Separated men nearly 5 times more likely to take their lives than married men
This problem seems especially the case for men. Intimate partner problems including breakups, separation and divorce feature in the paths to suicide among one in three Australian men aged 25 to 44 who end their lives.
Men account for three in every four suicides in many nations worldwide, including Australia. So improving our understanding of links between relationship breakdown and men's suicide risk has life-saving potential.
Our research, published today, is the first large-scale review of the evidence to focus on understanding men's risk of suicide after a breakup. We found separated men were nearly five times more likely to die by suicide compared to married men.
What did we find? We brought together findings from 75 studies across 30 countries worldwide, involving more than 106 million men.
We focused on understanding why relationship breakdown can lead to suicide in men, and which men are most at risk. We might not be able to prevent breakups from happening, but we can promote healthy adjustment to the stress of relationship breakdown to try and prevent suicide.
For separated men, the risk was much higher. We found that separated men were 4.8 times more likely to die by suicide than married men.
Most strikingly, we found separated men under 35 years of age had nearly nine times greater odds of suicide than married men of the same age.
The short-term period after relationship breakdown therefore appears particularly risky for men's mental health.
What are these men feeling? Some men's difficulties regulating the intense emotional stress of relationship breakdown can play a role in their suicide risk. For some men, the emotional pain tied to separation – deep sadness, shame, guilt, anxiety and loss – can be so intense it feels never-ending.
Many men are raised in a culture of masculinity that often encourages them to suppress or withdraw from their emotions in times of intense stress.
Some men also experience difficulties understanding or interpreting their emotions, which can create challenges in knowing how to respond to them.
Overall, our research found relationship breakdown may lead to suicide for some men because of the complex interaction between the individual (emotional distress) and interpersonal (changes in their social network and availability of support) impacts of a breakup.
Many of these impacts don't seem to feature in the paths to suicide after a breakup for women in the same way.
Breakups also impact social networks As intimate relationships become more serious, we tend to spend less time investing in our friendships, especially if juggling the demands of a career and family.
Many men, especially in heterosexual relationships, rely on their intimate partner as a primary source of social and emotional support – often at the expense of connections outside their relationship.
This can create a risky situation if relationships break down, as it seems many men are left with little support to turn to. This rang true in our research, as men's social disconnection and loneliness seemed to increase their suicide risk following relationship breakdown.
We also know people can struggle to know how to support men after a breakup. Research has found some men who ask for support are told to just 'get back on the horse". Such a response invalidates men's pain and reinforces masculine stereotypes that relationship breakdown doesn't affect them.
So, what can we do? There is no simple answer to preventing suicide following relationship breakdown, but a range of opportunities exist.
We can intervene early, by educating young people with the skills to end relationships healthily, handle rejection and regulate the difficult emotions of a breakup.
We can embed support groups and other opportunities for connection and peer support in relationship services that are regularly in contact with those navigating separation, to help combat loneliness.
top videos
View all
We can ensure mental health practitioners are equipped with the skills necessary to engage and respond effectively to men who seek help following a breakup, to help keep them safe until they can get back on their feet.
