Tesla plans 'friends and family' car service in California, regulator says
But California regulators are making clear that Tesla is not authorized to carry passengers on public roads in autonomous vehicles and would require a human driver in control at all times.
"Tesla is not allowed to test or transport the public (paid or unpaid) in an AV with or without a driver," the California Public Utilities Commission told CNBC in an email on Friday. "Tesla is allowed to transport the public (paid or unpaid) in a non-AV, which, of course, would have a driver."
In other words, Tesla's service in the state will have to be more taxi than robot.
Tesla has what's known in California as a charter-party carrier permit, which allows it to run a private car service with human drivers, similar to limousine companies or sightseeing services.
The commission said it received a notification from Tesla on Thursday that the company plans to "extend operations" under its permit to "offer service to friends and family of employees and to select members of the public," across much of the Bay Area.
But under Tesla's permit, that service can only be with non-AVs, the CPUC said.
The California Department of Motor Vehicles told CNBC that Tesla has had a "drivered testing permit" since 2014, allowing the company to operate AVs with a safety driver present, but not to collect fees. The safety drivers must be Tesla employees, contractors or designees of the manufacturer under that permit, the DMV said.
In Austin, Texas, Tesla is currently testing out a robotaxi service, using its Model Y SUVs equipped with the company's latest automated driving software and hardware. The limited service operates during daylight hours and in good weather, on roads with a speed limit of 40 miles per hour.
Robotaxis in Austin are remotely supervised by Tesla employees, and include a human in the front passenger seat. The service is now limited to invited users, who agree to the terms of Tesla's "early access program."
On Friday, Business Insider, citing an internal Tesla memo, reported that Tesla told staff it planned to expand its robotaxi service to the San Francisco Bay Area this weekend. Tesla didn't respond to a request for comment on that report.
In a separate matter in California, the DMV has accused Tesla of misleading consumers about the capabilities of its driver assistance systems, previously marketed under the names Autopilot and Full Self-Driving (or FSD).
Tesla now calls its premium driver assistance features, "FSD Supervised." In owners manuals, Tesla says Autopilot and FSD Supervised are "hands on" systems, requiring a driver at the wheel, ready to steer or brake at all times.
But in user-generated videos shared by Tesla on X, the company shows customers using FSD hands-free while engaged in other tasks. The DMV is arguing that Tesla's license to sell vehicles in California should be suspended, with arguments ongoing through Friday at the state's Office of Administrative Hearings in Oakland.
Under California state law, autonomous taxi services are regulated at the state level. Some city and county officials said on Friday that they were out of the loop regarding a potential Tesla service in the state.
Stephanie Moulton-Peters, a member of the Marin County Board of Supervisors, said in a phone interview that she had not heard from Tesla about its plans. She urged the company to be more transparent.
"I certainly expect they will tell us and I think it's a good business practice to do that," she said.
Moulton-Peters said she was undecided on robotaxis generally and wasn't sure how Marin County, located north of San Francisco, would react to Tesla's service.
"The news of change coming always has mixed results in the community," she said.
Brian Colbert, another member of the Marin County Board of Supervisors, said in an interview that he's open to the idea of Tesla's service being a good thing but that he was disappointed in the lack of communication.
"They should have done a better job about informing the community about the launch," he said.
Alphabet's Waymo, which is far ahead of Tesla in the robotaxi market, obtained a number of permits from the DMV and CPUC before starting its driverless ride-hailing service in the state.
Waymo was granted a CPUC driverless deployment permit in 2023, allowing it to charge for rides in the state. The company has been seeking amendments to both its DMV and CPUC driverless deployment permits as it expands its service territory in the state.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
As Trump Says He Wants Tesla to ‘THRIVE,' How Should You Play TSLA Stock?
