UK visa 'scam' : Migrant carers from Kerala await justice
It took Arun George half a working life to scrape together £15,000 ($19,460) in savings, which he used to secure a care worker job for his wife in the UK.But in barely a few months, he lost it all.Mr George - not his real name as his wife doesn't want to be identified within their small community for the shame associated with having returned without a job - paid the money in late 2023 to the managers of Alchita Care. The BBC has seen evidence of the payment to Alchita Care, the private domiciliary care home in Bradford that sponsored his family's visa. He did it at the behest of a local agent in his town in the southern Indian state of Kerala.It was the promise of a better life for their child who has special needs that prodded the couple to dip into their savings and take such a risk. But when they got to the UK there was no work."We kept chasing the care home, but they made up excuses. After I pleaded with them, they forced us to undergo some unpaid training and gave my wife just three days of work," Mr George said. "We couldn't carry on and came back to India a few months later."Mr George believes he has been scammed by the company and says the ordeal has set him back at least by a decade financially. His family is just one among hundreds of people from Kerala seeking work in the UK who have been exploited by recruiters, care homes and middlemen.Most have now given up hope of getting justice or their money.Alchita Care in Bradford has not responded to the BBC's questions. Their sponsorship licence - which allows care homes to issue certificates of sponsorship to foreign care workers applying for visas - was removed by the Home Office last year.But at least three other care workers who sent thousands of pounds to Alchita Care and uprooted their lives from Kerala told us that the jobs they had been promised did not materialise.
One of them, still in the UK, said his condition was so precarious that he was surviving on "bread and milk" from charity shops for the past few months.Like Mr George, Sridevi (not her real name) says she was charged £15,000 for a visa sponsorship by Alchita Care. She spent another £3,000 to get to the UK in 2023.She's unable to return to India, scared of facing family members and friends from whom she took a loan to make the trip."I struggle to even pay for my rent and meals," she said. Her job is a far cry from the stable eight-hour work she was promised, she says. She is sometimes on call from 4am to 9pm, driving from one patient's home to another, but gets paid only for the few hours she is actually with the patient, and not the full shift.Thousands of nurses from Kerala, desperate to migrate to the UK every year, are estimated to have been exploited after the government added care workers to the UK's shortage occupation list during Covid. This allowed people to be recruited from overseas as long as they were sponsored.The carers crossing the globe to fill UK shortageFor many, the care worker visa was a golden ticket to a better life as they could take family along.Baiju Thittala, a Labour party member and the mayor of Cambridge, told the BBC he had represented at least 10 such victims over the last three years.But the cross-border nature of these exploitative schemes means it has been incredibly hard to pursue justice, he said. Very often the victims have made payments to care homes or middlemen domiciled outside India which leads to "jurisdiction problems", he added.Secondly, lawyers are expensive and most care workers, already in deep debt, can hardly afford to fight it out in the courts.Thittala estimates at least 1,000-2,000 people from Kerala, directly or indirectly victims of these schemes, are still in the UK.
There are also hundreds of people scattered across Kerala's towns who lost money before they could even leave home.In the town of Kothamangalam, the BBC spoke to some 30 people who had collectively lost millions of dollars while trying to obtain a care visa that allows professionals to come to - or stay - in the UK to work in the social care sector.All of them accused one agent - Henry Poulos and his agency Grace International in the UK and India - of robbing them of their life savings through fake job offers and sponsorship letters.Mr Poulos even made some of them take a 2,500km journey to Delhi for visa appointments that were non-existent, they said.Shilpa, who lives in the town of Alleppey, told the BBC she had taken out a bank loan at a 13% interest rate to pay Mr Poulos, who gave her a fake certificate of sponsorship."I thought the UK would offer a good future for my three daughters, but now I am struggling to pay their school fees," she told the BBC."I have lost everything. My wife had left her job in Israel so that we could move to the UK," said another victim, Binu, breaking down. He made a comfortable £1,500 with his wife in Israel but has now been forced to take his children out of private school in Kerala because there's no money anymore.Neither Mr Poulos nor Grace International responded to the BBC, despite repeated attempts to get in touch with them. The police in Kothamangalam said Mr Poulos was absconding in the UK, and they had sealed his local offices after receiving complaints from six people.
