
The biggest political fights over Trump's megabill are converging in Nevada
For starters, Nevada is expecting the law's changes to Medicaid and food assistance to boot hundreds of thousands of residents from crucial social safety net programs.
Like other states in similar predicaments, lawmakers will have to scramble to figure out how to find money in the state budget to keep many of those people covered. But the impacts of the law on that budget and the state's broader finances could be even more significant than in many others because Nevada has no state income tax, and therefore is extremely limited in how it can find new revenues.
Then there are the new law's tax provisions related to tipped employees and gamblers that will have an outsize effect on a state whose economy relies almost exclusively on casinos and hospitality.
The implementation of the new law in the coming months and years will occur as Nevada is set to play a key role in the next midterm and presidential elections.
In 2026, Gov. Joe Lombardo — who has walked a fine line between offering praise for certain aspects of the megabill while pushing back against others — is seen as the most vulnerable Republican governor up for re-election. And Nevada's battleground 3rd District, represented by Democratic Rep. Susie Lee, will be a key race in the fight for the House majority.
And in 2028, Nevada will likely again host critical contests for the White House and Senate.
Democrats are already eager to go on offense against the law. State Rep. Steve Yeager, the Democratic speaker of the state Assembly, said he's already been contacted by many constituents who have expressed 'concern about what this bill might mean for them' and how they could be impacted by its changes to Medicaid, food assistance, energy credits, taxes on tips and gambling.
Yeager added he was going 'to make sure that every single voter who goes to the ballot box here next year in 2026 knows about this bill and knows about the impact.'
'A low-revenue state'
Approximately 1 in 3 Nevadans are on Medicaid, according to data from the state and KFF, a nonpartisan health policy research group, due in part to a massive expansion of the program back in 2013 by then-Gov. Brian Sandoval, one of the first Republican governors to embark on Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act.
Trump's law will institute steep cuts to Medicaid and food aid benefits mostly by establishing new work requirements, restrict state-levied fees on health care providers that are mostly used to fund Medicaid, and preclude the federal government from being responsible for reimbursing states any longer. In Nevada, as many as 100,000 people could fall off Medicaid as a result, according to the nonpartisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
But unlike some other states, which may be able to shift funds around in their budgets to build financial support for affected residents, Nevada's hands are largely tied. It has no state income tax and has a state constitutional provision requiring a two-thirds majority to raise revenue.
'We don't have the funds to be able to fill these critical gaps,' Yeager said. 'We're a low-revenue state. … We're in a really tough place.'
Nevada is also likely to be uniquely impacted by a pair of tax provisions.
Starting in 2026, gamblers will have to pay more taxes under the GOP's new law. That's because the law will limit what gamblers can deduct from their yearly taxes to 90% of their losses. Bettors can currently deduct the entirety of their losses — up until their winnings.
Bettors have expressed concerns that the provision could cause professional gambling in the U.S. to fold. And Nevada Democrats say it's all but certain to impact the bustling and crucial industry in the casino-laden state.
'This means if someone wins a big jackpot in Las Vegas and then loses that one jackpot later on, they would still be liable for 10% in taxes on gaming 'income,' even though they had not brought home anything,' Sen. Jacky Rosen, D-Nev., said last week on the chamber floor. 'That's not just bad math, it's bad policy.'
Meanwhile, Trump and Republicans have boasted of the law's provision that they call 'no tax on tips.' Trump unveiled the concept during a 2024 campaign event in Nevada, which is among the states with the highest concentration of service workers who rely on tips.
'If you're a restaurant worker, a server, a valet, a bellhop, a bartender, one of my caddies … your tips will be 100% yours,' Trump said of the policy idea during a January visit to Las Vegas shortly after he was sworn in for his second term.
The law allows for a deduction on federal taxes of up to $25,000 in tipped income. At first glance, it appears it could be a boon for workers who rely heavily on tips.
