Come hell or high water: Cambodia must make peace in an asymmetrical war with Thailand — Phar Kim Beng
Yet, beneath the apparent calm lies an asymmetrical truth: Thailand, with overwhelming military superiority, can afford to wage a war of attrition. Cambodia cannot. Thus, for Phnom Penh, peace is not merely a diplomatic choice — it is a geopolitical necessity.
The ceasefire, brokered at a moment of intense regional and global scrutiny, was welcomed across Asean. Its immediate enforcement on July 28 was a diplomatic feat, especially given the speed at which it was organised. The top brass of both nations' armed forces met within 24 hours at a forward post in Surin Province, Thailand, reaffirming their intention to hold the line.
The two sides agreed to halt troop movements, avoid provocations, and establish four-member liaison teams for future coordination. Importantly, both defence ministries backed the plan. Thailand, having called out Cambodia for ceasefire violations earlier in the week, softened its tone after the military-to-military interface.
Cambodia, for its part, categorically denied any breaches, claiming it had respected the ceasefire from the very beginning.
Yet, no amount of face-saving declarations or tightly scripted meetings can hide the lopsided military equation.
Thailand's military, with its F-16 fighters, advanced armoured divisions, and formidable naval power, dwarfs Cambodia's capabilities in every conceivable category.
Royal Thai Army soldiers are transported on the back of an army truck in the Thai border province of Si Sa Ket July 26, 2025. — AFP pic
Cambodia's only tactical advantage in recent years has been its acquisition of long-range rocket artillery, but even this cannot offset Thailand's dominance in the air, on the ground, and in its command-and-control structures.
Any further escalation would expose Cambodia's vulnerabilities in the field, in logistics, and in sustaining a prolonged campaign.
Given this reality, Cambodia's best chance at asserting its interests lies not on the battlefield but in the courtroom and the diplomatic chamber.
As early as June, Cambodia sought adjudication from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to resolve the long-running territorial dispute.
This was a calculated decision — one that aligns with Phnom Penh's historical preference for multilateral arbitration and reflects an understanding of its limitations. Thailand, however, has repeatedly rejected third-party mediation, insisting instead on bilateral talks.
This mirrors Bangkok's longstanding aversion to international legal interventions that may lock it into outcomes contrary to its national narrative and perceived territorial integrity.
It is precisely here that Cambodia must walk the tightrope. While invoking international law and seeking external legitimacy, it must also engage Thailand on bilateral terms to ensure that diplomacy remains alive. The ceasefire agreement — while commendable — exists in a fragile ecosystem.
It is held together by Asean diplomatic activism, threats of high tariffs from the United States, and the blunt warning that trade talks could be stalled completely by President Donald Trump if fighting resumed.
For a Cambodian economy grappling with post-pandemic recovery and attempting to wean itself off illicit digital revenues along the border, this external pressure was both timely and decisive.
Likewise, Thailand, eager to secure its own economic gains and maintain regional legitimacy as a future Asean Chair, could not afford to appear belligerent in the eyes of Washington, Beijing, or the broader Asia Pacific.
Nevertheless, Cambodia's decision to comply with the ceasefire must not be mistaken for surrender. Rather, it should be interpreted as a pivot—toward law, diplomacy, and international solidarity.
Hun Manet's government, still under the long shadow of his father Hun Sen, must now articulate a coherent peace strategy that goes beyond ceasefires.
That includes pushing for the August 4 General Border Committee meeting to deliver tangible results: demilitarised buffer zones, joint border demarcation teams, and confidence-building mechanisms supervised by Asean monitors, if not neutral third parties.
Yet spoilers remain. Wars — especially border wars — attract those who thrive in chaos.
There are factions within both militaries who believe victory is the only deterrent, and within civilian power circles who seek to elevate their political stature through brinkmanship. Sun Tzu once wrote that the best victory is one not fought.
But Clausewitz warned that war is politics by other means. Cambodia cannot afford to indulge in the latter interpretation. In an asymmetrical confrontation, the stronger party always sets the pace, and the weaker party must navigate with greater wisdom.
Cambodia has that wisdom — if it can remain disciplined. It must elevate its diplomatic efforts, consolidate its case at the ICJ, and secure support from Asean's current and future Chairs.
Malaysia and the Philippines have already endorsed a peaceful resolution. Now is the moment for Phnom Penh to push for Asean centrality — not in name, but in deeds.
This conflict has already cost too much. Border towns on both sides have been shelled. Livelihoods have been destroyed.
Trust has eroded. Every new skirmish risks drawing in larger powers, further complicating an already combustible region. China and the United States are watching, not just to prevent war but to test the resilience of Asean as a rules-based regional order.
Come hell or high water, Cambodia must make peace. Not because it is weak — but because peace, in this asymmetrical war, is its strongest form of power.
* Phar Kim Beng is a professor of Asean Studies at the International Islamic University Malaysia.
** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Barnama
3 hours ago
- Barnama
ASEAN Day: Malaysians Share Aspirations For Peaceful, Prosperous Southeast Asia
By Suraidah Roslan & Ahmad Idzwan Arzmi KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 6 (Bernama) -- As the region commemorates ASEAN Day on August 8, Malaysians voiced their hopes for a better future through the ambitious ASEAN Community Vision (ACV) 2045, a roadmap for a united, peaceful and prosperous region over the next two decades. A civil servant, Ameelia Roslan, 29, said ASEAN symbolises regional unity and should continue to promote cooperation, inclusivity and sustainable growth. bootstrap slideshow 'To me, ASEAN represents the spirit of regional togetherness. It's about working together, supporting one another, and building a better future for Southeast Asia, especially in ensuring sustainable development that leaves no one behind,' she told Bernama in conjunction with ASEAN Day. Former assistant manager at private university, Siti Zatil Iman Mohd Maarof, 39, said that if she had the chance to deliver a message to ASEAN leaders, she would urge ASEAN member state to strengthen their cooperation without relying on others, especially Western countries. 'ASEAN is much richer and stronger than we realise. If the region can fully utilise its resources, it is not impossible for ASEAN to emerge as the world's fourth-largest economy by 2030,' For private college student Nurhikmah Harshah Zulkifli, 20, ASEAN leaders must strengthen cooperation in various aspects to ensure that less developed countries benefit from the progress of other member states. She hopes that through the successful implementation of ASEAN Vision 2045, the region will become more harmonious, resilient and stable, one that capable of withstanding future challenges while promoting peace, unity, and sustainable development among its member states. Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) student Muhammad Ridzuan Zakaria, 24, believes Malaysia plays a significant role in promoting regional peace and is seen as a respected example, particularly among Islamic countries.
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Stanford University axes 363 jobs amid Trump's education funding cuts
LOS ANGELES, United States: Stanford University plans to axe hundreds of staff due to funding cuts for higher education under President Donald Trump, the latest mass layoff at an elite US college. The plan announced in late July, which AFP confirmed Wednesday by consulting official documents, follows similar firings at Harvard, Columbia and Johns Hopkins – all of which have been targeted in the White House's crackdown on top universities. Trump has wielded federal funds as a negotiating tool for universities that he says are too liberal, insisting that they submit to curriculum, enrollment and other changes. The Republican's administration has also decreased or placed holds on spending for university research as part of wider budget cuts since taking office in January. Stanford, located just south of San Francisco with some 18,000 staff, said it was making a US$140 million reduction in the general funds budget for the upcoming year. "This is the product of a challenging fiscal environment shaped in large part by federal policy changes affecting higher education," Stanford president Jon Levin and provost Jenny Martinez said in a joint statement. They added that the job cuts were "difficult actions that affect valued colleagues and friends who have made important contributions to Stanford." A filing by Stanford with the California state government said 363 employees would be impacted by the layoffs.--AFP
New Straits Times
5 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Ukrainian farmers live in fear as fighting nears their fields
GAZING out at his vast, sun-drenched field of wheat in eastern Ukraine, farmer Sergii Dozhenko is nervous. "Each year, the front line gets closer," he said. "I'm scared." One year ago, he said, it was some 60km away. Russian forces have closed in half that distance since. What's more, their drones have in recent weeks killed farmers across his central region of Dnipropetrovsk which has largely been spared fighting that has ravaged swathes of eastern and southern Ukraine. Following months of clashes, Russian troops claimed to have captured three villages in the region last month — a first in nearly 3½ years of war. Ukraine has denied those claims, but Sergii is still constantly scanning the sky for Russian explosive drones. "Fields are burning. People are fleeing, leaving behind barren land," he said. To counter the advances, Kyiv is building defensive lines further westwards, and parts of Sergii's land have been dug up for trenches and lined with barbed wire. "This might be the last year we harvest here... It will probably be the last," he said. In Mezhova, a garrison town close to the fighting, Ukrainian soldiers reject Russia's claim of having captured the village of Dachne. They said the troops only entered before being driven out. "Russians love symbols. They send soldiers to die just to plant a flag," said Andrii, a regiment commander, who declined to give his last name. But few civilians venture south of the town onto a road that leads to the battles some 12km away. Sitting on a bench, pensioners Olga and Zoya watched a cloud of black smoke rising above a charred field — another farmer targeted by a drone. A week earlier, one of their friends was killed the same way, they said. Olga, 71, said the situation worsened early last month when Moscow reached the region's border. Zoya, who like Olga declined to give her last name, said she was reluctantly planning to evacuate but did not want to leave behind her cow, Lypka. "I don't know how much time I have left," she said, breaking into tears. "Not enough to see Ukraine's victory." A large centre for displaced people 80km away is now always full. AFP reporters saw evacuees being dropped off in vans. Their suitcases, plastic bags and pets piled up. Some were crying on the phone, others had a vacant stare. Among them were some who had already fled their homes further east and are now forced to move again. Local authorities said in several villages threatened by Russian advances, 2,628 people — including 212 children — were evacuated over June and July. Alla Ryabtseva, a 57-year-old coordinator at the centre who is herself a displaced person from eastern Ukraine, said these people had no hesitation about moving again. "They have already experienced fear and understand the danger." She said the first large wave of displaced people arrived at the centre in early June as fighting intensified near the region and the authorities issued evacuation orders. The Kremlin has already laid claim to five regions of Ukraine — an annexation not recognised by the international community. Dnipropetrovsk would be a sixth. At a Pavlograd hospital, Natan, a psychiatrist, said people living in the region were suffering from "anxiety, excessive worry, insomnia". Above all, he said, there was a "fear of not knowing what will happen next — whether to stay or leave". Even though there is daily anxiety from air strikes "when reports say our troops have pushed back the Russians, people become more calm", said the 44-year-old doctor, who declined to give his last name. In the hospital corridors, men with drawn faces waited outside the office of Marina Huebner, head of the rehabilitation department. "The front is getting closer. There are bombings, sleepless nights," she said. The hospital is the last before the front line and it sends out medical teams closer to combat areas to help stranded civilians. "We are essentially like a fortress here, on the first line," said Huebner.
