Househunter compares renting in London to 'the Hunger Games' after revealing bizarre list of 'tips' for tenants from letting agent
Taking to TikTok, Harriet shared the message a friend got after doing viewings in the capital, which included a series of baffling 'tips' on how to get the landlord to accept an offer - such as paying a year's worth of fees upfront or pledging to increase the price each year.
She hit out at the 'out of control' demands being placed on tenants, in a clip that has now racked up more than 288,000 views.
The letter also stated they would need a 'bio' about each of the housemates and encouraged offering 'above the asking price'.
'Do you think I would be viewing a flat at this price if I could afford a flat over,' she quipped in the video.
'Anyway, moving along, "long contract length". Fine. Okay, whatever. Both things actually aren't really going to matter once the renters' right bill comes in.'
Harriet was then appalled by the third piece of advice, which was to 'stick to the moving date or sooner'.
'Right. So, do you want me to stick to the moving date, or do you want an earlier one?' she questioned.
'Because if you wanted an earlier moving date, why didn't you just put an earlier moving date? I don't really understand this.'
She continued: 'This one really got me paying up front from three to six to 12 months if possible. Oh, yes, sorry. Let me just get this £27,000 that sitting in my bank account and give it to you up front for a rental.
'Why didn't I think of that sooner? Oh, my goodness. I'm so glad you gave me these tips and tricks because now, I just feel like I'm going to get every flat I've ever wanted. F***ing idiots.
The fifth was to 'offer a rent increase each year if possible'.
'Again, where is this money coming from?' Harriet questioned. 'Rent increase, absolutely fine,' she added. 'I'm not going to offer that. Why the f*** would I offer a rent increase? Landlords grab it from us already. I don't need to be offering that sh**.'
She continued: 'These tips were hilarious on their own, but let's carry on. Lastly, "if your offer would be accepted, we will contact you first to give you the good news and then take the holding deposit, which is equivalent to first week's rent".
'First week's rent. Fine. Standard. You're ready for the Ending.'
The email concluded: 'Thanks and good luck.'
'Is this The Hunger Games?' Harriet asked, referencing the dystopian fantasy novel series which sees poor people forced to kill each other in an arena for the wealthy to be entertained.
'I mean; to be honest, the rental market does feel quite like The Hunger Games, but this whole thing really made me laugh.
'And I just thought, this person has typed out or copied and pasted or got this email from somewhere and thought, these renters are going to love all of this.
'These tips and tricks are going to be exceptional. They're going to take all of them on board. It's just really made me laugh. God bless estate agents and the rental market in London.'
Many rushed to the comments suggesting the 'tips' were 'appalling', with some saying it is 'gangster behaviour'.
One person wrote: 'Who in their right SANE mind would OFFER a rent increase?!?!???'
'Estate agents are responsible for all the problems with house prices, price gauging, pitching people against each other,' another added. 'It's all gangster behaviour and seems unregulated.'
A third penned: 'Literally if I had 27k I'd get a mortgage.'
Many rushed to the comments suggesting the 'tips' were 'appalling', with some saying it is 'gangster behaviour'
Elsewhere someone joked: 'They left off point 7 which is actually to kneel at a landlords' feet to kiss them, whilst throwing around £50 notes (which you may not keep).'
Meanwhile some estate agents took to the comments to try and explain some of the 'tips'.
'It's obviously not the agents, it's the rental market,' one defended. 'Agents are only the messengers, if landlords weren't selling up there wouldn't be this level of demand.'
Another suggested: 'As an estate agent most of the time we are actually instructed by our clients on what to say, sometimes we don't always agree but we must act on the clients' instructions!
'In my opinion I think this email is managing the viewers expectations and making sure that no one's time is wasted on both parties' side. Just remember it's not always the agent's fault!'
'In defence of the estate agent here, they're actually doing what many renters wish agents did: giving fair warning about existing interest before a viewing,' another advised.
'It might not be what you want to hear, but at least you know the situation upfront.
'Agents often get backlash when people view a flat and are later told their offer was too low in a competitive market. This heads that off.
'Yes, the spelling errors are a fair criticism, especially if it's a professional template. But a lot of these roles are filled by younger or less-experienced staff. You ask, "would I be viewing a flat at this price if I could afford more?"
'But yes, people often do. Some are downsizing, relocating, or going through breakups, they might have savings or sale proceeds and want to rent short-term rather than buy.
