
HMRC does not know how many billionaires pay tax in UK
The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) said that HMRC 'can and must' do more to understand and explain the contribution that the very wealthiest in society make to tax revenue.
Its report on collecting the right tax from wealthy individuals said: 'HMRC does not know how many billionaires pay tax in the UK or how much they contribute overall.'
It highlighted The Sunday Times Rich List and artificial intelligence (AI) as ways that the revenue body could dig deeper into wealth and assets.
The PAC is calling for the revenue body to publish its plan for increasing tax yield from wealthy taxpayers both domestically and offshore.
It said HMRC does not collect information on taxpayers' wealth and says that it only collects the data needed to administer the tax system as required by UK tax legislation.
The report said: 'There is much public interest in the amount of tax the wealthy pay.
'People need to know everyone pays their fair share.'
HMRC's plan for improving its understanding of the wealth and assets held by billionaires could include how it might immediately start work on comparing available data on known billionaires, such as The Sunday Times Rich List, with its own records, the report suggested.
In the United States, the Inland Revenue Service has worked with researchers to link its data to The Forbes 400, the report said.
There is 'much more' that HMRC can do to improve its work to risk assess and target wealthy people, in particular through the use of data and technology and recruiting wealth management experts, it added.
It said: 'We think there is scope for HMRC to use artificial intelligence (AI) to better exploit and analyse data and, in this way, improve its risk assessment and targeting of wealthy individuals.
'Possible uses of AI to speed up the system include sifting large amounts of data and suggesting what information is missing from tax returns.'
The tax authority told the inquiry that the tax gaps – the difference between taxes theoretically owed and those actually paid – for wealthy people and for offshore wealth are particularly difficult to measure.
Since 2019-20, HMRC defines wealthy individuals as those with incomes of £200,000 or more, or assets equal to or above £2m, in any of the past three years.
The PAC said it is concerned that HMRC is overly confident and optimistic in its estimate that the wealthy tax gap is £1.9bn.
Its partial estimate of the offshore tax gap, of £0.3bn, seems far too low, particularly when compared with UK residents holding £849bn in offshore accounts in 2019, the committee said.
PAC member Lloyd Hatton said: 'This report is not concerned with political debate around the redistribution of wealth.
'Our committee's role is to help HMRC do its job properly ensuring wealthy people pay the correct tax.
'While HMRC does deserve some great credit for securing billions more in the tax take from the wealthiest in recent years, there is still a very long way to go before we can reach a true accounting of what is owed.
'We already know a great deal about billionaires living in the UK, with much information about their tax affairs and wealth in the public domain.
'So we were disappointed to find that HMRC, of all organisations, was unable to provide any insight into their tax affairs from its own data – particularly given that any single one of these individuals' contributions could make a significant difference to the overall picture.
'We found a similar apparent lack of curiosity in how wide the tax gap is both for the very wealthy and for wealth stashed away offshore.
'Our report shows that, however you slice it, there is a lot of money being left on the table.
'HMRC must, under its new leadership, begin collecting the correct amount of tax from the very wealthiest – and this must include wealth that is currently squirrelled away in tax havens.
'There is certainly room for improvement.'
The yield from HMRC's compliance work with wealthy individuals has more than doubled in recent years, with it collecting £5.2bn in 2023-24, up from £2.2bn in 2019-20.
But the report said: 'The scale of this success suggests either non-compliance among the wealthy has got worse, or that previous estimates of the extent to which they were avoiding tax were too low.'
HMRC has identified opportunities that will help it close the tax gap.
There are currently around 1,000 people in the wealthy team, and HMRC has secured funding for another 400 staff, the report said.
The population of wealthy taxpayers that HMRC's wealthy team administers is growing, up from 700,000 individuals in 2019-20 to 850,000 individuals in 2023-24, it added.
HMRC treats wealthy people as one single group and says it finds some billionaires have quite straightforward tax planning, while some millionaires with much lower wealth will have set up very complex offshore trusts and structures, the committee said.
The revenue body deploys customer compliance managers according to taxpayers who pose the most risk and says managers typically end up working on cases relating to individuals with wealth above £10m, it added.
The committee recommended that HMRC should review whether segmenting its wealthy customer group according to different levels of wealth and complexity would help it to assess and then target the most significant risks.
HMRC should also write to the committee to explain how confirmed funding to date will feed through to better compliance performance, and what it expects to achieve from future investment, the committee said.
It added that a lack of penalties issued to enablers of tax evasion is 'particularly disappointing' despite unscrupulous advisers often playing a key role in helping the wealthy evade tax.
