logo
Europe Ukraine latest: EU leaders hold emergency talks on increasing military spending for Ukraine

Europe Ukraine latest: EU leaders hold emergency talks on increasing military spending for Ukraine

The Hill06-03-2025

European Union leaders are holding emergency talks on Thursday on ways to quickly increase their military budgets after the Trump administration signaled that Europe must take care of its own security and also suspended assistance to Ukraine.
In just over a month, President Donald Trump has overturned old certainties about U.S. reliability as a security partner, as he embraces Russia and withdraws American support for Ukraine.
On Monday, Trump ordered a pause to U.S. military supplies to Ukraine as he sought to press President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to engage in negotiations to end the war with Russia, bringing fresh urgency to the EU summit in Brussels.
___
Here's the latest:
Russia defends its vetoes on UN resolution mentioning Ukraine invasion
Moscow vetoed European amendments last month that would have added Russia's responsibility for invading its smaller neighbor. The U.N. Security Council resolution was adopted on Feb. 24 with its five European members abstaining.
Russia's deputy ambassador Dmitry Polyansky told the General Assembly on Thursday that Moscow highly values the Trump administration's peace initiative.
Polyansky called the U.S. resolution 'a step in the right direction and grounds for further efforts for a peaceful solution to the Ukraine crisis.'
Many European countries followed Polyansky to the assembly's podium to denounce Russia's invasion as a violation of the U.N. Charter which requires every U.N. member to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all countries, and to demand Russian troops withdraw from Ukraine.
And about those billions in frozen Russian assets…
Most of the assets frozen in Europe are in Belgium at the securities depositary Euroclear.
Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever said at the summit Thursday: ″I advocate great caution when it comes to those frozen assets.″
He called the frozen assets 'a chicken that also lays golden eggs' which can be used to help Ukraine.
'Countries that are already calling for the confiscation of those funds, they should be well aware of the economic risks they are taking,' he said. 'That is something that can really shock the world financial order. You should not take that lightly.'
European leaders hesitate to seize Russia's frozen billions
That's despite urging from Ukraine and front-line governments in the Baltic states and Poland, who want to seize some 210 billion euros ($227 billion) in Russian central bank reserves that have been frozen in the European financial system since the start of the war.
Officials in France and Germany have resisted due to concerns about legal obstacles and potentially undermining confidence in the euro and its associated financial system. So far the Group of Seven countries have used only the accumulating interest on the money to fund $50 billion in assistance for Ukraine.
The G-7 say the money will stay frozen 'until Russia ceases its aggression and pays for the damage it has caused.' Countries bordering Russia want to use it to pay for Ukraine's reconstruction.
Bulgarian PM: 'Europe is weak without the United States'
'Europe is weak without the United States,' Bulgarian Prime Minister Rosen Zhelyazkov told reporters in Brussels on Thursday. He voiced hope that 'the U.S. remains committed to our collective security, which is based on shared values.'
Zhelyazkov said that no decisions regarding peace in Ukraine should be made without Ukraine's involvement and that 'negotiations about Europe's security must be conducted by Europe and for Europe.' Asked about the kind of peace being pursued, he said, 'When the rule of law is confronted by the law of force, Europe must be prepared.'
Bulgaria insists that funding for rearmament should not come at the expense of EU cohesion funds, but by redirecting unspent money from EU's COVID-19 recovery fund toward the country's defense industry.
How big is French nuclear arsenal?
The talk about possibly ″sharing'' France's nuclear arsenal around Europe raises many questions, among them: How big is it?
The Federation of American Scientists, or FAS, estimates that all together, the United States and Russia possess approximately 88% of the world's total inventory of nuclear weapons — more than 5,000 each.
They are followed at a distance by China, and France is in fourth position with an estimated 290 nuclear warheads. The U.K. has an estimated 225, according to the federation. The FAS notes that the exact number of weapons in each country's possession is unknown because it's a closely held national secret.
EU leaders finish working lunch with Zelenskyy
