logo
Donkey slaughtering project sparks controversy

Donkey slaughtering project sparks controversy

Express Tribune5 days ago
Listen to article
As a nation, we often show little regard for the rights of animals, with the mistreatment of working animals—particularly donkeys—ranking high on the list. Now, it appears that in a couple of years, donkeys, like dinosaurs, will become fictional animals from books thanks to the government's haphazard decision to initiate commercial donkey slaughtering in the absence of any breeding farms.
Reportedly, the slaughterhouse in Gwadar is preparing to export donkey bones and hides to China, where they are used to produce gelatin for traditional medicine. This, however, won't stop at Gwadar since applications have already been received from other companies looking to establish slaughterhouses across the country. Animal rights activists, however, argue that with the donkey population already dangerously low and no breeding farms available, slaughtering the working animals will only exacerbate the decline in their population.
Speaking to The Express Tribune, Dr Javed Gondal, CEO of Brooke Pakistan, an international organization working for the welfare of working animals, claimed that the slaughterhouse established in Gwadar will have the capacity to annually process and slaughter 216,000 donkeys, who will be transported from different parts of the country to the slaughterhouse before they are exported to China.
'High exports of donkeys may lead to their shortage in Pakistan, where the birth rate of donkeys is lower than that of other animals. Some African countries have banned the exports of donkeys after a decline in their population,' said Dr Gondal.
Likewise, Altamash Saeed, an environmental and animal rights consultant, expressed his fears that in the aftermath of the project, donkeys will be transported from different parts of the country to Gwadar through inappropriate ways.
'Apart from this, donkeys are the source of livelihood for thousands of families across the country. They are being used for freight, garbage collection, agriculture, industry and mining. Hence, slaughtering donkeys will increase poverty. Moreover, slaughtering donkeys is forbidden on the grounds that Article 2A of the Constitution states that no action can be taken against the fundamental principles of Islam in Pakistan,' highlighted Saeed, who believed that slaughtering donkeys was not only against the Constitution but was also religiously inappropriate.
According to the Donkey Sanctuary, a welfare organization working for the protection of donkeys, the African Union has banned the slaughtering of donkeys for skin trade on the grounds that the practice could eventually lead donkeys towards becoming an endangered species just like the rhinos and elephants.
Responding to the concerns, Former Animal Husbandry Commissioner Dr Muhammad Akram, who is monitoring this project at the official level, informed that the country was home to 5.2 million donkeys, whose body parts, including the skin were used in the manufacture of cosmetics and other products.
'The main reason behind the decline in the number of donkeys is that their use has decreased. Due to this, donkey farming has never been pursued like other livestock. The company working on the donkey slaughtering project has been required to first work on donkey farming and then start slaughtering. They will be required to farm the same number of donkeys they will slaughter annually. Discussions are currently underway with five companies on donkey farming. These companies want to build slaughterhouses in different parts of the country,' said Dr Akram.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Afghan refugees risk billions in losses
Afghan refugees risk billions in losses

Express Tribune

time11 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Afghan refugees risk billions in losses

