Welton cancer survivor says smear test change risks lives
Ms Bradbury said all her previous screenings were clear but she developed symptoms, including irregular bleeding, after her last one. The mother-of-three said she was six months away from her next smear but she pushed for tests as she felt something was wrong."When I got told it was cervical cancer, it was a huge shock," she said. "You just think about your children, don't you. You think about the worst case scenario. But it was the worry because obviously my one-and-a-half-year-old would not remember me. It was a very scary time."Ms Bradbury, who was diagnosed in 2020, said she was worried extending the time between screening tests could mean some people going undiagnosed for longer."Five years seems a long time," she said. "There's going to be a lot of people whose diagnosis are going to get missed because of this."
'Really have confidence'
Athena Lamnisos, chief executive of gynae cancer charity The Eve Appeal, said more than 40% of women in England were worried being screened less often is not safe. However, Ms Lamnisos said: "Science has moved on a great deal. The test has moved on considerably. There have been huge trials done around the efficacy of this."The test has become more sensitive and efficient so there are lots of reasons to really have confidence in this change."
The move to five-year intervals brings England into line with Scotland and Wales. Women aged between 50 and 64 are also offered cervical screening every five years. NHS England said the change was based on a recommendation from the UK National Screening Committee."The NHS cervical screening programme tests for human papillomavirus (HPV) and uses a better and more accurate test than before. This means if you test negative for HPV, you don't need to be screened as often as your risk of developing cervical cancer is very low. If you test positive for HPV, we'll monitor you more closely with additional tests and follow-up appointments."This personalised approach ensures everyone receives the right level of screening based on their individual risk factors, providing better protection while reducing unnecessary procedures."Ms Bradbury said she is hoping to get her "five year clear" in November."I often think to myself, when I'm having a bad day, there's people out there that would give anything for my bad day. So I just feel really lucky," she said.
Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
Download the BBC News app from the App Store for iPhone and iPad or Google Play for Android devices
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Woman using weight loss jab Mounjaro reveals shocking side affect that left her permanently struggling to eat
A woman using popular weight loss medication Mounjaro has opened up about a shocking side affect that left her permanently struggling to eat. Kelly started taking the jabs in October after a decade of trying and failing to lose weight and being told she was at risk of developing type two diabetes. The 32-year-old was thrilled to find the pounds dropping off her, but after a few months on it, she noticed a rather unwelcome change: her taste buds had been completely ruined. Now, Kelly explained that she's 'instantly put off' of any food she tries to consume, and even when she is 'starving,' she says nothing sounds appealing. 'Mounjaro has completely changed my taste buds,' the talent executive, from the UK, told NeedToKnow recently. 'I have gone off the taste of food. When I eat, it's because I need it – and not because I enjoy the taste. 'It gets to around 1pm and my belly will rumble, and I'm aware that I'm hungry, but when I make myself a meal – no matter what it is – as soon as I have a bite, I'm instantly put off. 'All of a sudden, I feel full and don't like the taste of what I'm eating. 'If I'm eating a ham sandwich, all I taste is the bread and meat – but I won't enjoy the combination.' Kelly explained that she used to love eating, but now she disdains the entire process and has to force herself to get a few bites in purely for subsistence. 'When I was overweight, I was eating sandwiches and multipacks of [chips] in between meals,' she continued. 'I used to be able to eat, and eat, and eat without ever being full or satisfied. I would eat dinner and order a takeaway straight after! 'I ate purely for enjoyment. Everything that touched my lips was the best thing I'd eaten – and now even a takeaway pizza, which was my go-to, doesn't taste the same.' As soon as she prepares even her favorite dishes, Kelly said she immediately finds she no longer wants the food. 'I know I have to eat. I am trying to avoid food I know I won't like, for example meat and eggs,' she added. 'But if I have to, I force it down because I know my body needs it. Protein shakes have been a life saver for me.' Now, Kelly explained that she's 'instantly put off' of any food she tries to consume, and even when she is 'starving,' nothing sounds appealing. She's seen before and after her weight loss Kelly has been documenting her Mounjaro journey on TikTok, and she recently went viral after she spoke about the shocking affect it has had on her taste buds. In the clip, which garnered 230,000 views, she spoke about how it was 'such a struggle' for her to eat since she no longer enjoys the taste of food. She tried foods including spaghetti Bolognese, sushi, a protein bar and strawberries – and was seen visibly disgusted by most of them, particularly the sushi. Kelly, who has lost just over 50 pounds since starting the drug in October, explained that despite the change to her taste buds, she is happy that it's helped he drop from a size 18 to 12. She said: 'Regardless of what I am going through, I'm continuing to buy it because I'm losing weight, I'm almost at my goal.' Kelly says her quality of life has increased massively since shedding the excess weight. She explained that it's also boosted her self esteem, with her now weighing just 161 pounds and fitting into clothes she never thought she could. She said: 'When I was overweight, I was looking into weight loss surgeries and receiving counselling for my self-esteem. 