The EU's 27 leaders have finished a working lunch with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Meal-time discussions are unscripted, and the heads of state and government can freely speak, often in English, but also in their own languages without any obvious time constraints.
Early Thursday morning, EU envoys finished drafting a summit statement for the leaders to endorse. The text, seen by The Associated Press, insists there can be no negotiations on Ukraine without Ukraine and that the Europeans must be involved in any talks involving their security.
The text could still change before the summit concludes. It also says that a ceasefire can only happen as part of a process leading to a full peace agreement. Any agreement, the leaders would say, must be accompanied by 'robust and credible security guarantees for Ukraine.'
Hungary has threatened to veto parts of the statement relating to Ukraine, but Prime Minister Viktor Orbán entered the European Council building in Brussels via an alternate entrance, avoiding the waiting media.
Starmer says US remains an essential ally
U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has rejected suggestions that Europe and the United States are at odds over Ukraine and that Britain must pick a side.
Starmer says the U.S. remains an essential ally, and he's working 'to get the U.S., Ukraine and European allies onto the same page so that we can all focus on what matters most, which is lasting peace in Ukraine.'
Speaking on a visit Thursday to a shipyard in northwest England, the British leader repeated his call for a ceasefire to be backed up by robust security guarantees for Ukraine.
He said: 'That guarantee needs a European element, and of course the United Kingdom will step up, we always step up in the cause of peace. But we also need the U.S. to be working with us on that, and that is what I am focusing all my attention on.'
Scholz expresses reservations over French nuclear deterrent
Scholz has expressed his reservations about the idea of using French nuclear weapons to protect other European countries.
In response to questions from journalists, the German chancellor referred to the existing NATO system of nuclear deterrence, which is based on U.S. nuclear weapons and in which Germany participates.
He says he believes 'that this should not be abandoned — that is the common view of all centrist parties in Germany.'
Lavrov says statements about Russia being a threat to Europe are 'stupid'
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov on Thursday harshly criticized French President Emmanuel Macron's claim that Russia threatens Europe.
'This is a threat to Russia,' Lavrov said at a briefing in Moscow, noting Macron's plan to convene a meeting of top European military officers to discuss purported aggressive plans by Moscow.
Lavrov dismissed the allegations that Russia was hatching plans to attack European nations as 'stupid' and 'delirious nonsense.'
'For any more or less sane person it is completely clear that Russia does not need this,' he said.
Russia rejects Franco-British peace proposal for Ukraine
Russia's Foreign Ministry on Thursday rejected a peace proposal from France and Britain, describing it as an attempt by Kyiv's European allies to offer a break to the embattled Ukrainian army.
The ministry's spokesperson, Maria Zakharova, said that the proposed break in air and naval attacks is an attempt to 'secure a pause for the agonizing Kyiv regime, the Ukrainian armed forces and prevent the front from collapsing.'
She said that Ukraine would use any pause in fighting to strengthen its military, which would lead to prolonged conflict.
Merz, Germany's likely next chancellor, isn't part of EU summit
Friedrich Merz, who will most likely become Germany's next chancellor in a few weeks, won't be participating in Thursday's EU summit.
But the center-right politician who won the country' election last month did meet several top European leaders ahead of the summit in Brussels, including European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and the bloc's foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas.
On X, Merz writes that he agrees with both on sharply increasing Europe's s defense capabilities. He stresses that 'we must be able to defend ourselves so that we don't have to defend ourselves.' He adds, 'there can only be peace in Europe if we are strong.'
UK says about 20 nations involved in talks about protecting peace in Ukraine
The British government says plans are advancing for a multinational military force to help protect peace in Ukraine, with about 20 countries involved in talks.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer's office says officials from some 20 nations attended a planning meeting organized by the U.K. on Wednesday. Spokesman Tom Wells said the 'interested countries' came largely from Europe and the Commonwealth. He did not identify any of the countries.
Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron have proposed a 'coalition of the willing' to defend Ukraine and guarantee the peace after a ceasefire. Only the U.K. and France have so far said they are willing to send troops.