Most importantly, if men come to any of us seeking support after a breakup, we can remember that time is often a great healer. The best we can do is sit with men in their pain, rather than try and get them to stop feeling it. This connection could be life-saving. (The Conversation) NSA NSA
First Published:
July 18, 2025, 11:15 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
8 hours ago
- Economic Times
Health emergency: Deadly Mpox strain Clade 1 hits Australia, only the 2nd case ever
IANS Rare and dangerous mpox strain detected in Queensland A rare and more dangerous strain of the Mpox virus, known as Clade 1, has been confirmed in Queensland, marking the first-ever case in the state and only the second known detection of this strain in Australia's history. Queensland Health officials say the individual had recently returned from overseas and was diagnosed while seeking care at Logan Hospital in the state's Metro South region. Contact tracing is currently underway, and public health teams are working to identify and notify anyone who may have been exposed. 'Clade 1 is notorious for causing a more widespread rash, big blisters or pox-like lesions, typically all over the body,' said Dr. Paul Griffin, infectious diseases expert. 'And because it is more severe, they can have other symptoms like high fevers.'The virus, previously known as monkeypox, spreads primarily through close, prolonged, or intimate contact, including skin-to-skin contact or exposure to bodily fluids, respiratory droplets, or contaminated materials like clothing or bedding. The patient is in isolation, and authorities say there is no current threat to the broader community. Mpox Clade 1 is far more severe than Clade 2, the milder strain that caused most of Australia's 2022 outbreak. Clade 1 has been associated with higher rates of complications, including secondary infections and in rare cases, first Australian case of Clade 1 was reported in New South Wales in May 2025, also in a traveler returning from Africa. Clade 1 is more common in Central Africa and has been spreading more widely in the past year, prompting increased surveillance globally. What is MPox?Mpox is a viral infection similar to smallpox, but typically milder. It causes fever, body aches, swollen lymph nodes, and a characteristic blistering rash. What makes Clade 1 different? Clade 1 is a more dangerous strain. It causes larger, widespread blisters, more severe fever, and sometimes serious complications. It has a higher mortality rate than Clade 2, particularly in countries with limited healthcare access. How does Mpox spread? Mpox spreads through: Close or intimate contact (skin-to-skin, kissing, sex) Contact with lesions or scabs Respiratory droplets in close, prolonged face-to-face interaction Contaminated clothing, bedding, or surfaces Who is at risk?While anyone can contract Mpox, the risk is higher for: People with multiple intimate partners Travelers returning from endemic areas Close contacts of confirmed cases Healthcare and frontline workers Is there a vaccine?Yes. Australia offers free MPox vaccines to high-risk individuals. Two doses are recommended for full protection. Contact your local sexual health clinic or GP to book.
Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Health emergency: Deadly Mpox strain Clade 1 hits Australia, only the 2nd case ever
A rare and more dangerous strain of the Mpox virus, known as Clade 1, has been confirmed in Queensland, marking the first-ever case in the state and only the second known detection of this strain in Australia's history. Queensland Health officials say the individual had recently returned from overseas and was diagnosed while seeking care at Logan Hospital in the state's Metro South region. Contact tracing is currently underway, and public health teams are working to identify and notify anyone who may have been exposed. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Select a Course Category Data Analytics Leadership Others Design Thinking Cybersecurity healthcare others Product Management MCA Management Digital Marketing Degree MBA Operations Management Data Science Healthcare Artificial Intelligence Finance Public Policy Data Science Project Management CXO Technology PGDM Skills you'll gain: Data Analysis & Visualization Predictive Analytics & Machine Learning Business Intelligence & Data-Driven Decision Making Analytics Strategy & Implementation Duration: 12 Weeks Indian School of Business Applied Business Analytics Starts on Jun 13, 2024 Get Details 'Clade 1 is notorious for causing a more widespread rash, big blisters or pox-like lesions, typically all over the body,' said Dr. Paul Griffin, infectious diseases expert. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Unbelievable: Calculator Shows The Value Of Your House Instantly (Take a Look) Home Value Calculator Search Now Undo 'And because it is more severe, they can have other symptoms like high fevers.' The virus, previously known as monkeypox, spreads primarily through close, prolonged, or intimate contact, including skin-to-skin contact or exposure to bodily fluids, respiratory droplets, or contaminated materials like clothing or bedding. Live Events The patient is in isolation, and authorities say there is no current threat to the broader community. Rare but serious threat Mpox Clade 1 is far more severe than Clade 2, the milder strain that caused most of Australia's 2022 outbreak. Clade 1 has been associated with higher rates of complications, including secondary infections and in rare cases, death. The first Australian case of Clade 1 was reported in New South Wales in May 2025, also in a traveler returning from Africa. Clade 1 is more common in Central Africa and has been spreading more widely in the past year, prompting increased surveillance globally. FAQs What is MPox? Mpox is a viral infection similar to smallpox, but typically milder. It causes fever, body aches, swollen lymph nodes, and a characteristic blistering rash. What makes Clade 1 different? Clade 1 is a more dangerous strain. It causes larger, widespread blisters, more severe fever, and sometimes serious complications. It has a higher mortality rate than Clade 2, particularly in countries with limited healthcare access. How does Mpox spread? Mpox spreads through: Close or intimate contact (skin-to-skin, kissing, sex) Contact with lesions or scabs Respiratory droplets in close, prolonged face-to-face interaction Contaminated clothing, bedding, or surfaces Who is at risk? While anyone can contract Mpox, the risk is higher for: People with multiple intimate partners Travelers returning from endemic areas Close contacts of confirmed cases Healthcare and frontline workers Is there a vaccine? Yes. Australia offers free MPox vaccines to high-risk individuals. Two doses are recommended for full protection. Contact your local sexual health clinic or GP to book.
