logo
Panel advances bill banning delivery of abortion-inducing drugs in Oklahoma

Panel advances bill banning delivery of abortion-inducing drugs in Oklahoma

Yahoo21-04-2025
Sen. David Bullard, R-Durant, sits at his desk on the Senate floor during the chamber's organizational day on Jan. 7, 2025. (Photo by Emma Murphy/Oklahoma Voice)
OKLAHOMA CITY – A Senate panel on Monday advanced a measure to prevent the use of popular abortion-inducing drugs, including mifepristone.
House Bill 1168 makes it a felony to intentionally deliver abortion-inducing drugs in the state.
'We are stopping the pill from the abortion side of this just because of the damage it does to an unborn person, primarily, but also because of the damage it does to women and mothers,' said Sen. David Bullard, R-Durant, the Senate author of the measure.
Abortion in Oklahoma is already illegal, except to save the life of the mother.
Abortion-inducing drugs, like RU486, better known as mifepristone, are not the same as the morning after pill. Abortion-inducing drugs end a pregnancy while the morning-after pill prevents pregnancy.
'RU486 has one intent and that intent is to murder an unborn child,' Bullard said.
Bullard said the measure would also prevent it from being shipped into Oklahoma through major carriers.
The measure would make it a felony with a fine not to exceed $100,000 or up to 10 years in prison or both.
'I simply cannot believe that we are continuing to try and create new felonies for substances that are legal, that do provide valid medical relief to individuals here in our state,' said Sen. Carri Hicks, D-Oklahoma City.
Hicks said she was appalled that the state continues to push the envelope when mothers are going into sepsis and experiencing fatal conditions before they can get medical intervention.
'This is the only medical procedure in the world that the success of the procedure depends on the death of the patient,' Bullard said.
The measure passed the Senate Health and Human Services Committee by a vote of 7-3. It is available for consideration in the Senate.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

If Trump and the GOP keep this up, AOC is going to be president
If Trump and the GOP keep this up, AOC is going to be president

