Epstein Files: FBI Agents Reportedly Told To ‘Flag' Docs Mentioning Trump
Jeffrey Epstein (left) and now-President Donald Trump in 1997 at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm ... More Beach, Florida. Getty Images
Durbin, the ranking member on the Senate Judiciary Committee, sent letters Friday to Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino, which direct them to answer a series of questions about the Epstein documents and the DOJ memo last week announcing the agency would not make them public.
Anonymous sources told Durbin's office that FBI investigators tasked with reviewing the Epstein documents 'were instructed to 'flag' any records in which President Trump was mentioned,' as part of a broader 'haphazard' FBI review of the Epstein files that took place in March.
Durbin asked Bondi, Patel and Bongino to answer why officials were told to flag Trump-related documents, what the agency did with any documents related to Trump, and for any log they've created of the materials that mentioned him.
The Democrat also more broadly questioned the DOJ's memo, which said the government would not release any more Epstein files and shot down several theories about the financier's case, including the existence of a so-called Epstein 'client list' and that Epstein did not die by suicide.
The memo 'directly contradicts' Bondi's previous public statements about the case, Durbin argued, in which the attorney general claimed an Epstein 'client list' was 'sitting on my desk right now' and that the public would see 'the full Epstein files.'
The DOJ confirmed receipt of Durbin's letter to Forbes but declined to comment further, and the FBI has not yet responded to a request for comment.
Durbin asked Bondi, Patel and Bongino to respond to a series of questions about the Epstein case by Aug. 1. In addition to the questions about documents mentioning Trump, Durbin also asked for information on whether they've personally reviewed all of the Epstein files, why Bondi claimed there was a 'client list' if the agency later said there wasn't, what happened in the months between the FBI's review of the Epstein files and the memo not to release them and why that memo was not signed by any specific DOJ or FBI officials. The senator also questioned the surveillance footage the government released showing the area outside Epstein's cell on the night he died amid controversy over whether that video was modified. He also referenced Thursday's report in The Wall Street Journal alleging Trump sent a letter to Epstein for his 50th birthday—which allegedly included a drawing of a naked woman and Trump referencing Epstein's 'secrets'—with Durbin asking whether the FBI reviewed that letter or other correspondence between Trump and Epstein. (Trump has denied the veracity of the letter and has threatened to sue News Corp owner Rupert Murdoch for publishing the report.) What Do We Know About Trump's Relationship With Epstein?
Trump has never been accused of any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein and the financier's alleged sex trafficking operation, but the president used to be friends with Epstein and has appeared in photos with the late financier. 'I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,' Trump told New York Magazine in 2002. 'He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.' The president's name was on the flight logs for Epstein's private jets and was recorded in the financier's 'little black book,' but Trump has said he never visited Epstein's private island or took part in any sexual misconduct. Trump later said he had a 'falling out' with Epstein, which is believed to be tied to a 2004 real estate dispute, and said he was 'not a fan' of his former friend. The president has more recently criticized the demand to release more Epstein files, decrying the conspiracy theories over the Epstein case as a 'hoax' and disavowing his own supporters who have pushed for the documents.
There is still so far no indication that the public uproar over the DOJ's refusal to disclose its Epstein files will result in any more documents becoming available. Trump and Bondi said Thursday they will ask the court to unseal grand jury documents in the case, but legal experts note those documents are typically secret and are only made public in very limited instances. Even if the grand jury materials were released, Democrats and legal experts have suggested it would likely consist of limited information that doesn't include the potentially explosive information about Epstein's associates the public is hoping for, and would be heavily redacted. Key Background
Epstein is alleged to have abused more than 100 women before he was indicted in 2019 on sex trafficking charges, and he died in prison later that year. His case has remained a source of fascination due to the high-profile people he associated with, however—including Trump, former President Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew—which has sparked conspiracy theories about a 'client list,' Epstein's death and the government's lack of transparency by not releasing the Epstein files. (Clinton, like Trump, has not been accused of any wrongdoing, and Prince Andrew has denied allegations against him.) Those theories were spread by many Trump allies on the right such as Patel and Bongino, and both FBI officials and Bondi repeatedly claimed they would release the Epstein files. Only one tranche of documents had been made public by the time the DOJ issued its memo last week, however—and those materials were largely already publicly available—and the announcement that no further files would be released sparked an outcry on the right and calls for Bondi to resign. Democrats have also pushed for more transparency around the Epstein files and the Trump administration's failure to release them, and have introduced legislation and other measures aimed at forcing the documents' release. Further Reading Forbes Trump Directs Bondi To Release Some Epstein Documents, Threatens To Sue Wall Street Journal And Murdoch By Siladitya Ray Forbes Trump Rips 'Weaklings' Who Criticized Handling Of Epstein Files—Calls It 'Big Hoax' By Sara Dorn Forbes Trump And Bondi Promised Epstein Grand Jury Docs—But It Doesn't Mean Anything Will Be Released Today Or Ever By Alison Durkee Forbes Trump Sounded Hesitant About Releasing Epstein Files In Newly Resurfaced Interview By Sara Dorn