HMRC should assess whether it is using its powers to tackle non-compliance by the wealthy sufficiently, in particular, whether it makes enough use of available sanctions, the report said.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The innocent inheritance tax blunder that can cost your family dearly
Hundreds of bereaved families are being hit with unexpected inheritance tax bills after falling foul of rules around making gifts. Some 220 estates last year received a tax bill on £61 million worth of gifts given away incorrectly, according to HMRC data obtained by a Freedom of Information request by TWM Solicitors. More families could unwittingly breach the rules and be hit with unwelcome charges as they try to avoid inheritance tax. People making gifts slip up when they hand their loved ones assets, such as property, valuable artwork or fine wine, but still have use of them. This is known as Gifts with Reservation of Benefit – and the taxman treats them as if they have not been gifted at all. For example, a parent might give the family home to a child, which can be done tax-free as long as they live for seven years afterwards. However, if the parent then continues to live in the property they must pay rent at the market rate, or it will be considered a Gift with Reservation of Benefit because they are continuing to use the asset as though it is their own. If they fail to do this, HMRC does not consider it to be a proper gift and, when they die, it will then be taxed as though it is still part of the estate. Another example might be to give away a classic car, but then continue to keep it in your garage, or to gift a holiday home but still make use of it on a regular basis without paying a market rate. Duncan Mitchell-Innes, partner at TWM Solicitors, says: 'Making gifts is now one of the simplest ways of reducing an IHT bill, however many people are making mistakes in the process. Taxpayers should realise that simply handing over legal ownership of an asset isn't enough to satisfy HMRC.' Taxpayers paid a record £8.5 billion in inheritance tax in 2024-25 and £1.5 billion in the first two months of this tax year alone. Currently about 5 per cent of estates are liable for inheritance tax but more are being caught in the net as the thresholds at which IHT kicks in remain frozen but inflation pushes up the value of investments, property and assets. It is expected that the proportion of estates liable for IHT will rise to 8 per cent from 2027, when pensions are brought into the inheritance tax net. For many people, a pension is their most valuable asset, and this change in rules could tip them over the inheritance tax threshold. Kirsty Stone, chartered financial planner at The Private Office, says: 'We have seen a massive inflow of enquiries around inheritance tax and gifting since the pension changes were announced. 'A lot of people might think that giving away their home seems like a quick fix, without realising the intricacies of the rules.' Shane van Rossum, a retired school registrar, hoped to pass her pension pot to her daughter after she dies, but has had to change her plans since the Autumn Budget. Since the announcement that pensions would be liable for inheritance tax, she has started taking regular amounts from her pot to reduce its value and mitigate any future inheritance tax bill. 'I feel that I've worked hard to save money and I don't want it all taken away,' says Ms van Rossum, who retired ten years ago and lives in Fulham, west London. 'I'm not trying to avoid inheritance tax, but I want to be savvy about what I do.' She uses her annual £3,000 gifting allowance and also gives regular amounts to her family out of her surplus income. 'I really did my research first and I make sure to keep accurate records of any gifts,' she says. 'If you want to leave money you need to be really sure about what you're doing, and do your best to ensure that your family will get the best benefit from it.' You can make gifts out of income that you don't need so long as they are regular and come from income rather than assets.


Daily Record
10 hours ago
- Daily Record
EastEnders' Martine McCutcheon declared bankrupt
Martine McCutcheon has been declared bankrupt after a petition was filed for insolvency over a debt to a finance company, official public records reveal. EastEnders star Martine McCutcheon has encountered further distress a year on from her separation from husband Jack McManus. The 49 year old actress has been declared bankrupt following a petition for insolvency due to a debt owed to a finance firm, official public records indicate. This comes after she was compelled to reduce the asking price of her beautiful Surrey home. A court document reveals that the insolvency order was issued on 31 March this year, just a few months after her announcement of her split from Jack, her spouse of 18 years. Martine and Jack are parents to their 10 year old son Rafferty. The bankruptcy ruling, registered under her married name Martine McManus, was granted in March at the County Court in Guildford, subsequent to a petition lodged by a company named LDF Finance. However, Martine's company, Raven Music Ltd, was also liquidated last month, a move initiated by HMRC, due to unsettled tax bills, reports the Mirror. The most recent accounts reveal that the business had an outstanding tax bill exceeding £175,000, due within the 12-month period following February 2022. However, the total amount of Martine's personal tax bill remains undisclosed, and it is yet to be determined whether the Official Receiver will request a public examination of her bankruptcy, which would disclose her financial situation. Despite facing bankruptcy, Martine has kept her spirits high and hasn't let the strain show publicly. She recently shared a joyful day out with her son, Rafferty, and their pet dog on social media. Addressing her 635,000 Instagram followers, the ex-EastEnders actress expressed: "Wow... I needed this more than even I thought! I love being by the water.." She continued to share her appreciation for the UK's beauty spots, especially in good weather: "The UK has SO many beautiful places and in the sunshine, it really does take some beating, doesn't it? This is us on Hampton Court River.... We booked a boat, and took a little picnic, and it was gorgeous! ! Where do you love to go to in the sunshine months? I would love to hear your thoughts for our next little excursions in the summer!" However, this isn't Martine's first encounter with financial woes. Despite previously having a fortune estimated at £2million, she faced bankruptcy in 2013 due to debts totalling about £187,000, including a hefty £150,000 owed to HMRC. Remarkably, just a year after her bankruptcy, Martine was discharged and returned to financial stability. She and her now ex-husband splashed out an astonishing £1.3million on their former family home in Surrey only three years prior. Last year, the pair announced their separation after a marriage of 18 years. Announcing their separation on social media, she stated: "After much thought and consideration, Jack has decided it's best for us to separate after 18 years together and I accept his decision." She went on to express her well-wishes: "I continue to send Jack, all the love, luck and happiness for the next chapter of his life." This news came just a few weeks after they put their £1.5million home up for sale.


The Independent
11 hours ago
- The Independent
Man United and Leeds kick off pre-season with dull goalless draw in Stockholm
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.