
Cutting out ultra-processed foods can speed up weight loss, study shows
Cutting out ultra-processed foods from your diet can help you lose weight twice as quickly, according to researchers at University College London.
In the longest-running clinical trial of its kind, 55 participants followed two different nutritionally balanced diets over two eight-week periods.
One diet consisted solely of minimally processed foods (MPFs), while the other included ultra-processed foods (UPFs).
UPFs often contain ingredients such as emulsifiers and stabilisers that you wouldn't typically find in a home kitchen, foods like cereals, sliced bread and ready-made meals.
After each eight-week phase, both groups experienced weight loss, likely due to the improved nutritional quality of their diets compared to their usual eating habits.
However, the reduction was more significant in the MPF diet group, a 2.06% decrease in body weight compared to 1.05% in the UPF group.
Dr Samuel Dicken, the study's lead author from the UCL Centre for Obesity Research and the UCL Department of Behavioural Science & Health, explained: 'If these results were scaled up over a year, we'd expect to see around a 13% weight reduction in men and 9% in women on the minimally processed diet, compared to only about 4% in men and 5% in women on the ultra-processed diet.
"Over time, the differences become quite substantial.'
ITV News has been following the experiences of two participants for more than a year.
Suzy, who lost 5kg during the MPF diet, gained some weight back while eating UPFs.
She has since chosen to reduce her intake of UPFs significantly.
'I feel really good,' she told ITV News. 'I feel in control of what I'm eating, which is a really nice feeling.'
Similarly, 62-year-old David Bones shared his experience: 'It's like a fog lifting," he said. "You go from living in this fog, thinking that's normal, and then suddenly everything feels clearer—you feel better physically and mentally.
"It's a huge improvement.'
In both diets, participants were given more food than they needed.
The trial found that eating MPF resulted in fewer cravings.
The less calorie-dense food was often more effort to prepare and eat, which may have been a reason why participants chose to stop eating sooner.
Professor Chris van Tulleken, an author of the study from UCL Division of Infection & Immunity, commented: 'The current global food system promotes poor health and obesity, largely because of the widespread availability of cheap, unhealthy foods.
"This study highlights how ultra-processing influences health outcomes beyond just the nutrients, like fat, salt, and sugar.
"It underscores the need to shift policy focus away from individual responsibility and towards the environmental factors shaped by multinational food companies that promote unhealthy food environments.'
The trial also examined secondary health markers, including blood pressure, heart rate, liver function, glucose levels, cholesterol and inflammation.
Generally, there were no significant differences in these markers between the diets. The researchers caution that longer studies would be needed to properly investigate these measures in relation to changes in weight and fat mass.
When I caught up with Suzy at her final weigh-in last week, she had successfully maintained her weight loss. She shared that she has adopted permanent lifestyle changes.
'You could say 100% no ultra-processed foods, but that would be really difficult with friends and family,' she explained.
'For me, it's about finding a balance, still enjoying some of the foods others eat but not making UPFs a regular part of every meal and snack. That approach has worked really well for me.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


STV News
11 hours ago
- STV News
Mum falls into coma with sepsis and organ failure after botched BBL
All Sasha Dean wanted was to feel comfortable in her own skin. Instead, she came close to death after undergoing a BBL procedure that left her with a 5% chance of survival, ITV News Digital Reporter Cree-Summer Haughton reports When I first contacted Sasha Dean, she was in the hospital recovering from sepsis and organ failure. The 54-year-old had undergone a liquid Brazilian Butt Lift – a cosmetic procedure where dermal filler is injected into the buttocks. She'd been told it was a risk-free, 'lunchtime' treatment. In reality, it nearly cost her life. Over the next year, I spoke to women across the UK who'd suffered complications from BBLs – from infections to permanent disfigurement. After several BBL sessions, Sasha Dean still wasn't satisfied. / Credit: Sasha Dean But Sasha's story stood out. As far as I'm aware, she is the worst surviving case of a liquid BBL in the UK. At first, I had to speak to her partner, Alan, because she was too unwell. But this summer, Sasha called me. She was finally ready to share her story. What followed was one of the most difficult interviews I've ever done. Midway through, Sasha broke down in tears. Her trauma is still raw, and the physical toll still defines her daily life. Sasha Dean was in a coma for five days and spent over a month in hospital. / Credit: ITV News But she spoke – not just for herself, but for the many women being lured into dangerous, unregulated procedures that promise beauty and deliver devastation. Sasha told me she'd struggled with body image for most of her life. 'For me, my bum area had always been an issue. I thought: if people get filler in their lips… why not here too?' She tried workouts and body sculpting before turning to what was marketed as a 'quick, safe' fix with no downtime. An emotional Sasha Dean told how her dad told her to fight as she lay on a hospital bed. / Credit: ITV News But from the moment the first injection began, she says the pain was excruciating. Over several sessions, she still wasn't satisfied. A fourth treatment was offered – this time at home, for a discounted rate. During the procedure, she looked down and saw that her feet had turned black. Two days later, an ambulance was called. Sasha had sepsis. She was placed in a coma, given just a 5% chance of survival. Sasha was left with sepsis and a number of other complications following the botched procedure. / Credit: Sasha Dean 'I had a heart attack. My lungs collapsed. I had pneumonia. My bowels opened. I was dying.', she said. Alan, her partner, said it was like watching a horror film unfold. Sasha survived – but with lasting damage: PTSD, a leaking heart valve, permanent fatigue. 