Auckland environmentalist wins battle to protect urban style jungle
But plants on another grass verge will be removed by Auckland council after complaints from some residents in nearby apartments.
Freeman's Bay resident
Mark van Kaathoven has worked on the berm gardens
outside his home and neighbouring properties for more than three decades.
They are a colourful lush blend of natives and sub tropical plants that almost form a covered walkway or canopy over the footpath.
He uses green waste to fertilise the gardens, that also
act as sponges in extreme weather
.
Auckland Council has now given most of the berms protected status under its restorative gardening initiative, meaning they can't be removed.
Mark van Kaathoven told
Checkpoint
the victory was very special.
"Nothing like this has ever been done before, and it's not just a first for New Zealand, but I think actually it's a first for all of Australasia."
He said the scale the berms had reached was all thanks to nature.
"I've just quietly done my little bit. just putting a tree on the berm and then extending it with more planting ,and then lo and behold mother nature is along with me helping me," van Kaathoven said.
Auckland Council has now given most of the berms protected status under its restorative gardening initiative.
Photo:
RNZ/Lisa Owen
He said the protected status meant the berms would now be viewed like a park or garden, with similar maintenance to be provided by the council.
"Along the way I'll be educating the council or the contractors how this whole section's looked after and how to maintain it, and it's very easy."
Now at age 63, van Kaathoven is keen to pass his knowledge and care for the garden on to the next generation.
"I have to show the next generation how this whole process looks after itself in many ways. And you just have to give it a a helping hand to make it look after itself as much as you need to help it as well," he said.
When it comes to the look of the berms, van Kaathoven has opted for more is more.
"I don't know if anyone's ever been to the Amazon. It's very much like that. I've got layers of foliage in the trees, on the ground," he said.
"It's just a whole mixture of plants... on different levels. So, you walk through there and it's a completely different journey from what you get in other areas of the streets in Freemans Bay... We have a real ecosystem that's working so beautifully"
He said the sub-tropical plants thrive in this climate, most of them looking after themselves.
"In the 15 years that I've been doing landscape gardening, I've taken three or four bags of rubbish to the tip."
Green waste was the key to keeping the berms growing, van Kaathoven said he puts just about any green waste on the plants.
"Tree logs, lawn clippings, hedge trimmings, palm fronds, vegetable scraps... so I use everything in a positive way."
van Kaathoven is also a big advocate for green infrastructure.
"We need a combination of sponge gardens, wetlands and good infrastructure, and the three elements will work really well with the weather events."
He said he's now on the hunt for new berms he can grace with an urban jungle.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
How influential NZ schools hastened the demise of NCEA
By Stuart Deerness* of Photo: RNZ Analysis: As New Zealanders digest the news about government plans to scrap NCEA from 2028 , we should also consider the role influential and prestigious schools had on its demise. Since NCEA was introduced between 2002 and 2004, these prominent schools have increasingly opted for alternative assessment systems. This effectively undermined trust in the official assessment system. In 2011, Auckland Grammar School became the first state school to decide NCEA wasn't suitable for its students. It began offering assessments from Cambridge International Education , a suite of imported qualifications where students sit externally assessed exams alongside NCEA. The headmaster at the time, John Morris, publicly criticised NCEA , saying it was poorly designed and only suitable for less academic students. Other schools catering to wealthy or high performing students quickly followed. Macleans College copied Auckland Grammar's approach. Many private schools also began offering Cambridge examinations instead of (or alongside) NCEA, indicating their implicit criticism of the system by choosing alternative qualifications. Recently, Epsom Girls' Grammar principal Brenda McNaughton said there was "overwhelming community demand" for alternatives to NCEA. By heavily investing in alternative qualification systems these schools demonstrated a belief that NCEA, on its own, did not meet the academic needs and aspirations of their entire student body. The schools weren't trying to undermine NCEA on purpose. They were simply responding to pressure from parents who wanted what they saw as more rigourous qualifications for their children. But their language mattered. The way these schools talked about Cambridge exams is revealing. They used terms such as "rigour", "international standards" and "university recognition". This language appealed to parents who were familiar with traditional exam systems. The numbers tell a compelling story. A 2023 NZQA survey revealed that 25 percent of schools were not planning to offer a full NCEA Level 1 programme, with many high-performing schools abandoning it altogether. Between 2023 and 2024, Cambridge International Education reported a 20 percent increase in students taking its exams, with 8000 pupils across a quarter of New Zealand's high schools now doing Cambridge qualifications. But did New Zealanders lose confidence because NCEA genuinely had problems, or because influential schools had already signalled their lack of trust by offering alternatives? The answer is probably both. Educational theory suggests that when schools with serious influence opt out of national systems, they don't just seek alternatives - they inevitably change how people perceive the systems they leave behind. By 2025, NCEA was under attack from multiple directions. Some schools offered alternatives, employers were confused, and influential parents found it difficult to understand. Education Minister Erica Stanford's admission that she never understood the system perfectly illustrates the problem. NCEA's flexible system, designed to recognise different types of achievements, was simply unfamiliar to many parents who were used to traditional exams. The replacement system proposes scrapping NCEA Levels 2 and 3 and replacing them with the New Zealand Certificate of Education at Year 12, and the New Zealand Advanced Certificate of Education at Year 13. Students will need to take five subjects and pass at least four. The new qualifications focus on "international comparability", "subject mastery" and external assessment, according to the government. While these aren't necessarily bad things, they reflect particular ideas about what education should prioritise. Importantly, the government admits that fewer students may pass initially, particularly those who struggle with traditional academic approaches. The end of NCEA teaches us something important about how educational change actually happens. Systems can be undermined not through dramatic opposition, but through the gradual effect of individual choices made by those with enough power to influence public opinion. New Zealand's prominent schools didn't set out to destroy NCEA. They were responding to genuine pressure from their communities for alternatives they believed would better serve their students. But their collective actions created a situation that ultimately made the national system politically difficult to maintain. Any new qualification system faces the same fundamental challenge. How do you address legitimate concerns about consistency and clarity while also serving all students fairly? The Cambridge phenomenon suggests communities with educational advantages will always look for ways to distinguish themselves, regardless of what qualification system is in place. As New Zealand introduces new qualifications, it's worth remembering the loudest voices calling for educational change don't always represent what all students need. The real test of any system isn't whether it satisfies the most articulate parents or prestigious schools. It's whether it serves the educational hopes of all New Zealand families without accidentally creating new forms of inequality. The story of NCEA shows how powerful the actions of elite institutions can be, even when they don't intend to cause system-wide change. *Stuart Deerness is a senior lecturer in Education at Auckland University of Technology. -This story was originally published on The Conversation.

RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Northland school dealing with winter staffing crisis
education employment 20 minutes ago A Northland school has been forced to roster students home due to a winter staffing crisis. Northland College Principal Duane Allen spoke to Charlotte Cook.

RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Japanese warships arrive in Wellington
Two ships from the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force are in Wellington for a ceremonial visit. Photo: Alexandria Nowell / supplied Two Japanese warships have arrived in Wellington for a three day ceremonial visit. The ships had been holding a training manoeuvre with Australian and RNZAF P-8 martime aircraft. The pair were accompanied by HMNZS Canterbury, which was returning from the major, multi-country exercise Talisman Sabre . The helicopter destroyer Ise was in fact a small aircraft carrier, nearly 20,000 tons in size. It normally had four helicopters but was able to operate up to 18. It's accompanied by a destroyer, Suzunami. The Japanese maritime self defence force said the visit was to strengthen cooperation and understanding with allied and partner navies in the Indo-Pacific. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.