Ukraine celebrates Trump's weapons reversal, but the ‘devil's in the details'
WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump has finally found a way to like arming Ukraine: ask European allies to donate their weapons, and sell them American replacements.
Now comes the hard part - agreeing on who will actually give up their prized systems, including the Patriot missile batteries that Kyiv has been desperately seeking.
'We're going to make top-of-the-line weapons, and they'll be sent to Nato,' Mr Trump said in the Oval Office on July 14.
Some Patriot missile defense systems should arrive in Ukraine 'within days', added Mr Trump, who faces resistance from some high-profile figures in the Maga movement who oppose US support for Ukraine.
The costly Patriot systems - in high demand among US allies - have proven effective at destroying Russian ballistic missiles aimed at Ukraine's cities.
The US has also signalled willingness under the proposed arrangement with European allies to send additional offensive weapons, said one source familiar with the matter, though Mr Trump has said that Ukraine should refrain from attacking Moscow.
The plan, which Mr Trump and Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte hatched in recent days, according to two sources familiar with the discussions, has been received positively by Ukraine and its allies.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore July BTO launch to have over 4,600 balance flats, 2 BTO projects with under than 3-year wait
Singapore Baby died after mum took abortion pills and gave birth in toilet; coroner records an open verdict
Singapore Acute psychiatry services to be expanded across all healthcare clusters: MOH
Singapore Alleged Toa Payoh cat killer and abuser handed new charge of torturing sixth cat
Singapore 'Kpods broke our marriage, shattered our children': Woman on husband's vape addiction
Singapore Asia-Pacific will need over 230k new pilots, 250k aircraft maintenance technicians by 2042: ICAO chief
Business Tycoon Robert Kuok's daughter Kuok Hui Kwong appointed CEO of Shangri-La Asia
Multimedia Telling the Singapore story for 180 years
Leaders in Kyiv and elsewhere have celebrated a major tonal shift from Mr Trump, who had until recent weeks spoken glowingly of Russian President Vladimir Putin.
But since the announcement, it has become clear Mr Trump presented a framework - not a fleshed-out plan. How material any support ends up being for Ukraine will depend on coming negotiations about who provides which equipment, according to 10 officials in the US and Europe.
'As always with these things, the devil is in the details,' said one northern European ambassador in Washington.
The central question is who would donate the Patriot batteries, and when.
Spare a patriot?
During his Oval Office meeting with Mr Trump on July 14, Mr Rutte mentioned six Nato countries - Finland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, the Netherlands and Canada - that were willing to participate in the weapons-purchasing scheme.
High-ranking sources at two of those countries' embassies in the US told Reuters they personally learned of the plan as it was announced. Even close US allies appeared to learn of the proposal in real time.
'It is my clear sense that nobody has been briefed about the exact details in advance, and I also suspect that internally in the administration they are only now beginning to sort out what it means in practice,' said a separate European ambassador.
Mr Kurt Volker, a former US ambassador to Nato, said Mr Trump found a way to balance support for Ukraine with the political realities of the Republican Party. Having the European allies underwrite US arms supplies is 'very consistent with what he (Trump) said during the campaign,' he said.
Throughout the campaign, Mr Trump said he would
push European countries to spend more on defence, to great applause from Maga crowds. 'You gotta pay,' he said. 'If they're not going to pay, we're not going to protect, ok?'
Mr Volker said Ukraine could ultimately receive
12 to 13 Patriot batteries but it could take a year for them all to be delivered.
Asked for comment, a Nato official said the defense alliance would coordinate weapons deliveries through a mechanism known as the Nato Security Assistance and Training for Ukraine, a Nato mission located in Germany that is responsible for coordinating Western military aid for Kyiv.
'Several European countries have already committed to support this initiative including Germany, Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden, the United Kingdom, Canada and Finland,' the official said. 'Details are still under discussion.'
In response to a request for comment, the Pentagon referred Reuters to Mr Trump's July 14 remarks announcing his agreement with Mr Rutte.
The White House did not respond to a request for comment, nor did the Ukrainian or Russian embassies in Washington.