But economists at the Yale Budget Lab have written that 37% of all tipped workers don't earn enough money to even pay federal income tax, meaning that these people wouldn't gain from the new deduction.
In addition, critics note the cap is relatively small and that it phases out once workers enter a higher income bracket ($150,000 per year). Plus, the provision only runs through 2028.
Democrats also note that the law froze nearly all of the clean energy funds the state had received under President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. Nevada, where scorching temperatures have led to soaring energy costs for voters and businesses, was among the states that claimed the most IRA funds used to incentivize clean energy investments and jobs, as well as home energy rebates.
As those funds dry up, so too could financial relief for residents and businesses.
'With the undoing of some of the Inflation Reduction Act, losing monies that were in the bill, we're going to lose solar jobs — and I am confident that our power bills are going to increase,' Yeager said.
A key gubernatorial race
Those impacts will loom particularly large in next year's governor's race in Nevada. Even before Trump enacted the law, Lombardo, who won his 2022 election over Democrat Steve Sisolak by just 1.5 percentage points, was the only Republican governor up for re-election next year whose race was rated by the nonpartisan Cook Political Report as a 'toss-up.'
Nevada Democrats have already aggressively sought to link Lombardo to the 'big, beautiful bill.'
'Lombardo will have to reckon with the damage done to Nevadans' lives and livelihoods because he was too cowardly to stand up to Trump,' said Nevada Democratic Party Chair Daniele Monroe-Moreno.
Lombardo, for his part, has praised some of the tax provisions in the law, but he also warned Congress not to make changes to Medicaid funding ahead of its passage.
'While my administration continues to assess this bill as it moves to get signed into law, Nevadans should be excited about the potential impacts of tax cuts, investments in small businesses and American manufacturing, and efforts to help secure our border,' Lombardo wrote on X the day before Trump signed it into law.
A spokesperson for Lombardo declined to comment for this story but referred to that post on X, in which Lombardo also lauded the law's 'no tax on tips' provision. The spokesperson also referred to the letters Lombardo wrote to Congress and state legislators expressing his concerns about the bill's impact on Medicaid, plus a letter he wrote to Trump urging him to reconsider the gambling losses provision.
Lombardo was also among just seven Republican governors who did not sign a May letter in support of Trump's proposed 'big, beautiful bill.'
That tension underscores the bind many Republican incumbents are likely to find themselves in during next year's midterms as they seek to take credit for some of the tax-saving mechanisms of the bill while distancing themselves from the cuts that Democrats are already hammering them on — all while trying to avoid running afoul of Trump.
Responding to questions about the political impacts of the law, John Burke, a spokesperson for the Lombardo-supporting Better Nevada state PAC, said in an email, 'Under Governor Lombardo's leadership, Nevada is finally getting back on track, and the people of our state are seeing results.' He pointed specifically to accomplishments on affordable housing and education.
'The Governor has been vocal about his support for eliminating taxes on tips and supports a return to previous law on gambling losses,' Burke added.