'I now look in the mirror and I don't completely hate myself. I receive compliments all the time about how much better I look and it really boosts my mood. 'I can fit into clothes I never thought I could instead of just wearing black baggy clothes all the time. 'I can run up a flight of stairs without almost dying at the top. I can now play with my children without being out of breath and I am no longer ashamed to be in pictures with them.' In the end, she said she is trying to view the change to her taste buds as a good thing because it stops her from overeating. 'I feel like it has massively changed my relationship with food – I've learned that food is a need, not a want,' she concluded. 'I don't need to eat for the taste and I don't let it rule my life. I eat and I get on with my day. 'Whereas before I would lie in bed at night and think about what I was having for dinner the next day.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
I'm a podiatrist - here are three huge mistakes people make with their feet
A leading foot health expert has revealed three disastrous—and surprisingly common—mistakes people make when it comes to looking after their feet. Maddie Tait, a London-based podiatrist, says that wearing shoes that are too small, failing to moisturise the feet, and relying on flip-flops can all lead to painful problems including blisters, swelling, cracked heels and callouses. In a recent video posted on her TikTok account @mtpodiatry, she said the single most damaging habit is wearing shoes that are too tight. 'Your feet will swell and expand during the day,' she said. 'So, you'll most likely cause a blister quite quickly.' Blisters are small, fluid-filled pockets that form under the skin due to friction—typically on the feet. While painful, the NHS warns against popping them, as doing so can increase the risk of infection. To help a blister heal and prevent infection, pharmacists can recommend a plaster or dressing to keep the area clean and protected. Last year, a poll of 2,000 adults found 44 per cent of people had developed foot issues like bunions and callouses from wearing shoes that are too small. The survey, commissioned by DB Wider Fit Shoes, also found that bunions impaired 36 per cent of people's ability to walk. Bunions are bony bumps that form on the joint at the base of the big toe, forcing it to lean inwards towards the smaller toes. They can be extremely painful and are typically caused by ill-fitting shoes or inherited structural issues in the foot. If you're unfortunate enough to develop a bunion, treatment options include surgery or non-surgical measures such as pain relief and wearing wider-fitting footwear. Another common issue is calluses—thickened, hardened patches of skin caused by repeated pressure or friction. These can often be managed at home by soaking the feet in warm water, although in more severe cases, a referral to a foot specialist may be required. The next mistake podiatrist Maddie Tait warns against is failing to moisturise your feet—especially during warmer months. 'During the summer being on the beaches or on the sand or in the sun, our feet need a bit more moisturiser,' she said. 'We can develop cracked heals or corns or callus so, make sure you moisturise your feet throughout the year, but definitely in the summer.' In contrast to calluses, corns are smaller, typically round or oval, and can be quite painful do to pressure on deeper layers of the skin. The NHS advice for corns is also to soak them in warm water to soften them, but again, in some cases they may need specialist treatments. If either a corn or a callus or corn appears inflamed or is oozing pus or clear fluid it may be infected and need antibiotic treatment. The third mistake she warned against was wearing flat flip flops when you're out walking. She said: 'I don't mind them around the beach, or around the pool, but I would not recommend that you walk too far in the classic thong style sandals.' While wearing flip flops for short distances isn't likely harmful, walking in them for long periods of time can put you at risk of problems. Previously studies have shown that when people wear flip-flops, they take shorter steps and often curl their toes to keep them on. This has been found to the natural gait and reduces muscle engagement which over time can cause foot and joint pain. It isn't only dangerous to your foot health as other studies have shown wearing flip flops while driving is linked to serious road accidents.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
NHS facing ‘absolutely shocking' £27bn bill for maternity failings in England
