logo
Trump 'called Epstein the greatest in note inside book he gave to him'

Trump 'called Epstein the greatest in note inside book he gave to him'

Metro25-07-2025
Donald Trump praised Jeffrey Epstein as 'the greatest' in a note inside a copy of one of his books, according to a report.
The message was written in a copy of 1997's'Trump: The Art of the Comeback', reported the New York Times, which published a photo of the message.
'To Jeff – You are the greatest!' reads the note, which was signed 'Donald' and dated 'Oct 97', the month it came out.
The newspaper also reported Trump featured in the 'contributors list' – alongside Bill Clinton – for a now-infamous 50th birthday album compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell for Epstein.
The US president is suing the Wall Street Journal for a report claiming the album contained a racy birthday letter suggesting he and Epstein had 'certain things in common'.
Parts of the 2003 album were reportedly examined by Justice Department officials investigating Maxwell and Epstein.
The letter allegedly signed by Trump featured typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appeared to be hand-drawn with permanent marker.
Styled as an imaginary conversation between the pair, the text reads: 'Voice Over: There must be more to life than having everything.
'Donald: Yes, there is, but I won't tell you what it is.
'Jeffrey: Nor will I, since I also know what it is.
'Donald: We have certain things in common, Jeffrey.
'Jeffrey: Yes, we do, come to think of it.
'Donald: Enigmas never age, have you noticed that?
'Jeffrey: As a matter of fact, it was clear to me the last time I saw you.
'Trump: A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.'
The US president denied writing the note or drawing the picture, branding the report a 'fake Wall Street Journal story'.
The New York Times report includes a note from Maxwell to her former lover saying: 'The idea behind this book was simply to gather stories and old photographs to jog your memory about places, people and different events.
'Some of the letters will definitely achieve their intended goal. Some, well… you will have to read to see for yourself.'
Maxwell signed the letter: 'I hope you will derive so much pleasure looking through it as I did putting it together for you. Happy happy birthday. Love Ghislaine.'
Former Victoria's Secret owner Leslie H. Wexner, late Wall Street titan Alan C. Greenberg, and late Nobel-winning physicist Murray Gell-Mann also appeared on the list, which is about 50-strong, the newspaper added.
But the Wall Street Journal has reported that the next 'biggest name' in the album was the former US president Bill Clinton.
His note reportedly read: 'It's reassuring isn't it, to have lasted as long, across all the years of learning and knowing, adventures and [illegible word], and also to have your childlike curiosity, the drive to make a difference and the solace of friends.'
A spokesperson for Clinton declined to comment to the Journal, referring to a previous statement saying he was not aware of Epstein's crimes and had cut ties with him more than a decade before his arrest.
Epstein died in prison in 2019 after being arrested on federal sex trafficking charges.
The newspaper also reported that the album's 'friends' section includes a letter from Peter Mandelson, the Labour politician who held a number of major government roles during the Blair and Brown years.
The letter referred to Epstein as 'my best pal' and 'included photos of whiskey and a tropical island', according to the Journal.
A spokesperson for Mandelson declined to comment in response.
Other inclusions reported in the same article were billionaire investor Leon Black, fashion designer Vera Wang and billionaire former Microsoft executive Nathan Myhrvold.
Trump's slander lawsuit targets Rupert Murdoch, two Wall Street Journal reporters, the newspaper's publisher Dow Jones, and News Corp.
Seeking $10 billion or more in damages, it was filed in the southern district of Florida federal court in Miami.
The suit alleges the defendants 'failed to attach the letter, failed to attach the alleged drawing, failed to show proof that President Trump authored or signed any such letter, and failed to explain how this purported letter was obtained'.
'The reason for those failures is because no authentic letter or drawing exists', it claims.
By his own admission, Trump was friendly with Epstein for more than a decade starting in the 1980s.
The future president told New York Magazine in 2002: 'He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.
'No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.'
A lawyer for Ms. Maxwell, who is currently serving a 20-year sentence for child sex trafficking, had no immediate comment.
A spokesman for Mr. Wexner declined to comment to the New York Times.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Astronomer HR director Kristin Cabot resigns after Coldplay kiss cam scandal
MORE: Idaho killer's Tinder match reveals disturbing question he asked on date
MORE: Ghislaine Maxwell 'answers every single question' in Epstein file jail grilling
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Could you land a job at the New Statesman in the 2020s?
Could you land a job at the New Statesman in the 2020s?

New Statesman​

time36 minutes ago

  • New Statesman​

Could you land a job at the New Statesman in the 2020s?

