Affirm drops 8% on weaker-than-expected guidance for current quarter
Here's how the company did, compared to analysts' consensus estimates from LSEG: Earnings per share: 1 cent vs. an expected loss of 3 cents
1 cent vs. an expected loss of 3 cents Revenue: $783 million vs. $783 million expected
Affirm reported gross merchandise volume, or GMV, of $8.6 billion, topping the average estimate of $8.2 billion, according to StreetAccount. GMV, a key metric that helps gauge the total value of transactions, increased 36% from a year earlier.
Revenue in the quarter rose 36% from $576 million a year ago. The company's key margin metric — revenue less transaction costs, or RLTC —came in at 4.1%, slightly above its long-term target range of 3% to 4%.
Adjusted operating margin was 22%, compared to StreetAccount's estimate of 21.6%. Affirm reported net income of $2.8 million, or a penny a share, compared to a loss a year earlier of $133.9 million, or 43 cents a share.
For the current quarter, Affirm is guiding for revenue between $815 million and $845 million — with a midpoint of $830 million, below the average estimate of $841 million, according to LSEG.
Affirm's business is closely tied to consumer spending, as its online loan offering has become popular with sellers of electronics, apparel and travel. The U.S. economy contracted in the first three months of 2025 on an import surge at the start of President Donald Trump's second term in office, as companies and consumers sought to get ahead of the Trump tariffs implemented in early April.
As CNBC reported late last month, citing first-quarter results from credit card lenders, lower-income earners are reining in their transactions to focus on essentials, while the wealthy continue to spend on high-priced meals and and luxury travel.
'Right now, we're seeing credit outcomes that are very in line with expectations,' Chief Financial Officer Rob O'Hare said in an interview. 'We haven't seen any signs of stress on the consumer side.'
Affirm is forecasting fourth-quarter GMV between $9.4 billion and $9.7 billion, with a midpoint of $9.55 billion, above StreetAccount's estimate of $9.2 billion. Adjusted operating margin is expected between 23% and 25%, compared to the 23.8% StreetAccount estimate.
Affirm reiterated its commitment to achieving profitability on a GAAP basis by the end of its fiscal fourth quarter in 2025. Affirm's active consumer base increased to 22 million, including 2 million new to Affirm consumers.
The Affirm Card, which is the company's big bet for driving greater usage overall, saw GMV rise 115% from a year earlier, and the number of active cardholders more than doubled.
The company's partnerships with Apple , Amazon and Shopify continue to drive momentum. In June, Affirm and Apple announced plans for U.S. Apple Pay users on iPhones and iPads to be able to apply for loans directly through Affirm.
Earlier this week, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau said it will stop enforcing a Biden-era rule that complicated compliance for BNPL providers, in what was largely viewed as a win for lenders like Affirm.
The quarter saw a notable rise in 0% interest loans, a strategy in which merchants — and sometimes manufacturers — subsidize borrowing costs to drive sales. That marked a 44% increase from a year earlier.
O'Hare said that for merchants, 0% loans serve as an alternative to traditional discounts.
'It may be an expensive net discount rate, but it's better than 10% off,' he said.
Affirm CEO Max Levchin said that 0% loans help build a pipeline of higher-value customers.
'Every time we sign someone new through a 0% promo, some number of months or quarters from now, that's a prime candidate for the Affirm Card, and that's a lifetime value booster,' Levchin said on the earnings call.
Meanwhile, credit quality held steady, with losses below 1% in the company's core offering that allows users to repay loans in four installments.
Affirm shares are down 11% for the year, excluding the after-hours move, while the Nasdaq has fallen abut 7%.
