. IBKR also launched cryptocurrency trading via Paxos Trust Company, charging commissions that are lower than those of other crypto introduction of IBKR Desktop, the next-generation desktop trading application for Windows and Mac, marks a new chapter for Liquidity Position: Interactive Brokers has been consistent with its dividend payments for a long time. In April 2024, the company hiked its quarterly dividend 150% to 25 cents per share, followed by a 28% hike in April 2025. Additionally, it announced a four-for-one forward split of its common stock to make shares more accessible to of June 30, 2025, IBKR had cash and cash equivalents (including cash segregated for regulatory purposes) of $49.7 billion. Moreover, the company uses insignificant debt to finance its operations. Thus, given a solid liquidity position, IBKR's capital distribution actions look sustainable. What's Hurting IBKR's Growth Elevated Expense Base: Interactive Brokers has been witnessing a steady increase in non-interest expenses over the past few years. Expenses witnessed a CAGR of 13.8% over the five years ended 2024, with the uptrend persisting in the first six months of 2025. Expense Trend Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The increase has been mainly due to higher execution, clearing and distribution fees. As the company continues to invest in franchises, launch new products and services, and upgrade technology, overall costs are likely to remain Reliance on International Revenues: IBKR is a geographically diversified company with a presence across the globe. The company generates a large portion of its revenues (almost 37% of total net revenues) from overseas risks stemming from the regulatory and political environment, foreign exchange fluctuations and the performance of local economies may hurt its financials. Final Thoughts on IBKR Stock Interactive Brokers remains well-positioned for growth in the current volatile operating environment. While the company's profitability is expected to be hampered because of elevated expenses, its strong technological capabilities and diversified product offerings enhance its global reach, thus supporting long-term rapidly evolving trends will benefit the company's revenues and expand its market the past 30 days, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the company's 2025 and 2026 earnings has moved upward. The estimates reflect year-over-year growth rates of 9.7% and 6.7% for 2025 and 2026, respectively. Earnings Estimates Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The upward earnings estimate revisions reflect that analysts are optimistic regarding IBKR's earnings growth potential. Thus, it seems to be a wise idea to invest in the stock present, IBKR sports a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) : Free Stock Analysis Report Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) : Free Stock Analysis Report Tradeweb Markets Inc. (TW) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store