Man dies of infection and untreated wound at hospital-affiliated nursing home
Sanford Senior Care is part of the Sanford Medical Center complex in Sheldon, Iowa. (Photo via Google Earth)
A hospital-affiliated nursing home in northwest Iowa has been cited for contributing to the death of a resident.
State and federal records show that in January, the staff at Sanford Senior Care in Sheldon, which is a 70-bed nursing home affiliated with the Sanford Medical Center, found that a male resident of the home had developed a reddened area on his coccyx. The staff failed to assess and treat the situation or notify the man's family or physician — even after it developed into an open sore in February, according to inspectors.
A nurse aide later told state inspectors that she informed a nurse on March 4 that the area around the wound 'looked like hamburger' and there was blood seeping through the white cream the staff had applied to the wound. The aide reported her observations to a nurse, who later acknowledged to inspectors that she had received the information but was too busy to check the wound herself.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
On March 6, the resident was admitted to the hospital's emergency room with a Stage 4 wound, indicating there was sufficient loss of tissue to result in exposed bone, muscles or tendons, with the potential for a serious complication such as an infection.
The resident died two days later. According to state inspectors, the immediate cause of death was MRSA cellulitis — a dangerous skin infection that stems from staph bacteria — caused by the open wound.
A second nurse aide interviewed by inspectors allegedly reported that the last time she examined the man's wound 'it looked absolutely awful,' and the resident's overall color was 'off' and he appeared gray and purple. 'There was bloody skin on both sides of the buttocks and continuing down it looked like hamburger,' the aide reportedly told inspectors.
The facility's director of nursing allegedly informed inspectors that certain employees were disciplined as a result of the death, adding, 'We are trying to do everything possible to prevent this from occurring again.'
Senate passes bill on nursing home reviews, rejects Democrats' calls for more oversight
Administrator Richard Nordahl referred all questions on the matter to Sanford Health. A spokesperson for the company indicated Tuesday that he was unable to comment on the matter at that time.
No state fines were imposed as a result of the death. Federal records indicate the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services imposed a civil money penalty of some kind, but a CMS spokesperson was unable to say Tuesday what that fine totaled.
CMS' Care Compare website, which provides information for consumers that is often out of date, indicates Sanford Senior Care in Sheldon has been fined twice in the past three years, most recently in 2024 when it was fined $11,872.
On CMS' five-star quality scale, the Sheldon facility currently has a one-star overall rating — the lowest possible score.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Legislature to repeal MinnesotaCare for undocumented adults
Demonstrators gather for a protest organized by the Minnesota Immigrant Rights Action Committee calling for the continuation of MinnesotaCare for undocumented adults at the Minnesota State Capitol Tuesday, May 27, 2025. (Photo by Nicole Neri/Minnesota Reformer) Despite Democratic-Farmer-Labor control of the state Senate, the governor's office, and half of the House, Republicans forced Democrats to roll back one of their signature accomplishments from the 2023 legislative session: health care for undocumented people. The Legislature is expected to vote Monday to repeal undocumented adults' eligibility for MinnesotaCare, the state-subsidized health insurance program for the working poor. Children would still be covered. Republicans successfully used their leverage — the threat of a government shutdown starting July 1 — to force the Democrats' hand on an issue that is of supreme importance to GOP lawmakers. The DFL pulled out all nearly of the stops to avoid cutting health care access for undocumented adults. During negotiations, DFL leaders offered Republicans concessions related to paid leave, earned sick and safe time, and noncompete agreements — but Republicans didn't budge, said Sen. Alice Mann, DFL-Edina. 'They turned all of those things down, because all they wanted…was to make sure that the 17,000 people were left out to die, that we worsen our health care system and that we decrease our tax revenue,' Mann said at a press conference Monday decrying the move. When Gov. Tim Walz and legislative leaders announced a budget deal — contingent on repealing MinnesotaCare eligibility for undocumented adults — on May 15, lawmakers with the People of Color Indigenous Caucus protested outside the door. They told reporters later that they were blindsided by the deal. After the announcement, POCI caucus members brought alternatives to legislative leaders, said Rep. Liish Kozlowski, DFL-Duluth. The POCI caucus suggested capping undocumented enrollment in MinnesotaCare, raising premiums, allowing children currently enrolled to retain coverage instead of aging out, or making exceptions for elderly people or those with chronic conditions. None of those options made it into the bill, which is expected to be heard first on the House floor during a 21-hour special session beginning at 10 a.m. Republicans have repeatedly exaggerated the cost of providing health care to undocumented people enrolled in MinnesotaCare. Enrollment has exceeded the state's expectations, however, with more than 17,000 undocumented people currently enrolled. Meanwhile, per-person spending on the undocumented population has been lower than expected, according to the Department of Human Services. Federal politics and funding have complicated the issue: A budget bill passed by the GOP-controlled U.S. House would cut funding to states that provide health care to undocumented people, including Minnesota. And while the federal government pays for some of the cost of MinnesotaCare, it doesn't contribute any money for undocumented enrollees. Walz is expected to sign the bill into law.


