logo
Trump's sugar economics for Coke amid the company's multi-billion tax case

Trump's sugar economics for Coke amid the company's multi-billion tax case

Time of India2 days ago
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Trump, Coke and populist optics
HFCS vs. sugar
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Where Coca-Cola stands
Coke's billion-dollar tax mess
Impact on sugar producers and costs
Nutritional nuance
Ninety-four percent of the world's population recognises the red-and-white Coca-Cola logo, according to a ResearchGate study citing multiple reports. That's not a brand — it's a global reflex. And now, Donald Trump wants in.US President Donald Trump is gettinghimself involded into the recipe of the planet's most iconic soft drink. Coca-Cola, Trump claimed this week, has agreed to replace high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) with real cane sugar in its US-made sodas, a move he framed as a win for his "Make America Healthy Again" campaign.The announcement came via Trump's Truth Social platform, where he posted a mock-up of a Coke bottle reading 'Share a Coke with Trump' and declared, 'I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so… This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better!'Coca-Cola hasn't confirmed the change.But a vague statement hinted at something brewing: 'More details on new innovative offerings within our Coca-Cola product range will be shared soon,' the company said, while thanking the President for his 'enthusiasm.'Coca-Cola is deeply embedded in American culture. By nudging its formula, Trump taps into nostalgia, anti-corporate sentiment, and populism. Cane sugar recalls a time when things supposedly tasted 'better,' like the Mexican Coke many Americans swear by.The message is simple: real over artificial, sugar over syrup, 'America First', even in your soda.It's also a nod to Trump's Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who's crusading against ultra-processed foods. Kennedy has blamed HFCS for fuelling obesity and diabetes, calling it 'just a formula for making you obese and diabetic.'HFCS, derived from corn starch, dominates US soda recipes because it's cheaper, partly due to corn subsidies and tariffs on imported sugar.HFCS became Coke's sweetener of choice in the 1980s. But many consumers prefer the cane sugar version sold abroad, which they say tastes cleaner. Trump's move channels that feeling, but swapping out HFCS isn't just cosmetic.HFCS accounts for about 3% of total US corn usage, 410 million bushels a year, according to the US Department of Agriculture. Removing that would ripple through corn prices and farm incomes.The Corn Refiners Association (CRA) estimates such a shift could cut farm receipts by $2.2 to $5.1 billion, with worst-case losses reaching $7.5 billion. Iowa, Illinois and Nebraska alone could lose nearly $2.35 billion in the short term.'Replacing high-fructose corn syrup with cane sugar would cost thousands of American food manufacturing jobs, depress farm income, and boost imports of foreign sugar — all with no nutritional benefit,' warned CRA President and CEO John Bode, as per CBS.Coca-Cola remains a giant.As of July 17, 2025, it had a market cap of $298.16 billion. It reported $47.06 billion in revenue for 2024, with Q1 2025 revenues at $11.13 billion (down 2% YoY due to currency swings and bottling changes), while organic revenue rose 6%.Net income in 2024 hit $10.63 billion; Q1 2025 net income rose 4.8% to $3.33 billion.Coca-Cola sells 500+ brands in over 200 countries, reaching 1.9 billion people daily. It led the global non-alcoholic beverage market with over 40% share in 2024, according to Investing.com.The $478.14 billion carbonated beverage market is projected to hit $707.76 billion by 2034, as per Precedence Research. The cola segment alone could more than double, from $144.6 billion to $317.5 billion, by then, as per Prophecy Market Insights.In the US, Coke held a 44.9% share of the 2024 carbonated soft drink market, which was valued at $303.11 billion and is forecast to grow to $467.18 billion by 2030, according to Grand View Research.Core brands like Coke (19.2%), Sprite (8.1%), and Diet Coke (7.8%) remain dominant.What's also worth noting is that nearly 40% of Coca-Cola's global revenue comes from the US market alone. In 2024, North America contributed 39% to total revenue, followed by Europe, the Middle East and Africa at 23%, Latin America and Bottling Investments at 13% each, and Asia Pacific at 12%, as per the report.While Trump touts Coca-Cola's supposed health kick, the company is fighting a far more consequential battle, with the IRS. And the outcome could reset global norms on how multinationals are taxed.It goes back to 1996, when Coke and the