logo
Explained: The obstruction appeal controversy from India vs England Women 2nd ODI and what the law says

Explained: The obstruction appeal controversy from India vs England Women 2nd ODI and what the law says

First Post4 hours ago
Controversy erupted in the second ODI between India and England Women after the Harmanpreet Kaur-led side appealed for obstructing the field against Tammy Beaumont. read more
The second ODI between India and England Women that took place at the Lord's became a subject of massive controversy after Harmanpreet Kaur-led side appealed for Obstructing the Field against Tammmy Beaumont. While it certainly appeared that India had a case, the third umpire reached a different conclusion after going through the replays. As a result, the England opener survived and crafted a solid opening stand of 54 runs with Amy Jones, which perfectly set up the 116-run chase in a rain-affected game. Eventually, England won the game by 8 wickets and brought the series level at 1-1.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The match did not offer much when it comes to the contest between bat and ball, but still made headlines owing to the field obstruction incident. The odd episode transpired during the 4th over of the England chase. On the fifth delivery bowled by Deepti Sharma, Tammy Beaumont came down the track, playing a flick to mid-wicket.
More from First Cricket
Team India selectors make course correction as Anshul Kamboj reportedly picked ahead of Harshit Rana as pace back-up
India's appeal turned down by the third umpire
As the ball was collected by fielder Jemimah Rodrigues, who sent it back to the striker's end. However, the visiting team appealed for obstruction of the field. The Indian team believed the England batter deliberately blocked the throw. Paying heed to the appeal, the on-field umpires consulted each other before sending the decision to the third umpire for review.
Replays indicated that wicketkeeper Richa Ghosh failed to collect the ball. At the same time, England batter Beaumont had positioned her foot in the crease as the throw was coming toward Ghosh. Notably, Beaumont's left foot was grounded inside the crease when she moved her right leg. The ball ended up hitting Beaumont's pad, which prompted Ghosh to appeal for obstructing the field.
After taking a good look at the replays, the third umpire came to the decision that it was not out.
Following the culmination of the game, India batter Smriti Mandhana expressed her thoughts on the incident.
'I was not in a really good angle, to be fair, probably it was not visible at all. Jemmi definitely felt that maybe she kicked it or something. They referred it, and it was not out, so I'm sure that they should have seen all the angles. That's the only view I have on it,' Mandhana told reporters.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'But I was in no angle, to be fair, to see what happened. At mid-on, you don't see what exactly happened from that way. So, not being diplomatic, but genuinely, I did not see it,' she added.
What does the law say?
According to the game's laws, being back in the crease doesn't exempt a batter from being given out for obstructing the field. The ball was still in play, so it wasn't considered dead. However, laws specify a batter won't be out if the obstruction was accidental or done to avoid injury.
37.1.1 in MCC's law book states, 'Either batter is out Obstructing the field if, except in the circumstances of 37.2, and while the ball is in play, he/she wilfully attempts to obstruct or distract the fielding side by word or action.'
37.1.2 states, 'The striker is out Obstructing the field if, except in the circumstances of 37.2, in the act of receiving a ball delivered by the bowler, he/she wilfully strikes the ball with a hand not holding the bat. This will apply whether it is the first strike or a second or subsequent strike. The act of receiving the ball shall extend both to playing at the ball and to striking the ball more than once in defence of his/her wicket.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The incident that took place in the second ODI between India and England Women brought back the memories of the famous dismissals of Yusuf Pathan from IPL 2013 and Inzamam-ul-Haq from India's 2005/06 tour of Pakistan.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

WCL sponsors BREAK silence after much-anticipated India vs Pakistan clash gets cancelled due to…
WCL sponsors BREAK silence after much-anticipated India vs Pakistan clash gets cancelled due to…

India.com

time2 minutes ago

  • India.com

WCL sponsors BREAK silence after much-anticipated India vs Pakistan clash gets cancelled due to…