The previous Conservative government in the UK admitted last year that there was "clear evidence" that care workers were being offered visas under false pretences and paid far below the minimum wage required for their work.Rules to reduce its misuse were tightened in 2024, including increasing the minimum salary. Care workers are also now restricted from taking dependents, making it a less attractive proposition for families.Since July 2022, about 450 licences allowing employers to recruit foreign workers have been revoked in the care sector.Since the beginning of this year, sponsors are now also explicitly prohibited by the Home Office from passing on the cost of the sponsor licence fee or associated administrative costs to prospective employees. Top police officials in Kerala, meanwhile, told the BBC they were still investigating these cases in India and would work with Interpol agencies to crack down on agents, if necessary.But for the hundreds who've already been exploited, justice remains elusive, and still very much a distant dream.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
US shrimp fishers see Trump tariffs as a lifeline: ‘We're basically on our knees'
Sandy Nguyen has strong opinions about where the best shrimp in the US is produced. A second-generation shrimper in New Orleans, Nguyen maintains 'our [Louisiana] shrimp tastes better than Florida shrimp or Mississippi shrimp or Texas shrimp'. Her family moved to the Gulf Coast from Vietnam during the Jimmy Carter administration, and her dad, like many such immigrants to the area, worked as a fisher. The business gave Nguyen a front-row seat to one of the nation's most abundant sources of seafood. Shrimp thrive in brackish waters, and Louisiana has the largest delta on the continent, where fresh water from the Mississippi River mixes with the Gulf of Mexico's saltwater. In part due to the sheer expanse of this delta, Louisiana shrimpers provide nearly a quarter of all shrimp caught in the US, supplying an estimated 72m lbs of shrimp in 2023 – the largest share of any state. But things have changed drastically since the 1980s, when the Nguyen family settled in Louisiana. Demand and prices dropped during the Covid-19 pandemic. A run of devastating hurricanes – Laura, Delta, Zeta and Ida – caused over half a billion dollars in losses to the state's seafood industry since 2020. Nguyen hoped that 2022 would be a turning point, but then Russia invaded Ukraine, and the price of diesel climbed, driving up the cost to operate trawlers. As inflation appeared to be climbing everywhere else, the wholesale price of shrimp declined. All these factors were happening alongside another massive, decades-long change: a surge in imported shrimp from Asia and South America. Talk to most shrimpers and they will say this familiar foe is driving down the price of shrimp, making it nearly impossible for US shrimpers to hang on. So when Donald Trump announced sweeping tariffs, a move that threw global markets into tumult and caused consternation among many industries, some American shrimpers instead expressed optimism. 'I know it's going to affect a lot of other industries. But for us, it's good,' said Aaron Wallace, who helps run Anchored Shrimp Company in Georgia. The US shrimp industry pales in comparison to its counterparts in Ecuador, India, Indonesia and Vietnam. In those countries, aquaculture farms proliferate, churning out a prodigious volume of shrimp. Together, those four countries account for over 90% of shrimp imported to the US, or approximately 1.5bn lbs of shrimp in 2023. That's more than 20 times the amount of shrimp produced in Louisiana. 'Really, our battle is the farm-raised shrimp industry overseas,' Wallace added. 'We're basically on our knees [due to] what the imports do.' 'The farm-raised industry has created a market where shrimp is readily available anywhere, everywhere,' he continued. 'It's changed the way we view shrimp versus back in the day.' Today, shrimp is the most widely consumed seafood in the US, outranking salmon, tuna and tilapia. Like chicken breast, it's a protein that people expect to buy cheaply and regularly. Unlike its crustacean cousins, lobster and crab, which are typically associated with luxurious feasts, shrimp is economical and ubiquitous. It's frequently found on the menus of chains like Popeyes to all-you-can-eat specials at Sizzler and, formerly, Red Lobster. But shrimp's cheapness and commonplaceness have come with a cost. Consumers aren't often aware of the fact that most of the shrimp they consume is imported. Acy Cooper, president of the Louisiana Shrimp Association and a fourth-generation shrimper, said that tariffs provide an opportunity for US shrimpers to regain a foothold in the domestic seafood industry. 'We are losing our local industry,' Cooper said. That moved Cooper to vote for Trump, hoping he would 'make America great again in all sectors', including shrimping. When Cooper was growing up in the 1970s, shrimping was a good job, one that could easily support a family. Later, in the 1980s, when Cooper was first getting his start, he could get $1 per pound of small shrimp and $4.50 per pound of large shrimp. But last year, he could barely get $1 per pound from dockside buyers for his biggest shrimp. 