
Case for sugar trading on Pakistan Mercantile Exchange
At present, sugar trading in Pakistan is carried out through a sprawling network of intermediaries and informal 'exchanges'– marketplaces operating without licenses or regulatory oversight. Transactions are executed on platforms as rudimentary as WhatsApp, where truckloads (typically 12-tonne lots) are bought and sold on speculative pricing. Prices fluctuate based on these informal notations, and deals are struck without transparency, accountability, or the protections offered by centralised clearing systems. This market structure not only limits fair price discovery, but also exposes traders to defaults, arbitrary tax liabilities, and legal risks.
Utilising a formal commodities exchange — such as the Pakistan Mercantile Exchange (PMEX) — for sugar and similar agricultural products is not just a recommendation; it is a necessity.
Let's begin with the fundamentals. A regulated commodities exchange introduces three critical elements to any market: transparency, trust, and efficiency. In the case of sugar, a formal exchange ensures that both buyers and sellers are properly onboarded after KYC (Know Your Customer), AML (Anti-Money Laundering), and CFT (Countering the Financing of Terrorism) checks. This brings the shadow economy into the formal sector, discouraging tax evasion and fostering accountability across the trading ecosystem.
More importantly, it transforms price discovery from a speculative, rumour-driven process influenced by a handful of traders into a transparent, data-informed mechanism that has participation from tens of thousands of investors and traders from across the country.
On regulated exchanges, prices are determined through structured futures contracts, in which both parties deposit a small margin (usually between 5-10%) and commit to either buying or selling sugar at a future date. As delivery date approaches, these margins escalate every day to discourage pure speculators ensuring that real buyers, sellers and hedgers remain in the market to curb speculative impact on sugar prices.
This enables a more accurate projection of market trends, allowing producers, consumers, and even policymakers to make informed decisions about production planning, procurement, and inventory management.
The role of speculation, often misunderstood, is also critical in this context. A regulated environment doesn't eliminate speculation – it restrains it through various levers like daily circuit breakers, escalating margins close to delivery dates, broader investor participation, etc. Speculators bring liquidity to markets and contribute to robust price discovery. Whether they're informed by satellite data on crop yields, insights from sugar mills, or international price trends, these traders inject diverse perspectives into the pricing mechanism. When speculation is allowed in a structured and monitored space, it becomes a strength – not a risk.
To understand the urgency of reform, one must consider the current challenges. Informal sugar dealers are often subjected to massive tax claims from the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) in the absence of reliable trading history and profit and loss accounts.
A trader may turn over billions of rupees, but face net losses due to volatile market swings – and yet receive tax bills calculated purely on their trade volume. This drives many away from transparency and toward further informality. A regulated exchange solves this mismatch by recording and validating every trade, offering clarity on net positions, margins, and actual profit or loss.
Then there's the matter of volatility and fairness. In informal setups, there is no central counterparty to guarantee performance. If a party fails to honour a deal – say, they can't deliver the sugar they sold or pay for the sugar they bought – there is no protection for the counterparty. A licensed exchange like PMEX acts as the central counterparty, ensuring that all trades are honoured through active risk management systems and daily margining processes. It's a safeguard for all players, large or small, and incentivises broad investor participation in commodity markets.
Of course, the goal is not merely to digitise the existing system but to modernise it. Pakistan's commodity trading infrastructure is archaic – in some cases, unchanged for over a century. Prices vary between local 'mandis' and even across 'thadas' within the same 'mandis', with buyers and sellers often disconnected from broader market trends. This disjointed structure penalises both ends – farmers and consumers – as middlemen extract disproportionate margins. By integrating sugar, and eventually wheat, rice, and maize into a centralised, transparent exchange, we pave the way for inclusive, modern agricultural markets.
It's not just about making sugar trading efficient. It's about rewriting the country's agricultural policy playbook. Transparent futures price signals help farmers decide which crops to plant. Government agencies can monitor supply-demand dynamics in real time. And consumers benefit from more stable, predictable pricing – especially during sensitive periods like Ramazan.
In conclusion, the case for regulated sugar trading is as much about economic reform as it is about governance, equity, and national resilience.