The Hill

time5 minutes ago

  • The Hill

If Trump and the GOP keep this up, AOC is going to be president

Say hello to New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani. Say hello to a blue wave in the 2026 midterms. Say hello in 2028 to President Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. If President Trump and congressional Republicans keep this up, it will only be the start of the progressive takeover. Left-wing populists are already winning over voters by raising hell about the rising price of clothes and groceries due to tariffs. The growing appetite for populist left voices damning the high cost of living made headlines earlier this year in the successful ' Fighting Oligarchy,' tour featuring Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Ocasio-Cortez. Poll numbers also make the case that voters are frustrated with Trump's failed promise to deal with inflation. The same angst is evident in declining c o nsumer confidence. And now Scott Bessent, Trump's Treasury secretary, is floating the idea of replacing Social Security with a thousand-dollar gift to American babies. Those 'Trump Savings Accounts' are included in the Republicans' newly passed tax-and-spending plan. Bessent is now suggesting that a one-time payment, far smaller than monthly outlays for current benefits, is all that is needed to replace Social Security. Bessent openly said the 'Trump Savings Accounts' for newborns is 'a backdoor for privatizing Social Security' at an event sponsored by the conservative news outlet Breitbart. Bessent excitedly asked his audience to imagine that the thousand-dollar gift to an infant will grow until 'you have in the hundreds of thousands of dollars for your retirement — then that's a game changer too.' 'A stunning admission,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said on the Senate floor. 'Bessent actually slipped and told the truth: Donald Trump and his government want to privatize Social Security.' Schumer identified Bessent's musings as a politically potent message for Democrats going into next year's midterms. Have congressional Republicans forgotten the political pain they suffered when President George W. Bush tried to privatize Social Security in 2005? The party lost its majority in the following year's midterms, in part due to public outrage. Bessent's search for a way to end Social Security is a longstanding fixation among Republicans. They see the program as contrary to capitalism, a public welfare program sending the message that government has a role in preventing poverty. Former Republican Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) became a conservative hero for daring to talk about privatizing Social Security. When he ran for vice president on the GOP ticket in 2012, liberal groups famously responded with dramatic depictions in advertising of Republicans 'throwing grandma off a cliff.' Now, with the passage of Trump's budget reconciliation bill, which got congressional Republicans to buy into substantial cuts in Medicaid spending, the Treasury secretary feels free to again openly discuss an idea for eliminating Social Security. This comes at a time when the richest 10 percent of Americans own 90 percent of stock market wealth. 'Calling this a five-alarm fire is an understatement,' stated Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.). 'Between Bessent's comments and the harm DOGE has already done to the [Social Security Agency], it's clear Trump was lying all along about protecting Social Security. Like every Republican administration going back multiple generations, Trump and his billionaire cabinet want to privatize Social Security to give their Wall Street buddies a payday.' Let's not forget: During the campaign, Trump pledged to bring down inflation and 'make America wealthy again.' But a recent Fox poll found that 56 percent of Americans gave a negative rating to their family finances, and 67 percent rated Trump's handling of the economy negatively. In the Trump Cabinet, Bessent has company in floating ideas for undermining Social Security. 'What do you think [about] paying no taxes on Social Security … fantastic!' exclaimed Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick recently, with a bright, wide, television grin on Fox News Sunday. Just one problem, Mr. Secretary. The proposal for 'no taxes on Social Security' didn't make it into the final version of the Trump spending bill (it was turned into a temporary deduction for seniors). The truth revealed by his misleading comment is that the Commerce secretary — a billionaire, like the Treasury secretary — is preoccupied with ending Social Security. Earlier this year, Lutnick implied that Americans who complain about missing a Social Security check are likely fraudsters. 'If Social Security didn't send out their checks this month, my 94-year-old mother-in-law wouldn't complain,' he said. 'She'd think something got messed up and she'd get it next month. A fraudster always makes the loudest noise, screaming and yelling. Anybody who knows payments knows you stop the checks, and whoever screams is the one stealing.' That brutal disrespect for everyone who benefits from safety net protection against poverty is increasingly being heard in public. Earlier this year, Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) dismissed a constituent who expressed fear about the tax bill's cuts to health care support provided by Medicaid with a flip comment, replying, 'Well, we all are going to die.' Ernst then doubled down on her callous indifference in a grotesque campaign video filmed in a cemetery, mocking the woman's concern. 'I made an incorrect assumption that everyone in the auditorium understood that yes, we are all going to perish from this Earth,' Ernst said. 'So, I apologize. And I'm really, really glad that I did not have to bring up the subject of the tooth fairy as well.' Is it any wonder that figures like AOC and Zohran Mamdani are gaining traction?

Senators Shaheen And Murkowski Ask For $54.6 Billion To Aid Ukraine
Senators Shaheen And Murkowski Ask For $54.6 Billion To Aid Ukraine

Forbes

time13 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Senators Shaheen And Murkowski Ask For $54.6 Billion To Aid Ukraine