WCL sponsors BREAK silence after much-anticipated India vs Pakistan clash gets cancelled due to… EaseMyTrip, a major WCL sponsor, clarified on social media that they had previously cleared they won't be connected to any WCL match that featured Pakistan. By Sruti Thakur Edited by Sruti Thakur Advertisement Suresh Raina (L), Shahid Afridi (R0 The World Championship of Legends (WCL) 2025 match between the champions of India and Pakistan, which was supposed to take place on Saturday, July 20 at Edgbaston, Birmingham, has been canceled. The decision was taken following widespread fan outrage and a number of players decision to boycott in protest of the terrible Pahalgam terrorist attack in April, which killed numerous innocent civilians. The League sponsor EaseMyTrip has now released a statement about the situation, as fans will not be able to witness the match between Shahid Afridi and Mohammad Hafeez and the likes of Yuvraj Singh, Harbhajan Singh, and Suresh Raina. Advertisement === EaseMyTrip's official statement on Ind vs Pak clash in WCL 2025 EaseMyTrip clarified through social media that they won't be associated with any WCL match featuring Pakistan. Advertisement === 'Despite entering into a 5-year sponsorship agreement with the World Championship of Legends (WCL) two years ago, our stance has always been clear—EaseMyTrip will not be associated with or participate in any WCL match involving Pakistan. We proudly continue to support the India Champions and stand firmly by our team,' the statement read. 'However, as a matter of principle, we do not support or promote any match that includes Pakistan. This position was communicated unambiguously to the WCL team from the beginning. EaseMyTrip supports Team India, but will not engage in any match featuring Pakistan. Let's bring the cup home. Bharat First. Always,' the statement further read. Official Statement from EaseMyTrip Despite entering into a 5-year sponsorship agreement with the World Championship of Legends (WCL) two years ago, our stance has always been clear—EaseMyTrip will not be associated with or participate in any WCL match involving Pakistan We… — (@EaseMyTrip) July 19, 2025 Shikhar Dhawan, along with several player boycotts Ind vs Pak match Several Indian players had already pulled out before the match between the champions of India and Pakistan was formally canceled. Former Indian opener Shikhar Dhawan made a public announcement on social media on the evening of July 19 that he would not be participating in the game. 'Jo kadam 11 May ko liya, uspe aaj bhi waise hi khada hoon. Mera desh mere liye sab kuch hai, aur desh se badhkar kuch nahi hota (The step I took on May 11, I still stand by it today. My country means everything to me—nothing comes above the nation.),' Dhawan wrote. According to a previous Revsportz report, on July 20, Yusuf Pathan, Irfan Pathan, Suresh Raina, and Harbhajan Singh all withdrew from the match.

Nishant Dev defeats LaQuan Evans, wins his third professional boxing bout
Nishant Dev defeats LaQuan Evans, wins his third professional boxing bout

Indian Express

time2 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Nishant Dev defeats LaQuan Evans, wins his third professional boxing bout