The NHS is facing an 'absolutely shocking' £27bn bill for maternity failings in England, the Guardian can reveal, after a series of hospital scandals triggered a record level of legal claims. Hundreds of babies and women have died or suffered life-altering conditions as a result of botched care in NHS trusts across the country in recent years, prompting the government to launch a 'rapid' national inquiry. Analysis of NHS figures shows the potential bill for maternity negligence in England since 2019 has reached £27.4bn – far more than the health service's roughly £18bn budget for newborns in that time. The number of families taking legal action against the NHS for obstetrics errors rose to a record of nearly 1,400 a year in 2023 – or 115 a week, double the number in 2007, according to figures released under the Freedom of Information (FoI) Act. Labour MP Paulette Hamilton, the acting chair of the Commons health and social care select committee, said the figures were 'absolutely shocking' and represented a 'devastatingly high number of deaths and injuries of mothers and babies'. She added: 'The words 'eye-watering' come nowhere near to describing the enormous financial cost of these cases to the NHS, arising from failings within its own provision of care.' An NHS source said about half of the 1,400 claims a year may not result in compensation payouts, so the amount paid out would be lower. However, compensation only accounts for part of the total 27bn figure, a larger share being legal costs. In the past six years, the NHS has spent £24.6m on legal fees for claims that did not result in damages. NHS Resolution, the organisation that handles negligence claims for the NHS trusts in England, recorded in its most recent annual report, published on Thursday, that the cost of settling all maternity-related claims was £37.5bn. This amounts to nearly two-thirds of its total £60bn clinical negligence liabilities bill, a sum described by senior MPs as 'jaw-dropping'. Jeremy Hunt, the former Conservative health secretary, said: 'It should be a matter of national shame that we now spend more on maternity litigation than the total cost of running maternity services.' Hunt said the NHS was still not doing enough to learn from mistakes and the biggest problem was that clinicians fear being sacked for admitting errors. Jess Brown-Fuller, the Liberal Democrat hospitals spokesperson, accused the Conservatives of a 'scandalous' neglect of maternity services. She added: 'The crisis in our maternity services is being laid bare through the trauma that so many families have to deal with. Now these figures are showing just how much damage it is causing to our health service.' The £27.4bn figure is the estimated value of maternity claims arising out of incidents since April 2019. NHS Resolution said the figure could change as there is an average three-year gap between an incident and a legal claim, the most serious birth injuries resulting in payments made over several years – and sometimes for the duration of the child's life. The figures have been revealed amid growing alarm about the state of maternity care in NHS hospitals across England. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, last month ordered a national investigation into 'failing' services for women and babies, following a series of scandals in Shrewsbury and Telford, Nottingham, Barrow-in-Furness, Leeds and elsewhere. Inspections of 131 NHS maternity units across England classed as many as two-thirds as 'inadequate' or 'requires improvement' for safety between 2022 and 2024. The Care Quality Commission, the healthcare regulator, said issues including staff shortages were 'systemic' and 'widespread', with almost half of the 131 maternity units it reviewed performing below standard. Hamilton said the state of maternity care in the UK was 'completely unacceptable'. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Previously unreported FoI figures show the NHS paid out £134m in the nine years to March 2023 to the families of nearly 300 women and about 400 babies who died in NHS settings. However, the biggest settlements were for clinical errors that resulted in severe long-term disabilities, for which the NHS is liable for the lifetime costs of the child's care. As much as £1.7bn was paid out over failures to respond to abnormal foetal heart rates and £1.55bn for failing to properly monitor second-stage labour between 2006 and 2024. A further £247m was paid out over birth defects owing to clinical negligence. Natalie Richardson, a medical negligence solicitor for Patient Claim Line, said there had been a 79% increase in the number of birth and pregnancy cases the firm had taken on this year. Leeds teaching hospitals NHS trust, whose maternity units were last month downgraded to inadequate over safety concerns, paid out nearly £72m in compensation due to 107 obstetrics failings in the nine years to March 2024 – including 13 fatalities and 14 stillbirths. In the same period, Nottingham University hospitals NHS trust was ordered to pay nearly £60m for 80 clinical damages claims related to pregnancies – including seven deaths. That trust is at the centre of a vast criminal investigation into suspected corporate manslaughter over the severe harm of potentially more than 2,000 babies and women. The Department of Health and Social Care said it had inherited 'an unacceptable situation where too many families are suffering from botched care' and the NHS is 'paying billions for its mistakes, rather than fixing them'. It added: 'We are committed to breaking that cycle and providing mothers and babies with safe, compassionate care once and for all.' NHS England said it was taking immediate steps to strengthen maternity services, including closer oversight of underperforming trusts. It added: 'We recognise that too many women and families are not receiving the high-quality maternity care they deserve, and we are committed to changing this.' NHS Resolution said: 'The high cost of compensation arising in maternity comes from a small number of very serious incidents resulting in brain injury to a baby at birth. These incidents are devastating for families and reflect the need to make provision for lifelong and complex care needs.'