Lavrov warns Russia won't accept NATO troops as peacekeepers in Ukraine
Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov warned that Moscow wouldn't accept any troops from NATO members as peacekeepers to monitor a possible peace deal in Ukraine.
Lavrov assailed French President Emmanuel Macron and U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer for pushing the proposal for European peacekeepers' deployment to Ukraine and reaffirmed that Russia won't accept it.
'We aren't seeing any room for compromise here,' Lavrov said.
He emphasized that Russia would see the move as a 'direct, official and unveiled involvement of NATO members in the war against Russia,' adding that 'it can't be allowed.'
Scholz calls for bigger defense spending in Europe
Germany's Scholz says just as his country is getting ready to massively boost its defense capabilities, all of Europe should plan to make much bigger investments in the military so that the continent is capable of defending itself.
He welcomed the EU initiative to loosen its regulations in order to offer additional borrowing options for member states.
Scholz says he is 'in favor of not just having that discussion now for the next one or two years, but that we ensure in the long term that states can spend as much on defense as they themselves and with their friends and allies see fit.'
In addition, he says, the summit is about 'strengthening our European arms industry by giving us more freedom to cooperate with each other and making procurement easier.'
Spanish prime minister says Europe should be part of Ukraine peace talks
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez told reporters in Brussels that it was too early to speculate what role Europe should play in a possible ceasefire in Ukraine but reiterated that Ukraine and Europe should be present in any negotiations.
He added that Europe shouldn't 'underestimate itself' amid uncertainty about the future of U.S. participation in Ukraine's defense.
EU chief executive says Europe has to be able to defend itself
EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen says 'Europe faces a clear and present danger, and therefore Europe has to be able to protect itself, to defend itself.'
Arriving at the EU summit alongside Zelenskyy, von der Leyen said: 'This is a watershed moment for Europe and Ukraine as part of our European family. It's also a watershed moment for Ukraine.'
Scholz calls on EU to jointly respond to Trump's tariffs
Ahead of the EU summit in Brussels, Scholz called on the European leaders to act jointly in responding to tariffs threatened by U.S. President Donald Trump.
He said that 'Europe is the strongest economic area in the world with its own opportunities. And that is why it is very important that, especially when it comes to tariffs, we are also clear about how we act in this matter — namely united and determined.'
Ukraine's ambassador to UK says US is destroying rules-based order
Ukraine's ambassador to the United Kingdom says the United States is destroying the rules-based international order by cozying up to Russia.
Valerii Zaluzhnyi told a conference hosted by the Chatham House think tank that 'it's not just the axis of evil and Russia' disrupting the global system, 'but the U.S. is finally destroying this order.'
Speaking through an interpreter, Zaluzhnyi said talks between Washington and Moscow over the Ukraine war showed the White House 'makes steps toward the Kremlin, trying to meet them halfway.' He also warned that Russia's next target 'could be Europe.'
The ambassador, a former commander of Ukraine's armed forces, said NATO might cease to exist in the next few years if the current course continues.
Scholz says EU must ensure US support for Ukraine
Scholz says Europe must continue to support Ukraine financially and militarily.
At the same time, he says, 'we must ensure, with a cool and intelligent head, that the support of the USA is also guaranteed in the coming months and years, because Ukraine is also dependent on their support for its defense.'
Outgoing German chancellor throws support behind Ukraine
Outgoing German Chancellor Olaf Scholz told reporters upon arrival at the EU summit in Brussels that 'it is very important that we ensure that Ukraine does not have to accept a dictated peace, but that there will be a fair and just peace that ensures the sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.'
He says he supports concrete proposals such as silencing weapons in the air and sea, no further threats to Ukraine's infrastructure and a prisoner exchange, which 'can lay the foundation for a ceasefire.'
Baltic nations welcome Macron's idea of nuclear deterrent
Baltic nations welcomed French President Emmanuel Macron's proposal for talks about using France's nuclear deterrent to protect the continent from Russian threats.