Illustration by Roger Chouinard / Ikon Images We at the New Statesman are no strangers to hard work, but even the most diligent strivers need to take a break sometimes, and recently the New York Times was kind enough to provide us all with some distraction. 'Could you have landed a job at Vogue in the Nineties?' it asked, atop a cultural-literacy quiz, based on one once used to test applicants to the magazine. Once we were done smugly trading our scores, I began dwelling on what such a quiz would look like for this title. So, I present: 'Could you land a job at the New Statesman in the 2020s?' Match the numbers and letters to find out; answers below (don't cheat). Score full marks and I'm told Tom McTague will graciously vacate his office for you*. Four Shades of Grey 1) 'Great White Male' guest editor 2) Chronicler of Southgateism 3) Tina Brown successor 4) Feline Philosophy author a) James Graham b) Graydon Carter c) John Gray d) Grayson Perry Further reading 1) 'Books are the mirrors of the soul' 2) Nicola Six 3) George Smiley 4) 'Only connect' a) EM Forster b) John Le Carré c) Virginia Woolf d) Martin Amis Boys George 1) Rhapsody in Blue composer 2) Real name: Eric Blair 3) Austerity posterboy 4) Real name: Mary Ann Evans Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe a) George Gershwin b) George Orwell c) George Eliot d) George Osborne The Kate Mossman interview 1) Old Brightonian 2) Mostly Men author 3) The Pervert's Guide to Cinema writer 4) Joni Mitchell muse a) Slavoj Žižek b) Nick Cave c) Lynn Barber d) Cary Raditz Go figure 1) Seven 2) 49 3) 20th Century Women 4) 13 a) Liz Truss b) David Fincher c) Blur d) Greta Gerwig Life of (B)rian 1) Popular 20th-century philosopher 2) New Statesman illustrator 3) Scarface director 4) Former New Statesman film critic a) Ryan Gilbey b) Brian De Palma c) Ryan McAmis d) Bryan Magee Man and boy 1) Scottish satirist 2) Welsh illustrator 3) Fury author 4) Any Human Heart author a) Ralph Steadman b) William Boyd c) Salman Rushdie d) Armando Iannucci The Tony Awards 1) Prison Notebooks author 2) The Future of Socialism author 3) Stop the War president 4) Start the War prime minister a) Tony Crosland b) Tony Blair c) Tony Benn d) Antonio Gramsci * There is no actual reward for any score in this quiz, nor will taking it in any way influence your prospects of being employed by the New Statesman, and Tom is quite attached to his office, thank you very much. Answers: 1d, 2a, 3b, 4c; 1c, 2d, 3b, 4a; 1a, 2b, 3d, 4c; 1b, 2c, 3a, 4d; 1b, 2a, 3d, 4c; 1d, 2c, 3b, 4a; 1d, 2a, 3c, 4b; 1d, 2a, 3c, 4b. [See also: Labour's summer of discontent] Related

Baby Reindeer and Fleabag team's next show is nothing I expected
Baby Reindeer and Fleabag team's next show is nothing I expected

Metro

timean hour ago

  • Metro

Baby Reindeer and Fleabag team's next show is nothing I expected

Baby Reindeer and Fleabag are known around the world as genre-defining TV shows. But they began life on the Edinburgh Fringe's cobbled streets, with flyers, persistence and a revolutionary spark, under the direction of Francesca Moody Productions. I expected Francesca's next trick to embody her last name like the predecessors: something dark, twisty and uncomfortable. But Ohio, running at the Edinburgh Fringe right now, is nothing of the sort. Toe-tapping, chest-pounding folk music is not a genre I can usually abide by. So when a hugging couple (I could sneak a glimpse of them backstage from my spot) beamed onto the stage with a guitar, I sank in my seat – worried at how a crowd in Scotland would receive a hippy-clappy American hour. Silly me. Far from it: Ohio turned out to be a heartwarming, raw, and deeply personal story of Obie-winning indie-folk duo Shaun and Abigail Bengson, as told by them. Light-hearted release cut through any threat of a saccharine toothache like a jug of peppermint mouthwash. Phew. Ohio tells the story of Sean's degenerative hearing loss and his journey away from God, told through song, poetry and theatre. As his deafness progresses with the story, syllables are left off on-screen captions, and the sound of their voices blur into a microphone, imitating his ordeal in that moment. It's one of the most powerful depictions of a disability I've ever seen on stage, putting us into his shoes without shoving trauma down out throats (as the Fringe quite likes to do these days). While Baby Reindeer tackles a big, crazy story, Ohio is a no less honest expression – but tackles human struggles, and finds beauty and hope within and despite of them. Through song, this duo express themselves like no one is on the receiving end: there are no rigid choruses, verses and genre conventions, but a meaningful, spine-tingling sound. One poignant moment is the duo's song for Mrs Wean, who helped Sean hear past his tinnitus as a child, told through his gravelly and beautifully strained vocals, and a genuinely brilliant melody. Meanwhile, Abigail's voice is nothing like I've ever heard. It's a yodelling, entrancing cross between Joni Mitchell, Dolly Parton and even, dare I say it, Enya. Her vocals and chants, recorded and played back during the show, are as eerie as a viking war cry and convey messages of longing, sadness and hope in a single note. More Trending Sean's reading of his dad's final ever sermon as a pastor before his deafness took hold of him, like it will eventually do to him, made me cry. I'm left wondering when Sean's last show will be. When will be his last Neil Young or Bob Dylan listen before the little hairs that give life to his ears lay their weary heads? But if the spirit of Ohio is genuine – which I believe it is – then I have hope that this remarkably talented couple will find beauty and meaning even when the performance is over. Ohio will be ringing in my ears for some time. Ohio is on at The Edinburgh Fringe at Assembly Roxy Upstairs for the rest of August at 3pm. Tickets here. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: I watched a woman orgasm on stage and it wasn't even awkward MORE: 'My comedy show is usually illegal – I can't wait to let loose in Scotland' MORE: EastEnders' Michelle Collins reaches out after fan collapses during her performance

Blake Lively And Justin Baldoni Came Face To Face During Her Deposition, But What Actually Happened?
Blake Lively And Justin Baldoni Came Face To Face During Her Deposition, But What Actually Happened?