Afghan refugees arrive from Pakistan at the border in Spin Boldak district of Kandahar province on December 3, 2023. PHOTO: AFP Listen to article As the status of over one million Afghan citizens holding Proof of Registration (PoR) cards hangs in the balance after expiry of their stay limit last month, the refugees are worried about economic losses due to possible disposal of their assets in haste that they built in the past five decades. Although there is slow implementation of the Illegal Foreigners Repatriation Plan, the refugees are concerned that they may be forced to sell their valuable assets at throwaway prices in case the validity of their cards is not extended further. Due to security and economic considerations, the Pakistani authorities decided to repatriate all illegal foreign immigrants in November 2023. Pakistan has so far repatriated approximately 1.3 million Afghans and still there are about 1.6 million staying back, according to the data compiled by a United Nations entity. These include over one million refugees who have PoR cards but these documents expired on June 30, 2025. The government is considering two options, either giving a temporary extension or offering these PoR card holders a long-term visa, according to officials dealing with the subject. So far, no decision has been taken to extend the PoR cards but the government is working on a new visa policy for foreigners, said Chaudhry Talal, the Minister of State for Interior, while talking to The Express Tribune. The matter to give an extension had also been discussed in the federal cabinet but no decision was taken. Talal said that the new visa policy would offer incentives for foreign investment in Pakistan and the Afghan citizens can also take advantage of that. Beyond Boundaries, an initiative of the Centre for Research and Security Studies, has been working for the resolution of the Afghan refugees' issue. It is advocating a permanent solution to the problem so that the refugees who came to Pakistan after 1979 are not forced to sell their assets at discounted prices and these people can also positively contribute to the local economy. Only Dostokhail tribe people are holding approximately Rs52 billion in assets in Peshawar in the shape of movable and immovable properties in others' names, said Ahmad Shah, a trader from the tribe. Affluent Afghans should not be deported, as it is mutually beneficial for them as well as for Pakistan, said Ahmad Shah. Shah claimed that they are not allowed to own assets and cannot open bank accounts. But the central bank authorities said that thousands of PoR card holders were having bank accounts. Shah said that his tribe also contributed over Rs14 billion or $51 million in foreign remittances last year. These remittances are sent by the tribe members working in Europe, Canada, and the United States, he added. "Our family does not have any criminal record, and we are traders doing business in black tea, tyres, and batteries," said Ahmad Shah. "My children are born in Pakistan and they do not want to go back to Afghanistan," said Shah, who is worried about selling off his benami assets at throwaway prices if the government finally decides to repatriate all Afghan refugees. "We are traders because we do not have permanent residence status and cannot legally invest in Pakistan," said Mohammad Bakhtiar, another member from the Dostokhail tribe. However, for Pakistani authorities, $51 million in remittances is not much compared to the cost that they believe the Pakistani economy was paying due to the presence of Afghan refugees. The cost is in the shape of the role of Afghan refugees in illegal trade of currency and smuggling of goods under the Afghan Transit Trade Agreement. In the last fiscal year, Pakistan received a record $38.2 billion in foreign remittances that helped post a current account surplus of $2.1 billion. But there are questions on the sustainability of these remittances due to the federal government's decision to freeze subsidies for remittances. It has also reduced the benefits on foreign remittances, but a decision remains pending on who would foot the bill. Building foreign exchange reserves is the responsibility of the central bank, thus, it should be funding the scheme, Finance Secretary Imdadullah Bosal told the National Assembly Standing Committee on Finance this week. Bosal said that the federal government did not have funds to continue the Pakistan Remittances Initiative scheme. The secretary said that the finance ministry was working with the central bank to find a solution, as no money is kept in the new budget. "As against Rs89 billion budgeted allocation in the last fiscal year, the finance ministry received nearly Rs200 billion claims from the central bank ... that is quite a substantial chunk," said Bosal. He said one of the options was for the central bank to deduct the cost upfront from the profits it transfers to the federal government. However, the challenge is that it would still be treated as part of the primary expenses. After multiple rounds of background discussions, Beyond Boundaries has recommended streamlining visa processes for traders of Afghan origin and granting them residency, enabling them to invest in Pakistan.

Speaker puts brakes on PTI MPAs disqualification move
Speaker puts brakes on PTI MPAs disqualification move

Express Tribune

time12 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Speaker puts brakes on PTI MPAs disqualification move