Lithuania's President Gitanas Nausėda praised a 'very interesting idea' at his arrival at an emergency EU summit on defense and Ukraine in Brussels. 'We have high expectations because nuclear umbrella would serve as really very serious deterrence towards Russia,' Nausėda said.
Latvia Prime Minister Evika Siliņa said she sees the French proposal 'as an opportunity to discuss,' stressing that more time is needed for talks with European allies and at home.
Macron said he has decided to open a 'strategic debate' on the protection of European allies by France's nuclear deterrent. Macron said the use of France's nuclear weapons would remain only in the hands of the French president.
Kremlin criticizes Macron's speech as confrontational
The Kremlin on Thursday dismissed as 'extremely confrontational' a speech by Emmanuel Macron, in which the French president called Moscow a 'threat' to Europe.
In an address to the nation on Wednesday, Macron also said that he's ready to start discussions on nuclear deterrence with European allies.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov during a regular call with journalists said the speech was 'extremely confrontational' and said that it was clear that France wasn't thinking about peace.
'One can conclude that France thinks more about war, about continuing the war,' Peskov added.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov echoed Peskov, saying during a news conference in Moscow that Macron's speech and his comments on discussing nuclear deterrence with European allies were a 'threat' against Russia.
Zelenskyy arrives at EU summit
Zelenskyy arrived at the emergency EU summit on Thursday and thanked European Union leaders for their unwavering support for Ukraine.
'During all this period, and last week, you stayed with us. … Big appreciation. We are very thankful that we are not alone. And these are not just words — we feel it,' Zelenskyy said.
He said EU support for Ukraine 'signals to increase our production, and signals to a new program to increase European security.'
Limited room to increase spending
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has proposed a plan to loosen budget rules so countries that are willing can spend much more on defense. Her proposal is underpinned by 150 billion euros ($162 billion) worth of loans to buy priority military equipment.
Most of the increased defense spending would have to come from national budgets at a time when many countries are already overburdened with debt.
France is struggling to reduce an excessive annual budget deficit of 5% of GDP. Five other countries using the euro currency have debt levels over 100% of GDP: Belgium, Greece, Spain, Italy and Portugal. Europe's largest economy, Germany, has more room to borrow, with a debt level of 62% of GDP.
France steps in to provide military intelligence to Ukraine
France is providing military intelligence to Ukraine after Washington announced it was freezing the sharing of information with Kyiv.
French Defense Minister Sebastien Lecornu said, 'Our intelligence is sovereign. We have intelligence that we allow Ukraine to benefit from.'
He added that following the U.S. decision to suspend all military aid to Ukraine, French President Emmanuel Macron asked him to 'accelerate the various French aid packages' to make up for the lack of American assistance.
Russian ballistic missile kills 4 in Zelenskyy's hometown
In Ukraine, a Russian ballistic missile killed four people staying at a hotel in President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's hometown during the night.
Zelenskyy said a humanitarian organization's volunteers had moved into the hotel in Kryvyi Rih, in central Ukraine, just before the strike, including Ukrainian, American and British nationals. He didn't say whether those people were among the 31 injured.
Russia fired 112 Shahed and decoy drones, as well as two ballistic Iskander missiles, at Ukraine overnight, the Ukrainian air force said.
Flurry of early morning meetings in Brussels
Friedrich Merz, the likely next chancellor of Germany, conferred in Brussels with summit chairman Antonio Costa over breakfast on how to fortify Europe's defenses on a short deadline. Merz only days ago pushed plans to loosen the nation's rules on running up debt to allow for higher defense spending.
At the same time, the 27-nation bloc was waking up to the news that French President Emmanuel Macron would confer with EU leaders about the possibility of using France's nuclear deterrent to protect the continent from Russian threats.
The bloc will 'take decisive steps forward,' Macron told the French nation Wednesday evening. 'Member states will be able to increase their military spending' and 'massive joint funding will be provided to buy and produce some of the most innovative munitions, tanks, weapons and equipment in Europe,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump charts new territory in bypassing Newsom to deploy National Guard
Trump charts new territory in bypassing Newsom to deploy National Guard

