Labour minister Jess Phillips says rebel MPs right to be punished for ‘slagging off own government'
Keir Starmer suspended Rachael Maskell, Neil Duncan-Jordan, Brian Leishman and Chris Hinchliff on Wednesday after the four rebels voted against the government's flagship benefits bill earlier this month.
Responding to controversy over the prime minister's decision, home office minister Jess Phillips said on Thursday: 'I disagree often with directions that are going on and I spend time working with colleagues on the back and front benches ensuring that we discuss these things.
'Constantly taking to the airwaves and slagging off your own government – I have to say: what did you think was going to happen?'
There had to be a level of party discipline for the government to function, Ms Phillips, who is the minister for safeguarding and violence against women and girls, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.
Government minister Jess Phillips has told Labour MPs punished for voting against welfare reforms that they have only themselves to blame in the escalating rebels row (House of Commons)
The four MPs all voted against the government over the welfare reform legislation, but party sources said the decision to suspend the whip was taken as a result of persistent breaches of discipline rather than a single rebellion.
Speaking to Sky News, Ms Phillips said: 'We were elected as a team under a banner and under a manifesto, and we have to seek to work together, and if you are acting in a manner that is to undermine the ability of the government to deliver those things, I don't know what you expect.'
Referring to a description of the rebels by an unnamed source in The Times, she told Sky News: 'I didn't call it persistent knob-headery, but that's the way that it's been termed by some.'
Ms Maskell, who spearheaded plans to halt the government's welfare reforms, hit out at Sir Keir's attempt to assert his authority over the party, saying he was wrong to carry out a purge of persistent rebels.
Labour MP Rachael Maskell spearheaded plans to halt the government's welfare reforms (PA Archive)
The York Central MP said: 'On this occasion, I don't think he's got it right.'
Speaking to the BBC, she added: 'I really hope from this process there will be reflection over the summer, but also learning. There needs to be a better reach-out to backbenchers to ensure that we are the safeguards of our government.'
Meanwhile, Sir Keir faced a fresh challenge to his authority when senior left-winger Diane Abbott said she had no regrets about comments on racism that led to her being suspended from Labour for a year.
Diane Abbott has said she has no regrets about comments on racism that led to her being suspended from Labour for a year (PA Archive)
The Hackney North and Stoke Newington MP was disciplined for saying in 2023 that people of colour experienced racism 'all their lives' and in a different way to Jewish people, Irish people and Travellers.
Despite withdrawing the remarks at the time, she was suspended from the Labour party after Sir Keir said her comments were antisemitic.
In a new intervention, Ms Abbott, who was subsequently readmitted to Labour, said she does not regret her remarks and stands by her argument.
She told the BBC: 'Clearly, there must be a difference between racism which is about colour and other types of racism because you can see a Traveller or a Jewish person walking down the street, you don't know.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘She's going to be big': why Putin should fear Britain's next fighter jet
The first thing to know about Britain's flagship new fighter jet is that it's big. This becomes immediately clear when you see the full-scale mock-up that dominates a warehouse at the Warton factory near Preston, Lancashire, which is run by British defence giant BAE Systems. And here, size matters. Because it tells you a lot about what the UK, Italy and Japan are planning for the supersonic stealth jet they are building together. The three countries are aiming to bring the aircraft – which has been christened 'Tempest' in the UK – into service by 2035 under an agreement known as the Global Combat Air Programme (GCAP). 'This won't be the final shape and size but, in terms of scale, it's about the same,' says Jonny Moreton, of BAE, during a visit by The Telegraph. 'Whatever GCAP as a core platform is going to be ... she is going to be big.' A bigger jet means bigger fuel tanks. That means more range and bigger payloads of explosive warheads. But the size also means weapons can be stored internally – ensuring a smooth exterior that makes the aircraft harder to detect with radar. At the same time, Tempest will be packed with technology allowing it to link up with other aircraft, drones, ground forces and satellites. All this suggests Tempest is being designed for long-haul missions deep into enemy territory, where communicating with home base may be impossible. If Nato ever ended up at war against Putin's Russia, experts say this means the aircraft would take off from a British airfield, fly to Russia undetected, destroy hostile air defences and then fly all the way back again. Not only that, but such a long range would allow Japanese pilots to strike deep into the Chinese mainland in any future Pacific conflict. Moreton, who is also an ex-commodore of the Royal Air Force, remains tight-lipped about whether these propositions are correct. But with modern warfare happening at ever-larger distances, he concedes that any deterrent to Russian and Chinese aggression must be able to operate 'at ranges that previously we've been unable to do'. 