'As for the request to "offer more if possible" that's not a demand. If it's not possible, don't. But if someone else can and does, at least you know why they got it. Even the "good luck" sign-off, I think that's just human.
'There might be several viewings lined up. Would you rather they wrote "regards" instead? I know plenty of renters who complain when they lose out and say, "I would've offered more if I'd known" but this agent's giving you that chance in advance?'
The Renters' Rights Bill is expected to come into effect from Autumn 2025.
The bill proposes significant changes to the private rented sector in England, aiming to improve security and fairness for tenants.
Key changes include ending 'no-fault' evictions (Section 21), strengthening tenants' rights, and improving property standards.
The bill also seeks to ban rental bidding wars, introduce a landlord ombudsman, and create a private rented sector database.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Tory opponents of Angela Rayner's strikers charter will celebrate ‘Norman Tebbit Day' in honour of Margaret Thatcher's union-bashing ally
Opponents of Angela Rayner 's controversial new industrial laws will tomorrow celebrate 'Norman Tebbit Day' in honour of Margaret Thatcher 's late union-bashing ally. Tory peers will use a debate in the Lords to try to amend Ms Rayner's Employment Rights Bill, which critics say will make it harder to employ workers, leave businesses vulnerable to strikes and force firms to employ diversity officers to censor conversations they deem inappropriate. The Bill also contains a raft of other measures. They include the end of zero-hours contracts, strengthened redundancy rights, more flexible working and the power for ministers to take companies to employment tribunals on behalf of employees – even if they do not want to sue. The peers are planning to amend measures granting access rights for union officials, and new electronic balloting which would make it easier for union reps to persuade workers to back industrial action. Lord Tebbit, who died aged 94 on July 7, led Mrs Thatcher's drive to restrict the unions' ability to bring industrial action. He described Marxist totalitarians in unions as 'small in number, anti-democratic forces [which] have gained great power through the trades union movement'. The peers are also expected to raise fears that hostile states such as Russia, Iran and North Korea could cyber-hack the e-ballots. As The Mail on Sunday revealed earlier this month, under the Bill employers must protect their staff from harassment by third parties. It means, for example, that a worker could take an employer to a tribunal if they feel jokes or banter they overhear was offensive on grounds such as race, sex or religion if their bosses didn't do 'all they could' to prevent it. That is likely to lead to firms taking on more diversity officers to monitor what people are saying to help them prove they had taken steps to protect their workers. The Bill fails to stipulate any ring fence allowing the expression of opinions on political, moral, religious or social matters. Shadow Business Secretary Andrew Griffith said: 'Angela Rayner's extreme union charter will take us right back to the 1970s, a period Norman Tebbit fought tooth and nail to drag Britain out of. 'These laws will see the unions run rife, strangle private enterprise and grind the country to a halt. 'Most worryingly are measures which risk industrial sabotage. This goes against everything Tebbit fought for, and must be stopped at once'.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Spaniels replace 'unhealthy' French bulldogs as UK's favourite dog breed
With distinctive ears and playful personalities, it's little wonder French bulldogs have been the bestselling dog for ten years. But they have finally been knocked off the top spot – with the Prince and Princess of Wales ' favoured breed, the cocker spaniel, coming up as top dog. A Pets4Homes report looked into 7.5million pets which have been rehomed in the past six years and found 'flat-faced' breeds such as the French bulldog, which are expensive and can have health problems, are less popular. In contrast, cocker spaniels have rocketed up to take the crown. William and Kate got their spaniel Orla in 2020 after Lupo, also a cocker, died. Also popular is the miniature dachshund – beloved by celebrities including Prince Harry 's ex-girlfriend Cressida Bonas and Game Of Thrones actress Emilia Clarke – which has made it into the top three for the first time. The number of people investing in a new pet rose sharply during the pandemic as families spent more time at home. This was followed by a slump in the market as over-supply, rising living costs and adoption fatigue took its toll. But demand was up 33 per cent last year, which caused puppy prices to jump 14.3 per cent. While cockers are the bestsellers, goldendoodles – a cross between a golden retriever and a poodle – are the most sought-after, with the greatest number of enquiries per dog on Pet4Homes website. They had around 900 interested buyers per listing, followed closely by maltipoos – a Maltese and a poodle – on 802, and then golden retrievers on 771. The most expensive pets are English bulldogs, which sell for an average of £1,544 – up by a quarter on last year. Meanwhile, cavalier King Charles spaniels cost £1,528, up by more than a quarter, golden retrievers are £1,521 on average – up 15.8 per cent – and boxers come in at £1,472, up 17.2 per cent. Axel Lagercrantz, chief executive of Pets4Homes, said: 'French bulldogs being dethroned as the number one bred dog reflects a wider societal turning away from dogs that appear to be unhealthy, as well as a wider diminishing popularity of bulldogs. 'Bulldogs also tend to be very expensive – the English bulldog being the most expensive dog breed, according to our report – which means as the costs of keeping a pet rise, the appetite for very expensive dogs decreases.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Government prepares for release of landmark review into ailing water sector
