John Lewis remembered in Congress for urging 'good trouble'
Lewis would say he was getting into ''good trouble'' in his fight for civil rights. In addition to the Monday night salute, other groups plan to recognize Lewis' work this week with social media posts and programs.
Organizers of nationwide protests against Trump administration policies have dubbed Thursday's demonstrations "Good Trouble Lives On.''
With a poster behind them of a black and white photo of a young Lewis at the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama, caucus members read excerpts of his columns, speeches and memoir, "Walking with the Wind: A Memoir of the Movement."
They described Lewis as a mentor, a leader and a trailblazer. They said Lewis' push to protect voting rights is as important as ever, pointing to efforts in some states to restrict access to the ballot box.
"For generations we have marched, fought and even died for the right to vote,'' said Rep. Yvette Clarke, chair of the Congressional Black Caucus. "Congressman Lewis certainly knew this.''
Clarke said it's a shame that in this climate of partisan politics there isn't agreement that access to voting should be a right for everyone.
"Congressman John Lewis devoted every day of his life to fight to make our country live us to its highest ideals...,'' she said. "From the Edmund Pettus Bridge to the halls of Congress the boy from Troy never stopped making good trouble."
Members of the caucus, mostly Democrats, also took aim at Republicans arguing they have led attacks on voting rights, civil rights and diversity efforts - issues important to Lewis.
Rep. Glenn Ivey, a Democrat from Maryland, said Lewis serves as an inspiration "during this unprecedented and difficult times."
"To heal the soul of America again we need to remain inspired by John Lewis and to get into good trouble again,'' he said.
"Just imagine where we would be if John Lewis and those foot soldiers had given up on Bloody Sunday,'' Rep. Terri Sewell, D-Ala., said on the House floor, alluding to the March 1965 day when Lewis and others were attacked by police on Selma's Edmund Pettus Bridge. "They had every reason to throw up their hands and surrender, but they didn't."
More: Civil rights icon John Lewis remembered by fellow veterans: 'We had right on our side'
'We have been too quiet for too long'
In the years since his death, Lewis' Democratic colleagues have continued to reintroduce a federal voting rights bill named in his honor.
The John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act would, among other things, restore a key provision of the 1965 Voting Rights Act that required states with a history of discrimination to get federal approval before making election changes.
It has repeatedly stalled in Congress. It has little chance of passing again in the Republican-controlled Congress.
Caucus members and other Democrats vow to continue to push for its passage.
"We must continue to honor his legacy with unshakeable determination to fight for what is right and what is just,'' said Rep. Lucy McBath, a Democrat from Georgia.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Partisan rancor in Congress raises risk of US government shutdown this fall
WASHINGTON, July 31 (Reuters) - Growing Democratic rancor in the U.S. Congress over President Donald Trump's tactics on the federal budget is threatening the long legislative tradition of funding the government through bipartisan deals, while raising the risk of a partial shutdown this fall. Republicans stirred the Democrats' distrust by clawing back $9 billion of congressionally approved money at the White House's behest and discussing making further such rescissions. Some hardline Republicans have floated the unprecedented idea of bypassing Senate rules requiring 60 of the 100 members to agree on most legislation to pass a funding bill for the fiscal year beginning October 1 without any Democratic votes. "Republicans in Congress are bowing down to Donald Trump and ratifying some of his worst efforts," Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren said in a floor speech outlining her unwillingness to cooperate on government funding without a Republican agreement not to rescind the money later. "The Trump administration is saying, loud and clear, Donald Trump makes all the decisions." The budgeting process has long been strained. For almost three decades lawmakers have failed to pass the 12 bills that are meant to detail the government's discretionary spending and the government has partially shut down 14 times since 1981 as lawmakers have missed deadlines. The annual battle over discretionary spending involves less than a third of the roughly $6.75 trillion federal budget, with funding for programs like building roads and supporting schools. The rest is mandatory spending including Social Security, Medicare and roughly $1 trillion of financing costs for the nation's $36 trillion in debt. As the Senate prepares to leave Washington for a month-long summer recess, Republicans have also hardened their rhetoric about government funding by trying to blame any future shutdown on Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer and House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries. "If we end up with a Schumer shutdown at the end of the year, the Democrats are going to own that," Senate Majority Leader John Thune told a news conference. The last government shutdown, which stretched over 35 days from late 2018 into early 2019, occurred during Trump's first term in office. Polling at the time showed that voters blamed Republicans for the disruption. The task of keeping the government funded has historically fallen to bipartisan negotiators to find deals that can pass the House of Representatives and garner the 60 votes needed to approve most legislation in the Senate. "Budgeting is hard. Budgeting is governing. And