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
5 soldiers wounded by fellow soldier in workplace shooting at Fort Stewart in Georgia; suspect in custody, officials say
The alleged shooter, identified as Sgt. Quornelius Radford, was quickly "subdued" by other soldiers, Brig. Gen. John Lubas told reporters. Five soldiers were shot and wounded on Wednesday at a U.S. Army base in Georgia by a fellow soldier in a workplace shooting that prompted a lockdown, officials there say. In a post on its Facebook page, Fort Stewart Hunter Army Airfield said the shooting occurred in the 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team area shortly before 11 a.m. local time. The alleged shooter was identified as Quornelius Radford, an automated logistics sergeant assigned to the 2nd Brigade Team. At a press conference on Wednesday afternoon, Brig. Gen. John Lubas, commander of the 3rd Infantry Division said Radford was quickly "subdued" by fellow soldiers before law enforcement arrived. "Soldiers in the area that witnessed the shooting immediately, and without hesitation, tackled the soldier, subdued him, and allowed law enforcement to then take him into custody," Lubas said. "These soldiers without a doubt prevented further casualties." All five of the victims were transported to the hospital in stable condition, Lubas said. Three of the victims required surgery, and all are expected to recover. According to Lubas, the shooting occurred at Radford's place of work and involved his co-workers, but he would not speculate on a motive. Lubas said that Radford used a personal handgun, and that the incident remains under investigation. In an earlier alert announcing the lockdown, Fort Stewart said multiple 'casualties" had been reported in what was described as "an active shooter incident." Gates to the base were closed for several hours, and some schools in the area were briefly placed on lockdown. Fort Stewart, which is located about 40 miles southwest of Savannah, is home to about 10,000 people, including soldiers, family members and civilian employees, live there, according to its website. The FBI in Atlanta said on X that its office in Savannah was aware of the incident and "coordinating with Army Criminal Investigation Division for any assistance that might be needed." President Trump was briefed on the shooting, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp wrote on X that he was "in close contact with law enforcement on the ground," adding that his family was "saddened by today's tragedy." "We are keeping the victims, their families, and all those who answer the call to serve in our hearts and prayers, and we ask that Georgians everywhere do the same," Kemp said.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Congress members trying to see ICE detainees at MDC Brooklyn jail barred from entry
NEW YORK — Officials at MDC Brooklyn barred three Democrat members of Congress from conducting an oversight visit of the jail's ICE detention operation, sparking a brief lockdown that led to cancelled legal visits for inmates seeing their defense lawyers. The Congress members, Reps. Adriano Espaillat, Nydia Velazquez and Dan Goldman, showed up at the notorious Sunset Park jail Wednesday morning, but were blocked at the door, then were briefly trapped between the iron gate in front of the jail and its entrance doors. Inside, about 20 defense attorneys visiting their clients abruptly had those visits cut short, multiple lawyers told the Daily News. Jail staff recalled those inmates back to their housing units, and wouldn't let their lawyers leave the MDC for about a half hour as the drama unfolded outside, the attorneys said. Those lawyers included Marc Agnifilo, who represents Sean 'Diddy' Combs and alleged healthcare CEO killer Luigi Mangione, both of whom are housed in MDC, sources said. Agnifilo did not return messages seeking comment Wednesday. 'We were trapped between the gate and the building,' Velazquez told The News. She said that the lawmakers entered the gate and approached the place's front door, and Espaillat asked a masked Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent outside to show his face. 'He [the agent] immediately jumped in front of the gate and locked us inside, and then went upstairs, climbed the steps for the federal building and locked the door so we could not get out to the street,' Velazquez said. 'We couldn't get into the building.' New York Immigration Coalition President Murad Awawdeh, who accompanied the lawmakers, said the ICE agent immediately confronted them, asking for ID, then triggered a lockdown and disappeared into the building. 'It was a circus that the federal prison bureau created,' he said. 