'You need to be able to get there safely, undetected and return home,' he adds. So critical is the need for range that project leaders have suggested the jet will be capable of crossing the Atlantic without mid-air refuelling – something no Royal Air Force fighter has ever been able to do. A Typhoon jet, the backbone of the RAF's existing fleet, has a combat radius of about 860 miles on a single tank of fuel. Meanwhile, the American-made F-35A stealth jet, which air force chiefs recently said they were planning to acquire, has a combat radius of about 680 miles. That is less than half the distance between London and Moscow, which is roughly 1,550 miles. It means Tempest will be in a league of its own when it comes to British fighters, says Francis Tusa, an independent defence analyst. 'As the requirements have changed over the years, so have the models,' he says. 'You can make your aircraft as stealthy as you like but if it has to be refuelled by a tanker then ultimately your adversary just needs to track down and destroy the tanker. 'So you need enough internal fuel to go a very, very long way – and stay out there.' Tempest in combat Imagine Nato and Russia did go to war in future – what does this mean for Tempest's role in the fight? Tusa says in week one of the conflict, Tempest would probably have to go into Russia and attack surface-to-air missile defences and air bases. Then in week two, when there is no threat from air defences, the jet can either be an air superiority fighter that loiters in the sky and takes out enemy fighters or continues in a ground support role. To fulfil that role, it is expected to be able to unleash massive arsenals of explosive weapons on its targets – potentially twice as much as an F-35 can deploy. Based on reports, Tusa says Tempest's maximum takeoff weight could be 'north of 30 tonnes' compared to Typhoon's 23 tonnes. That is more than the Lancaster bombers used in the Second World War. 'It is going to be in a completely different league to anything we have ever built,' Tusa says. The technology being built into Tempest will also ensure the jet can act as an airborne communications hub, even if contact with bases back in Britain has been disrupted. This means it can act as a central contact point for nearby friendly drones and missiles, as well as forces on the ground and satellites in space. 'We need to be able to operate at range, where our communications might be disrupted,' explains BAE's Moreton. 'Therefore we need to make sure we have a core platform that's crewed, that's in a position that it can be the heart of the network if we're unable to communicate back to home base for operations. 'It needs to be able to operate in an isolated environment.' Automation push BAE is part of 'Team Tempest', a partnership between the Ministry of Defence and industry that also includes Rolls-Royce, missile maker MBDA and Italy's Leonardo . Since 2023, however, the effort has been amalgamated with GCAP, with the UK, Italy and Japan combining research and development into a single programme. The British team, led by BAE, is working on a demonstrator jet that will road-test a key piece of equipment – a vent system that will feed air to Tempest's engines using an S-bend that wends its way through the aircraft's insides. This is vital to reducing the jet's radar signature. A trial has been scheduled for some time in 2027 and remains on schedule, according to BAE. At Warton, the company is trialling new production processes that will be used to fabricate the aircraft's wings and tail fins in the coming months. These include additive manufacturing, a form of 3D printing where material is added instead of removed, the production of large, carbon-based panels and more extensive use of robots. For example, reconfigurable robot arms are being used instead of specialist 'jigs' that were previously needed on the production lines of older aircraft such as the Typhoon. Jigs are tools that hold components in place or guide cutting tools during manufacturing and are often tailor-made for a certain stage of the process. Using robots instead will slash the cost of making the jigs – which often runs to tens of millions of pounds – and could shave up to three years off the run-up to full-rate production. It also means the factory floor is more easily reconfigurable, saving money for BAE at its facilities and letting the company easily switch to the production of a different product when required. All this will help to keep vital domestic skills alive as the company prepares to transition away from making Typhoon to producing Tempest in the next decade. That is still some way away, BAE stresses, with workers likely to be kept busy for at least the next 10 years by orders anticipated from Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey. But the development of Tempest will help to preserve Britain's sovereign capability to make its own aircraft, says Richard Hamilton, the managing director for Europe and International at BAE's air business. 