'Look, I quit school in the eighth grade and went to work fishing because I made more money than college graduates at the time,' Cooper said. But his own son chose to leave the industry. 'He just broke the chain in my family,' Cooper said. 'He's got three kids in his household, and he couldn't make enough to survive.' Deborah Long, a spokesperson for the Southern Shrimp Alliance, said: 'The problem is not cheap imports. The problem is the counterproductive trade policies we have that have led to cheap imports' and that other countries benefit from practices not allowed in the US. Long pointed to the fact that many foreign aquaculture operations are subsidized by international financial institutions backed by taxpayer dollars and employ unpaid labor or using banned antibiotics. From Long's perspective, these factors allow foreign shrimp suppliers to undercut domestic shrimp suppliers' prices. 'When you look at trade data, you will find that the 1980s were the heydays for this industry,' Long said. 'Aquaculture came around, and shrimpers were able to compete against it. And around the early 2000s, you started seeing a flood of imports. That's where allegations of dumping – selling below fair value – came in.' However, Martin Smith, a Duke University economist who studies fisheries and seafood markets, said it's not clear that Trump's recent broad-based tariffs – those that target a wide array of goods – are the right tool to address a flood of cheap shrimp imports. He noted that the US Department of Commerce was already working on anti-dumping and countervailing duties, which aim to counteract the impact of dumping and governmental subsidies, on the biggest importers of shrimp. Already, those duties were showing modest improvements in ex-vessel prices, the prices that shrimpers are paid at the dock. 'In principle, the system had already addressed the aspects of competition that are unfair,' Smith said. 'This additional layer of broad-based tariffs is really just saying that we are now going to make it unfair for the rest of the world.' Smith also cautioned that any efforts to bolster the prices of shrimp could risk reducing the overall demand for shrimp, which would also adversely impact domestic shrimpers. 'There's some real long-term risk here in using tariffs to try to elevate the prices of domestic product. … It could actually just push them back into being luxury goods,' Smith said. Still, Long, of the Southern Shrimp Alliance, applauded Trump's tariffs, which she hoped would put a dent in imports, while also acknowledging that it wouldn't be a magic bullet for all of the issues facing shrimpers. 'It is a short-term measure that is desperately needed to support these guys and get them through other seasons while we address these systemic problems,' Long said. But Nguyen remained skeptical as to whether the tariffs would actually help the industry to which she's dedicated her whole life. 'I'm not excited about anything that Trump does,' Nguyen said. 'Even though I'm broke, I can't trust that his tariffs are going to help us because I understand the economics of the industry.' She pointed out that tariffs could cause the price of rope, steel or even nets to go up, making the work of shrimping even more costly. Plus, from Nguyen's point of view, it's not just cheap imports driving down the prices; it's also the fact that there are fewer processors and wholesale distributors as the industry has consolidated, leaving shrimpers with little room to negotiate at the docks. A report on the Louisiana shrimp value chain, produced for the Coalition to Restore Coastal Louisiana, recognized this disconnect, noting that shrimpers like Nguyen are at the bottom of a value chain that is trying to compete with low global prices. Shrimpers get the short end of the stick even when consumers are paying more for the shrimp at their supermarket or on their dinner plate. Long, of the Southern Shrimp Alliance, echoed that point. 'While the prices collapsed from 2021 to 2023, and the industry lost more than half of its value – and the values of imports plunged $1.5bn as well – consumer prices, the retail price you would pay at a grocery store, reached record highs,' Long said. 'There's a big disconnect in the market there.' Nguyen put it more bluntly. 'It's the big dogs, the big companies, that hurt us,' she said, referring to the dockside buyers, as well as to the network of processors, distributors and retailers. 'Part of the reason our prices went down drastically is that we're making enough shrimp for all of them to get filthy rich.' In her opinion, tariffs won't fix that problem. And it won't fix the devastation she has seen among shrimpers fighting to survive. By 2023, she noted shrimpers she knew had 'strokes, heart attacks, overdoses, domestic violence and children not being able to go to college', Nguyen said. 'An entire way of life was stripped from us for the last three years at no fault of our own.'