The on-again, off-again relationship between President Donald Trump and Tesla (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk witnessed a new plot twist when Trump posted on Truth Social that 'I want Elon, and all businesses within our Country, to THRIVE.' This is a startling development, to say the least, considering the very public nature of their fallout, which was sour for all involved. Musk had been quite vocal about his opposition to Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' arguing it would only add to the country's mounting debt. And specifically hurting Tesla is the removal of $7,500 tax credits on EV purchases, a stipulation of the tax-and-spending legislation. More News from Barchart Here's What Happened the Last Time Novo Nordisk Stock Was This Oversold As Nvidia Gets Ready for New China H20 Shipments, How Should You Play NVDA Stock? As SoFi Raises 2025 Guidance, Should You Buy, Sell, or Hold SOFI Stock Here? Our exclusive Barchart Brief newsletter is your FREE midday guide to what's moving stocks, sectors, and investor sentiment - delivered right when you need the info most. Subscribe today! So, amid all the noise around Tesla, is the company's stock (-21.7% YTD) still one that warrants an investment? Let's find out. Q2 Was Somewhat Pleasant Revenues for the quarter came in at $22.5 billion, down 12% from the previous year. Core automotive revenues again slipped on a YOY basis, this time by 16% to come in at $16.7 billion, as competitive pressure and Musk's political activities continued to put pressure on sales. The energy segment witnessed a less sharp fall of 7% in the same period to $2.8 billion. The gross margin remained almost flat at 17.2% compared to the previous year's 18%, which provided some comfort. Total production was at 410,244 vehicles (vs. 410,831 in the year-ago period) while total deliveries fell by 13% in the same period to 384,122 vehicles, against expectations of 387,000, per FactSet. Meanwhile, Tesla reported EPS of $0.40, which represented a yearly decline of 23%. Tesla continued to remain cash flow positive, although its cash flow declined alongside revenue and earnings. Net cash from operating activities for the quarter was at $2.5 billion (-30% YOY), and free cash flow was at $146 million (-89% YOY). Overall, the company closed the quarter with a cash balance of $36.8 billion, up 20% from the previous year. This was much above its short-term debt levels of $15.2 billion. Yet, what remains a cause of worry for Tesla investors is Musk's recent remarks during the latest earnings call. Downbeat Comments Cloud Long-Term Growth? My thoughts on Tesla have been consistently cautiously optimistic, with the company's long-term prospects sounding quite convincing, driven by artificial intelligence, Full-Self Driving (FSD), robotics, and energy, among others. However, Musk's revelation that the EV leader will likely face 'a few rough quarters' is concerning. Yet, what is even more worrying is his acknowledgement that the company's outsized bets on humanoid robots is still a long way from contributing to the company's bottom line. This draws a question mark over other businesses as well, hurting its overall value, considering that most of the bullishness around Tesla is primarily due to the expectations that its operations in the above-mentioned businesses will create massive wealth for shareholders in the long run. Specifically on robotics, Tesla has publicly shared a detailed time horizon for its robotics ambitions, with the Optimus 3 prototype slated to be ready by late 2025. Production ramp‑up is expected to begin in early 2026, targeting monthly volumes of 100,000 units within five years, scaling to one million annually by 2030, and eventually aspiring toward a long‑term goal of 1 billion robots per year. That said, Tesla's track record of meeting Musk's ambitious timelines has been inconsistent. A prominent example dates back to his 2019 assertion that 1 million robotaxis would be operational by 2020. Reality diverged substantially. Robotaxis just launched in Austin in a limited pilot in June 2025. However, the opportunity remains as scaling beyond a company-owned fleet is essential to unlock true network effects for the robotaxi business. With millions of Teslas already on the road, the company could enable private owners to contribute vehicles to the robotaxi platform, a monetization opportunity few other automakers can match. Meanwhile, Tesla's in‑house AI training infrastructure is also evolving rapidly. The Dojo 2 supercomputer, expected in 2026, is projected to deliver computing power equivalent to roughly 100 000 H100 GPUs. Built for vision-centric workloads essential to autonomy and robotics, it supports large‑scale real‑world simulation. Tesla is already working toward hardware convergence across edge and cloud, from Dojo servers to on‑device chips, with next‑generation AI6 and Dojo 3 already in early planning stages. Overall, this combination of proprietary data, in‑house chip design, scalable compute infrastructure, and integrated deployment gives Tesla full control over the AI stack. It enables scaling from fleet data to trained models to real-world applications, a vertically integrated strategy that few companies can replicate. Analyst Opinions on TSLA Stock Taking all of this into account, analysts have deemed the TSLA stock a 'Hold,' with a mean target price of $299.94, which has already been surpassed. However, the high target price of $500 denotes upside potential of about 56% from current levels. Out of 41 analysts covering the stock, 12 have a 'Strong Buy' rating, two have a 'Moderate Buy' rating, 17 have a 'Hold' rating, and 10 have a 'Strong Sell' rating. On the date of publication, Pathikrit Bose did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Ontario cancels internet deal with Musk's Starlink as part of US tariff fight