Business Wire
3 hours ago
- Business Wire
Sesen Launches with a Singular Mission: Advancing Life Sciences Globally Through Specialized Language Solutions
BOSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Today marks the official launch of Sesen, a next-generation language services company purpose-built to meet the complex demands of the life sciences industry. Specializing exclusively in translation, localization, and AI-enhanced linguistic solutions for pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device, CRO, and regulatory organizations, Sesen combines industry expertise with cutting-edge technology to deliver fast, accurate, and fully compliant multilingual communications across 150+ languages. Built by industry veterans, Sesen is redefining how life sciences companies manage language workflows, from clinical trial documentation and regulatory labeling to patient communications and digital health platforms. At the core of its offering is SesenGPT, a proprietary AI engine trained on life sciences terminology and optimized for medical and regulatory content. Key Capabilities Include: Regulatory-compliant translations aligned with EMA, FDA, and PMDA guidelines ISO 17100, ISO 9001:2015, and ISO 13485:2016 certified quality management AI-enabled hybrid workflows for clinical trial translations, pharmacovigilance, and labeling Native linguists and MD/PhD medical reviewers for domain-specific accuracy Scalable language solutions integrated with sponsor CMS and eTMF systems 'Life sciences innovation is increasingly global, but language remains a critical barrier,' said Dr. Vladimir Misik, VP of Global Clinical Trial Strategy. 'We launched Sesen to solve this challenge with unmatched specialization, seamless technology integration, and the linguistic precision this industry demands.' Diego Di Leva, Sesen's VP of Global Operations, and a certified ISO 9001 and ISO 13485 auditor, added: "At Sesen, language quality is not an afterthought, it's built into the DNA of every project. Our quality assurance framework is grounded in international standards and supported by linguists with deep domain expertise, ensuring every deliverable meets the highest regulatory and scientific expectations." With a growing network of linguists, in-country reviewers, and regulatory consultants, Sesen supports top pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies with on-time, compliant delivery of multilingual assets for product launches, clinical trials, and regulatory submissions. About Sesen Sesen is a specialized language solutions provider exclusively serving the life sciences industry. Focused on clinical, regulatory, and commercial translation, Sesen supports pharmaceutical, biotech, medical device, and CRO clients in 150+ languages. The company combines native linguists, medical professionals, and ISO-certified workflows with proprietary AI technology to deliver faster, more accurate, and compliant content. From clinical trial support to product localization, Sesen enables life sciences organizations to operate with linguistic confidence and regulatory precision.


Politico
4 hours ago
- Politico
Is Rubio's PEPFAR claim ‘made up'?
Presented by With Carmen Paun and Robert King Driving the day SHOW ME THE MONEY — Democrats are sparring with Secretary of State Marco Rubio over the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, the HIV and AIDS program credited with saving millions of lives in poor countries, Carmen, Amanda Friedman and Robert report. President Donald Trump shut down the agency that signed off on most PEPFAR spending and fired staffers who supported it. Democrats say the administration is lying about the state of the program following massive foreign aid cuts led by Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency. Rubio has suggested those concerns are overblown, considering that PEPFAR remains '85 percent operative,' a claim that he made repeatedly in budget testimony before Congress. But neither Rubio nor the State Department will provide a detailed accounting to back up the figure. Dems say: 'It's made up,' Hawaii Sen. Brian Schatz said when asked by POLITICO about the 85 percent figure. 'It's the most successful, bipartisan, highly efficient life-saving thing that the United States has ever done, and Elon Musk went in and trashed it.' Schatz confronted Rubio about the cuts at a Foreign Relations Committee hearing in May, telling him: 'You are required to spend 100 percent of the money.' Rubio's retort: Rubio said the 15 percent cut targeted programs that weren't delivering the services the government was paying for. He pointed to fraud in Namibia and armed conflict in Sudan as reasons for slashed funding, although it isn't clear those instances were related to PEPFAR. Asked repeatedly by POLITICO for more clarity on what the 85 percent figure represents, a State Department spokesperson said that 'PEPFAR-funded programs that deliver HIV care and treatment or prevention of mother to child transmission services are operational for a majority of beneficiaries.' Data collection is ongoing to capture recent updates to programming, the spokesperson also said, adding: 'We expect to have updated figures later this year.' The day after his exchange with Schatz, Rubio told the House Foreign Affairs Committee that he meant 85 percent of PEPFAR's beneficiaries were still getting U.S. assistance. But the goal, he said, was to pass off the work to the countries where the beneficiaries live. 