New Hampshire Senator Jeanne Shaheen and Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski jointly introduced legislation in the Senate last week proposing $54.6 billion in aid to Ukraine across 2025 and 2026. The bill arrives amid intensified Russian drone and missile strikes across Ukraine. 'There is continued bipartisan resolve to sustain Ukraine's valiant fight for freedom,' Shaheen said in a statement. She added that the United States must 'help Ukraine obtain the air defense needed to protect its civilian population centers, including schools and hospitals, from Russia's relentless drone and missile attacks.' 'This legislation ensures Ukraine can continue to resist Russia's illegal and brutal war,' Murkowski added. She noted that the bipartisan bill will incorporate the use of 'seized Russian assets to hold aggressors accountable, while [also]Since the start of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the United States has provided over $175 billion in aid to Ukraine, which includes defense, medical, humanitarian, and financial assistance. This support, combined with aid from other countries, has helped the Ukrainians to defend themselves from Russia's ongoing invasion. Critics within the United States have argued that aid to Ukraine has been very costly. They believe that the U.S. should prioritize domestic programs rather than providing foreign assistance. Additionally, they claim that the U.S. should not involve itself in Ukraine's defense. But according to the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, when calculating the cost of this aid per U.S. citizen per month, the assistance equates to just two cups of coffee. In exchange, the Ukrainians have used this aid to successfully defend their homeland without the loss of a single American soldier. For example, since the full-scale invasion, the Ukrainians have destroyed two-thirds of Russia's pre-invasion tank force, and decimated nearly half of Russia's naval fleet on the Black Sea. Multiple Western reports, independently verified by various governments, also found that the Russians have sustained over one million casualties during the war. Based on these results, U.S. assistance has been highly effective. The proposed legislation by Shaheen and Murkowski is also timely. On July 31, the Senate Appropriations Committee approved the Defense Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2026. The proposed bill, which was advanced by the committee by a vote of 26-3, includes an additional $800 million for the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI). Republican and Democratic members of the committee have also highlighted the importance of this assistance, suggesting that there is still bipartisan support for Ukraine. 'The Secretary of the Army rightly calls Ukraine the Silicon Valley of warfare,' stated Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell during last month's Senate Appropriations Committee meeting. 'Shutting off engagement with Ukraine would undermine our military's efforts to prepare for the modern battlefield. Like our friends on the Armed Services Committee, we are restoring funding for the USAI and other security assistance programs that make America safer.' 'I would say support for Ukraine is a billion dollars,' added Delaware Senator Chris Coons while members of the Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense spoke with reporters last week. 'I think there's broad enthusiasm for bringing [Russia's] war to a just conclusion, but also broad awareness that that means not peace at any price,' he noted. Coons ended his statement by saying that the United States needs to strengthen 'Ukraine so that it is able to defend itself.' Even the White House has supported recent motions to send aid to Ukraine. On July 14, President Donald Trump announced that the U.S. would send additional defense assistance to Ukraine. The president also shared that the U.S. would sell weapons to NATO, which could then be provided to the Ukrainians. Based on these developments, it appears that there is a shift in how some elected officials in the Senate and the White House view aid to Ukraine. Republicans and Democrats in the Senate have made it clear that they view providing additional assistance to Ukraine as a priority. Support from the House of Representatives, however, will be more challenging. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson has previously stated that he 'does not have an appetite for further Ukraine funding.' There are also some Republican House members who oppose future aid to Ukraine. But if Senate Republicans and Democrats pass the newly proposed legislation by Shaheen and Murkowski, and if the White House continues with its shift toward providing additional aid to Ukraine, then Johnson may be persuaded. There are also hundreds of elected officials in the House who have previously supported Ukraine, suggesting that the new bill would have bipartisan support as well. In other words, the new Ukraine aid bill may face some challenges. Nonetheless, Shaheen and Murkowski will speak with their colleagues to persuade them to support their aid bill for Ukraine. It remains to be seen how the Senate will proceed with the proposed legislation.