Graziadaily

time3 hours ago

  • Graziadaily

Blake Lively And Justin Baldoni Came Face To Face During Her Deposition, But What Actually Happened?

A year after It Ends With Us landed in cinemas, the feud between co-stars Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni shows no signs of abating. Despite the judge's ruling to throw out Baldoni's countersuit in June, which alleged defamation, extortion and and invasion of privacy, there still seems to be foul play keeping the saga in the headlines. Last December, after months of speculation about what happened behind the scenes of the film, Lively filed a lawsuit against Baldoni alleging sexual harassment and claims a calculated smear campaign was launched against her by his PR team. It came in tandem with a New York Times article detailing her alleged experiences and prompted Baldoni to countersue Lively for $400m and the New York Times for $250m. What followed was a toxic back and forth between the pair, all of which prompted unprecedented commentary on social media, with TikTok sleuths wading through legal documents to offer their 'takes' on the dispute. However, once Judge Liman ruled that Baldoni's claims were unsubstantiated – both against Lively and the NYT – onlookers might have been fooled into thinking the story would fade from public view. Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni in It Ends With Us. ©IMAGO Baldoni's legal team had other ideas. On 31 July, Lively was summoned to depose in front of the defence team to testify about her sexual harassment claims. At one point prior to the deposition, Baldoni's attorney, Bryan Freedman, suggested hosting the meeting as a pay-per-view event at Madison Square Garden with proceeds going to domestic abuse organisations. Even if this were a charitable endeavour, it is a preposterous suggestion, and the judge granted Lively's request to choose the location for the deposition herself. She opted for her lawyer's office in New York. 'Justin Baldoni's lawyer has tried to make this matter a public spectacle at every turn,' Lively's rep told People. 'Even proposing to sell tickets to a televised deposition at Madison Square Garden. This is a serious matter of sexual harassment and retaliation, and it deserves to be treated as such.' Her legal team later added: 'Defendants have not denied that their intent is to manufacture a harassing stunt by requiring Ms Lively to parade through paparazzi, or by inviting unknown attendees to the deposition, including members of the media or social media influencers, or any other number of abusive tactics.' The judge's decision to allow Lively to choose the location did not go down well with Baldoni's team who accused her of 'foot-stomping' and using her 'celebrity status' to control proceedings, adding 'her counsel's tantrum has no place in this court'. This meant matters were particularly acrimonious between both sides before the deposition took place – something that appears to have continued afterwards. According to details allegedly leaked to the Daily Mail, Lively attended with her older sister Robyn Lively, her husband Ryan Reynolds and a team of eight lawyers, while Baldoni and Freedman were the only two to attend on the defence side. However, Lively's lawyers later clarified that she 'testified across the table from Mr Baldoni, Jamey Heath, Steve Sarowitz, Melissa Nathan and Jennifer Abel, all of whom attended the deposition in person, as well as eight attorneys representing Wayfarer and Wallace Parties, two of whom questioned her'. Yes, Lively's deposition is thought to be the first time the pair have met in person since the saga began last summer. While Baldoni's decision to attend Lively's deposition is unusual, it is no unheard of, and he has the right to be present at oral depositions relating to the case to prepare for trial next March. According to Lively, Baldoni attempted to upload the 292-page transcript after the deposition took place. This is unsurprising to those who have been following the case given that he has previously uploaded his lawsuits onto a publicly available website for anyone to read. In a motion filed by Lively's team, they argue: 'There is no conceivable legal purpose to file the whole transcript, particularly given that it has not been reviewed, corrected or finalised, and a mere two pages of it were cited in their argument.' Lively's lawyers claim the move was 'a manufactured excuse to force the transcript into the public domain as fodder for the Wayfarer Defendants' media campaign' and have asked the judge to strike the rough draft of her deposition from the court record, as the motion to seal it is pending. 'Ms. Lively affirmatively pursued this litigation with the full intention and desire to have her testimony heard in a legal process, governed by the rules of evidence which publicly filing this rough draft transcript in this manner substantially undermines,' the letter reads. 'To suggest otherwise is part of an ongoing character attack that Mr. Freedman has been advancing to undermine Ms. Lively's credibility and taint the jury pool.' Baldoni has denied all allegations made in Lively's original lawsuit and has not yet publicly responded to her team's claims that he attempted to publish the deposition transcript as 'fodder' in a wider media campaign. Nikki Peach is a writer at Grazia UK, working across entertainment, TV and news. She has also written for the i, i-D and the New Statesman Media Group and covers all things pop culture for Grazia (treating high and lowbrow with equal respect).

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store