Indian professional boxer Nishant Dev continued his winning start to his professional boxing, registering a win via technical knockout (TKO) in his third career bout against USA's LaQuan Evans in Texas on Saturday. He was fighting in the undercard of the bout between Jesse Rodriguez and Phumelela Cafu. It was a dominant win for the Indian boxer from Haryana as he landed clean blows from the first round. While Evans started attacking, Nishant did well to evade his initial punches and pushed him in the corner to land some clean blows. He continued this strategy of cornering Evans and landing punches on him throughout the bout. While Evans held off for the five rounds, in the sixth round an upper cut from Nishant caught Evans off-guard resulting in him loosing the footing. In his last action, Nishant unleashed a flurry of punches and completely overwhelmed Evans. With one minutes and two seconds left on the clock, the referee intervened to declare Nishant winner by TKO. Nishant forces the stoppage in the sixth and final round 👏 #RodriguezCafu — Matchroom Boxing (@MatchroomBoxing) July 19, 2025 A technical knockout or TKO is called when a boxer is unable to continue the fight safely due to any injury or is unable to defend themselves safely. This is third career win for Nishant who turned professional in January winning his debut bout against Alton Wiggins by knockout. He then registered an unanimous decision win over Josue Silva in his second bout last month. Nishant is a former Olympian and World Championship medallist who signed with Eddie Hearn led boxing promotion Matchroom Boxing in January, months after his heartbreaking loss to Marco Verde of Mexico in the 2024 Paris Olympics quarterfinal. Pursued by his coach Ronald Simms, Nishant decided to quit on the Olympic dream and follow his childhood dream of becoming a professional boxing. Earlier in an interview with the Indian Express, Nishant mentioned, 'I was talking to Ronald during that time, and he asked me to travel to the USA and train with him for a few days. This was the same time around last year when the future of boxing was uncertain in the Olympic programme. A lot of people in the boxing community recognised me because of the quarter-final bout and also because I had fought USA's Omari Jones in the first Olympic qualifiers.' After training in the US for three months, Nishant received a call from Eddie Hearn, the British promoter who heads Matchroom Boxing. 'When Eddie called and asked me to join… I didn't think twice. It was about realizing the dream I saw as a 15-year-old when I stepped in the boxing ring for the first time.'

England remains destination for WTC finals, ECB to host next three editions
England remains destination for WTC finals, ECB to host next three editions

News18

time6 minutes ago

  • News18

England remains destination for WTC finals, ECB to host next three editions

Agency: PTI Last Updated: Singapore, Jul 20 (PTI) The International Cricket Council (ICC) on Sunday awarded the hosting rights for the next three editions of World Test Championship finals to England. The global body made the decision at its annual conference which concluded here Sunday. The three WTC finals scheduled in 2027, 2029 and 2031 after completion of two year cycles will in all likelihood be held in June, which is the time for the cricket season in England. The England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) has already hosted the 2021 final in Southampton (India vs New Zealand), 2023 summit clash at the Oval in London (India vs Australia) and the 2025 edition finale at the Lord's (South Africa vs Australia). '…..the England and Wales Cricket Board have been awarded hosting rights for the next three World Test Championship Finals. The first three editions of the WTC Final were held at different venues in England, with Lord's hosting the most recent final between South Africa and Australia last month," the ICC stated in a release. Since the scheduling of the WTC cycle is such that only possible country where there is likely to be least weather intervention in June is England. Australia's cricket season runs from October to March. 'We are absolutely delighted that England and Wales has been chosen to host the next three ICC World Test Championship Finals," Richard Gould, ECB CEO, said. 'It's a testament to the passion that fans in this country have for this treasured format of the game and the willingness of supporters from around the world to travel here for these games. 'Hosting these finals is a privilege, and we look forward to working with the ICC to build on the success of the previous editions," he added. In case of India, Test cricket isn't the most popular format and if India doesn't play the final, then there would be bare minimum footfalls even if top cricketing nations play the summit clash. New Associate Members ================ The ICC also welcomed two new members in Timor Leste Cricket Federation and Zambia Cricket Union which were included as Associate Members, taking the ICC's total membership to 110. USA Cricket given 3 months to set house in Order =============================== Among other decisions, the USA Cricket has been given three additional months to undertake comprehensive governance reforms, including but not limited to completing free and fair elections within the period. USA Cricket has been facing non compliance issue for the longest time and there is a suspension looming large on the immediate regime if they don't set their house on order. New Members in ICC CEC =============== Among other announcements, Mr Gurumurthy Palani (France Cricket), Mr Anuraag Bhatnagar (Cricket Hong Kong, China) and Mr Gurdeep Klair (Cricket Canada) were elected to the ICC Chief Executives' Committee (CEC) as Associate Member representatives. PTI KHS AT KHS AT AT AT view comments First Published: July 20, 2025, 19:45 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store