'We're one of a small number of nations that have the whole aircraft capability,' he says. 'That means we can design an aircraft, we can make it and we can actually fly it from the site as well to our customers. 'Not many other countries still have that capability, so it's a freedom of action that our Government has at the moment.' This is one reason why other countries are also queuing up to join the GCAP consortium. Saudi Arabia is understood to be one of the countries in discussions with the three existing national partners, although it is not clear yet what level of involvement the Gulf nation could have. Riyadh is currently a buyer of the Typhoon jet but defence sources say the kingdom is looking for a potentially weightier role in GCAP that would give it more influence over capabilities and a greater role in manufacturing as well. But Herman Claesen, the head of future combat air at BAE, says the window for new joiners is narrowing, particularly given the brisk pace the founding countries want to maintain. 'To be part of the core programme today in the same way as Japan, Italy and the UK, because of the pace we've achieved and where we are today, becomes quite challenging and will have an impact which the three governments will have to either reject or accept,' Claesen says. 'It's never impossible ... we can make anything happen. But I see the likelihood as diminishing all the time, considering the pace we have on the programme.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Thousands rally in Georgia capital to reinforce demands for new parliamentary elections
Thousands of demonstrators took to the streets of the Georgian capital on Saturday to reinforce their demand for new parliamentary elections. Last year's decision by the ruling Georgian Dream party to halt Georgia's bid to join the European Union continues to spark protests across the country.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Airport costs are plane crazy as Scots get financially hammered again
In a week when UK inflation was confirmed as rising again, it seems like Scots are getting hammered financially every way they turn. The Labour Government has boosted the minimum wage, the state pension and welfare spending has risen overall. But that can't undo the explosion in the cost of living in the immediate. aftermath of Tory austerity and the coronavirus pandemic. Wages have not kept pace, interest rates caused mortgages to soar and ordinary households have been hit by soaring fuel bills. At this time of year, those fortunate enough to enjoy a summer holiday abroad leave their worries at home for a week or two as they fly off to warmer climes. But Scots travellers are in for one final cost-of-living blow before they can even step on their plane. READ MORE: Man charged with Terrorism over 'Palestine Action poster at Scots property' READ MORE: Scottish island looking for Scots to relocate with accommodation provided Both Edinburgh and Glasgow airports are among those in the UK which have increased drop-off charges. An absurd fee for stopping for less than a minute. Edinburgh Airport raised the charges by £1, with Glasgow Airport adding 50p, bringing the charge for both airports to £6. It might not seem like much – until you consider most of the busiest EU airports have no equivalent charges. It's another reminder of just how expensive it is to live in the UK. And how those who own our major infrastructure – like airports, energy firms and banks – often treat the public with contempt. Teens get a voice The UK Government is right to give 16 and 17-year-olds the vote in general elections. The voting age was lowered in Scotland for the 2014 independence referendum. It was made permanent a year later and contributed to a much higher number of people getting out to vote at the 2016 and 2021 Holyrood elections. It works as a way of increasing participation and interest in politics. At 16, young people can leave school, get a job and pay taxes. In Scotland, they can get married and join the Armed Forces. They contribute to our country so ought to have a say on where the money they are taxed on is spent. As the American revolutionaries said during the late 18th century: 'No taxation without representation.' The result of the general election has a huge impact on their future, so they deserve to have a voice.