State Attorney General Aaron Ford, who is so far the only Democrat who's entered the race against Lombardo, slammed the law for its impacts on health care and food assistance. He said 'servers and bartenders and hospitality workers are going to be getting played' by Republicans' 'no tax on tips' claims.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Reeves ‘eyes £5bn windfall from sale of seized cryptocurrency'
Rachel Reeves is eyeing up a £5bn pre-Budget windfall as the government considers selling off seized cryptocurrency to plug a hole in the public finances. The Home Office is reportedly working with police forces to offload at least £5bn worth of Bitcoin and other currencies taken from criminals. It is planning to develop a storage system for the currencies to handle their sale, it has emerged, as concerns about Labour's spending plans mount ahead of the autumn Budget. Home Office plans for a 'crypto storage and realisation framework' would allow law enforcement to securely store frozen digital currencies and sell them, The Sunday Telegraph reported. Ms Reeves has been left with a gap of at least £5bn to fill when she sets out the government's spending plans this autumn, with the government's chaotic U-turn on planned benefit cuts raising the likelihood of tax hikes. The chancellor and Sir Keir Starmer have left the door open to a wealth tax to cover the shortfall. As well as the £5bn black hole left by the welfare climbdown, the impact of sluggish economic growth and Donald Trump 's trade war could leave the Treasury scrambling to find as much as £20bn in tax hikes or spending cuts elsewhere. It is not known how much cryptocurrency law enforcement agencies currently have, but one 2018 raid saw 61,000 Bitcoin seized from a Chinese Ponzi scheme. The value of Bitcoin has surged since Mr Trump's return to the White House, meaning the haul could be worth more than £5.4bn. Responding to the suggestion Ms Reeves could sell the reserves, Reform UK chairman Zia Yusuf said: 'This would be a terrible decision. The UK should be implementing Reform's Crypto Bill and increasing its Bitcoin reserves. 'Selling now will go down as a far worse decision than Gordon Brown's fire sale of our gold. 'The Westminster class are dinosaurs who don't get the future.' But Aidan Larkin, the chief executive of seizure company Asset Reality, told The Sunday Telegraph: 'There is oil under our feet in terms of digital assets, from an illicit perspective, that could have hundreds of millions of pounds coming back into the UK each year.' Bitcoin investors have been spurred on by Mr Trump, who has lent his support to the market both by promising new legislation and regulatory changes, but also even launching his own digital currencies. The leading cryptocurrency reached $120,000, marking both an all-time high and an important landmark for those who believe that bitcoin is undervalued.


Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Watch Democrats squirm as they're grilled on who's REALLY leading their party as young 'communists' rise in ranks
As President Donald Trump has racked up a string of major policy wins in his six months, Democrats are stuck in a rut without a clear party leader, they admitted in interviews with the Daily Mail. Though House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer are technically the left's top lawmakers, Democrats on Capitol Hill shared that there is still no consensus on who is the party's head. In the absence of a clear frontrunner to lead the party in 2028, Democrats are left to tout their current efforts resisting Trump. 'It's a group leadership at this point in time, obviously Hakeem, obviously Chuck Schumer, a lot of governors,' veteran Democrat Rep. Steny Hoyer of Maryland told the Daily Mail in an interview. 'I think there are a number of leaders.' Hoyer twice served as House Majority Leader under former Speaker Nancy Pelosi. He has served on Capitol Hill for over 43 years since 1981 and is the longest tenured Democrat in the House of Representatives. It's safe to say he's been around a while to witness the party in and out of power. 'When you don't have the presidency...I can't remember a time when there was a leader,' he continued. 'So I think it's a collective leadership.' Other Democrats flat-out admitted there is no clear head of the party. Hoyer told the Daily Mail that there are a number of Democratic leaders, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. But his colleague, Rep. Moskowitz, said the party doesn't really have a leader at the moment A recent poll from Reuters/Ipsos found that 62 percent of Democratic voters want completely new leadership 'We don't have a counterpart in our party at the moment, because ... we're coming out of the last presidency,' Florida Democrat Rep. Jared Moskowitz told the Daily Mail. 'But no, we don't have a counterbalance at the moment.' The Floridian, known for his cool Air Jordan sneaker collection, noted that when Trump's term expires in 2028, both parties will be left searching for new leadership, ostensibly ignoring the platform JD Vance will have after serving as vice president. 