Redistricting wars heat up
Redistricting wars heat up

Politico

timean hour ago

  • Politico

Redistricting wars heat up

Presented by DRIVING THE DAY — Assembly and Senate Democrats each held all-caucus Zoom meetings Sunday night to discuss the rapidly moving battle over redistricting, according to several people familiar with the calls. The briefings came as the showdown over redistricting escalated sharply, with Democratic lawmakers in Texas fleeing the state in an effort to deny a quorum to Republican lawmakers seeking to redraw lines there. California Democrats, including Gov. Gavin Newsom, are pushing to respond in kind if Texas and other states proceed with their own redistricting. The presenters, including California Reps. Pete Aguilar and Zoe Lofgren, talked about the current state of play, including how the state's congressional district boundaries could change and a briefing on polling on how California voters would respond to lines being redrawn, according to one person familiar with the calls and granted anonymity to describe them. — With help from Jeremy B. White. RIP RECALL — The effort to recall Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass debuted with a bang five months ago. Today, it will die with barely a whimper. The campaign brimmed with potential … Bass was indisputably vulnerable following her handling of the January wildfires, and organizers were backed by the deep pockets of Silicon Valley philanthropist Nicole Shanahan. But slick launch videos and petitions don't translate to the arduous work of actually qualifying a measure for the ballot. The recall committee never filed for approval to start collecting signatures and in June preemptively stood down, stating that a recall is 'no longer our vehicle for change.' The Monday qualification deadline makes it official. The failure to qualify 'tells us that people didn't have the appetite for a recall, and they wanted the problems in the city to get fixed, whether it had to do with the fire, homelessness or crime,' said Doug Herman, a political strategist working with Bass. A spokesperson for the recall effort did not respond to a request for comment. Ironically, it was Bass' former (and potentially future) foe Rick Caruso who helped drive a stake into the recall, when he declared the effort was 'not a good idea' not long after the committee launched. Caruso, a centrist Democrat, would have lent a bipartisan sheen to the effort. Instead, Bass and her allies could paint the effort as a GOP-adjacent partisan attack that would have trouble catching on in deep-blue Los Angeles. More upside for Bass … She could raise unlimited donations to fend off the recall, scooping up checks far larger than the $1,800 maximum donations for her reelect campaign. Bass raised nearly $750,000 to the anti-recall account and put that money to use on consulting, polling, digital lists — basically, all the building blocks that will come in handy for her reelection campaign. She posted a far more meager sum in her 2026 account: less than $180,000 for the first six months of the year. While the figure drew some flak online, Bass' team said it was necessary for the anti-recall campaign to be the top fundraising priority at the time. 'It needed to be done because of the seriousness of the recall and the fact that it had financial backing,' Herman said. GOOD MORNING. Happy Monday. Thanks for waking up with Playbook. MEA CULPA: Friday's edition of California Playbook mischaracterized how much money Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis has on hand. She has $4.6 million on hand in her governor's race account, with an additional $4.6 million stowed away in her lieutenant governor's account — most of which her campaign says can be transferred. It also misstated Chad Bianco's fundraising edge over Steve Hilton. Like what you're reading? Sign up to get California Playbook in your inbox, and forward it to a friend. You can also text us at ‪916-562-0685‬‪ — save it as 'CA Playbook' in your contacts. Or drop us a line at dgardiner@ and bjones@ or on X — @DustinGardiner and @jonesblakej. WHERE'S GAVIN? Nothing official announced. Big News: On Wednesday, Aug. 27, POLITICO is hosting its inaugural California policy summit. At The California Agenda, some of the state's most prominent political figures will share the stage with influential voices in tech, energy, housing and other areas to chart the path forward for a state at the forefront of critical policy debates. The live and streamed event is free, but advanced registration is required. Request an invite here. KAMALA WATCH UNWELCOME OFFER — Kamala Harris said when she opted not to run for governor that she planned to help elect Democrats across the country. Many operatives within her party, still smarting from her 2024 defeat, would be glad if she didn't run again in 2028 — and don't want her help in 2026, Dustin, Melanie and three of our colleagues report. 'If she was gravity for our candidates running in center-right districts in 2024, then she will be gravity for them in 2026,' said Lauren Harper Pope, co-founder of WelcomePAC, which supports center-left candidates. 'So,' she added of Harris' pledge to campaign for Democrats, 'no thank you.' Across the country in Southern California, a Democratic strategist who was also granted anonymity to speak frankly said he would prefer Harris 'go away' because voters equate her with Biden. The greater Los Angeles area, similar to metro New York, could be central to Democrats' quest to take control of the House of Representatives. 'I wouldn't want her in my district,' the strategist said. CAMPAIGN YEAR(S) NEXT DOMINO — Without Harris in the field, the looming question in the governor's race is whether Caruso will run — staging a political comeback after losing to Bass. Harris' exit has, in many insiders' eyes, widened Caruso's path to the governor's mansion. Supporters lit up Caruso's phone after Harris made her announcement, according to a confidante, some urging him to run for governor, while others pushed the mayoral race. 