Tesla plans 'friends and family' car service in California, regulator says
But California regulators are making clear that Tesla is not authorized to carry passengers on public roads in autonomous vehicles and would require a human driver in control at all times.
'Tesla is not allowed to test or transport the public (paid or unpaid) in an AV with or without a driver,' the California Public Utilities Commission told CNBC in an email on Friday. 'Tesla is allowed to transport the public (paid or unpaid) in a non-AV, which, of course, would have a driver.'
In other words, Tesla's service in the state will have to be more taxi than robot.
Tesla has what's known in California as a charter-party carrier permit, which allows it to run a private car service with human drivers, similar to limousine companies or sightseeing services.
The commission said it received a notification from Tesla on Thursday that the company plans to 'extend operations' under its permit to 'offer service to friends and family of employees and to select members of the public,' across much of the Bay Area.
But under Tesla's permit, that service can only be with non-AVs, the CPUC said.
The California Department of Motor Vehicles told CNBC that Tesla has had a 'drivered testing permit' since 2014, allowing the company to operate AVs with a safety driver present, but not to collect fees. The safety drivers must be Tesla employees, contractors or designees of the manufacturer under that permit, the DMV said.
In Austin, Texas, Tesla is currently testing out a robotaxi service, using its Model Y SUVs equipped with the company's latest automated driving software and hardware. The limited service operates during daylight hours and in good weather, on roads with a speed limit of 40 miles per hour.
Robotaxis in Austin are remotely supervised by Tesla employees and include a human safety supervisor in the front passenger seat. The service is now limited to invited users, who agree to the terms of Tesla's 'early access program.'
On Friday, Business Insider, citing an internal Tesla memo, reported that Tesla told staff it planned to expand its robotaxi service to the San Francisco Bay Area this weekend. Tesla didn't respond to a request for comment on that report.
In a separate matter in California, the DMV has accused Tesla of misleading consumers about the capabilities of its driver assistance systems, previously marketed under the names Autopilot and Full Self-Driving (or FSD).
Tesla now calls its premium driver assistance features, 'FSD Supervised.' In owners manuals, Tesla says Autopilot and FSD Supervised are 'hands on' systems, requiring a driver at the wheel, ready to steer or brake at all times.
But in user-generated videos shared by Tesla on X, the company shows customers using FSD hands-free while engaged in other tasks. The DMV is arguing that Tesla's license to sell vehicles in California should be suspended, with arguments ongoing through Friday at the state's Office of Administrative Hearings in Oakland.
Under California state law, autonomous taxi services are regulated at the state level. Some city and county officials said on Friday that they were out of the loop regarding a potential Tesla service in the state.
Stephanie Moulton-Peters, a member of the Marin County Board of Supervisors, said in a phone interview that she had not heard from Tesla about its plans. She urged the company to be more transparent.
'I certainly expect they will tell us and I think it's a good business practice to do that,' she said.
Moulton-Peters said she was undecided on robotaxis generally and wasn't sure how Marin County, located north of San Francisco, would react to Tesla's service.
'The news of change coming always has mixed results in the community,' she said.
Brian Colbert, another member of the Marin County Board of Supervisors, said in an interview that he's open to the idea of Tesla's service being a good thing but that he was disappointed in the lack of communication.
'They should have done a better job about informing the community about the launch,' he said.
Google spinoff Waymo, which is far ahead of Tesla in the robotaxi market, obtained a number of permits from the DMV and CPUC before starting its driverless ride-hailing service in the state.
Waymo was granted a CPUC driverless deployment permit in 2023, allowing it to charge for rides in the state. The company has been seeking amendments to both its DMV and CPUC driverless deployment permits as it expands its service territory in the state.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Is Wall Street So Bearish on Lucid Group? There's 1 Key Reason.
Key Points Electric car stocks have surged due to robotaxi optimism. But severe near-term challenges remain. 10 stocks we like better than Lucid Group › Several electric car stocks got huge boosts in recent weeks over enthusiasm for the promise of robotaxis. Tesla launched its robotaxi pilot program in Austin, Texas, last month. Lucid Group (NASDAQ: LCID), meanwhile, recently partnered with Uber Technologies to deliver 20,000 self-driving vehicles alongside a $300 million cash infusion. But not every analyst is bullish. CNBC's Jim Cramer, for example, recently questioned the value of Lucid's deal with Uber. This month, seven other major Wall Street analysts reaffirmed their price targets for Lucid stock. Everyone predicts that shares will fall in value over the next 12 months. Why is Wall Street still so bearish? There's one obvious culprit. The near-term reality for EV stocks is frightening Cathie Wood, CEO of Ark Invest, thinks robotaxis will be a $10 trillion industry long term. That has investors excited. Over the next 12 to 24 months, however, most EV makers will be feeling the pain. That's because federal tax credits for EVs are set to expire this September, effectively making a new EV purchase $7,500 more expensive. While the exact impact remains unknown, this shift should sizably lower demand growth. Federal automotive regulatory credits, meanwhile, are also set to lose their value given fines for noncompliance are being eliminated. Lucid has earned more than $200 million through these programs. And while it won't lose access to the entirety of this profit source, given that many state and international programs will remain, the financial impact will be sudden and meaningful. Every EV maker will be affected by these regulatory shifts, including Rivian, Tesla, and Lucid. EV sales in the second quarter of 2025 are already down 6.3% year over year. We could see these declines persist, or even accelerate, given reduced incentives. Lucid's robotaxi opportunity remains lucrative long term. But analysts are rightfully worried about the next year or two when it comes to reduced sales and profit growth. Should you invest $1,000 in Lucid Group right now? Before you buy stock in Lucid Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Lucid Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Ryan Vanzo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla and Uber Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Is Wall Street So Bearish on Lucid Group? There's 1 Key Reason. was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Affordable Can the Entry Tesla Model Y Be, Without Being Too Cheap?
