Trump, Murdoch, Epstein and MAGA: Bannon predicts firestorm, but it's not clear who will get burnt
The president phoned Murdoch in an effort to kill the story, but the Journal published nevertheless. Trump denounced it as fake and sued Murdoch for a minimum claim of $US10 billion for defamation. It would be 'an interesting experience' to get Murdoch into the witness box, said the president.
But, to Bannon, it was not a problem. It was an opportunity. 'The real enemy has revealed itself,' he exclaimed. Immediately, he rallied the MAGA movement in defence of Trump. And in pursuit of Murdoch: 'This was a kill shot by Murdoch,' Bannon tells me in a Monday phone call, meaning a political hit rather than a kinetic one. 'All of MAGA will rally around because of the attack on President Trump,' he predicted.
'This is going to blow up the Murdoch empire in the US. People will turn on him. Already, the streaming services have a bigger audience than Fox News' – the Murdoch cable TV channel which created the far-right-wing ecosystem to incubate Trump's first presidential candidacy.
'Their audience will turn against Murdoch for trying to smear the president of the US. Besides, President Trump is suing him for $10 billion. The Achilles' heel of the Murdoch empire is Murdoch.'
Trump and Murdoch have had ructions over the years, but the two men have maintained a cordial relationship. Indeed, Trump entertained Murdoch in his box at the FIFA Club World Cup final five days before the WSJ story ran.
But why would Murdoch unleash a political 'kill shot' against the president only six months into a four-year term? Bannon has two explanations – one immediate and one larger.
The immediate reason, he says, was to deflect attention from an imminent news event. On Friday, US time, the day after the WSJ 's story ran, Trump's director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, was due to release an investigation into the claims of Russian interference in the 2016 election. She duly did.
Gabbard sought to discredit the US intelligence community's finding that Vladimir Putin had meddled to harm Hillary Clinton's campaign and to help Trump's. Gabbard accused Obama administration officials of 'treasonous conspiracy' in confecting the claims of Russian interference and referred documents to the Justice Department for possible investigation.
Loading
The WSJ published story of the Trump letter 'to thwart the Tulsi Gabbard files,' says Bannon.
But why would Murdoch and his newspaper want to do that? Because Murdoch is in league with the so-called 'deep state', the career officers of the US intelligence agencies. 'It's the deep state, with their media partners, led by Murdoch, that's out to destroy Trump,' Bannon told The Washington Post.
Murdoch and the intelligence services want to foment suspicions that Trump was involved with Epstein's sex-trafficking ring, he says. 'Epstein is tied to the intelligence services.' I ask Bannon outright whether, if there is a list of Epstein clients, he thinks Trump might be on it. 'Zero chance,' he replies.
'The No.1 thing we have to do now is to take down the deep state,' he tells me. 'Who governs us?' He cites the two attempts to assassinate Trump last year. 'The FBI hasn't released all its files,' he says, implying possible complicity.
'Who governs this country? The intelligence agencies, the CIA, Mossad, the FBI, the Five Eyes?' The Five Eyes is an intelligence-sharing arrangement that sprang up in World War II between five allies – the US, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.
Loading
'Who governs your country?' he poses to me, hinting that a conspiracy of the five countries' intelligence agencies might secretly control Australia as well as the US. 'This is of vital importance to Australia too. Do elections mean anything? This is bigger than Watergate.' He has no answers, but many questions.
Bannon gave Trump a way out of his MAGA crisis – he urged the president to order Bondi to ask the courts to release any 'pertinent' Epstein testimony held under seal – and the president took it.
Bannon says, approvingly, that 'it's a dramatic first step – it's going to be a firestorm'. But he demands that Trump go further by appointing a special counsel to investigate the Epstein case. So the pressure remains on the president to restore faith with his base.
But Bannon is confident that MAGA will emerge intact. Besides, there are yet more enemies to be confronted: 'The biggest schism is not the Epstein case, it's with the tech bros.' But that's a conspiracy for another day.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
6 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Investigation launched into Obama officials over Russia 2016 election collusion hoax
Sky News host Andrew Bolt discusses the US grand jury investigation being launched into officials of former United States president Barack Obama to find out the 'conspiracy theory' of Russian collusion in the 2016 election. 'We might finally now get to the truth about what our ABC once boasted was the story of the century … but it a truth very different to what the ABC and journalists around the world were claiming, they told us Donald Trump stole the first election that made him president by colluding with Russia,' Mr Bolt said. 'The overwhelming evidence since is that Trump never did collude with Russia, those discredited claims were largely based on a dossier of fake intelligence secretly funded by the campaign of Trump's Democrat opponent, Hillary Clinton.'