WATCH: Affirm CEO on consumer behavior
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
2 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump eyes U.S. government stakes in other chip makers that received CHIPS Act funds: Reuters
U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is looking into the federal government taking equity stakes in computer chip manufacturers that receive CHIPS Act funding to build factories in the country, two sources said. Expanding on a plan to receive an equity stake in Intel in exchange for cash grants, a White House official and a person familiar with the situation said Lutnick is exploring how the U.S. can receive equity stakes in exchange for CHIPS Act funding for companies such as Micron, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co and Samsung. Much of the funding has not yet been dispersed. Aside from Intel, memory chipmaker Micron is the biggest U.S. recipient of CHIPS Act cash. TSMC declined comment. Micron, Samsung and the White House did not respond to requests for comment. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed on Tuesday that Lutnick was working on a deal with Intel to take a 10% government stake. "The president wants to put America's needs first, both from a national security and economic perspective, and it's a creative idea that has never been done before," she told reporters. While Lutnick said earlier on CNBC that the U.S. does not want to tell Intel how to run its operations, any investment would be unprecedented and ramps up a new era of U.S. influence on the big companies. In the past, the U.S. has taken stakes in companies to provide cash and build confidence in times of economic upheaval and uncertainty. In a similar move earlier this year, Trump approved Nippon Steel's purchase of U.S. Steel after being promised a "golden share" that would prevent the companies from reducing or delaying promised investments, transferring production or jobs outside the U.S., or closing or idling plants before certain time frames, without the president's consent. The two sources said Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is also involved in the CHIPS Act discussions, but that Lutnick is driving the process. The Commerce Department oversees the $52.7 billion CHIPS Act, formally known as the CHIPS and Science Act. The act provides funding for research and grants for building chip plants in the U.S. Lutnick has been pushing the equity idea, the sources said, adding that Trump likes the idea. The U.S. Commerce Department late last year finalized subsidies of $4.75 billion for Samsung, $6.2 billion for Micron and $6.6 billion for TSMC to produce semiconductors in the U.S. In June, Lutnick said the department was re-negotiating some of former President Joe Biden's grants to semiconductor firms, calling them "overly generous". He noted at the time that Micron offered to increase its spending on chip plants in the U.S.
E&E News
10 minutes ago
- E&E News
Trump's AI plan meets a stressed American electric grid
President Donald Trump's plan to make the U.S. a leader in artificial intelligence is also set to remake the country's electric grid in his vision: Bigger, faster and bolstered by fossil fuels. But it's unclear how parts of the plan would be implemented and if it would be enough to ensure the U.S. has ample power to meet demand from energy-hungry data centers over the next decade. In a speech Wednesday, Trump declared that his administration would pursue 'all-out American energy dominance' to promote the AI industry. He promised the country would build as much new electricity capacity as China this year. Advertisement To do so, Trump signed an executive order Wednesday to streamline permitting for new data centers and associated power generation, along with two others related to artificial intelligence model development. The administration also released an action plan Wednesday morning that included ambitions for a 'comprehensive strategy to enhance and expand the power grid.' 'There's a global competition to lead in artificial intelligence and we want the United States to win that race,' David Sacks, the White House AI and crypto czar, said on a call with reporters. The action plan's provisions were designed to be implemented in six months to a year, said White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Director Michael Kratsios. The White House called for streamlining permitting requirements for new data centers and construction of data centers and power generation on federal land. The plan dictates the prioritization of 'reliable dispatchable power sources' like coal and gas plants, keeping existing generation on the grid and even reforming power markets 'to align financial incentives with the goal of grid stability.' Many of the provisions — including support for AI workforce programs — were backed by the Data Center Coalition, which represents the industry. The plan's 'focus on the removal of barriers to faster data center construction and operation — ranging from power access to supply chains to workforce development — which will allow data center companies to continue investing hundreds of billions of dollars to expand U.S. data center infrastructure across the country,' Josh Levi, the group's president, said in a statement. The group called for Congress to take further action on issues such as permitting. The plan was praised by groups representing industries supported by Trump and companies like telecommunications giant Lumen Technologies, which said cutting regulatory barriers would help build an AI backbone. While the plan mentions a need for 'new energy generation sources at the technological frontier' like geothermal and advanced nuclear, it is silent on wind and solar power. Renewable energy is typically the quickest form of new generation to build and has been a backbone for much of the new data center construction. The U.S. Energy Information Administration has reported that wind, solar and batteries accounted for more than 80 percent of new generation in 2024 and forecast that renewables would be 81 percent of new capacity in 2025. 