'We are ready'
The rapid hardening of
Mr Trump's rhetoric toward Moscow in recent weeks has come amid an increasingly firm belief that Mr Putin is not engaging in good-faith negotiations, according to two US officials.
'At a certain point, you know, ultimately talk doesn't talk. It's got to be action. It's got to be results,' Mr Trump said during his meeting with Mr Rutte on July 14.
One of the officials said Mr Trump came to realize that Putin's ambitions extend beyond Crimea and four eastern regions of Ukraine, a point Kyiv and European allies have publicly and frequently made.
Three Russian sources close to the Kremlin said Mr Putin will not stop the war under pressure from the West and believe that Russia - which has survived the toughest sanctions imposed by the West - can endure further economic hardship, including Mr Trump's July 14 threat to impose US tariffs targeting buyers of Russian oil.
Now, three US officials involved in weapons matters said, the real work begins.
US officials are now talking with Nato allies and gauging who is willing to send what to Ukraine.
European officials have been broadly receptive.
'We are ready to participate,' Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen told reporters in Brussels on July 15 ahead of a meeting of European Union ministers.
One official cited Germany, Greece, the Netherlands and Spain as good candidates to send a Patriot battery to Kyiv, either because they had multiple batteries or the threats they face are relatively remote.
Some, including Greece and Spain, have previously resisted appeals from allies to give some of their Patriot systems to Ukraine, arguing that they are essential to defend their own countries and Nato as a whole.
Mr Trump's move to take credit for the additional weapons headed to Ukraine has created some mild friction in Europe.
'If we pay for these weapons, it's our support,' said EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas, speaking after the Brussels meeting, adding that she welcomed Mr Trump's decision.
'So it's European support, and we are doing as much as we can to help Ukraine... If you promise to give the weapons, but say that somebody else is going to pay for it, it's not really given by you, is it?'
One of the officials said that the Trump administration has been going through Nato inventories to see what is available. Their next effort is to attempt to persuade the allies to gift the equipment to Ukraine in exchange for a 'trade' of some sort, the official said.
The trade could be a variety of things, the official said, including giving up an impending acceptance of a piece of military equipment through the Foreign Military Sales program, or sending munitions to Ukraine in exchange for an earlier replenishment date.
Mr Trump told reporters there was one country with 17 Patriots, some of which would go directly to Ukraine.
The figure has caused widespread confusion among European allies and on Capitol Hill - many of whom have not been briefed - according to the US and European officials.
No Nato member except the US has that number of Patriot systems, said two sources familiar with the matter, causing speculation that Mr Trump may have been referring to particular Patriot components, like launchers or missiles.
German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius, who visited the Pentagon on July 14, said the Germans would discuss sending Patriot batteries to Ukraine with the US in the coming days or weeks.
But no Patriot system would arrive in Kyiv for months, he said, likely delaying any receipt until after the tactically crucial summer months.
Another official said Mr Trump was engaged directly in negotiations, though talks so far were 'squishy.'
'So far folks have said, 'We can help,'' that official said.
