Only one in 10 treatments for lower back pain ‘are effective'
The majority of treatments for lower back pain may not be effective, according to a new review.
While the NHS advises that back pain will usually improve 'within a few weeks', this may seem like a lifetime to sufferers who will look for ways to alleviate their pain.
But a new study has found that only one in 10 treatments for lower back pain are effective, with those that improve symptoms only having 'slight' or 'small' effects on pain.
Experts found that evidence was 'inconclusive' for a number of popular treatments.
Researchers led by academics in Australia set out to examine the effectiveness of non-surgical back pain treatments in adults.
They looked at 301 trials examining 56 different treatments for lower back pain.
People involved with the studies reported pain intensity at the start of the trial and again after treatment.
Researchers also assessed the certainty of the evidence provided in the studies.
They found that just one treatment for acute low back pain and five treatments for chronic – or long-term – back pain were 'efficacious'.
These include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as ibuprofen, for short-term back pain.
For long-term back pain the treatments found to be effective were exercise, spinal manipulative therapy, taping, antidepressants and a type of drug called transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1).
But even these were only found to have 'slight' or 'small' reductions in pain compared with a placebo – or dummy drug.
'Best available evidence shows that one in 10 common non-surgical and non-interventional treatments for low back pain are efficacious, providing small analgesic effects beyond placebo,' the authors said.
They said that exercise, paracetamol and glucocorticoid injections 'probably provides little to no difference in pain' for acute lower back issues.
Antibiotics and anaesthetics were also found to be 'not efficacious' for long-term lower back problems.
Meanwhile the rest of the interventions studied had 'inconclusive evidence' so the authors called for more studies to examine the 'remaining uncertainty' surrounding a number of back pain treatments.
While the evidence was deemed to be inconclusive, the information available did point to some of these being effective for acute back pain.
For example the authors found that the certainty of the evidence for acupuncture was 'low' but the information that is available suggests that it may provide moderate reductions in pain for both short and long-term back pain.
And while massage is said to have large reductions in pain, the evidence surrounding this claim is 'very low'.
Other interventions where the evidence was deemed to be inconclusive include heat, TENS, opioids and muscle relaxants.
The authors, writing in BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, added: 'Most non-surgical and non-interventional treatments for low back pain were not efficacious.
'Around 10% of non-surgical and non-interventional treatments provided small analgesic effects beyond placebo.
'For acute low back pain, there is moderate certainty evidence that NSAIDs are efficacious.
'For chronic low back pain, there is moderate certainty evidence that exercise, spinal manipulative therapy, taping, antidepressants, and TRPV1 agonists are efficacious.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Loss of data relating to inquiry at NHS trust most likely deliberate, say police
A missing data file containing the details of hundreds of maternity cases was most likely deleted 'intentionally or maliciously', a police investigation has concluded. Nottinghamshire police began an investigation in February into the temporary loss of the computer file at Nottingham University Hospitals (NUH) NHS trust. The trust is at the centre of the largest maternity inquiry in the history of the NHS, examining deaths and harm spanning more than a decade at the Queen's Medical Centre and Nottingham city hospital. The police force's cyber team said the deletion was 'most likely to be the action of an individual' but the loss 'was not caused or contributed to by any systemic corruption within NUH'. A letter to families involved in the inquiry, seen by the BBC, from assistant chief constable Rob Griffin said the deletion was 'most likely to have been done intentionally/maliciously rather than accidentally'. Police said the identity of the culprit could not be determined. The trust previously said the computer file went missing in July 2024 for a few days. It was recovered after its deletion was spotted by the trust and led to about 300 more cases being added to the maternity inquiry. Nearly 2,500 cases are being examined by the senior midwife, Donna Ockenden, and a national team of leading doctors and midwives, whose review is due to conclude in summer 2026. A statement from the Nottingham Affected Families Group said: 'Nottingham families would like to thank the police for their determined investigation. We are distressed that they were unable to find who did this. 'We are appalled to hear this news, though sadly we are not surprised … To know that there is most likely an individual who is capable of such behaviour is devastating for the already harmed and for the future of NUH safety. 'We call for openness at this worrying time and for the individual, their colleagues or anyone who knows anything about this to come forwards as a matter of urgency. This is a patient safety emergency.' Anthony May, chief executive of NUH, said: 'I would like to thank Nottinghamshire police for their support in investigating this matter and we accept their findings. Upon discovering the issue, the trust informed Nottinghamshire police and engaged fully in the investigation. 'We have put appropriate measures in place to secure digital files so that this cannot happen again.' Last week, Nottinghamshire police said they were investigating possible corporate manslaughter at the trust over the deaths and severe harm of more than 2,000 babies and women. Det Supt Matthew Croome said at the time that the alleged offences related to 'circumstances where an organisation has been grossly negligent in the management of its activities, which has then led to a person's death'.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
New NHS guidelines mean younger women could have fewer cervical screenings