'The Republicans, will be in the same boat, right?' Moskowitz said. Who will be the leader of the party? Because it won't be the president anymore.' In addition to Jeffries and Schumer, there are a number of Democrats who have been floated as the next party boss. On those lists are usually Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett, and occasionally, former VP Kamala Harris. Popular prediction sites Kalshi and Polymarket list Newsom as the most likely Democratic nominee for the 2028 presidential contest, AOC is listed as close second while former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg comes in third. Democrats have indicated they want new faces steering the party. According to a June poll from Reuters/Ipsos, 62 percent of self-identified Democrats agreed that 'the leadership of the Democratic Party should be replaced with new people.' That could be why Democratic candidate for New York mayor Zohran Mamdani, a self-declared democratic socialist, has been surging in the polls and landing countless TV interviews. 'Zohran Mamdani, the new leader of the Democratic Party, supports 'the abolition of private property' and 'seizing the means of production,' Republican Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana wrote this week. 'But Washington Democrats are still cozying up to him. There's no doubt about it: the loon wing is running the show.' Mamdani, 33, embodies a political archetype akin to former presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders, also a self-declared democratic socialist. The young mayoral candidate has even caught the attention of the president. 'It's finally happened, the Democrats have crossed the line. Zohran Mamdani, a 100% Communist Lunatic, has just won the Dem Primary, and is on his way to becoming Mayor. We've had Radical Lefties before, but this is getting a little ridiculous,' Trump wrote recently on Truth Social. Mamdani met personally with AOC, along with about 40 other Democratic lawmakers this week in D.C. The meeting was an hour-long session on communicating and organizing hosted by AOC, the progressive leader of the 'Squad.' The venue had to change because of high demand from lawmakers to sit in on the session, a Mamdani spokesperson said. One longtime Democrat even likened Mamdani to Trump, saying they share a similar populist appeal. 'Donald Trump and he both get out and they talk to people and they listen to people and they understand how people feel. And he's using social media the way that Donald Trump has,' Rep. Debbie Dingell of Michigan said.


Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Elon Musk could upend the 2026 midterms and MAGA majority but THESE are the menacing roadblocks to his grand plan
Elon Musk is embracing the role of troublemaker for Republicans in the 2026 midterms, threatening to form a third-party that could play spoiler to the GOP 's effort of holding onto the Senate and House. July polling conducted for the Daily Mail by J.L. Partners found that while a Musk-backed party would only garner 4 percent support, it allowed the Democrats to have a 9-point advantage over the GOP in a generic House of Representatives ballot. The world's richest man clearly bears the resources to upend the traditional duopoly that's powered American politics for more than two centuries. What remains foggy is whether the tech titan holds the strategic focus, discipline and sheer will that such a daunting political undertaking will require. Especially in an epic showdown against the singular political force of one Donald J. Trump. If Musk's political drive matches the market capitalization of Tesla, he could create a movement that could easily kill the GOP majority. 'If Elon invests in half a dozen races, that could be the difference between the Republicans being in power and Hakeem Jeffries and AOC having the keys to power. And that is unacceptable,' said James Fishback, a former Department of Government Efficiency employee who's now funding an effort to stop Musk in his tracks. If his commitment mirrors his uneven stewardship of X, formerly known as Twitter, his third party movement won't be known for more than a viral meme. 'Third parties are nothing new to politics on any level. We already have the Libertarians, we already have the Green Party, we already have the Rent is Too Damn High party,' pointed out Hogan Gidley, an adviser to House Speaker Mike Johnson and a veteran of the first Trump administration. 'The political reality is it is extremely difficult to mount third party runs that are victorious because you don't have a natural base of voters of which to pull,' Gidley observed. 