'We're by far the most generous nation on Earth on foreign aid, and will continue to be by far with no other equal, including China, despite all this alarmist stuff,' he said. Big picture: For flummoxed Democrats, the tussle with Rubio indicates a broader problem: How to respond to Trump's budget requests when his administration refuses to spend the money Congress has provided. Trump last month asked Congress to cut PEPFAR's budget for next year by 40 percent. WELCOME TO MONDAY PULSE. I'm Erin Schumaker, POLITICO's National Institutes of Health reporter, filling in today for Kelly. Are you a current or former NIH employee considering a job offer abroad? Shoot me a message! Send your tips, scoops and feedback to eschumaker@ and khooper@ and follow along @erinlschumaker and @Kelhoops. Congress RACE TO FINISH MEGABILL — Senate Republicans could finalize their domestic policy megabill this week, Robert reports, finally tackling Medicaid changes. Republicans are expected to release text for the Medicaid portion of the spending package, which seeks to extend President Donald Trump's tax cuts. The megabill includes changes to Medicaid, like restrictions on eligibility, to help generate more than $700 billion in savings to pay for the tax cuts. Senate Republicans generally agree on adding work requirements, which will mandate some able-bodied beneficiaries complete 80 hours a month of work, job training or another activity. There are exemptions for pregnant women and disabled people, among others. But there are some disagreements surrounding states' ability to levy taxes on hospitals and other providers to pay for their share of Medicaid, which is funded jointly by the federal and state governments. The House version places a moratorium on new state provider taxes but leaves current ones intact. But the question is whether the moratorium will remain intact in the Senate bill, which leadership aims to pass before July 4. Insurance PUSH AGAINST MEDICARE ADVANTAGE CHANGES — A key insurer-backed advocacy group is trying to block Senate Republicans from changing the popular Medicare Advantage program to find savings for their domestic policy megabill, Robert reports. The Better Medicare Alliance, which includes insurers among its members and advocates for Medicare Advantage, is running ads in the Washington Reporter calling for Republicans to protect the program that enables older Americans to buy private insurance plans offering benefits not covered by traditional Medicare, like dental. The group said it will also share polling data with lawmakers that shows older Americans overwhelmingly oppose the changes being discussed. 'Cutting Medicare Advantage, and particularly in-home care, would break a promise to millions of seniors who rely on it,' said Mary Beth Donahue, president and CEO of the Better Medicare Alliance. Last week, Senate Republicans weighed whether to add a bill co-sponsored by Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) to the larger package, which seeks to extend President Donald Trump's tax cuts. The legislation, called the No UPCODE Act, clamps down on tools Medicare Advantage plans use to generate higher payments from the federal government. Cassidy pushed back on the attacks from the insurance industry and Democrats who said the legislation cuts benefits. 'We're taking care of patients and we're trying to rescue the program,' he said in a statement. 'To say the No UPCODE Act has bipartisan support is an understatement. This addresses an issue both Republicans and Democrats have called waste, fraud and abuse.' Merkley said in a statement that he still supports the legislation but that it should be considered 'through regular order, not in the context of a partisan bill that will end up leaving 16 million people without healthcare.' The House did consider adding similar language to its bill but eventually backed off. AROUND THE AGENCIES NIH BUDGET TALKS — NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya will testify tomorrow on the agency's budget proposal, which calls for a 40 percent funding cut. The hearing before the Senate Appropriations Labor, HHS, Education and Related Agencies Subcommittee comes amid widespread discontent at the NIH. Last month, members of the NIH fellows union walked out of a town hall Bhattacharya held in protest of cuts to programs, layoffs and funding uncertainty. While Congress will ultimately decide how much money the agency gets, and could restrict how it's dispersed, we'll be watching for how Bhattacharya defends: — The indirect cost rate cap. The budget plan proposes capping at 15 percent the rate the NIH pays for administrative and facilities costs to grantees. But lawmakers, including Republicans, have criticized indirect cost caps, which the NIH first tried to impose in February. A federal court blocked that move, and the administration has appealed. Notably, the NIH budget proposal also asks Congress to stop restricting how the NIH sets indirect cost rates. — Downsizing the NIH. The budget plan suggests consolidating the agency's 27 institutes and centers into an eight-institute structure, eliminating the National Institute of Nursing Research, the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities and the Fogarty International Center, which promotes collaboration with foreign researchers. — Spending this year's budget. While Tuesday's hearing is about the 2026 budget, Bhattacharya is likely to be questioned about this year's budget, too. During a May 29 meeting with disease advocacy organizations, Bhattacharya promised to fully utilize the NIH's fiscal 2025 budget. But with billions of dollars in grants terminated or delayed since Trump was inaugurated, researchers and NIH staffers worry the 2025 budget won't get spent before the fiscal year ends Sept. 30. WHAT WE'RE READING POLITICO's Juan Perez Jr. reports on how President Donald Trump has universities in the bind the right has long wanted. Reuters' P.J. Huffstutter reports on how the Trump administration's aid cuts are straining food banks in Ohio. The Washington Post's Erin Blakemore reports on new research that could explain why the human brain has such large storage capacity.