The Government is bracing for the release of a landmark review into the water industry, which could reportedly lead to the abolition of embattled water regulator Ofwat. The Independent Water Commission, led by former Bank of England deputy governor Sir Jon Cunliffe, will outline recommendations to turn around the floundering sector in its final report on Monday. The review was commissioned by the UK and Welsh governments as part of their response to systemic industry failures, which include rising bills, record sewage spills and debt-ridden company finances, although ministers have ruled out nationalising companies. The Government will respond to the recommendations in Parliament later on Monday. The review reportedly includes proposals to establish a new system of regulation, which is currently split between Ofwat, the Environment Agency and the Drinking Water Inspectorate. Ministers will announce a consultation that could lead to axing Ofwat, which oversees how much water companies in England and Wales can charge for services, according to the Guardian. Ofwat has faced intense criticism for overseeing water companies during the years that they paid shareholders and accrued large debts while ageing infrastructure crumbled and sewage spills skyrocketed. In an interview with the Sunday Times, Environment Secretary Steve Reed suggested he was in favour of a new model where regional boards managed water in their areas, including representatives from water companies, local authorities and other organisations. He said: 'I think the catchment-based model has a lot to commend it. Because if you can manage what's going into the water better, you can clean up the water faster.' Asked on Friday if there were plans to scrap Ofwat as the regulator, Downing Street said the Government will wait for a final report. A No 10 spokesman said: 'We are waiting for Sir Jon Cunliffe's final report next week, you can expect us to set out our response after that on what more we will do to turn the sector around.' A Government spokesperson said: 'We are not going to comment on speculation.' Ofwat declined to comment. Mr Reed is also expected to announce a new Government pledge to halve sewage pollution from water companies by the end of the decade, during broadcast interviews on Sunday. He said: ' Families have watched their local rivers, coastlines and lakes suffer from record levels of pollution. 'My pledge to you: the Government will halve sewage pollution from water companies by the end of the decade.' But in his Sunday Times interview, he acknowledged that bills were unlikely to fall from their current level, saying instead that an investment of £104 billion in the sector would 'avoid the need for any big bill hikes in the future'. It comes after the Environment Agency on Friday said the number of serious pollution incidents caused by water companies across England rose by 60% in 2024 compared with the previous year. The figures showed companies recorded a total of 2,801 pollution incidents, up from 2,174 in 2023. Of these, 75 were categorised as posing 'serious or persistent' harm to wildlife and human health – up from 47 last year. The Environment Agency said it is clear some companies are failing to meet the targets it has set on pollution, attributing failures to persistent underinvestment in new infrastructure, poor asset maintenance and reduced resilience because of the impacts of climate change. Earlier on Friday, the Public Accounts Committee also released a report which called the level of pollution 'woeful' and recommended an overhaul of the regulation system. The cross-party group of MPs said the Government must act with urgency to strengthen oversight of the sector to rebuild trust and ensure its poor performance improves. The Independent Water Commission published its interim report in June, which found the sector to be beset with 'deep-rooted, systemic' failures. While the paper outlined the commission's direction of travel, it stopped short of providing detailed recommendations on policy, regulatory reform and corporate governance, which are now expected in the final report. The interim review pointed to the need for better regulation of water companies but it did not recommend the wholesale scrapping of Ofwat, which some have urged. Nationalisation, which some campaigners have also called for, was excluded from its terms of reference when commissioned by the Government. Meanwhile, the Conservatives accused Labour of copying the previous government's policies and doing nothing to halt rises in water bills. Shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins said the Government should be 'transparent' about where the money to fix Britain's sewers was coming from, warning that consumers may have to stump up some of the cash. She added: 'Labour's water plans must also include credible proposals to improve the water system's resilience to droughts, without placing an additional burden on bill payers and taxpayers.'
