Locals oppose bid by Otley Run shop for 24/7 alcohol licence
The Otley Run is a 19-stop pub crawl finishing in the city centre which draws thousands of revellers every weekend, including many students.However, last month a man injured two women with a crossbow along the Headingley drinking route, raising questions about the event's safety. The man, 38-year-old Owen Lawrence, was arrested and taken to hospital but later died from a self-inflicted injury. Eight letters of objection have been received by the council about the Nisa store's application to extend its licencing laws, alongside concerns raised by West Yorkshire Police, ward councillors and public health officials, said the Local Democracy Reporting Service. The shop has maintained the 24/7 licence would not add to anti-social behaviour on the pub crawl, and a list of proposed conditions, if granted, included a 'check 25' policy, CCTV and staff training.Nonetheless, the council's licensing officer, Susan Duckworth, remains unconvinced: "I'm concerned that if this premises was allowed to sell alcohol after midnight, that would become an emerging problem."
Mrs Duckworth also pointed out that more families had been moving to Headingley, with more student accommodation opening up in the city centre, exacerbating her concerns over any increased access to alcohol. Nisa's existing premises licence allows alcohol sales between 05:00 and 00:00. Residents previously told the BBC they hoped the Otley Run might become a "recognised" event to better protect those taking part.Acknowledging the burgeoning popularity of the event, MP for Leeds Central and Headingley Alex Sobel said: "We need to look at the laws we have and tightening them, bringing more control to the Otley Run."Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
40 minutes ago
- Sky News
Police ordered to consider revealing ethnicity of suspects
Police should consider disclosing the ethnicity and nationality of suspects when they are charged in high-profile and sensitive cases, new national guidance says. Coming into force today, it says there must be a policing reason to release the information, such as where there are high levels of disinformation, if it will improve public safety, or if it is significantly in the public interest. A Home Office spokesperson told Sky News they will support the new guidance by authorising the release of relevant accompanying immigration information if appropriate. The change comes after two men charged over the alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton were reported to be Afghan asylum seekers, sparking protests. Warwickshire Police did not confirm the immigration status, leading to Reform UK accusing them of a cover-up, something the force strongly denied. Responding to the row, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said last week she wanted police to be more transparent, and that new guidance was being worked up. 2:41 How high-profile cases sparked debate When considering what information to release, police must consider contempt of court laws which aim to give defendants a fair trial, as well as media guidance from the College of Policing. Until now, the media guidance said once a suspect has been charged, police can give out information such as their name, date of birth and address. It did not mention anything about ethnicity, nationality, or immigration status. The Southport murders committed by Axel Rudakubana last July led to speculation about his ethnicity and immigration status, fuelling riots in many parts of the country. While the details were not initially released in that case, when a car ploughed into crowds celebrating Liverpool's Premier League win earlier this year, Merseyside Police were quick to say the suspect was a white British man. In the Nuneaton case, Reform leader Nigel Farage said retaining the "basic and sober facts" was "a cover-up that in many ways is reminiscent of what happened after the Southport killings". Warwickshire Police said officers "did not and will not cover up such criminality", and followed national guidance. How will new guidance work? The new guidance says it is at the discretion of the police force to decide whether to release ethnicity and nationality details, and that they must consider the ethical and legal implications. It says it is not the job of police to verify a suspect's immigration status, which rests with the Home Office. The advice has been developed by the National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) and the College of Policing, in consultation with the Home Office and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). Deputy chief constable Sam de Reya, the NPCC lead for communications and media, said: "We saw during last summer's disorder, as well as in several recent high-profile cases, what the major, real-world consequences can be from what information police release into the public domain. "We have to make sure our processes are fit for purpose in an age of social media speculation and where information can travel incredibly quickly across a wide range of channels. "Disinformation and incorrect narratives can take hold in a vacuum. It is good police work for us to fill this vacuum with the facts about issues of wider public interest." 3:31 'A chilling message' The guidance is interim, and will be considered as part of a wider review of the College of Policing's authorised professional practice for media relations later this year. Chief constable Sir Andy Marsh, the college's CEO, said officers will continue to police "without fear or favour". But the guidance is likely to provoke backlash from anti-racism campaigners. Last week, the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants warned that revealing ethnicity and migration status would "send a chilling message: that some people are inherently more 'suspect'". 'Public trust requires transparency' A Home Office spokesperson told Sky News they welcome the new guidance, adding: "Public trust requires transparency and consistency from the authorities that serve them." They added: "The public, and police forces themselves, want greater clarity on when, why and how information is released and the legitimate and compelling reasons it may need to be withheld. "The Home Office will support that effort by authorising the release of relevant accompanying immigration information in future cases, where it is appropriate to do so, and where the police have requested it. All cases will of course take account of consultation with the police and CPS. "The government also asked the Law Commission at the end of February to speed up the elements of its review around the law of contempt in relation to what can be said publicly ahead of a trial."
Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
'Group sex talk, a lust for married men and cancer': Blow-by-blow, read the astonishing accusations Mark Latham is making about his ex in court
Mark Latham's ex-girlfriend told acquaintances her husband had died of bowel cancer and that she was a grieving widow - when nothing of the sort happened, the politician claims in an explosive court document. In a sworn affidavit, filed in local court as part of restraining order proceedings Nathalie Matthews is bringing against Latham, the politician also claims Ms Matthews told him in a conversation in London in June 2023 that she had an interest in group sex and had a 'fetish' for married men. 'In f***ng me, it shows how much they value it, risking their marriage,' she told him, Latham alleges in his affidavit. During that same alleged conversation, held during a six-week trip to London, he also learned Ms Matthews ran an OnlyFans account under the name 'BondiC**S**t', Latham claimed in the court document. Latham, who had recently left a 22-year marriage, said in the affidavit that the conversation in London was 'a lot to take in', adding it was 'wild and beyond my experience in life'. That night, Latham decided to pursue what he called a 'situationship' with Ms Matthews because, he said, he wanted to embrace a 'modern approach of not being judgmental about a woman's morality' and to 'enjoy' himself before he passed away. 'At my age (62 when we met on 3 March 2023) my father had already dropped dead, and if that was going to happen to me one day, at least I was going to enjoy myself beforehand,' he wrote. 'So, I decided to see how it went for those six weeks, if our time together was compatible and happy, comforted by the fact that Nathalie spent a lot of time in Dubai, meaning if I needed a break from her intensity, I had that back in Sydney. 'I saw 90 per cent benefit in our situation and ten per cent downside. 90 beat ten, as I rationalised it at 3-4am in Putney that night and eventually fell asleep.' Elsewhere in the affidavit, Latham accused Ms Matthews of telling people her ex-husband had died of bowel cancer despite being alive to this day. 'When she went to Dubai in 2022, following a break in her time with (her husband), she told people there her husband had died of bowel cancer and she was in Dubai as a grieving widow,' he wrote. Ms Matthew's ex-husband, who asked not to be named, told the Daily Mail he was not aware of the alleged claims, and that he had never suffered from bowel cancer. Ms Matthews declined to comment. The affidavit was filed on July 31 in response to Ms Matthews' AVO application with the NSW Local Court. Ms Matthews, 37, alleged that Latham, 64, inflicted 'a sustained pattern' of psychological, financial and emotional abuse against her for almost three years. The former federal opposition leader has denied all abuse claims made by Ms Matthews, alleging the pair's relationship was consensual. The relationship, which Latham said was founded on 'sexual pleasure', would devolve within the next nearly two years. Also in the court document, Latham accused Ms Matthews of planning to meet a senior corporate figure for sex in May 2024. 'She called me on my mobile that day. I remember it well because she rarely called (preferring to message) and the Parliament was sitting. 'I took her call as I was walking down a corridor back towards my office.' Daily Mail does not suggest Ms Matthews is dishonest nor that Latham's claims are true, simply that they have been made in an affidavit sworn by Latham. Latham has denied all abuse accusations, claiming that he had 'scores of documents' which would vindicate him, and enjoyed a 'fantastic' sex life with Ms Matthews. In the affidavit, Mr Latham also rebuffed the idea relationships should be entirely equal, claiming Ms Matthews enjoyed elements of 'consensual subservience'. 'A feature of today's politics is the woke feminist idealisation of the notion of Equality. This is a political theory, popularised by the #MeToo movement, that every aspect of every relationship must have equal power relations and practices. 'But as a colleague said to me last week, "It's not uncommon for relationships to be internally unequal, in fact there are plenty of them in private, it's just the way some people like it by choice". 'Nathalie was one of those people, enjoying elements of consensual subservience.' Ms Matthews describes herself as the managing director of Skynet Global Logistics, a company involved in freight forwarding which has a presence in Sydney, Perth and Dubai. Latham and Ms Matthews began dating in 2023 and ended their relationship earlier this year. The matter will return to court next month.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Epping council goes to High Court to remove migrants from hotel
