logo
Meta to halt political advertising on its platforms in EU from October

Meta to halt political advertising on its platforms in EU from October

Meta Platforms will end political, election and social issue advertising on its platform in the EU in early October, blaming legal uncertainties due to new EU rules on political advertising, the U.S. social media company said on Friday.
Meta's announcement echoed Alphabet unit Google's decision announced last November, underscoring Big Tech's pushback against EU rules aimed at reining in their power and making sure that they are more accountable and transparent.
The European Union legislation, called the Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising regulation and which will apply from October 10, was triggered by concerns about disinformation and foreign interference in elections across the 27-country bloc.
The law requires Big Tech companies to clearly label political advertising on their platforms, who paid for it and how much, as well as which elections are being targeted, or risk fines up to 6 per cent of their annual turnover.
"From early October 2025, we will no longer allow political, electoral and social issue ads on our platforms in the EU," Meta said in a blog post.
"This is a difficult decision - one we've taken in response to the EU's incoming Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising (TTPA) regulation, which introduces significant operational challenges and legal uncertainties," it said.
Meta said the EU rules would ultimately hurt Europeans.
"We believe that personalised ads are critical to a wide range of advertisers, including those engaged on campaigns to inform voters about important social issues that shape public discourse," it said.
"Regulations, like the TTPA, significantly undermine our ability to offer these services, not only impacting effectiveness of advertisers' outreach but also the ability of voters to access comprehensive information." Meta's Facebook and Instagram are currently being investigated by the European Commission over their suspected failure to tackle disinformation and deceptive advertising in the run-up to the 2024 European Parliament elections.
The EU probe is under the Digital Services Act, which requires Big Tech to do more to counter illegal and harmful content on their platforms or risk fines of as much as 6 per cent of their global annual turnover.
ByteDance's TikTok is also in the EU crosshairs over its suspected failure to tackle election interference, notably in the Romanian presidential vote last November.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Mira Murati, ex-CTO of OpenAI, doesn't chase hype—and what we can learn from that
Why Mira Murati, ex-CTO of OpenAI, doesn't chase hype—and what we can learn from that

Time of India

time26 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Why Mira Murati, ex-CTO of OpenAI, doesn't chase hype—and what we can learn from that

In an age where tech leaders launch companies with press tours and promises of disruption, Mira Murati took a different route. The former CTO of OpenAI , known for helping develop ChatGPT and DALL·E, quietly stepped away in September 2024. Months later, she resurfaced, not with a media blitz, but with a new AI startup built on a rare quality in Silicon Valley: restraint. As reported by Wired, Murati and her entire team rejected billion-dollar offers from Meta's new Superintelligence Lab. The story made headlines not just because of the money involved, but because it revealed something deeper, Murati was prioritizing long-term vision and team integrity over fast wins and fame. Who is Mira Murati? Murati began her career in aerospace before moving to Tesla, where she worked on the Model S and Model X electric cars. She then led engineering at Leap Motion before joining OpenAI in 2018. Over the next six years, she became one of the most influential figures in AI, steering development on major tools like ChatGPT, DALL·E, and Codex. But instead of cashing in on her fame, Murati did something few in her position would: she started her own lab, Thinking Machines Lab , and did so in stealth mode, not to be secretive, but to stay focused. 'I'm figuring out what it's going to look like,' she told Wired in November 2024. 'I'm in the midst of it.' That kind of honesty is rare in tech, where founders often feel pressured to announce a grand vision even before writing a single line of code. Why doesn't she chase hype Focus on substance over spotlight Murati doesn't lead with noise. Her strategy is clear: build first, speak later. Instead of hyping unfinished products, she prioritizes clarity and quality. Investors say her startup's early attention isn't just about the technology, it's about the rare trust and discipline coming from the founding team. Team-driven mindset Her refusal to let any of her team members leave for Meta's billion-dollar offers shows her deep investment in people. As Wired reported, not a single person defected. That speaks volumes about the loyalty she fosters, not by promises, but by example. Awareness of AI's ethical complexity In January 2025, Murati gave a keynote at the World Economic Forum in Davos. She warned: 'AI without values is intelligence without conscience.' It wasn't a flashy announcement; it was a global call to reflect. She's also advising the European Commission on AI regulation, a rare position for a startup founder. She's not just creating the tools of the future; she's helping shape the laws around them. Strategic restraint Her startup is pioneering customizable AI systems tailored to local cultures, languages, and industries. But the company isn't shouting from the rooftops. Its 'stealth' approach isn't about hiding, it's about building with intention, without the distractions of hype cycles. As reported by Wired, her team is operating 'free from hype… with clarity and intention.' She's comfortable with uncertainty In the same Wired interview, Murati said: 'I'm in the midst of it.' That's not a rehearsed pitch, it's a real admission. And that's powerful. She reminds us that creation is a process, and it's okay not to have all the answers right away. What can we learn from that Quiet confidence is powerful You don't need to be loud to lead. Murati's example proves that real influence often comes from calm focus, not flash. Letting results speak By choosing progress over press, she builds trust, not just buzz. That's the kind of leadership that lasts. Leadership can be humble Murati redefines what it means to lead in tech. Her style isn't built on ego, it's built on ethics, teamwork, and responsibility. Avoiding hype protects integrity Hype can be tempting, but it can also be a trap. Murati's approach keeps her grounded, exactly what's needed in a field as high-stakes as AI.