Listen to article Punjab Assembly Speaker Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan apparently put the matter of PTI disqualifications to rest on Saturday by ruling the disqualification applications against 26 suspended lawmakers as non-maintainable, but by passing the buck to the judiciary and election tribunal. The sword of litigation still dangles over the suspended lawmakers, with the speaker making it clear that while his doors were not closed, the petitioners must first knock on the right ones, by securing a declaration from a court of competent jurisdiction before revisiting his office. In a move seen as a political de-escalation, the speaker has dismissed the applications filed against 26 suspended opposition lawmakers, following a successful round of talks between the treasury and opposition benches. A six-page ruling signed by the speaker outlines the rationale for rejecting the four separate applications, which sought to disqualify the PTI-affiliated MPAs over their disorderly and abusive conduct during the budget session. The move to dismiss the applications gained momentum after recent behind-the-scenes negotiations between government and opposition leaders bore fruit. According to sources, the reinstatement of the suspended MPAs is now expected soon. It is noteworthy that Speaker Khan had earlier suspended the 26 PTI lawmakers under Rule 210(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the Provincial Assembly of the Punjab, 1997, following their disruption of Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz's speech on June 27. In his detailed ruling, Speaker Khan noted: "Though serious legal and constitutional violations, including constitutional oath, have been alleged by the applicants, these violations first need to be established in a court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction before I could decide whether a question of qualification has arisen in terms of Article 63(2) of the Constitution and refer the question to the Election Commission of Pakistan." "The people are the source of all power, and through their vote, they confer trust — not to be undone without the gravest reasons. To disqualify a representative is not merely to silence a voice — it is to disenfranchise people. For an elected House is not only a chamber of laws; it is the echo of the people's will. That voice must not be silenced," he added. The speaker ruled that references to past cases, such as the Panama Papers and other disqualification jurisprudence under Articles 199 and 184(3) of the Constitution, were not valid in the current context. Such petitions, he noted, could undermine freedom of speech in the House and nullify the opposition's presence. Article 19 protects robust debate — even if abrasive — subject to reasonable legal restrictions. "These restrictions are found in our Rules, not in threats of permanent disqualification. Let the welfare of the people be the supreme law, the Assembly must remain a forum where dissent is voiced, not extinguished," the ruling stated. Speaker Khan stressed that the welfare of the electorate is best preserved when the House handles internal disorder itself, without disenfranchising voters' chosen representatives. He also expressed concern about many members' lack of familiarity with assembly rules, legislative processes, and the effective use of standing committees. He called for targeted training to uphold parliamentary supremacy and democratic accountability. "As elected representatives, we must legislate responsibly, put an end to political victimisation, and work together to uphold the supremacy of the people's Assembly and protect our democracy. Political parties are, after all, the true guardians of democracy and the responsibility to uphold the democratic functioning of the House lies with all of them collectively," the speaker added. He called for inter-party dialogue reminiscent of the Charter of Democracy to ensure the Assembly functions effectively as a space for public interest and genuine debate. Referring to political theory, Khan noted: "Modern societies are built upon dialogue; as Jürgen Habermas wrote, 'The public sphere is that realm of our social life in which something approaching public opinion can be formed,' underscoring that free, inclusive and reasoned discourse within parliaments forms the bedrock of democratic communities. Safeguarding this vital exchange of ideas is indispensable for our collective democratic future." In a strong critique of constitutional clauses historically used to undermine democracy, Speaker Khan declared: "As Speaker and a political worker, I firmly oppose anti-democratic constitutional provisions. This includes the infamous Article 58(2)(b), and Articles 62 and 63, all imposed by authoritarian dictators, notably General Zia-ul-Haq. These Articles have historically been weaponised to unjustly target elected politicians. We must end this vicious cycle; the Panama Case cannot become another tool like Article 58(2)(b). Otherwise, we succumb to Nietzschean nihilism, believing time is a flat circle and we are condemned to repeat mistakes." He asserted that misuse of these Articles undermines the constitutional right to political association and representation under Article 17. Disqualifying elected representatives on allegations or technicalities violates the presumption of innocence, disenfranchises voters and erodes the legitimacy of parliament. "The disqualification of elected representatives has deep roots in Pakistan's history. Early examples are the Public Representative Offices Disqualification Act 1949, and Elective Bodies Disqualification Order (EBDO) 1959. These 'backdoor tools' have consistently served non-democratic elements," the speaker stated. He criticised political parties for occasionally abetting such practices, citing the Panama "show trial" as an example of judicial overreach that continues to affect the political landscape through undemocratic means. "This destructive chain must be broken," Speaker Khan emphasised. "The very fact that the Constitution has been exploited this way means such challenging questions can be, and have been raised." He called upon the federal parliament to remove such dictatorial remnants from the Constitution to reclaim democratic values. Concluding his remarks, Speaker Khan affirmed: "During my tenure as Speaker, I will work to uphold parliamentary rule and the principles of representative constitutional democracy, as envisioned by our great Islamic Republic's founding fathers."

IHC upholds QAU's autonomy
IHC upholds QAU's autonomy

Express Tribune

time17 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

IHC upholds QAU's autonomy

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Saturday dismissed a petition filed by students challenging Quaid-i-Azam University's decision to cancel the summer session and vacate hostels, declaring the petition non-maintainable. In the written order issued by Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro, the court stated that under the Quaid-i-Azam University Act, 1973, the university is a legally empowered and autonomous institution. The decision in question was made by the university's Syndicate through a resolution, and universities, as autonomous bodies, have the authority to formulate their own disciplinary, administrative, and academic policies. The court held that matters related to the summer session and hostel accommodation fall within the internal administrative domain of the university and are thus part of its autonomous functioning. The petitioners failed to demonstrate any violation of a fundamental right or legal provision that would justify the court's intervention under Article 199 of the Constitution. The QAU's Registrar clarified that the directives were issued in compliance with decisions taken at a Syndicate meeting. The court observed that the matter pertains to a dispute between the university administration and certain students and is entirely related to internal governance and administrative affairs.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store