Epping Forest district council has applied to the High Court to stop asylum seekers being housed at a hotel that has been at the centre of protests. The local authority has asked for an interim injunction to prohibit the use of the Bell Hotel as asylum seeker accommodation for a fortnight. The leader of the council said it had taken the action because ' the current situation cannot go on', adding that the Home Office 'continues not to listen'. Protests have been taking place outside the hotel since last month, after an Ethiopian asylum seeker was charged with sexually assaulting a schoolgirl days after arriving in Britain. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, denied the charge when he appeared at Chelmsford magistrates' court, and has been remanded in custody. In a statement on Tuesday, Cllr Chris Whitbread said: 'The current situation cannot go on. If the Bell Hotel was a nightclub, we could have closed it down long ago. 'So far as the council is aware, there is no criminal record checking of individuals who might only have been in the country a matter of days before being housed at the hotel. 'There are five schools and a residential care home within the vicinity of the hotel. 'The use by the Home Office of the premises for asylum seekers poses a clear risk of further escalating community tensions already at a high, and the risk of irreparable harm to the local community. We are frustrated that the Home Office continues not to listen.' The Conservative-led council is claiming that placing asylum seekers in the Bell Hotel is a 'clear breach of planning permission' because it is not being used as a hotel. Cllr Whitbread said he hoped that, should an interim injunction be granted, it would be a 'catalyst to the prohibition of the use of the Bell Hotel' to house migrants. At the end of last month, Essex Police said 14 people had been charged in connection with protests outside the hotel, and there had been 23 arrests. Protesters opposing the use of the hotel to house migrants have also been faced by counter-protests, at times leading to hundreds of demonstrators in the area. Since the demonstrations began in Epping, there have been other migrant protests cropping up in other parts of the country, including at Heathrow and the financial area of Canary Wharf. Cllr Holly Whitbread, responsible for Epping Forest district council's finances, told PA: 'In terms of the community impact and the pressure on local infrastructure, it's just completely unsustainable, particularly also in light of the amount of police resource which has been required around some of the protests which I know have been largely peaceful.' 'In theory, the Home Office are supposed to foot the bill for those within the hotel, but I think the reality is often different'. Meanwhile, Ricard Tice, the Reform UK deputy leader, claimed migrants were 'leering and jeering' at mothers taking their children to school. He told Times Radio: 'We are seeing an increase in numbers of sexual assaults, leering and jeering, coincidentally around asylum seeker hotels. When I campaign up and down the country, I hear this from concerned residents close to these hotels time and time again. Around primary schools, as mums take their youngsters to school.' Other local authorities have previously sought injunctions against the use of hotels as asylum accommodation. Councils including Ipswich borough council, East Riding of Yorkshire council, Fenland district council and Stoke-on-Trent city council had interim injunctions granted but not continued. In January 2023, the High Court decided to continue an injunction from the previous in Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, where a seafront hotel had been lined up to house asylum seekers. The court noted that the area's local plan had a policy to protect the seafront, and that hostels were not permitted there. Matt Vickers, the shadow policing minister, said Epping Forest district council 'is absolutely right to take a stand'. He added: 'Communities like Epping should not be forced to carry the burden of Labour's broken asylum policy. Local residents have every right to feel safe in their own streets and every right to object to this accommodation in their community. 'This is the direct result of Labour's decision to throw open Britain's borders and tear up the deterrents the Conservatives put in place. The Conservatives will remove all illegal arrivals immediately and put a proper deterrent in place so that towns like Epping are never put in this position again.' A Home Office spokesman said: 'It would be inappropriate to comment while legal proceedings are ongoing.'