Boston Globe

time10 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Trump charts new territory in bypassing Newsom to deploy National Guard

Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Trump invoked a section of the US code that allows the president to bypass a governor's authority over the National Guard and call those troops into federal service when he considers it necessary to repel an invasion or suppress a rebellion, the law states. California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, has sharply criticized the move, saying state and local authorities have the situation under control and accusing Trump of attempting to create a 'spectacle.' Advertisement The directive, announced by the White House late Saturday, came after some protests against immigration raids turned violent, with protesters setting cars aflame and lighting fireworks, and law enforcement in tactical gear using tear gas and stun grenades. Trump claimed in his executive order that the unrest in Southern California was prohibiting the execution of immigration enforcement and therefore met the definition of a rebellion. Advertisement Legal experts said they expect Trump's executive order to draw legal challenges. On Sunday, Newsom asked the Trump administration to rescind his deployment of the National Guard, saying the administration had not followed proper legal procedure in sending them to the state. Trump said the National Guard troops would be used to 'temporarily' protect Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and 'other United States Government personnel who are performing Federal functions, including the enforcement of Federal law, and to protect Federal property, at locations where protests against these functions are occurring or are likely to occur based on current threat assessments and planned operations.' Goitein called Trump's exercise of the statute an 'untested' departure from its use by previous presidents. She said presidents have in the past invoked this section of federal law in conjunction with the Insurrection Act, which Trump did not. The Insurrection Act authorizes the president to deploy armed forces or the National Guard domestically to suppress armed rebellion, riots or other extreme circumstances. It allows US military personnel to perform law enforcement activities - such as making arrests and performing searches - generally prohibited by another law, the Posse Comitatus Act. The last time a president invoked this section of US code in tandem with the Insurrection Act was in 1992, during the riots that engulfed Los Angeles after the acquittal of police officers in the beating of Rodney King. The Insurrection Act has been invoked throughout US history to deal with riots and labor unrest, and to protect Black Americans from the Ku Klux Klan. Advertisement During his 2024 campaign, Trump and aides discussed invoking the Insurrection Act on his first day in office to quell anticipated protests, and he said at an Iowa rally that he would unilaterally send troops to Democratic-run cities to enforce order. 'You look at any Democrat-run state, and it's just not the same - it doesn't work,' Trump told the crowd, suggesting cities like New York and Los Angeles had severe crime problems. 'We cannot let it happen any longer. And one of the other things I'll do - because you're supposed to not be involved in that, you just have to be asked by the governor or the mayor to come in - the next time, I'm not waiting.' Trump's willingness to use the armed forces to put down protests has drawn fierce blowback from civil liberties groups and Democrats, who have said suppressing dissent with military force is a violation of the country's norms. 'President Trump's deployment of federalized National Guard troops in response to protests is unnecessary, inflammatory, and an abuse of power,' Hina Shamsi, director of the National Security Project at the American Civil Liberties Union, said in a statement. 'By taking this action, the Trump administration is putting Angelenos in danger, creating legal and ethical jeopardy for troops, and recklessly undermining our foundational democratic principle that the military should not police civilians.' Goitein said Trump's move to invoke only the federal service law might be calculated to try to avoid any political fallout from invoking the Insurrection Act, or it's merely a prelude to doing so. 'This is charting new ground here, to have a president try to uncouple these authorities,' Goitein said. 'There's a question here whether he is essentially trying to deploy the powers of the Insurrection Act without invoking it.' Advertisement Trump's move also was unusual in other ways, Goitein said. Domestic military deployments typically come at the request of a governor and in response to the collapse of law enforcement control or other serious threats. Local authorities in Los Angeles have not asked for such help. Goitein said the last time a president ordered the military to a state without a request was in 1965, when President Lyndon B. Johnson sent troops to Alabama to protect civil rights demonstrators. Georgetown law professor Steve Vladeck wrote on his website that invoking the Armed Services Act - and not the Insurrection Act - means the troops will be limited in what role they will be able to perform. 'Nothing that the President did Saturday night would, for instance, authorize these federalized National Guard troops to conduct their own immigration raids; make their own immigration arrests; or otherwise do anything other than, to quote the President's own memorandum, 'those military protective activities that the Secretary of Defense determines are reasonably necessary to ensure the protection and safety of Federal personnel and property,'' Vladeck wrote. Rachel E. VanLandingham, a former Air Force attorney and professor at the Southwestern Law School in Los Angeles, echoed the point. Unless acting under federal orders from the president, National Guard units are state organizations overseen by governors. While under state control, Guard troops have broader law enforcement authorities, VanLandingham said. In this situation, the service members under federal control will have more restraints. 'But it can easily and quickly escalate to mortal and constitutional danger,' she said, if Trump decides to also invoke the Insurrection Act, which would give these Guard members and any active-duty troops who may be summoned to Los Angeles the authority to perform law enforcement duties. Advertisement During his first term as president, Trump suggested invoking the Insurrection Act to deal with protests over the 2020 police killing of George Floyd, but his defense secretary at the time, Mark T. Esper, objected and it never came to fruition. Trump asked the governors of a handful of states to send troops to D.C. in response to the Floyd protests there. Some governors agreed, but others turned aside the request. National Guard members were present outside the White House in June of that year during a violent crackdown on protesters demonstrating against police brutality. That same day, D.C. National Guard helicopters overseen by Trump's Army secretary then, Ryan McCarthy, roared over protesters in downtown Washington, flying as low as 55 feet. An Army review later determined it was a misuse of helicopters specifically designated for medical evacuations. Trump also generated controversy when he sent tactical teams of border officers to Portland, Oregon, and to Seattle to confront protesters there.