the way things have been so politicized and partisanized, it makes it almost impossible for Congress to legislate effectively," said William Hoagland, a former Senate Republican aide and fiscal legislation veteran who is now at the Bipartisan Policy Center think tank. This time around, the challenge has been complicated by the aggressive tactics of Trump budget director Russell Vought, who has withheld funding appropriated by Congress, succeeded in getting Republicans to defund Democratic priorities including the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and threatened to use so-called pocket rescissions to withhold other allocated funds. Trump has also proposed a fiscal 2026 budget that calls for $163 billion in spending cuts. "We all want to pursue a bipartisan, bicameral appropriations process," Schumer told reporters. "The Republicans are making it extremely difficult to do that." Hardline conservative House Republicans have been discussing the possibility of setting a new precedent for partisanship by using the parliamentary process known as budget reconciliation to pass full-year 2026 funding legislation to reopen government agencies at lower spending levels in the event of a shutdown. The tactic was most recently used to pass Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill earlier this month. Democrats also used it under President Joe Biden to pass his domestic agenda. "It's not a serious discussion yet. But it might be as we get closer to September 30," said Representative Andy Harris, chair of the ultraconservative House Freedom Caucus. Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson, who has floated the possibility of further reconciliation packages, said they have not considered the idea. Some traditional-minded Republicans have rejected it out of hand. "That's a bad idea," House Appropriations Committee Chairman Tom Cole said. "It means everything has to be partisan all the time. Appropriations, historically, is bipartisan." But hardliners who have seen their demands for deep spending cuts frustrated over the years say Republicans could need an alternative to the usual bipartisan path. "We'd all prefer that you do the appropriations process. So, we should keep trying to get that done. But if we can't, and we have to look at something else, we'll look at something else," said Representative Jim Jordan, a leading hardliner. "Whether we'll do that or not, I don't know. But it's already happened," the Ohio Republican said when asked about reconciliation as a way to reopen shuttered federal agencies. Experts say using reconciliation as a vehicle to reopen shuttered federal agencies may not be feasible, given that Congress would first need to pass a budget resolution that could take weeks or even months to craft. But hardliners say they are aware of that issue. "It's hard to do reconciliation at the last minute. That's the problem," said Representative Warren Davidson. Asked if the potentially long lead time ruled out its use, the Ohio Republican replied: "I hope not. We're trying to make sure it doesn't die."
Economist
2 hours ago
- Economist
The US in brief: The Fed holds its nerve, and its rate
The Federal Reserve held its benchmark interest rate at 4.25-4.5%. Two rate-setters, Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, voted against the decision—the first ' double dissent ' by members of the Fed's board in more than 30 years. The central bank's decision will anger Donald Trump, who has been calling for lower borrowing costs and publicly toying with the idea of ousting Jerome Powell, the Fed's chairman. The administration made a dizzying array of trade announcements in advance of its invented deadline, set for tomorrow, for countries to sign trade deals with America or face high(er) tariffs. It trumpeted deals with South Korea, Cambodia and Thailand. Mr Trump increased levies on many Brazilian goods from 10% to 50%, citing the ' extraordinary threat ' its government poses to America. He also threatened India with tariffs of 25% on its goods and an unspecified 'penalty' because it imports Russian oil and weapons. And certain copper products, including pipes and cables, will face tariffs of 50% from tomorrow. Democrats on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee used an arcane law to demand that the Justice Department release documents related to the late Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted child molester. The 'rule of five' allows a group of five committee members to request information relevant to its remit from federal agencies. The provision, introduced in 1928, has seldom been used, so its effectiveness is unclear. The Senate voted 52-44 to confirm Joe Kent as head of the National Counterterrorism Centre. Mr Kent, a former Green Beret and CIA agent, has served as an aide to Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence. Democrats objected to his nomination because of his association with far-right figures and track record of promoting the 'Fedsurrection' conspiracy theory, which holds that the FBI initiated the storming of the Capitol on January 6th 2021. Republicans in Texas's legislature unveiled a proposal to redraw the boundaries of the state's electoral districts to help them win five extra seats in America's House of Representatives at the midterms in 2026. Republicans have a majority in both chambers of the Texas legislature, but Democrats have in the past fled the state, making the legislature inquorate, to block similar efforts. Texas's gambit has sparked talk about other states, both Republican- and Democrat-controlled, doing the same. Kamala Harris said she would not run to be California's governor in 2026. Despite her defeat in the presidential election in 2024, it had been widely presumed that the former vice-president would both bid to lead her home state and be the strong favourite. Her decision blows the Democratic primary wide open. Gavin Newsom, the current Democratic governor, cannot serve a third term. Fix up, look sharp Initially Mr Trump was keen to eliminate the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which oversees disaster relief. After a flood in Texas in early July killed more than 135 people, he softened. Now his administration talks of making FEMA more 'efficient'. Read our story on how America is remaking its disaster-relief system and trying to get rid of perverse incentives. A view from elsewhere 'Trump is extractive, not transactional as the lazy cliché goes,' wrote Prashant Jha in the Hindustan Times, an Indian newspaper. 