IRS agreed on a royalty formula for profits from foreign subsidiaries: the so-called 10-50-50 rule. Under it, subsidiaries kept 10% of sales and half the residual profit; the US parent got the rest.In return, the IRS said it wouldn't impose accuracy-related penalties, so long as Coke stuck to the formula.That truce held, until 2011. As reported the Forbes, without warning, the IRS scrapped the agreement for tax years 2007 to 2009 and imposed a new method: the Comparable Profits Method (CPM), which bases income allocations on profits earned by similar independent companies.The switch inflated Coca-Cola's taxable income by $9 billion and hit it with $3.4 billion in tax deficiencies for those three years alone.Coke challenged the IRS in court, but in 2020, the US Tax Court largely sided with the government. While the court allowed Coke some credit for dividends paid, it upheld the IRS's overall approach.The company now owes $2.7 billion in back taxes, $6 billion with interest.In September 2024, Coca-Cola wired the full $6 billion to the IRS, labelling it a 'tax litigation deposit.' The company is still appealing, but the money's already gone.Coke's argues that the IRS pulled a bait and switch. After encouraging use of the 10-50-50 formula for years, the agency retroactively changed the rules and punished the company for following its guidance.In its own words, the IRS 'handed Coca-Cola a $3 billion jaywalking ticket' after leading it into the crosswalk.Additionally, the IRS accuses Coca-Cola of shifting billions in profits to low-tax countries like Ireland, Brazil, and Eswatini. In court, Judge Albert Lauber called the company's global tax structure 'astronomical.'The fallout is already visible.Coca-Cola in May 2024 raised $4 billion in debt, partly to deal with the load.Financial Express reported that the case could curb acquisitions and buybacks. Al Jazeera pegged the company's total exposure at up to '$16 billion, almost two years' worth of profits.A shift to cane sugar would likely boost demand for domestic producers, particularly in Florida and Louisiana, where most of the US cane sugar industry is based. In 2024, the US sugar market stood at 48.1 million tons, as per IMARC, and the cane segment accounted for roughly 40–45% of total supply, USDA ERS, 2025.This shift would be welcomed by powerful industry groups like the American Sugar Alliance, which have long advocated for reduced reliance on HFCS.Despite being shielded by the US Sugar Program, which keeps domestic prices high through tariffs and quotas, cane sugar producers have struggled. They face rising input costs, margin pressures, and stiff competition from cheaper HFCS, widely adopted since the 1980s.The sector has also seen significant consolidation, with sugarcane farms declining by 31% between 1997 and 2022, as reported Southern Ag Today. For many growers, a move back to real sugar in sodas would be a rare opportunity to reclaim lost ground.But the cost implications are steep.Cane sugar costs between $0.40 and $0.50 per pound in the US, compared to $0.20–$0.30 for HFCS. That could mean $800–$900 million in added annual costs for Coca-Cola alone, Hindustan Times reported, based on its estimated use of 2.7 billion pounds of sweetener.Consumers could see price hikes of 10–15% on sweetened drinks, as per HT.Switching would also force 'massive supply chain overhauls,' from storage to equipment upgrades.The labour impact is mixed. Corn processors and HFCS refiners may face job cuts, thousands, according to the CRA. Meanwhile, sugar refining jobs could grow slightly, but direct employment in that sector is modest — 14,000 to 15,000 people, as per IBISWorld, 2025.Scientifically, switching to cane sugar may not mean much. The FDA has stated there's no evidence of a meaningful safety difference between HFCS and cane sugar. Harvard nutritionist Frank Hu summed it up: 'Sugar in general' is the problem, not which kind.But the war on ultra-processed food is as much cultural as medical, and Trump is using that momentum.This is more than a formula change, it's a potential $6 billion shake-up in the domestic sugar economy, which accounts for 30% of US sugar supply.Trump's announcement may be political theatre, but for Coca-Cola, it could be smart brand positioning. With tax agents closing in and consumers rethinking processed foods, appearing to respond to health concerns could be a reputational buffer.'Real sugar Coke' fits 2025's consumer trends: nostalgia, authenticity and clean-label marketing. But overhauling sugar sourcing, supply chains and formulas won't be easy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Crypto sector breaches $4 trillion in market value during pivotal week
Crypto sector breaches $4 trillion in market value during pivotal week