News18
a day ago
- News18
Scroll, watch, burn: sunscreen misinformation, its real-world damage
London, Jul 19 (The Conversation) On a sunny afternoon, I was scrolling through social media when I came across a video of a young woman tossing her sunscreen into a bin. 'I don't trust this stuff anymore," she said to the camera, holding the bottle up like a piece of damning evidence. The clip had been viewed over half a million times, with commenters applauding her for 'ditching chemicals" and recommending homemade alternatives like coconut oil and zinc powder. In my research on the effect of digital technology on health, I've seen how posts like this can shape real-world behaviour. And anecdotally, dermatologists have reported seeing more patients with severe sunburns or suspicious moles who say they stopped using sunscreen after watching similar videos. Sunscreen misinformation created by social media influencers is spreading and this isn't just a random trend. It's being fuelled by the platforms designed to host influencer content. In my book, The Digital Health Self, I explain how social media platforms are not neutral arenas for sharing information. They are commercial ecosystems engineered to maximise engagement and time spent online – metrics that directly drive advertising revenue. Content that sparks emotion – outrage, fear, inspiration – is boosted to the top of your feed. That's why posts questioning or rejecting science often spread further than measured, evidence-based advice. Each second a user spends watching or reacting gives the platform more data – and more opportunities to serve targeted ads. This is how health misinformation becomes profitable. In my work, I describe social media platforms as 'unregulated public health platforms". They influence what users see and believe about health, but unlike public health institutions, they're not bound by standards for accuracy or harm reduction. If an influencer claims sunscreen is toxic, that message won't be factchecked or flagged – it will often be amplified. Why? Because controversy fuels engagement. I call this environment 'the credibility arena": a space where trust is built not through expertise, but through performance and aesthetic appeal. As I write in my book: 'Trust is earned not by what is known, but by how well one narrates suffering, recovery, and resilience." A creator crying on camera about 'toxins" can feel more authentic to viewers than a calm, clinical explanation of ultraviolet radiation from a medical expert. This shift has real consequences. Ultraviolet rays are invisible, constant and damaging. They penetrate cloud cover and harm skin even on cool days. Decades of research, especially in countries like Australia with high skin cancer rates, show that regular use of broad-spectrum sunscreen dramatically reduces risk. And yet, myths spreading online are urging people to do the opposite: to abandon sunscreen as dangerous or unnecessary. This trend isn't driven solely by individual creators. It's embedded in how content is designed, framed and presented. Algorithms prioritise short, emotionally-charged videos. Interfaces highlight trending sounds and hashtags. Recommendation systems push users toward extreme or dramatic content. These features all shape what we see and how we interpret it. The 'For You" page isn't neutral. It's engineered to keep you scrolling, and shock value outperforms nuance every time. That's why videos about 'ditching chemicals" thrive, even as posts on other aspects of women's health are shadowbanned or suppressed. Shadowbanning refers to when a platform limits the visibility of content – making it harder to find, without informing the user – often due to vague or inconsistently applied moderation rules. The system rewards spectacle, not science. Once creators discover that a particular format, like tossing products into a bin, boosts engagement, it's replicated over and over again. Visibility isn't organic. It's manufactured. Those who throw away their sunscreen often believe they're doing the right thing. They're drawn to creators who feel relatable, sincere and independent — especially when official health campaigns seem cold, patronising or out of touch. But the consequences can be serious. Sun damage accumulates silently, raising skin cancer risk with every hour spent unprotected. Sunscreen isn't perfect. It needs to be reapplied properly and paired with shade and protective clothing. But the evidence for its effectiveness is clear and robust. The real danger lies in a system that not only allows misinformation to spread, but also incentivises it. A system in which false claims can boost an influencer's reach and a platform's revenue. To resist harmful health trends, we need to understand the systems that promote them. In the case of sunscreen, rejecting protection isn't just a personal decision – it's a symptom of a digital culture that turns health into content, and often profits from the harm it causes. (The Conversation) NSA NSA First Published: July 19, 2025, 11:15 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