Sydney Morning Herald
7 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Russia's dad-dancing chief blowhard makes Putin look reasonable
In agreeing to step down – and sacrifice any ambition he had to run for a second term as president – Medvedev deepened Putin's loyalty towards him. In exchange, he was given the position of prime minister, which he held until the president felt the debt repaid and dismissed him in 2020. The previous years had not been altogether kind. From having been a key player on the world stage, Medvedev's role was 'to draw public anger at him', Mironenko says, leaving Putin to announce all the good news while he mopped up the bad. Alexei Navalny's organisation exposed his mysteriously obtained empire of luxury properties, including the use of a castle outside Moscow. Critics gleefully posted the video of his awkward, strutting dance to American Boy at a university reunion. All the while, the self-professed Pink Floyd fan was being roundly humiliated by Putin's propaganda machine, something that cannot but have left a profound psychological impact. Rumours of heavy drinking started around this time and linger to this day. 'The rules have changed' That Medvedev needed to find a new role would have been clear to the St Petersburg native, who followed Putin into politics in 1999, serving as a fresh-faced balance to a clan of ex-KGB agents and other security state types. 'I think he realised better than anyone else how the rules have changed and the system changed' in February 2022, says Farida Rustamova, an exiled Russian journalist whose newsletter has become a key chronicle of the Russian elite. The state would now go all-in on war. Any lingering traces of liberalism would need to be publicly – and repeatedly – expunged. 'The Russian security forces saw him as the sort of informal leader of any liberals who remained in the Russian system,' Rustamova says. 'That's the key to his transformation.' There was added motivation from the fact that key members of Medvedev's inner circle had already been arrested, including his former deputy, Mikhail Abyzov, and the billionaire Magomedov brothers, who were alleged to have stolen from state funds meant for the 2018 World Cup. What has surprised Western leaders with whom he once rubbed shoulders is the foul-mouthed virulence with which Medvedev has taken to calling them names and threatening to blow up their capitals. In a theatrical style not unlike Trump's, the former president has rounded on Western leaders as 'half-witted old women', 'infantile morons,' 'pompous Anglo-Saxon imbeciles,' and, in the case of Joe Biden, 'a strange grandfather with dementia'. Before his latest battle with the US president, he had threatened nuclear strikes on London, Paris, Washington and, on multiple occasions, Ukraine. Medvedev is not totally on political skid row, Rustamova points out. The position Putin created for him after his dismissal as prime minister – deputy chairman of the National Security Council – now allows him to hear the unfiltered views of the president at weekly meetings. His intemperate posts on social media, she argues, are likely 'an old Kremlin trick', whereby an outrider is pushed to say outrageous things in public in order for Putin to present himself, in private, as a moderate, reasonable negotiator. 'Putin could say in his conversations with Trump, 'look what people around me want me to do, and I'm not doing that.'' Putin's response to Trump's 50-day deadline for Russia to agree to a Ukraine ceasefire – which was shortened to expire this week – has been muted. In this round of negotiations, it has been left to Medvedev to remind Trump of Russia's 'Dead Hand', the semi-automated nuclear launch system, as he did on July 31. At the very least, the fact that Putin has not restrained his one-time protege suggests he sees some purpose in his ranting, says Mironenko.
The Age
7 hours ago
- The Age
Russia's dad-dancing chief blowhard makes Putin look reasonable
In agreeing to step down – and sacrifice any ambition he had to run for a second term as president – Medvedev deepened Putin's loyalty towards him. In exchange, he was given the position of prime minister, which he held until the president felt the debt repaid and dismissed him in 2020. The previous years had not been altogether kind. From having been a key player on the world stage, Medvedev's role was 'to draw public anger at him', Mironenko says, leaving Putin to announce all the good news while he mopped up the bad. Alexei Navalny's organisation exposed his mysteriously obtained empire of luxury properties, including the use of a castle outside Moscow. Critics gleefully posted the video of his awkward, strutting dance to American Boy at a university reunion. All the while, the self-professed Pink Floyd fan was being roundly humiliated by Putin's propaganda machine, something that cannot but have left a profound psychological impact. Rumours of heavy drinking started around this time and linger to this day. 'The rules have changed' That Medvedev needed to find a new role would have been clear to the St Petersburg native, who followed Putin into politics in 1999, serving as a fresh-faced balance to a clan of ex-KGB agents and other security state types. 'I think he realised better than anyone else how the rules have changed and the system changed' in February 2022, says Farida Rustamova, an exiled Russian journalist whose newsletter has become a key chronicle of the Russian elite. The state would now go all-in on war. Any lingering traces of liberalism would need to be publicly – and repeatedly – expunged. 'The Russian security forces saw him as the sort of informal leader of any liberals who remained in the Russian system,' Rustamova says. 'That's the key to his transformation.' There was added motivation from the fact that key members of Medvedev's inner circle had already been arrested, including his former deputy, Mikhail Abyzov, and the billionaire Magomedov brothers, who were alleged to have stolen from state funds meant for the 2018 World Cup. What has surprised Western leaders with whom he once rubbed shoulders is the foul-mouthed virulence with which Medvedev has taken to calling them names and threatening to blow up their capitals. In a theatrical style not unlike Trump's, the former president has rounded on Western leaders as 'half-witted old women', 'infantile morons,' 'pompous Anglo-Saxon imbeciles,' and, in the case of Joe Biden, 'a strange grandfather with dementia'. Before his latest battle with the US president, he had threatened nuclear strikes on London, Paris, Washington and, on multiple occasions, Ukraine. Medvedev is not totally on political skid row, Rustamova points out. The position Putin created for him after his dismissal as prime minister – deputy chairman of the National Security Council – now allows him to hear the unfiltered views of the president at weekly meetings. His intemperate posts on social media, she argues, are likely 'an old Kremlin trick', whereby an outrider is pushed to say outrageous things in public in order for Putin to present himself, in private, as a moderate, reasonable negotiator. 'Putin could say in his conversations with Trump, 'look what people around me want me to do, and I'm not doing that.'' Putin's response to Trump's 50-day deadline for Russia to agree to a Ukraine ceasefire – which was shortened to expire this week – has been muted. In this round of negotiations, it has been left to Medvedev to remind Trump of Russia's 'Dead Hand', the semi-automated nuclear launch system, as he did on July 31. At the very least, the fact that Putin has not restrained his one-time protege suggests he sees some purpose in his ranting, says Mironenko.