By Ryan Patrick Jones TORONTO (Reuters) -The Canadian province of Ontario has canceled a C$100 million ($68.12 million) satellite high-speed internet contract with Elon Musk's company Starlink, following through with a vow by the province's premier to cut ties in retaliation for U.S. tariffs imposed on Canada. Stephen Lecce, Ontario's minister of energy and mines, confirmed the cancellation of the contract for internet services at an unrelated news conference in Toronto on Wednesday. Lecce, who oversees broadband connectivity in Canada's most populous province, didn't say how much the termination would cost. "I can confirm that the premier has fulfilled his word, which is to cancel that contract because of the very reasons he cited in the past," Lecce said. "We are standing up for Canada." Under the terms of the deal, which Ontario signed last November, Starlink was to provide high-speed internet access to 15,000 eligible homes and businesses in more remote communities. In February, Ontario Premier Doug Ford threatened to end the agreement with Starlink in response to U.S. President Donald Trump imposing tariffs on Canadian goods. He later postponed the cancellation after Trump agreed to a 30-day pause on tariffs. SpaceX, Starlink's parent, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Musk headed Trump's drive to shrink the federal government and was a close ally before falling out with the president. Canada and the U.S. are working on negotiating a trade deal by August 1, the date Trump is threatening to impose a 35% tariff on all Canadian goods not covered by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement. Earlier this week, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said talks were at an intense phase, while reiterating that a deal that would remove all U.S. tariffs was unlikely. Lecce said Ontario has taken other measures against the U.S., including restricting the ability of U.S. companies to bid on provincial government contracts, removing U.S.-made alcoholic beverages from store shelves and working to decouple the province's energy sector from the U.S. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Axios
2 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump administration rolls out new Social Security hurdles, then makes them optional
The Trump administration quietly rushed through a major change to Social Security's phone service policy, but after advocates for the elderly expressed concerns, the agency that oversees the program now says the change is "optional." Why it matters: The policy would have forced millions more Americans to travel to the agency's already understaffed field offices to do routine things like change their address, obtain a tax form or generate a benefit verification letter. That would be a big obstacle, particularly for seniors, people struggling with mobility issues or those in rural areas who live far from a field office. The Social Security Administration's own filing says 3.4 million more people would be forced to go to the field offices, which are already understaffed, and hard to get to for many Americans. How it works: For decades, Social Security beneficiaries could phone the agency to do routine tasks. Under the policy, described in the filing to the Office of Management and Budget, beneficiaries would first have to go online to get a one-time "Security Authentication PIN," or SAP. This was set to begin Aug. 18. The intrigue: Earlier this week, AARP, the powerful advocacy group for older Americans, and other advocates for the elderly and disabled drew attention to the change. Now, the agency says that use of the SAP PIN is optional, and was always meant to be optional. "The intention of the expanded SAP feature in the filing was always to be optional," an agency spokesperson tells Axios in an email. "The purpose of the feature is to improve the customer experience by providing a convenient and secure method for callers to verify their identity." "If a caller does not have a 'my Social Security account' or chooses not to use the SAP feature, the customer experience will be no different than it is today, and they will continue to use the existing authentication methods to verify their identity," they said. Yes, but: The filing detailing the new policy has not yet been updated or changed. The big picture: This latest dustup comes months after the agency backed off a similar plan after widespread outcry. It's part of the Trump administration's effort to combat fraud — ongoing even as Elon Musk's DOGE efforts have receded into the background. The agency instituted the policy without any announcement — a departure from how it has operated under prior administrations — and critics say that it hasn't provided substantial evidence for the fraud it's trying to combat. Between the lines: In the past, including in the first Trump administration, a big policy change would be carefully tested and messaged to the public in blogs, the website and press releases. The agency would typically reach out to stakeholders, like AARP, advocates for the poor and disabled and other lawyers who work with Americans on their benefit claims. What to watch: The agency says it will amend its filing to make it clear that this policy is optional. Advocates are keeping an eye out for that.