'Companies are investing in renewables not because they love renewable energy, but because it provides the best return,' said Safak Yucel, associate director of the Business of Sustainability Initiative at Georgetown University. 'And the reason is not subsidies, it's that they're cheaper to run.' Large technology companies are continuing to find any energy source — including renewables — available on the grid. Meta, for example, announced a contract this week to purchase 600 megawatts of solar power from a Texas project developed by Canadian energy giant Enbridge to power its data centers. On Tuesday, OpenAI and Oracle announced next steps for the 'Stargate' project, a company with multiple partners backed by Trump that pledged in January to spend $500 billion in four years to build AI infrastructure in the United States. The companies inked a deal to develop 4.5 gigawatts of additional data center capacity, an amount that is more than double the power used in San Francisco. The companies did not specify where the new facilities would be or which power sources they would use but said parts of an existing data project in Abilene, Texas, tied to Stargate is now 'up and running.' In a research note Wednesday, Bank of America said it expected data centers to help U.S. electricity demand increase 2.5 percent annually over the next decade, almost five times more than the rate from 2014 to 2024. The action plan also came a day after United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres called on major tech firms to power their data centers entirely with renewable energy by 2030, warning that the forecast electricity demand is 'not sustainable — unless we make it so.' 'The future is being built in the cloud,' Guterres said in a speech Tuesday in New York. 'It must be powered by the sun, the wind, and the promise of a better world.' Outside view of the newly completed Meta's Facebook data center in Eagle Mountain, Utah on July 18, 2024. The data center is a complex of five large buildings, each over four football fields long and totaling 2.4 million square feet. | George Frey/AFP via Getty Images Abundance or scarcity? Critics charge that the administration's bid to expand the grid for AI is at odds with the policies coming out of the White House. The budget and tax megalaw signed by Trump earlier this month, for example, slashed tax credits and incentives for wind and solar projects. A forecast from BloombergNEF predicts that new wind, solar and energy storage additions could drop 23 percent through 2030 compared to what would have happened without the law. In all, that would be about 117 fewer gigawatts of new power. The Interior Department has also added new requirements for construction of solar and wind on federal lands, which developers have called a form of sabotage. The AI plan's release also came on the same day that Trump's Department of Energy nixed a conditional federal loan for the Grain Belt Express transmission project. That line, set to be one of the nation's largest new grid projects, would carry renewable energy from the Great Plains to large cities in the East, but had opposition from key Republican lawmakers. 'Their rhetoric doesn't match reality,' said Harry Godfrey, leader of Advanced Energy United's Federal Priorities team. 'They talk a game about energy abundance, yet their actions are fundamentally counter-abundance. They're creating scarcity.' In his speech, Trump talked up the potential of nuclear power to back data centers, calling the technology 'incredible.' But the technology — like advanced geothermal — is years away from commercial viability. Even building a new gas plant is expected to take at least five years because of supply chain backlogs. 'There is no AI revolution without power,' Godfrey said. 'But under this administration, where are you going to get the power?' The AI Action Plan mentions grid management technologies and tools to make existing power lines more efficient. It also calls for 'new and novel ways' for data centers to manage demand during periods of peak demand, a strategy researchers have said could allow more construction without additional generation. Rob Gramlich, president of the research firm Grid Strategies, said those were 'encouraging proposals' and could continue work on grid enhancements that started under the Biden administration. But, he added, other parts of the plan that tilt the scales toward fossil fuels, especially in interconnection queues, could result in 'market distortion' that slows down new power growth. President Donald Trump talked up the potential of nuclear power to back data centers, calling the technology 'incredible.' Cooling towers four, left and three are seen at the Alvin W. Vogtle Electric Generating Plant in Waynesboro, Georgia. | Mike Stewart/AP Streamlining NEPA A chief way the Trump administration is aiming to expedite a build out of data centers is through regulatory changes, including environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act. The action plan calls for the creation of a categorical exclusion under NEPA 'to cover data center-related actions that normally do not have a significant effect on the environment.' That could free them from conducting environmental impact statements and assessments, if fully implemented. 