'He doesn't have the juice.' Musk also doesn't seem to yet have his ducks in a row. Despite his announcement on July 7 that he was officially forming the American Party, Musk has filed no paperwork to do so. An aide to Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie - who Musk signaled he would help defend from a Trump primary challenge - wasn't able to point the Daily Mail to any official outreach. And then there's Musk's own waning political popularity. CNN released a survey Friday showing him as the least popular public figure the network polled, with Musk's favorability plummeting a staggering 66 percentage points in just four months. Support for his third party registered at a paltry 25 percent. The entity that appears most outwardly excited about Musk's third party play is a group that's been struggling to find relevance for decades: Libertarians. 'Our position is that Elon should join up with the Libertarians for the simple fact that we have the most ballot access of any third party,' Steven Nekhaila, chair of the Libertarian National Committee, told the Daily Mail. It's extremely difficult to run winning candidates outside the two-party system due to differing and often confusing ballot access rules in every state. Many states require tens of thousands of signatures apportioned over specific geographic regions to qualify. 'I think Elon is going to be pleasantly displeased with just how difficult it is to actually get ballot access in a lot of states,' he continued. Both Musk and Libertarians see value in an electoral strategy where a small group of candidates can gain leverage in Congress - Nekhaila noted that electing just a handful could wield significant influence, as major parties would need their votes to pass legislation. Nekhaila also suggested Musk pursue a broad, anti-duopoly movement to attract centrist voters. Musk appears to be interested in that type of thing as he's been in touch with Andrew Yang, who's been active in the third-party space since launching his Forward Party in 2021. At the same time, nothing firm came out of the chatter. 'Yes, Andrew did speak with Elon and his team, but he has made no commitments or plans to collaborate on anything specific in the near or future term,' a source close to Yang told the Daily Mail. 'The line of communication remains open,' the source added. A spokesperson for Musk did not respond to Daily Mail questions inquiring when Musk would form his America Party and if he's considering joining the Libertarians. If Musk really wanted advice on the challenges in mounting a third-party, he could reach out to Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump's current Health and Human Services Secretary. After Kennedy announced he was mounting an independent bid for the White House, much of his campaign's time was sucked up seeking ballot access. For instance, the Kennedy campaign got a jump on collecting signatures in Nevada to get on the ballot, but because RFK Jr. hadn't announced a running mate yet they had to be tossed out. In the end, Kennedy only made the ballot in 15 states before he ended his campaign. Additionally, there are already Trump-aligned groups ready to combat any of Musk's efforts. In late June, two of Trump's top political advisers, Chris LaCivita and Tony Fabrizio, launched MAGA Kentucky, a super PAC designed with one purpose - damage Massie. One of MAGA Kentucky's first ads blasted Massie as an acolyte of uber-liberals Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and likening him to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei for questioning Trump's bombing campaign of Iran. Musk vowed to help the libertarian congressman but has made no moves to since. Fishback, the CEO of the investment firm Azoria, poured a million dollars of his own money to a new super PAC that was named to troll Musk. The group is called FSD PAC as 'FSD' in Tesla parlance means 'full self-driving' cars. But in the political world, Fishback wanted the acronym to mean 'Full Support for Donald.' The PAC will deploy a whack-a-mole type strategy, waiting for Musk to pop his head up. If Musk funds a candidate, FSD PAC will finance the Trump-aligned alternative. 'It's a hedge,' Fishback explained to the Daily Mail. 'I hope, by the way, that this is simply an insurance policy,' he added. Trump has his own insurance policy - a massive war chest, with Fox News reporting in late June totals about $1.4 billion. 'This will likely be a headache for Republicans,' Republican strategist Ron Bonjean said of Musk's involvement. 'But with Trump being the fundraiser-in-chief and an already massive billion dollar war chest, money isn't going to be an issue.' However with Musk threatening to run primary challengers against MAGA-aligned Republicans Bonjean warned that 'candidate quality is going matter now more than ever in order to be successful.' Democrats are enthusiastic that Musk and any Musk-aligned candidates could potentially shine more light on two issue areas where they could benefit - the 'big, beautiful bill' and Jeffrey Epstein. 'The 'Big, Beautiful' tax law is Republicans' top liability because it breaks their promises to lower costs and stand up for working people. Musk's attacks on the BBB compound that problem,' observed Andrew Bates, the principal at Wolfpack Strategies, and a veteran of President Joe Biden's press shop. The White House's Deputy Chief of Staff James Blair shrugged off Musk's threats in a gaggle with reporters on Friday.