Tesla CEO Elon Musk confirms a more affordable Model Y is on the way later this year, set to play the role of an entry-level volume model. Years ago Tesla had planned a $25,000 offering at times called a "Model 2," but had effectively abandoned that project amid a focus on the Cybertruck and other projects like the Optimus robot. A decontented Model Y is now expected to arrive on sale by the end of the year. Tesla began teasing the idea of a $25,000 car long ago, before inflation rapidly overtook that number, so the EV maker has focused instead on its delayed Cybertruck and other projects like the Robotaxi, as well as the Optimus robot. But the idea of a stripped-down budget model never quite went away, it turns out, even though we would have expected it to land before 2025. Now, just such a model is on the way into mass production later this year, and as rumored earlier this spring it'll be just a decontented Model Y. On a recent earnings call, Tesla CEO Elon Musk confirmed that a more affordable Model Y is indeed on the way. "It's just a Model Y," Musk said in response to a question about Tesla's future volume model. "Let the cat out of the bag there." This makes plenty of sense from Tesla's point of view. How Low Can Tesla Go? The Model Y has already seen plenty of variants over the six years it has been in production, so there is an extensive catalog of parts that can be added (or subtracted) from the vehicle with ease. It also makes sense not to develop something new and different, which is what Tesla has tried to do with its entire model range. There's also the reality that EV buyers don't really want something truly smaller in size, as evidenced by the lack of popularity of hatchback-sized EVs with correspondingly small batteries. So something close to the Model Y but cheaper seems to be the optimal solution. Just how much more affordable this Model Y will be remains to be seen. The least expensive Model Y currently offered in the US starts at $46,630, and that's before any tax incentives, which are slated to expire in a matter of weeks. We think it's pretty clear that the previous $25,000 target price for a budget model is entirely off the table, and that hitting a $35,000 price point will be quite an achievement, if it does not come with a laughably small battery. Where to Cut Corners? One of the issues with the updated Juniper Model Y is that the crossover itself was already quite basic, with so much having been trimmed as part of Tesla's drive to reduce complexity. So one way to decontent is to opt for harder, police-grade interior plastics, manually adjustable seats, fewer interior features, and less trim. Another tactic Tesla has already used is locking out part of the battery by software. And long ago General Motors practiced the art of decontenting a car by ditching the rear seat in the Chevette and applying the Scooter badge to it. So a more basic rear bench seat could probably be added, with no third-row option. The Model Y is already quite skimpy inside, so cost savings could have to be found via the hardware underneath, such as a smaller and less expensive LFP battery offering less range and a less powerful motor. This tactic has worked well for other EV makers seeking to offer a shorter-range, single-motor model, and it might work for Tesla as well. But this more affordable Model Y must hit a certain desirability point as well, in order to gain interest from buyers. It cannot be too cheap inside or offer too little range. It's a tough balancing act for any automaker, especially one already known for cutting corners whenever possible. Still, we think a $35,000 price before any incentives could be achieved if Tesla were to apply all the cost-cutting measures at its disposal for its popular crossover. A less expensive volume model—as small and inexpensive challengers like the Volvo EX30 start to arrive—could be just what Tesla needs at the moment. How should an entry Model Y be priced and what kind of range would it need to interest enough buyers to be a success in the marketplace? Please comment below.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Police take action against BMW driver as warning issued
Police in Oxfordshire have reminded drivers to make sure vehicles are insured after stopping a BMW last night. Thames Valley Police officers stopped a BMW in Banbury on Friday after checks showed it had no insurance. Police took the opportunity to remind people that it is the driver's responsibility to make sure a vehicle has the correct insurance. READ MORE: Friend's tribute to 'loyal' man found dead in Oxford hotel People are often prosecuted for not having third-party insurance. Punishments can include fines, points and even driving bans. In a statement issued on Saturday afternoon, Thames Valley Police's rural crime taskforce said: "PCs Shayler and Speke stopped this BMW in the Banbury area last night. "Checks showed the vehicle was not insured. The driver was subsequently reported for the offence. "Remember, as the driver, it is your responsibility to make sure you are insured to drive the vehicle."