Reuters
32 minutes ago
- Reuters
Rupee's sticks to muted price action, implied volatility retreats
MUMBAI, June 11 (Reuters) - The Indian rupee ended slightly higher on Wednesday, sticking to rangebound price action for a third consecutive session on two-sided client flows and the absence of cues to firm a directional bias on the currency. The dollar-rupee pair's implied volatility, a gauge of future expectations, has receded on the back of muted moves in the currency. The 1-month gauge eased to about 4.4%, the lowest in over one month. On the day, the rupee closed at 85.51 against the U.S. dollar, up slightly from its close of 85.6025 in the previous session. Asian currencies were largely steady as well while the dollar index was hovering sideways around the 99-handle. Mild dollar sales from foreign banks helped the rupee tick higher in early trading but routine corporate dollar demand stood in the way of the local currency extending its rise, a trader at a state-run bank said. India's benchmark equity indexes, the BSE Sensex (.BSESN), opens new tab and Nifty 50 (.NSEI), opens new tab, ended slightly in the green, tracking a rise in regional equities as markets gave a guarded welcome to the latest signs of progress in trade talks between the United States and China. "The dollar remains one of the best gauges of trade sentiment. While it has held up generally well early this week, it hasn't built on the late-week momentum following the US-China meeting announcement," ING Bank said in a note. Worries about the impact of wide-ranging U.S. tariffs have weighed on the dollar this year and left it nursing losses of more than 8.5% against major peers. The focus now turns to U.S. consumer price inflation data, due later on Wednesday, which is expected to show month-on-month core consumer prices rose 0.3% in May, according to a Reuters poll, slightly higher than the 0.2% rise in the previous month.
Fashion United
an hour ago
- Fashion United
Pinko returns to profitability following strategic restructuring and new leadership
After navigating several challenging years, Italian womenswear brand PINKO has successfully returned to profitability in the first quarter of 2025. This marks a significant achievement in its ongoing transformation, driven by a strategic overhaul and new leadership. The company, founded in 1986 by Pietro Negra and Cristina Rubini, reported Q1 sales exceeding 70 million euros and a positive EBITDA shift of 6 million euros, moving from -1.2 million euros to +5 million euros year-on-year. This turnaround comes as PINKO works to emerge from Italy's Composizione negoziata della crisi, a negotiated debt settlement procedure. Chairman Pietro Negra described it as a "real turning point," emphasizing a prudent, sustainable business plan designed to generate cash flow starting this year. A new phase under CEO Laura Manelli The arrival of CEO Laura Manelli in March 2025 signaled a decisive shift for PINKO. With extensive experience at leading fashion houses such as Armani, Versace, Fendi, and Sergio Rossi, Manelli brings a strong background in financial oversight and fashion operations. Under her leadership, PINKO has concentrated on redefining its business model, streamlining operations, and realigning with core brand values. "We prefer not to call it a relaunch," Manelli stated. "There is untapped potential in the brand. These results confirm that our new approach is working." She underscored the company's strengths in brand recognition and customer loyalty, attributing the recent progress to employee commitment and the new management team's direction. Lessons learned from overexpansion PINKO's current position follows a period of rapid expansion and financial strain. After growing revenue from 197 million in 2019 to 303 million euros in 2022, the company embarked on an ambitious international strategy targeting 500 million euros in turnover. However, significant investments in China and the US underperformed, leading to liquidity issues and a debt load exceeding 100 million euros by late 2023. "The post-Covid growth wave misled us," Negra admitted. "We invested too fast, especially in China, where market dynamics shifted rapidly. Our mistake wasn't going to China – it was going too fast." The restructuring blueprint To regain financial stability, PINKO implemented comprehensive restructuring measures, including closing underperforming stores, cutting operational costs, resizing the company, and simplifying its governance. The plan has been submitted to banks for final approval and is expected to conclude the debt resolution process by mid-year. Both Negra and Manelli emphasize that the crisis was financial, not a crisis of brand identity. "This was a financial crisis, not a crisis of image," Manelli noted. The brand's appeal remains intact, and current efforts are focused on refining market positioning and improving operational efficiency. Future outlook: Strategic recalibration Positioned firmly in the 'entry-to-luxury' segment, PINKO is recalibrating its international strategy with a more selective and geographically cautious approach. A new partnership with Lima Commercial Management in Shanghai, signed in February 2025, exemplifies this shift towards sustainable growth in China. Domestically and internationally, PINKO is also deliberately moving away from the post-pandemic pricing surge observed across the luxury sector. "We're lowering our prices," Negra stated. "Our aim is to offer the best value for money while maintaining our aspirational brand presence." With strong Q1 figures, a refined strategy, and new leadership at the helm, PINKO appears to be transitioning beyond crisis towards a more measured and resilient future.