'Now, what that means, we don't know.' REUTERS

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
20 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Faint signs of life appear in effort to halt Ukraine war
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky proposed over the weekend to revive negotiations with Russia to end the war. NEW YORK - When Russian and Ukrainian peace negotiators met in June, they could agree on little more than exchanging bodies. Those negotiations, brokered by the Trump administration, appeared to show its goal of ending the war was deeply stalled. But that doesn't mean that the diplomatic entreaties don't continue – with both Russia and Ukraine trying in their own ways to appeal to the White House. President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine proposed over the weekend to revive the talks. It was his first offer for renewed negotiations since the Trump administration agreed to facilitate the transfer of air defence weapons to Ukraine and threatened to impose sanctions on Russia's trading partners within 50 days – both steps intended to hasten negotiations. Mr Zelensky proposed talks on a ceasefire, prisoner exchanges and the return of Ukrainian children deported to Russia during the war. He reiterated an offer for a direct meeting with President Vladimir Putin of Russia, first floated in May. Mr Putin had then remained silent for days before rejecting the offer. 'The Russian side must stop hiding from decisions,' Mr Zelensky said in a video address on the evening of July 19. Ukraine, he said, has offered a meeting in the coming week in Istanbul, where two previous rounds of talks took place in May and June. Mr Zelensky said his national security adviser, Mr Rustem Umerov, had conveyed the proposal to the Russian negotiating team. Russia did not immediately respond directly to Ukraine's offer. The Kremlin spokesperson, Mr Dmitri Peskov, told Russian state television on July 20 that Mr Putin wanted a peace agreement but that 'the main thing for us is to achieve our goals' in the war. 'President Putin has repeatedly spoken of his desire to bring the Ukrainian settlement to a peaceful conclusion as soon as possible,' Mr Peskov said. 'This is a long process, it requires effort, and it is not easy.' Tass, a Russian state news agency, confirmed that the Kremlin had received the offer. Russia is seeking additional territory, a declaration that Ukraine will not join Nato and will remain a neutral state, limits on the future size of Ukraine's army and recognition of Russian as an official language in Ukraine, among other demands. The Trump administration has pushed for an unconditional ceasefire before substantive talks on a final settlement. Ukraine agreed to that condition in March. NYTIMES

Straits Times
20 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Witness stand not arena for humiliation in sex offence cases, judge reminds lawyers
Justice Vincent Hoong said: 'There is no honour in extracting testimony through degradation, nor is there skill in exploiting the emotional vulnerability of a witness.' SINGAPORE – During the trial of a man accused of raping his mother, his lawyer suggested that the woman 'could have easily avoided' the assault if she had just crossed her legs and 'shut the gates'. In another case, a lawyer stared inappropriately at the breasts of a molestation victim and asked her to stand up in an attempt to show that there would be 'motive' to molest her if she was wearing a low-cut top. These examples were cited in a recent speech by High Court Judge Vincent Hoong as cross-examination questions that have no place in the Singapore courts. Justice Hoong, who is also presiding judge of the State Courts, said: 'We would do well to remember that the courtroom is not a battleground, and the witness stand is not an arena for humiliation. 'There is no honour in extracting testimony through degradation, nor is there skill in exploiting the emotional vulnerability of a witness.' He was speaking to members of the Singapore Academy of Law at a private event held at the State Courts on July 2. The keynote address has been published on the Singapore Courts website. Justice Hoong's speech on navigating the sensitivities of cross-examining complainants in sexual offence cases is the latest reminder from the judiciary to the legal fraternity to be aware of the impact that the trial process can have on victims. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Priority for singles, higher quota for second-timer families to kick in from HDB's July BTO exercise Singapore Both Bukit Panjang LRT disruptions in July linked to newly installed power system: SMRT Singapore 1 in 3 vapes here laced with etomidate; MOH working with MHA to list it as illegal drug: Ong Ye Kung Asia Johor Bahru collision claims lives of e-hailing driver and Singapore passenger Sport Arsenal arrive in Singapore for pre-season matches with AC Milan and Newcastle Business Crypto exchange Tokenize to shut down Singapore operations Singapore More initiatives and support for migrant community announced at Racial Harmony Day event Singapore ComfortDelGro to discipline driver who flung relative's wheelchair out of taxi Most recently, in December 2024, Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon emphasised the need for judges to take a more active supervisory role in the management of such cases, including the giving of evidence by complainants. This was followed in January by the introduction of measures, such as the use of a checklist at the pretrial stage, to identify contentious issues so that the judge can shut out irrelevant lines of questioning during the trial . In his speech, Justice Hoong noted that judicial guidance in recent years has reinforced and clarified the legislative safeguards against improper questioning. When conducted within proper bounds, robust cross-examination is essential to ensure that the defence can put forward its case fully and fairly, he said. However, cross-examination can be traumatising if conducted without appropriate sensitivity. 