'Why is the federal government going so far out of its way to prohibit anyone from seeing what's happening inside their facilities?' Eventually, an assistant to the warden came out, 'and he said what we knew he would say, that we have to request seven days in advance for a permit to allow us to go inside,' Velazquez said. That's against federal law, which gives Congress members the right to make unannounced visits, she said. Starting in June, MDC Brooklyn began holding more than 100 ICE detainees as part of an interagency agreement between ICE and and the Bureau of Prisons to use eight federal facilities across the country to hold immigrants ensnared in Donald Trump's mass deportation machine. 'Denying Members of Congress access to a federal detention facility is outrageous and unacceptable,' Espaillat said in a statement later Wednesday. 'MDC Brooklyn has a well-documented record of abuse. ICE should not be allowed to expand its reach through backdoor deals with federal prisons. This contract must be terminated now.' BOP spokeswoman Randilee Giamusso said Wednesday that the prison system would be happy to accommodate Congress member visits if they give advance notice. 'However, as a law enforcement entity, we must prioritize the safety of our staff, inmates and our facilities. We remain committed to working with our congressional partners,' Giamusso said. 'With proper notice, the BOP is happy to accommodate a request for a site visit from any congressional member.' Espaillat and several other Congress members sued the Trump administration last week, arguing that federal law specifically prohibits immigration detention facilities from requiring prior notice before members of Congress can make oversight visits. 'The Trump administration's lawless efforts to defy that constitutional authority are a gross abuse of power,' Goldman said, 'and we're taking them to court in defense of that principle and to find out what they're hiding.' _____
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Library of Congress Website Deleted Part of the Constitution That Trump Doesn't Like. Now They're Calling It a 'Coding Error'
The removed portions of the Constitution include clauses that limit Congress' power to suspend habeas corpus and forbid titles of nobility in the United StatesNEED TO KNOW Portions of the Constitution were deleted from the Library of Congress' website after President Donald Trump ousted the longtime librarian from her role in May The omitted portions of Article I cover limitations on Congress' ability to suspend habeas corpus and grant titles of nobility After internet users noticed the quiet omission, the Library of Congress claimed it was a "coding error"The Library of Congress removed two and a half sections of the Constitution from its website sometime after President Donald Trump ousted the library's longtime leader in May. In recent days, internet users noticed that portions of Article 1 were missing from the Library of Congress' Constitution Annotated website: Sections 9 and 10, and part of Section 8. Article 1 appeared on the site in full at the start of the summer, according to internet archives. On Aug. 6, the Library of Congress insisted that deletion of several clauses in Article 1 were the result of a website "coding error" and ensured the issue would be resolved in a timely manner. But despite the library's statement, some have continued to express suspicion given the timing of the removal and the specific clauses that were cut. Article 1 of the Constitution establishes the legislative branch of the federal government and details the various powers of Congress. Section 9, which focuses on the limitations of Congress' authority, notably includes a clause that Congress cannot suspend habeas corpus — which grants everyone in custody the right to challenge their detention in court — unless necessary for safety in moments of "rebellion or invasion." Trump's White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller told reporters in May that the administration is "actively looking at" suspending habeas corpus, per PBS, amid the government's mass detention and deportation of immigrants. Without habeas corpus, Trump's aggressive deportation program would have fewer roadblocks and move more quickly. Another constitutional clause that was removed from the Library of Congress' website included a line that bars Congress from offering Americans titles of nobility — a limitation that sought to safeguard the United States government from being influenced by European monarchies. During his second term starting in January, Trump has repeatedly referred to himself as a "king" multiple times, including through the White House's official social media. Trump's flirtation with the title inspired the sweeping "No Kings" protests on June 14 — Trump's 79th birthday — in opposition to his perceived abuse and wielding of government power. Meanwhile Section 10 of Article 1, which was also removed, restricts U.S. states from engaging in certain actions that could undermine the federal government's authority. The update to the Library of Congress' digital Constitution came shortly after Trump fired the longtime Librarian of Congress, Carla Hayden, in May. Hayden was appointed to a 10-year term in the role by former President Barack Obama and confirmed by the Senate in a 74-18 vote in 2016. At present, it's disputed who is serving as the acting Librarian of Congress. Following the removal of Hayden, Trump appointed Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche — his former criminal attorney — to the post, though the library staff chose to recognize Robert Newlen, who was functionally next in line for the job, as their new leader. Read the original article on People