Economic Times

time15 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Crypto sector breaches $4 trillion in market value during pivotal week

Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel The crypto sector's market value hit $4 trillion on Friday, according to CoinGecko, marking a milestone that reflects its shift from a nascent asset class to a central part of the global investment landscape.A wave of renewed optimism, regulatory clarity in key markets and rising institutional flows have catapulted the crypto sector to a new valuation U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill on Thursday to create a regulatory framework for U.S.-dollar-pegged cryptocurrency tokens, known as stablecoins, sending the bill to President Donald Trump , who is expected to sign it into law."The arrival of the Trump legislation signaled an about-turn in attitudes towards the crypto industry, but legislators are still exercising some caution," said Derren Nathan, head of equity research, Hargreaves lawmakers also passed two other crypto bills, sending them next to the Senate for consideration. One lays out a regulatory framework for crypto, while the other seeks to ban the U.S. from issuing a central bank digital $4 trillion milestone underscores how far the crypto industry has come from its speculative, fringe origins. With growing interest from asset managers, new exchange-traded products and broader adoption among retail and corporate users, digital assets are increasingly shaping conversations in global a type of cryptocurrency designed to maintain a constant value, usually a 1:1 dollar peg, are commonly used by crypto traders to move funds between tokens. Their use has grown rapidly in recent years, and proponents say they could be used to send payments instantly."The Genius Act will go down in history as a law that served as a foundational step in mainstreaming of crypto as an asset class," said Chris Perkins, president, treasury allocations to bitcoin are also gaining pace, with a growing number of public companies adding the token to their balance sheets as a long-term store of sector was last trading at a combined market value of $3.92 trillion, as bitcoin - the world's largest cryptocurrency - fell 1.8%.Bitcoin crossed the $120,000 mark earlier this week, setting a record. Brokerage Bernstein forecast it could climb to $200,000 by the second-biggest crypto token, was last up 4.5%. It has more than doubled over the past three crypto rally also powered gains in linked equities, with Coinbase and Robinhood climbing to all-time highs on Friday. Shares of the crypto exchange were last up 1%, while the retail trading platform, which also supports crypto trades, gained 3%.Ether-focused stocks also saw broad gains.

Trump aides discussed ending some SpaceX contracts, but found most were vital
Trump aides discussed ending some SpaceX contracts, but found most were vital

Mint

time15 minutes ago

  • Mint

Trump aides discussed ending some SpaceX contracts, but found most were vital

Elon Musk joined President Trump in the Oval Office in May as his role at the Department of Government Efficiency drew to a close. For the U.S. government, breaking up with Elon Musk is easier said than done. Just days after President Trump in early June raised the prospect of cutting ties with Musk's businesses, the Trump administration initiated a review of SpaceX's contracts with the federal government, according to people familiar with the matter. The review was intended to identify potential waste in the multibillion-dollar agreements the company has with the government, the people said. But administration officials determined that they couldn't eliminate most of those contracts because they are critical to the Defense Department and NASA, the people said. The early assessment underscored the company's dominance as the world's pre-eminent rocket launcher and a major satellite-internet provider. A White House official said the review of government contracts focused on a range of companies with lucrative government contracts. Musk and SpaceX didn't respond to requests for comment. Musk was once one of Trump's closest advisers, overseeing the cost-cutting effort known as the Department of Government Efficiency. But the relationship between the two men ruptured after the billionaire publicly criticized Trump's signature tax-and-spending bill. On June 5, as Musk's social-media attacks turned personal, Trump posted on Truth Social that the easiest way to save federal dollars was to 'terminate" the government contracts for Musk's companies. Days later, a senior General Services Administration official asked the Defense Department to fill out a spreadsheet with all of its current SpaceX contracts and other transaction agreements, according to an email described to The Wall Street Journal. The June 9 email was sent by Josh Gruenbaum, the GSA's commissioner for the Federal Acquisition Service. In the email, Gruenbaum said he planned to share the data with the White House. Gruenbaum also made similar requests for information about SpaceX contracts to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and nearly half a dozen other federal agencies, according to an administration official. The spreadsheets, which are known as 'scorecards," included the value of the SpaceX contracts and whether a competitor could do the same job more effectively, this official said. Instead of terminating SpaceX contracts after reviewing the data, White House and agency officials, including those at the Pentagon, determined that most of the deals were vital to the missions of the Defense Department and NASA, according to some of the people familiar with the matter. One of the people said some SpaceX contracts could face continued scrutiny. SpaceX President Gwynne Shotwell met with White House officials in recent weeks as the review was ongoing, people familiar with the matter said. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk gave Donald Trump, then the president-elect, a tour of the company's Starbase facility in Texas before a launch last November. In struggling to find ways to reduce the government's dependence on SpaceX, the Trump administration highlighted how much agencies rely on the company's sophisticated technology. At least for now, the government has limited alternatives for many rocket launches and low-Earth-orbit satellite services, a situation that continues to give SpaceX—and Musk himself—an outsize role in space. The government has been aware of this dynamic for years, and the Trump administration's review is the latest sign that policymakers are wrestling with the situation. SpaceX's dominance has also sparked frustration among industry rivals. Government officials have expanded agencies' work with SpaceX because of the company's technology and prices. They have also pushed other space companies to step up and designed some contracts to stoke competition. Many rivals still have hurdles to overcome as they develop their own space vehicles and satellites, and race to get them into service. Several companies have faced delays and technical challenges as they worked on products that would compete with SpaceX. Setbacks are common as engineers try to mature complex hardware designed for space, and Musk's company has faced its own problems of late with a new vehicle. SpaceX executives have said the company believes strongly in competition, and its rockets often launch rivals' satellites to space. At an investor event in November, Shotwell said that the company has earned its contracts with the government by offering the best prices and executing. This year, the company has won more government contracts and continued working on major missions following the spat between the president and Musk. In April, SpaceX was awarded the most money and launches under a closely watched Pentagon contract, winning 28 national-security flights in a new deal valued at $5.9 billion. It launched an upgraded GPS satellite for the Space Force in May. NASA is planning to have SpaceX fly a new crew to the International Space Station at the end of this month. The company's Falcon rockets, which rely on reusable boosters, have emerged as workhorses for government space missions. SpaceX's Crew Dragon spacecraft is the only U.S. vehicle certified to fly people to and from the space station. Musk's threat—later walked back—to decommission Crew Dragon during his feud with Trump last month sparked worry inside NASA, the Journal previously reported. The agency has long wanted to have two different options for astronaut space-station missions. SpaceX also has a growing business providing high-speed internet to government agencies through its Starlink satellite fleet. A SpaceX division called Starshield provides several national-security satellite capabilities, and secured a major classified deal a few years ago from the intelligence agency that operates U.S. spy satellites. Write to Brian Schwartz at Shalini Ramachandran at and Micah Maidenberg at