'It is not about a give and take; it is predominantly about take, with a little bit of give.' He gets away with it because America 'is very powerful and the costs of a retributive Trump are very high'. And 'no one believes in the only other option, which is collective resistance.' Figure of the day Up to $500m, the amount that Harvard University is reportedly prepared to pay to get the Trump administration off its back. Columbia University and the University of Pennsylvania have both already paid up, and yesterday the administration succeeded in shaking down Brown University. Read our story about what the president is teaching America's richest university. Today's poll Every week YouGov polls Americans on behalf of The Economist. Yesterday the administration said it would revoke the 'endangerment finding', a declaration by the EPA in 2009 that greenhouse gases are a risk to health. Yet a plurality (37%) of Americans want government restrictions on greenhouse-gas emissions expanded, and 21% want them kept the same. Only 24% wanted restrictions reduced or eliminated. Daily Quiz From Monday to Thursday we'll quiz you on all things American. To mark Mr Trump's visit to his Scottish golf courses, this week's questions are on previous presidents who have shared his passion for the links. Thursday: Which president was the first to install a putting green on the White House lawn? Wednesday: An ancestor of George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush gives his name to one of golf's oldest international tournaments, held on the Old Course at St Andrews since 1922. What is it called? See how to take part in the quiz at the bottom of this page. If you enjoyed this week's questions, play Dateline, The Economist' s history game. Seen on Truth Social 'Wow! Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine. That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them. Oh' Canada!!!' —Donald Trump invents another reason to impose tariffs on America's trading partners.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Nigel Farage described by Democrat as 'looking unhinged and like a giant manbaby' as he clashed with US politicians during their visit to UK
An 'unhinged' Nigel Farage has been accused of acting 'like a giant manbaby' during a meeting with members of the US Congress. The Reform UK leader is claimed to have 'shouted down' a Democrat politician in a 'heated exchange' about free speech this week. Politico reported the clash occurred as Mr Farage met with members of the House of Representatives ' Judiciary Committee to talk about tech during their visit to the UK. Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the committee, is said to have been warning about the threat to free speech posed by Donald Trump when Mr Farage interrupted. 'We're not here to talk about Donald Trump,' Mr Farage, an ally of the US President, said, according to Mr Raskin's account of the meeting. '[Mr Farage] said that I am a guest here, and I should act like a guest. And I told him that he was a host, and he should act like a host.' After the Reform leader accused Mr Raskin of being 'the most pig–headed person he'd ever met', he responded: 'This is why we had a revolution against you guys.' Three other Democrat members of the committee – Lou Correa, Jasmine Crockett and Eric Swalwell – also told the website of the exchange. Mr Swalwell said: 'Farage just looked unhinged and like a giant manbaby.' The meeting, in which the UK's Online Safety Act was discussed, is said to to have taken place following a private tour of Parliament. Mr Raskin said the outburst was the 'explosive reaction of one British politician who obviously didn't want any challenge to his view that he's a free speech victim'. 'This manbaby was not feeling it,' Ms Crockett said. 'He was gonna pigeonhole the conversation into only things that he wanted to discuss. 'And anything else was gonna be shut down, because that's what free speech, I guess, looks like to him.' Mr Farage's spokesman did not respond to a request for comment. Reform has pledged to scrap the Online Safety Act, while Mr Farage has also urged people to sign a petition demanding the legislation is repealed. Under rules that came into effect last Friday, online platforms including social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. But Mr Farage has warned the Act 'poses the biggest threat to freedom of speech in this country in our lifetimes'. He added in a newspaper article this week: 'These apparently well-intentioned checks enforce mandatory ID scans, not just for porn sites, but also for mainstream social media where political or any other content is deemed potentially 'harmful'. 'This erosion of privacy could make it easier to identify online critics of government policy on migration and much else.' Mr Farage has been engaged in a bitter row with Technology Secretary Peter Kyle over the Act. The Labour Cabinet minister accused the Reform leader of being on the side of 'people like Jimmy Savile' by opposing the legislation. Mr Farage has demanded an apology from Mr Kyle, describing his remarks about vile sex predator Savile as 'so absolutely disgusting that it's almost beyond belief'.