'I'm not who I was before,' she told me. Even after her hospitalisation, the clinic continued to advertise the treatment as 'safe.' When 26-year-old Alice Webb died after a liquid BBL in 2023, Sasha says she felt a burden of survivor's guilt. 'I was asked to speak out, but I wasn't ready. I felt like I'd failed her.' A journey from silence to change This year, Sasha gave evidence in Parliament, calling for tighter regulation of aesthetic procedures. And she was heard. The government has now announced a crackdown on liquid BBLs, with only qualified healthcare professionals allowed to carry them out – though most doctors refuse to perform them at all due to the risks. It's a journey that began in a hospital but ended in a change in the law. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country


ITV News
11 hours ago
- ITV News
Why are so many slot machine shops in our high streets?
Reporter Lewis Denison meets Harlesden MP Dawn Butler to learn why there are so many gambling shops Gambling firms are being accused of targeting the UK's most deprived areas with high street slot machine shops, which can be highly addictive - and local councils have almost no powers to block them. Senior Labour MP Dawn Butler - along with the 37 council leaders and mayors - is urging the government to reform the Gambling Act 2005 which currently requires local authorities to approve almost all gambling licences. The two main firms, Mekur and Admiral, operate over 500 gambling shops in the UK, many of which are open 24 hours a day. Slot machines operating in these venues are a particular cause of concern. They allow a maximum stake of £2 with a maximum prize of £500. Since the pandemic, the number of gambling machines has increased from around 171,000 to 202,000. The NHS has warned that slot machine venues "deploy addictive products to keep vulnerable people playing for hours on end, against their own interests." It said it is supporting a record number of people who have had their "lives destroyed by gambling", with 15 clinics now open across England. Gambling safety campaigner Jackie Olden, whose mum Wendy Hughes became addicted to digital roulette machines while she had cancer, believes the addiction contributed to her death. She told ITV News: "We reached a point where she collapsed one day, and we finally got to the GP, and as she was going through all the tests for cancer, that's when she came clean, that she spent every single penny of their wages at a place exactly like this. "She'd taken a loan out for £11,000, secured against a house, two credit cards, one for £8,000, one for £3,000 loads of little short term high interest loans, £30-40,000 pounds worth of debt and every single penny of it had been thrown out and gone in cash to somewhere like this." Jackie has started a petition with over 40,000 signatures, demanding the government give councils more power to block betting shops in their towns. In a letter to Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy, council leaders said the Gambling Act 2005 is "desperately out of date and stripping power away from the health of our local communities and high streets". 'The alarming concentration of these premises is often met with strong community opposition, and concerns from public health and community safety officials," the group adds. "But, despite this shared opposition among residents, police and politicians, councils have found themselves effectively powerless to intervene.' They added that communities across the UK are "experiencing a groundswell of land-based gambling operators, spreading along our high streets and seemingly targeting areas of higher deprivation in a bid to maximise profits". Speaking to ITV News, Nandy suggested a law change could already be in the works. She said: "We've been looking at this issue very closely and were considering what more we can do to support communities. "As a government, we're very committed to devolving power so that councils and mayors can help to shape sustainable communities and take greater decisions about what happens in their local areas." She added: "I haven't got anything to announce today, but we are looking at this issue." Gambling firms have insisted they do not target deprived areas and that venues open in areas with already high footfall. But recent analysis by the Guardian has shown that more than half of the UK's Adult Gaming Centres are found in the poorest 20% of areas. Bacta, the UK's leading trade association representing the amusement and land-based low-stake gambling entertainment industry, defended adult gaming centres. Its president, Joseph Cullis, said the low-stake, alcohol-free venues are "among the safest places to gamble, with experienced staff on hand to identify problems and provide support to customers". He added: 'The idea that operators deliberately target disadvantaged areas is simply untrue. AGCs tend to open on high streets where there is already footfall, alongside other hospitality and leisure venues, and where planning and licensing permissions allow.' A spokesperson for the Department for Culture Media and Sport said: "We recognise the impact harmful gambling can have on individuals and their families and we are absolutely committed to strengthening protections for those at risk. 'We're delivering on our commitment to introduce a statutory levy on gambling profits. This is expected to deliver £100 million funding a year for research, prevention, treatment of gambling harms. "There are already a range of robust rules in place on gambling adverts, wherever they appear, but Ministers continue to consider the best available evidence in this area to inform effective action as needed." Mekur and Admiral have been contacted for a response.