Rubio strips US visas from 8 of 11 Brazilian Supreme Court judges in a show of support to Bolsonaro
Rubio strips US visas from 8 of 11 Brazilian Supreme Court judges in a show of support to Bolsonaro

First Post

time15 minutes ago

  • First Post

Rubio strips US visas from 8 of 11 Brazilian Supreme Court judges in a show of support to Bolsonaro

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that he has ordered the revocation of American visas of eight Brazilian Supreme Court judges in a show of support to the country's former President Jair Bolsonaro read more US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has reportedly stripped American visas of Brazil's eight Supreme Court judges in a show of support for the country's former President Jair Bolsonaro. The far-right Brazilian leader with strong ties with US President Donald Trump is on trial for allegedly masterminding a murderous plot to cling to power after losing the 2022 election to Brazil's current president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Bolsonaro is expected to be convicted by the Brazilian Supreme Court in the coming weeks and might face a jail sentence of up to 43 years. As the day of sentencing nears, Trump has been increasing pressure on Brazil to help out his 'friend'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In light of this, Trump announced on July 9 that he would impose 50% tariffs on all Brazilian imports as of August 1. The threat triggered nationalist sentiments in Brazil, with Lula threatening reciprocal tariffs. The Brazilian president went on to describe Trump's move as 'unacceptable blackmail'. Who got their visa stripped? On Friday, Brazil's federal police raided Bolsonaro's house and ordered him to wear an ankle tag in a bid to stop him from absconding. Soon after that, Rubio announced further moves in support of the former Brazilian president, who claimed that the case against him is a 'political witch hunt'. Rubio announced the move in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter. He said that he had ordered visa revocations for the judge leading the investigation into Bolsonaro, Alexandre de Moraes, as well as 'his allies on the court' and their family members. .@POTUS made clear that his administration will hold accountable foreign nationals who are responsible for censorship of protected expression in the United States. Brazilian Supreme Federal Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes's political witch hunt against Jair Bolsonaro created a… — Secretary Marco Rubio (@SecRubio) July 18, 2025 While the secretary of state did not mention the names of other judges, Brazilian newspaper Globo identified them as Luís Roberto Barroso, José Antonio Dias Toffoli, Cristiano Zanin, Flávio Dino, Cármen Lúcia Antunes Rocha, Luiz Edson Fachin and Gilmar Ferreira Mendes. Interestingly, two other judges who were nominated to the court during Bolsonaro's 2019-23 presidency, André Mendonça and Kassio Nunes Marques, reportedly avoided the sanction along with a third judge, Luiz Fux. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Lula hits back Meanwhile, the Brazilian president denounced what he described as 'another arbitrary and completely groundless measure from the US government'. 'Interference in another country's justice system is unacceptable and offends the basic principles of national sovereignty and respect between nations,' the president said on Saturday, adding: 'I'm certain that no kind of intimidation or threat – from whoever it may be – will compromise the most important mission of our nation's powers and institutions, which is to act permanently to defend and safeguard the democratic rule of law.' Meanwhile, Trump's Alex Bruesewitz welcomed Rubio's announcement, describing Bolsonaro's treatment in the country as 'sick and wrong'. Bolsonaro's son, Eduardo, went on to thank Rubio for his decision. 'Thank you very much for this fight in favour of free speech, we do believe in the same values,' tweeted Eduardo, who has been living in the US since February and has reportedly been lobbying officials there over his father's plight," Eduardo said in the post.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store