Women aged 25 to 49 who test negative for human papillomavirus (HPV) will be invited to cervical screening every five years instead of every three, under new NHS guidelines. The change, set to take effect next month in England, follows recommendations from the UK National Screening Committee. According to analysis from King's College London, extending the screening interval to five years for HPV-negative women is just as safe as the current three-year interval, with a similar rate of cancer detection. HPV is a sexually transmitted group of viruses, with around 13 high-risk types known to cause almost all cases of cervical cancer. Most people with HPV don't experience any symptoms. Women who test positive for HPV, or have a history of the virus, will continue to be invited for more frequent screenings to monitor the virus and check for any changes to cells in the cervix. In a written statement to Parliament, health minister Ashley Dalton said the new change 'increases the opportunities to test and recall women and people with a cervix who have HPV, while extending the cervical screening intervals from three to five years in England for individuals who have a negative HPV test. 'This will bring England's cervical screening intervals in line with those of Wales and Scotland.' She said the NHS screening programme in England provides all women between the ages of 25 and 64 'with the opportunity to be screened routinely to detect HPV infection or cervical abnormalities at an early, more treatable stage'. She added: 'The aim of the programme is to reduce the number of women who develop invasive cervical cancer and reduce the number who die from it.' Ms Dalton said testing negative for HPV means the chances of developing cancer within five years are very small, as it can take around 10 years or more from the time HPV is detected to developing cervical cancer. She added: 'Those who test positive for HPV are already being followed up with yearly testing. 'This is important to ensure that individuals are monitored for any early signs of cervical abnormalities and provided the necessary treatment.' Experts have been concerned about falling numbers of women under 50 attending cervical screening, with around a third in England not taking up their invitations. Dr Sue Mann, NHS national clinical director for women's health, said: 'Taking a more personalised approach to cervical screening will help ensure everyone eligible can make the most of these life-saving services, while sparing women appointments that they don't need. 'The NHS is following robust evidence on how often women need to be safely screened, and by putting invitations and reminders straight in women's pockets on their phones, we're making it easier than ever to take up screening appointments. 'Make sure you come forward for your screening when you're invited, even if it was weeks, months or years ago. If you think you are due but have not yet had an invitation, speak to your GP practice.' Michelle Mitchell, chief executive of Cancer Research UK, said: 'We welcome this change to cervical screening in England, which is the result of years of vital research to make screening more effective and has shown it is safe to extend the time between tests. 'Screening, alongside the roll out of the HPV vaccine – which Cancer Research UK scientists helped develop – have seen cervical cancer rates drop by around a quarter since the early 1990s, and we look forward to even more progress. 'If you notice any unusual changes for you, do not wait for a screening invitation – speak to your doctor.' Athena Lamnisos, chief executive of the Eve Appeal, said: 'We want every eligible person to feel empowered to attend a vaccination and cervical screening appointment when they are invited so we can achieve the brilliant ambition of eliminating cervical cancer.'
Daily Record
4 hours ago
- Daily Record
NHS urges Tesco shoppers to read important life saving labels in store
The warning comes amid a new collaboration between the NHS and the supermarket giant on Tesco's own brand Luxury Soft toilet rolls. The NHS is encouraging Tesco shoppers to 'keep an eye out' and 'contact your GP practice if something doesn't feel right'. This health warning has been issued as Tesco's own brand-Luxury Soft toilet rolls now feature the NHS logo on the packaging. The collaboration between the NHS and the supermarket giant has been established to increase awareness surrounding bowel cancer among consumers. An NHS post on X, formerly known as Twitter, reads: "Keep an eye out for our logo on @Tesco toilet roll-78.9 million rolls sold and counting!" The initiative serves as a reminder for people to be aware of potential cancer symptoms when going to the bathroom. The NHS emphasises: "It's a reminder for people to look out for possible signs of cancer when going to the loo. Know what's normal for you and contact your GP practice if something doesn't feel right." Printed underneath the NHS logo on the toilet roll is the note: "Finding cancer earlier makes it more treatable and can save lives." Further details are provided on the back of the pack. The packaging also lists warning signs of cancer that may be visible during toilets visits like alterations in stool and the presence of blood. For more detailed information on cancer symptoms, the public is advised to visit the NHS website here. Symptoms of bowel cancer: changes in your stool, such as having softer stool, diarrhoea or constipation that is not usual for you needing to go to the toilet more or less often than usual for you blood in your stool, which may look red or black bleeding from your bottom often feeling like you need to empty your bowels, even if you've just been to the toilet tummy pain a lump in your tummy bloating losing weight without trying feeling very tired or short of breath – these are signs of anaemia, which can be caused by bowel cancer Many of these symptoms can be quite common and may also arise from various other health conditions. Experiencing these symptoms does not necessarily mean that you have cancer but it is essential you consult a GP for a check-up if you notice anything abnormal. If cancer is the cause behind your symptoms, early detection may make treatment more manageable. If anyone experiences symptoms of bowel cancer for three weeks or more, they should speak to a medical professional. The NHS reassures: "Try not to be embarrassed. The doctor or nurse will be used to talking about these symptoms. "If you notice your poo is black or dark red, or if you're experiencing bloody diarrhoea, it's crucial to seek an urgent GP appointment or get assistance from NHS 111. You can reach out by calling 111 or using the online help available at 111." Cancer can come in over 200 different forms and can affect any part of the body, including organs, blood, bone marrow, and the immune system. Sometimes, cancer can spread from its original site to other parts of the body, a process known as secondary cancer or metastasis. The type of cancer you have will determine the treatment you receive. Common cancer treatments include surgery to remove the tumour, chemotherapy with drugs that destroy cancer cells, and radiotherapy that uses radiation to target and kill cancer cells. Other treatment options might involve immunotherapy, which boosts your immune system to fight cancer, and hormone therapy, which aims to slow down or stop the growth of cancerous cells. The NHS assures patients: "You'll be looked after by a team of specialists who will work with you to create a treatment plan that is best for you."