JONATHAN TURLEY: Democrats' rabid anti-ICE resistance in LA against Trump could backfire
JONATHAN TURLEY: Democrats' rabid anti-ICE resistance in LA against Trump could backfire

Fox News

time11 minutes ago

  • Fox News

JONATHAN TURLEY: Democrats' rabid anti-ICE resistance in LA against Trump could backfire

California Gov. Gavin Newsom was in his element over the weekend. After scenes of burning cars and attacks on ICE personnel, Newsom declared that this was all "an illegal act, an immoral act, an unconstitutional act." No, he was not speaking of the attacks on law enforcement or property. He was referring to President Donald Trump's call to deploy the National Guard to protect federal officers. Newsom is planning to challenge the deployment as cities like Glendale are cancelling contracts to house detainees and reaffirming that local police will not assist the federal government. Trump has the authority under Section 12406 of Title 10 of the U.S. Code to deploy the National Guard if the governor is "unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States." The administration is saying that that is precisely what is unfolding in California, where mobs have attacked vehicles and trapped federal personnel. Most critics are challenging the deployment on policy grounds, arguing that it is an unnecessary escalation. However, even critics like Berkeley Law Dean Erwin have admitted that "Unfortunately, President Trump likely has the legal authority to do this." There is a fair debate over whether this is needed at this time, but the president is allowed to reach a different conclusion. Trump wants the violence to end now as opposed to escalating as it did in the Rodney King riots or the later riots after George Floyd's death, causing billions in property damage and many deaths. Courts will be asked to halt the order because it did not technically go through Newsom to formally call out the National Guard. Section 12406 grants Trump the authority to call out the Guard and employs a mandatory term for governors, who "shall" issue the president's order. In the memo, Trump also instructed federal officials "to coordinate with the Governors of the States and the National Guard Bureau." Newsom is clearly refusing to issue the orders or coordinate the deployment. Even if such challenges are successful, Trump can clearly flood the zone with federal authority. Indeed, the obstruction could escalate the matter further, prompting Trump to consider using the Insurrection Act, which would allow troops to participate directly in civilian law enforcement. In 1958, President Eisenhower used the Insurrection Act to deploy troops to Arkansas to enforce the Supreme Court's orders ending racial segregation in schools. The Trump administration has already claimed that these riots "constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the government of the United States." In support of such a claim, the administration could cite many of the Democratic leaders now denouncing the claim. After January 6th, liberal politicians and professors insisted that the riot was an "insurrection" and claimed that Trump and dozens of Republicans could be removed from ballots under the 14th Amendment. Liberal professors insisted that Trump's use of the word "fight" on January 6th and his questioning of the results of an election did qualify as an insurrection. They argued that you merely need to show "an assemblage of people" who are "resisting the law" and "using force or intimidation" for "a public purpose." The involvement of inciteful language from politicians only reinforced these claims. Sound familiar? Democrats are using this order to deflect from their own escalation of the tensions over the past several months. From Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz calling ICE officers "Gestapo" to others calling them "fascists" and "Nazis," Democratic leaders have been ignoring objections that they are fueling the violent and criminal responses. It did not matter. It was viewed as good politics. While Newsom and figures like New Jersey Democrat Sen. Cory Booker have called these "peaceful" protests, we have also seen rocks, and Molotov cocktails thrown at police as vehicles were torched. Police have had to use tear gas, "flash bang" grenades, and rubber bullets to quell these "peaceful" protesters. There appears little interest in deescalation on either side. For the Trump administration, images of rioters riding in celebration around burning cars with Mexican flags are only likely to reinforce the support of the majority of Americans for the enforcement of immigration laws. For Democrats, they have gone "all in" on opposing ICE and these enforcement operations despite support from roughly 30 percent of the public. Some Democrats are now playing directly to the mob. A Los Angeles City Council member, Eunisses Hernandez, reportedly urged anti-law enforcement protesters to "escalate" their tactics against ICE officers: "They know how quickly we mobilize, that's why they're changing tactics. Because community defense works and our resistance has slowed them down before… and if they're escalating their tactics, then so are we. When they show up, we gotta show up even stronger." So, L.A. officials are maintaining the sanctuary status of the city, barring the cooperation of local police, and calling on citizens to escalate their resistance after a weekend of violent attacks. Others have posted the locations of ICE facilities to allow better tracking of operations, while cities like Glendale are closing facilities. In Washington, House Speaker Hakim Jeffries has pledged to unmask the identities of individual ICE officers who have been covering their faces to protect themselves and their families from growing threats. While Democrats have not succeeded in making a convincing political case for opposing immigration enforcement, they may be making a stronger case for federal deployment in increasingly hostile blue cities.