Telegraph
17 hours ago
- Telegraph
US rejection of mRNA vaccines shows ‘lack of respect for science,' says Nobel laureate
The Nobel Prize winning scientist behind mRNA vaccine technology has attacked the US health secretary's plan to effectively cancel the use and development of the science in America. Speaking exclusively to The Telegraph, Dr Katalin Karikó, said the decision by Robert F Kennedy Jr to cancel $500 million worth of mRNA research and development contracts is 'devastating' and reflects a 'lack of respect for science.' Dr Karikó, who received the Nobel Prize in 2023 for her groundbreaking work on messenger RNA, the technology behind the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 vaccines, added the decision could have far-reaching consequences. 'The global progress of vaccine development and science is suffering because of this decision and others like it affecting scientific enterprise in the United States,' she said. 'If you are sick, you don't ask your lawyer what to do. RFK Jr. is a lawyer who doesn't understand these issues. You ask a physician, someone knowledgeable on the subject,' Dr Karikó added. Mr Kennedy, an outspoken vaccine sceptic, announced on Tuesday that federal funding for at least 22 major mRNA vaccine contracts with companies including Moderna, Pfizer, and CSL Seqirus would be terminated. He said the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) would redirect funding toward 'safer, broader vaccine platforms that remain effective even as viruses mutate'. The health secretary also claimed the mRNA platform 'fails to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like Covid and flu,' though he offered no scientific evidence to support the assertion. The technology was first deployed globally during the Covid-19 pandemic and is widely credited with saving millions of lives. While traditional vaccines use inactivated fragments of viruses to prompt an immune response, mRNA vaccines do not contain any part of the actual virus. Instead, they deliver genetic instructions to spark a response. The main advantage of mRNA vaccines is that they can be designed and manufactured much more quickly than traditional vaccines. Flu vaccines, for example, are typically grown in chicken eggs – an arduous process that can take months. In contrast, the mRNA platform can be adapted to match a pandemic-causing pathogen within just a few days. Mr Kennedy alleged that mRNA vaccines 'encourage new mutations and can actually prolong pandemics,' suggesting they force viruses to evolve to escape vaccine-induced immunity, a claim that scientists strongly dispute. 'No vaccine, including mRNA, encourages new mutations,' said Professor Stephen Evans, Emeritus Professor of Pharmacoepidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. 'Mutations occur randomly during viral replication. When a virus spreads easily, mutations are more likely. An effective vaccine suppresses viral replication, reducing the chance of mutation. In that sense, vaccines actually discourage new variants,' Prof Evans said. Alex Pym, Director of Infectious Disease at the Wellcome Trust added: 'mRNA vaccine technology has been in development for decades. It has been shown to be safe and effective against infectious diseases.' In May, Mr Kennedy cancelled a $766 million contract with Moderna for the development of mRNA human bird flu vaccine. The pharmaceutical giant was awarded the multi-million dollar contract by the Biden administration last year, as the H5N1 virus began to ravage US dairy and poultry farms. In the same month, he also announced that mRNA Covid vaccines would no longer be recommended for healthy children or healthy pregnant women.