'Where possible, adopt Categorical Exclusions already established by other agencies so that each relevant agency can proceed with maximum efficiency,' the plan states. That echoes the calls of many in the tech industry, who have complained that it takes too long to build infrastructure. Environmentalists say the language could lead to faster approval of large facilities that worsen air and water pollution. 'Across the South we are seeing states and communities clamor for more information about the infrastructure demands for AI, not less. Transparency is crucial to ensure that the physical infrastructure needed to support AI doesn't threaten our health, energy grid, access to water, and dramatically increase costs,' said Southern Environmental Law Center Climate Initiative Leader Alys Campaigne. The plan, if implemented, could make it harder for communities to obtain important information about nearby data centers, the group said. James Coleman, a law professor at the University of Minnesota, said the language could expedite projects, but it's not a 'silver bullet that gets you out of NEPA review.' Environmentalists could still challenge projects in court if they believe a data center facility did not have adequate environmental review. A court 'is going to make its own interpretation,' no matter what agencies do, he said. At the same time, the Trump administration may be in a better position to win many lawsuits, after the Supreme Court ruled in July that NEPA does not require agencies to consider far-reaching environmental impacts of projects, according to Coleman. Another lingering question is how agencies would look to implement categorical exclusions, since the administration has moved to roll back regulations governing the NEPA process. The Department of Energy issued an interim final rule this year rescinding its NEPA regulations and releasing alternative guidance in its place. 'What does a categorical exclusion mean if you aren't allowed to adopt regulations?' Coleman asked. Tanya Das, the director of artificial intelligence and energy technology policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center, said her organization supported the categorical exclusions to expedite the NEPA process. Language in the plan aiming to 'enable AI adoption' also could be useful, considering the time it takes to process applications under NEPA and other regulations. Going through data 'at a human pace can be very slow,' she said. AI tools that sift through data could be an option for expediting reviews, she said. Das said she would be watching closely to see how the administration fleshes out language in the action plan on the grid. The White House included broad directives such as 'stabilize the grid of today as much possible' and 'enhance the efficiency and performance of the transmission system,' but did not specify matching agency actions as of yet to implement many of those goals. Some groups that often back deregulatory actions said they were concerned that the plan puts too much focus on tapping the federal government to finance and guide the technology. The plan, for instance, calls for agencies 'with significant land portfolios' to identify sites suited for data center development. 'We don't want the Energy Department to overshadow private rollout and development of the infrastructure,' said Wayne Crews, a fellow in regulatory studies at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a libertarian think tank.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House joins TikTok after delaying enforcement of sale-or-ban law
The White House launched a TikTok account on Tuesday amid uncertainty about the app's future, as another deadline approaches for its parent company, Bytedance, to sell to a US buyer or be banned in the United States. President Donald Trump has repeatedly extended the deadline of a sale-or-ban law passed under former President Joe Biden's administration, with the new deadline less than a month away on September 17. The latest delay in June kept the app accessible for its 170 million American users, despite the legislation that passed last year with bipartisan support over concerns that TikTok's Chinese ownership poses a US national security risk. And it came as both the United States and China sought leverage in tense trade talks. TikTok's ultimate fate in the US remains unclear, but the official White House account is a signal the app could be here to stay. The first post on the official White House TikTok account features video of Trump as he says, 'Every day, I wake up determined to deliver a better life for the people all across this nation. I am your voice.' The post's caption reads, 'America we are BACK! What's up TikTok?' As of 8 p.m. on Tuesday, shortly after launching, the account had garnered more than 20,000 followers. This is the administration's first official TikTok account. Both Trump and Biden launched accounts during the 2024 presidential campaign, drawing scrutiny as the leaders had previously raised national security concerns with the app. TikTok doesn't operate in China, but the Chinese government enjoys significant leverage over businesses under its jurisdiction. The US government has said it's worried China could use its national security laws to access the significant amount of personal information that TikTok, like most social media applications, collects from its US users. The TikTok sale-or-ban law went into effect on January 19 after Biden signed it last year. TikTok briefly took itself offline, sparking outcry from creators, but quickly came back after Trump signed an order delaying the ban's enforcement by 75 days in one of the first acts of his second term. The president's June delay marked his third extension of the ban.