'The race has opened up a bit. Kamala had weaknesses and a ceiling, but she had support, too,' said the confidante, who was granted anonymity to discuss Caruso's view of the political playing field. 'Everything clicked up a notch, maybe two notches, as far as the excitement level. But in terms of a plan, it's going to be a while.' Read more from our Jeremy B. White. TOP READS BEHIND A PORTRAIT OF SUCCESS — The new CEO of Calexit, the organization campaigning for California's secession, projects opulence. He resides in a luxurious estate in Calabasas and claims to own lithium mines in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Sir. Dr. Xavier Mitchell, Ph.D., however, appears 'to be an extremely prolific fraudster, with a civil and criminal record of financial swindling and deceit,' our Will McCarthy reports in a deep look at Mitchell's background. Mitchell has been accused of stealing a man's identity, applying for fraudulent business loans, forging documents, attempting grand theft and perjury. None of his companies appears on major exchanges, but rather on so-called OTC (over-the-counter) markets that have less stringent reporting requirements and allow securities (often penny stocks) to be traded directly between two parties. Although Mitchell does seem to have created a number of LLCs, at least one of them is currently suspended by the Franchise Tax Board, and the minuscule stock prices of others hardly denote grand wealth. CLIMATE AND ENERGY CALIFORNIA GOV & TEXAS TEA — Newsom spent the last four years provoking the big oil boogeyman. Now, it's haunting him, writes our Alex Nieves. Newsom's casting of Big Oil as the villain behind the state's perpetually high fuel prices signaled the industry's waning influence in Sacramento. But the plot took a dramatic turn for the governor and his party when two refineries in the state announced closure plans. 'Refineries all across the globe are struggling,' Newsom said last month in unveiling a suite of proposals to keep refineries solvent, including holding talks with potential buyers and offering incentives to boost in-state oil drilling. 'We've got some challenges, and so just require some new considerations.' The about-face, Alex writes, 'is emblematic of Democrats' course correction on cost-of-living issues in the wake of the presidential election — and provides a real-time demonstration of the political risks of pursuing an aggressive transition away from fossil fuels.' But, but, but … Chevron isn't ready to give state leaders kudos yet. Read Friday's California Climate to see why one of the company's top executives says he still has little faith that California will make long-term changes the industry thinks are needed. NUMBER OF THE DAY $16.90: What California's minimum wage will increase to at the start of next year. That's up from $16.50 thanks to adjustments for inflation. Top Talkers HUERTA ON FARM RAIDS — Storied California labor leader Dolores Huerta spoke with our colleague Samuel Benson about the Trump administration's arrest of farmworkers, and she's not optimistic about how coming harvest seasons will play out for crops or employees. 'It's an atrocity, what they've been doing to the immigrant community,' Huerta said. The longtime labor activist says the federal government's current approach is 'very, very different' from anything she's seen before. WITH A LITTLE HELP FROM A FRIEND — San Francisco's progressive Democratic Sheriff Paul Miyamoto explained his surprising endorsement of Republican Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco in the governor's race last week. 'I honestly don't know what his stance is on every issue,' Miyamoto said Thursday, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. 'I'm looking at this as supporting a peer and a friend, someone who's doing the exact same job that I am.' AROUND THE STATE — The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday night upheld a ruling against the Trump administration's 'roving' immigration patrols, a setback for the president's deportation agenda. (LA Times) — Financial disclosures show San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie's campaign has spent unprecedented sums on consultants to polish his public image. (SF Standard) — Fresno County Supervisor Buddy Mendes said a Navy fighter jet that crashed on his farm will cost him upland cotton crops. (CBS47/KSEE24) PLAYBOOKERS KEYNOTE — Harmeet Dhillon, the head of the Justice Department's civil rights arm who served as vice chair of the California Republican Party, will speak during a Saturday brunch at the party's fall convention. She'll go on at 11 a.m. on Sept. 6 in Orange County. PUT A RING ON IT — Christopher Mika, national security adviser for Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), and Sonja Packard got engaged on the Speaker's Balcony last Tuesday. STORK ALERT — Madailin Callahan Johnson was born in the wee hours of Aug. 2 to Jamie Callahan, deputy chief of staff to Newsom, and Mike Johnson (not the House speaker). Callahan will be on leave until January, and Rhys Williams will fill the deputy role until her return. BIRTHDAYS — former President Barack Obama … British royal Meghan Markle … actor Billy Bob Thornton … director Greta Gerwig … Claire Berry of Rep. Judy Chu's (D-Calif.) office ... Hector Escobar, property claims field adjuster, Mercury Insurance BELATED B-DAY WISHES — (was Sunday): Assemblymember Chris Ward (favorite cake: Black Forest cake) … Sydney Hilbush of Rep. John Garamendi's (D-Calif.) office ... (was Saturday): Vice President JD Vance … Mark Martin, Assembly budget consultant … David O'Brien at California Community Colleges … Chelsea Haines at the Association of California Water Agencies ... Gigi Sohn WANT A SHOUT-OUT FEATURED? — Send us a birthday, career move or another special occasion to include in POLITICO's California Playbook. You can now submit a shout-out using this Google form.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store