India Unites Against Trump's ‘ECONOMIC BLACKMAIL': PM Modi, Rahul Gandhi, Tharoor BLAST US Tariffs
India Unites Against Trump's ‘ECONOMIC BLACKMAIL': PM Modi, Rahul Gandhi, Tharoor BLAST US Tariffs

Time of India

time31 minutes ago

  • Time of India

India Unites Against Trump's ‘ECONOMIC BLACKMAIL': PM Modi, Rahul Gandhi, Tharoor BLAST US Tariffs

India's SHOCK Reply To Trump's 50% Tariffs; Fires 'Will PROTECT National Interests' Warning In a strongly worded statement, India's Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) sharply rejected the United States' new 25% tariff on Indian imports tied to Russian oil purchases—calling it 'unfair, unjustified, and unreasonable.' The MEA clarified that India's energy imports are driven by market dynamics and national interest, aimed at securing reliable, affordable energy for its 1.4 billion citizens. India noted that many other countries—including China, Turkey, and the EU—are also continuing trade with Russia, yet are not being targeted in the same way. 7.1K views | 1 hour ago

US Hypocrisy? 50% Tariff On India, Zero On EU That Bought Russian Oil
US Hypocrisy? 50% Tariff On India, Zero On EU That Bought Russian Oil

NDTV

time31 minutes ago

  • NDTV

US Hypocrisy? 50% Tariff On India, Zero On EU That Bought Russian Oil

New Delhi: US President Donald Trump's announcement of 25 per cent additional tariffs on Indian goods triggered immediate diplomatic pushback from New Delhi and raised questions about Western consistency on Russian energy sanctions. President Trump has signed an executive order imposing a steep 50 per cent tariff on Indian imports, citing India's continued purchases of Russian oil. India now faces the highest US tariff burden globally, tied with Brazil at 50 per cent. Other nations in the upper bracket include Switzerland at 39 per cent, Canada and Iraq at 35 per cent, and China at 30 per cent. India's Response India called the decision "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable," and accused the United States of selectively targeting India for actions that are, in fact, being undertaken by several other countries-including US allies. "The United States has in recent days targeted India's oil imports from Russia. We have already made clear our position on these issues, including the fact that our imports are based on market factors and done with the overall objective of ensuring the energy security of 1.4 billion people of India. It is therefore extremely unfortunate that the US should choose to impose additional tariffs on India for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest," India's statement read. "India will take all actions necessary to protect its national interests." On July 30, Trump publicly warned of tariff hikes targeting Indian goods, accusing India of undermining Western efforts to pressure Moscow. The US is India's single-largest export market, purchasing $87 billion worth of goods in 2024. In comparison, India imported $41 billion in goods from the US during the same period. That imbalance generated a $46 billion trade surplus in India's favour. Western Double Standards India has repeatedly argued that the West is applying sanctions and economic penalties inconsistently. While countries like Hungary (an EU member) continue to import Russian crude through pipelines, India is being penalised for the same. Moscow responded to the US move, siding with India and condemning Washington's tariffs. "Sovereign countries have the right to choose their own trade partners," Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told news agency AFP. China's Position While India is facing steep US tariffs, China has thus far avoided comparable penalties despite being the largest consumer of Russian energy. Chinese imports of Russian oil rose in 2024. Crude oil from Russia made up 21.5 per cent of China's total crude imports, an increase from the 2018-2021 average of 15.5 per cent. This was driven in part by Chinese "teapot" refiners, which are small-scale, privately owned facilities that depend heavily on discounted supplies. In addition to oil, China also imports large quantities of Russian LNG. According to Chinese customs data cited by news agency TASS, LNG imports from Russia rose 3.3 per cent last year to 8.3 million metric tonnes. There have also been discussions around a major gas pipeline that would carry Russian gas to China but it has not been finalised yet. EU Trade with Russia While the European Union speaks of cutting economic ties with Russia, data shows that its total trade with Russia dropped from 257.5 billion euros ($297.4 billion) in 2021 to 67.5 billion euros ($77.9 billion) in 2024, and key energy imports continued. The Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air, a Finnish think tank, estimates that since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, the EU has paid Russia $105.6 billion for gas alone. This amount equals roughly 75 per cent of Russia's military spending in 2024. Additionally, EU imports of Russian LNG rose by 9 per cent in 2024 compared to the previous year. Mineral fuels continue to constitute the bulk of the EU's Russian imports, followed by food and raw materials. According to a report by the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air, in June this year, Belgium's purchases of Russian LNG rose by 12 per cent in volume terms month-on-month, totalling EUR 300 mn. US Trade with Russia Despite Washington's hardline stance, the US also maintains a limited trade relationship with Russia. In 2024, bilateral trade was worth $5.2 billion -- lower than the $36 billion recorded in 2021 but still significant given the context. The US continues to import Russian chemicals, among other goods.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store