'It is therefore incumbent upon us, as judges and counsel, to approach this process with care, precision and a heightened awareness of its potential impact,' he added. Justice Hoong said questions that reinforce outdated notions, such as the expectation that a victim would put up physical resistance or immediately report the crime, can cross the line into being gratuitously harmful, irrelevant or demeaning. 'It is the judge's task to discern and draw that distinction with care and vigilance,' he said. However, lawyers must also be mindful to ensure that their questions are appropriate and relevant. 'Cross-examination is not an opportunity for theatricality nor for an advocate to demonstrate a flair for antagonistic or aggressive, repetitive and oppressive questioning,' he said. He listed past cases where lawyers' questions impugned the complainant's morality, relied on harmful stereotypes and victim-shaming tactics, tried to link the complainant's attire to the accused's 'motive', or suggested that the assault could have been avoided if the complainant had not parted her legs. Justice Hoong added: 'It is entirely possible to challenge the reliability and credibility of a witness in a way which is measured, respectful and upholds the decorum of the court.' Lawyer Luo Ling Ling, who has defended clients accused of committing sexual offences, told The Straits Times: 'I fight all the way for my clients, but I'm also in favour of protecting sexual assault victims. Both objectives can be achieved if you consciously cross-examine the witnesses with respect and restraint.' Ms Luo, who is the managing director of her eponymous firm, said she learnt this 'the hard way' in a case where three girls had accused their stepfather of molesting them. The lawyer said she did not cross the line, but one of the victims broke down when questioned about the contradictions between her police statement and her court testimony. The victim was testifying via a camera, and those in the courtroom did not realise that she was crying until the counsellor who was with her informed the judge, Ms Luo recalled. '(In) hindsight, I would have still done the same cross-examination and asked those hard questions, but I would have used a gentle tone,' she mused.

Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Pakistan arrests suspect after viral video of couple shot dead in the name of ‘honour'
Find out what's new on ST website and app. QUETTA, Pakistan - Pakistan on July 20 arrested a suspect after a video emerged on social media of a woman and a man being shot and killed for marrying against the wishes of their families, in a so-called honour killing, authorities said. The couple, who were not identified, were shot dead on the orders of a local tribal council in June in Pakistan's southwestern Balochistan province, according to provincial authorities, who investigated after the video went viral. One of the suspects has been arrested after the location and people in the video were identified, the provincial chief minister, Mr Sarfraz Bugti, said in a statement. A case has been registered against all those involved, he said. The video shows people in a desert, and some pickup trucks and SUVs that they had apparently driven there. The woman is given a copy of the Quran, the Muslim holy book, and she then tells a man: 'Come walk seven steps with me, after that you can shoot me.' The man then follows her for a few steps. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Priority for singles, higher quota for second-timer families to kick in from HDB's July BTO exercise Singapore Both Bukit Panjang LRT disruptions in July linked to newly installed power system: SMRT Singapore 1 in 3 vapes here laced with etomidate; MOH working with MHA to list it as illegal drug: Ong Ye Kung Asia Johor Bahru collision claims lives of e-hailing driver and Singapore passenger Sport Arsenal arrive in Singapore for pre-season matches with AC Milan and Newcastle Business Crypto exchange Tokenize to shut down Singapore operations Singapore More initiatives and support for migrant community announced at Racial Harmony Day event Singapore ComfortDelGro to discipline driver who flung relative's wheelchair out of taxi A local police official said the woman did not cry or seek mercy. 'You are allowed only to shoot me. Nothing more than that,' the woman says in the regional Brahavi language, translated by the official. It was not clear what she meant by 'nothing more than that'. The man, who had followed her, then aimed a pistol at her. The woman, wrapped in a shawl, stood still as shots were fired. She remained standing after two shots, delivered from close range, dropping to the ground after the third shot. That is followed by a series of gunshots. The footage then shows a bloodied man lying on the ground, close to the woman's body. Then, men are shown shooting at both the bodies. Reuters could not independently verify the authenticity of the video. The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan said that in 2024, there were at least 405 'honour killings', criticising the authorities for failing to stamp out these crimes. Most victims are women, and killings are usually carried out by relatives professing to defend their family's reputation, human rights groups say. Conservative families do not allow couples to marry against their wishes. Such killings are against the law. REUTERS