Liberals, anti-Trump figures bash ABC for suspending Terry Moran over anti-Trump social media rant
Liberals, anti-Trump figures bash ABC for suspending Terry Moran over anti-Trump social media rant

Fox News

time11 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Liberals, anti-Trump figures bash ABC for suspending Terry Moran over anti-Trump social media rant

Liberal pundits and anti-Trump figures slammed ABC News for suspending longtime correspondent Terry Moran after he ranted on social media about President Donald Trump and Stephen Miller. "They can clutch their pearls and act mad but this is spot on from Moran," Tommy Vietor, a co-host of "Pod Save America," wrote, reacting to Moran's deleted social media post that referred to both men as "world-class hater[s]." Moran called out Trump and Miller on social media early Sunday morning and proceeded to delete the post. An ABC News spokesperson told Fox News Digital in a statement that Moran was suspended, saying, "The post does not reflect the views of ABC News and violated our standards." "MAGA, I thought you all defended free speech and the First Amendment, right? Why are you so upset about Terry Moran's comments? Stop being such snowflakes, right? Stop looking for safe spaces. Man up," posted left-wing writer Wajahat Ali, who edits "The Left Hook" Substack. Joe Walsh, a former GOP congressman who joined the Democratic Party this year, said, "shame on you, @abcnews." "Way to NOT stand up for a free press," he added. In another post on X, Walsh called the suspension of Moran "utter b-------," and said, "You're the free press. You don't do what the authoritarian in the White House tells you to do. Thank you @TerryMoran for having the courage to speak the truth." "What Moran reported was demonstrable fact. Indisputable fact. Yet they suspend him. This is the advantage that Trump and his ilk have. They are so beyond the moral pale, so beyond normality, that it is considered impolite, impolitic, or intemperate to describe them as they are," Lincoln Project co-founder George Conway wrote. Medhi Hasan, a former MSNBC host who started his own publication, Zeteo, directed his criticism at the Trump officials who defended the president and Miller. "Snowflakes. Pretend free speech warriors. Getting journalists suspended and calling for their firing. Hypocrites," Hasan wrote. Hasan also posted on Bluesky that Moran's suspension was "'ironic given Moran went out of his way to not embarrass Trump over the president's delusion about the doctored MS13 photo, repeatedly saying 'let's agree to disagree' and 'let's move on' but they still got him suspended. You can't appease these people ever." Moran interviewed Trump about his first 100 days in office, during which Trump repeatedly called out Moran and ABC News. Trump accused Moran of "not being very nice" during an exchange about the deportation of illegal immigrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia. "They're giving you the big break of a lifetime," Trump told Moran. "You're doing the interview, I picked you because, frankly, I never heard of you, but that's OK. I picked you, Terry, but you're not being very nice." Far-left former MSNBC host Keith Olbermann re-posted Moran's attacks on Miller and Trump, and called out Bob Iger, the CEO of Disney, which owns ABC News. "Another coward named @RobertIger responded by letting ABC News suspend Terry indefinitely for telling the truth," Olbermann wrote. "I have copied Terry's words here and I encourage everybody, journalists especially, to do the same, or cut and paste what I've written, and put it out under your name." Others also called on their followers to share Moran's deleted post. Ron Filipkowski, editor-in-chief of MeidasTouch, a liberal website, said Moran's suspension was a product of corporate journalism. "Independent journalism is when you can write what Terry Moran wrote without getting in trouble. Corporate journalism is when you can't," he wrote. ABC News did not immediately return a request for comment. Moran's suspension for airing his thoughts comes as public trust in the media continues to steadily erode. A Gallup survey last year showed a record-low 31 percent of Americans expressed at least a "fair amount" of trust in the media to accurately report the news. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt responded to Moran's post on X, Sunday, calling it "unhinged and unacceptable."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store