By shifting from fragmented, informal systems to structured, licensed platforms, Pakistan can unlock a more productive, transparent, and inclusive future for its commodity markets. Sugar may be the starting point – but the implications reach far beyond the sweetener itself.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Forces regain extended detention powers with Senate nod
The Pakistan armed forces reiterated their commitment to eradicating terrorism, emphasising their solidarity with the nation in this ongoing fight. SCREENGRAB Following its passage in the National Assembly, the Senate on Tuesday approved the Anti-Terrorism (Amendment) Bill 2025, restoring powers that allow law enforcement agencies and the armed forces to detain suspects for up to three months, a move that sparked uproar from the opposition benches. Minister of State for Interior and Narcotics Control Muhammad Talal Badar tabled the bill, which amends sub-section (1) of Section 11EEEE of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. According to the amendment, "the government or, where the provisions of Section 4 have been invoked, the armed forces or civil armed forces for a period not exceeding three months and after recording reasons thereof, issue order for the preventative detention of any person." The bill states that persons suspected of activities against national security, including target killing, kidnapping for ransom and extortion, can be detained for three months, adding that it applies "against whom sufficient grounds exist of his having been so concerned, for purpose of inquiry". Detentions extending beyond this threshold will be subject to Article 10 of the Constitution, which provides safeguards with respect to arrest and detention. Under the new arrangement, if a detention order is issued by the army or civil forces, the investigation will be handled by a joint investigation team. "The inquiry will be conducted by no police officer below the rank of Superintendent of Police, Intelligence agencies, civil armed forces, armed forces, and other law enforcing agencies," the bill adds. While JUI-F's Senator Kamran Murtaza attempted to move amendments, they were rejected by majority vote as the House passed the law clause-by-clause. According to its statement of objects, the current security outlook requires "a robust response that goes beyond the existing legal framework". The bill explains that previous powers under Section 11EEEE, which lapsed in 2016 due to a sunset clause, needed to be "re-inserted to empower the government, Armed Forces and Civil Armed Forces with the necessary authority to detain individuals who pose a significant threat to national security". The government contends the provision would allow for preventive detention based on credible information or reasonable suspicion, enabling authorities to disrupt terror plots before they mature. 'Urgency must not eclipse wisdom' Defending the legislation, Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar told senators, "Currently, the country is facing the menace of terrorism and amendments proposed by Syed Naveed Qamar have already been incorporated to make it more effective." He pointed out the bill had passed judicial scrutiny and included a three-year sunset clause. He further clarified that under Clause 2 of the amendment, the detainee would have presented before the Magistrate within 24 hours. However, PTI's Barrister Syed Ali Zafar urged caution, stating: "Some of its clauses are against the law and Constitution, so the bill should be referred to the committee." "Today we are being asked to amend one of the most powerful — and most controversial — laws in our statute book: the Anti-Terrorism Act," the opposition lawmaker said, adding that the law first came into being under extraordinary circumstances to protect Pakistan from extraordinary threats. "But as lawmakers, we must always remember: every extraordinary power given to the state can both be used and misused," he cautioned. He acknowledged that the anti-terrorism act was made to get rid of the menace of terrorism, which had destroyed the peace of the nation. "There is no doubt that we have to eradicate terrorism from the country and punish the terrorists. There is also no doubt that we will fight against terrorism till the last and that together we will win this battle." However, he cautioned that "urgency must not eclipse wisdom". Barrister Ali Zafar further pointed out that the Supreme Court had examined the provisions of the existing anti-terrorism act and decided that many of its provisions were against the constitution. "It was only after that that the present law was passed, and hence there is no room for any changes in it. By adding any provision in the existing law and making it more draconian, it will only become unconstitutional." He lamented that the amendment proposes that even an SHO and detain anybody for a period of three months in prison, and the person in prison will have no recourse to the courts. "The government can call anyone a terrorist on the grounds of public order and imprison them," he warned. "We must ask ourselves: will this amendment make Pakistan safer, or will it weaken the constitutional rights we swore an oath to protect?" "Our duty is twofold: on the one hand, to protect the lives of our citizens from the scourge of terrorism; on the other, to defend those constitutional freedoms without which Pakistan cannot remain a democratic state," he stressed. "We have to do a balancing act. Security will have to be balanced against liberty and power against accountability," he added. 'No softness toward militancy' PML-N Senator Irfanul Haque Siddiqui argued that no softness could be shown toward armed militancy. "We do not want terrorists roaming freely while innocent people are slaughtered... These acts weaken our federation and create mistrust between the people and the state." He said lawmakers must either surrender to militants or legislate to resist them, arguing such measures can "prevent crime and also curb forced disappearances and arbitrary detentions". Siddiqui appealed for viewing anti-terror legislation in good faith rather than as a political stick, stressing the need for transparent government-opposition communication with the public and media.


Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Senate passes Anti-Terrorism Bill amid opposition walkout
ISLAMABAD: Amidst strong opposition, the Senate, Tuesday, passed three government bills including the Anti-Terrorism (Amendment) Bill, 2025, that allows detention of suspects at the hands of law enforcement agencies for more than three months. On the last day of the 353rd session, State Minister for Interior Talal Chaudhry presented the bill in the House that met strong opposition. Last week, the bill was passed by the National Assembly where it faced strong opposition too. In the Senate meeting, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Parliamentary Leader Ali Zafar criticised the powers given to the law enforcement agencies to detain any suspect without presenting them in a court of law for three months. 'The country is burning in the fire of terrorism,' responded Law Minister Azam Tarar, defending the bill, saying it aimed at countering terrorism. Kamran Murtaza from Jamiat Uelma-e-Islam Fazal (JUI-F) criticised the treasury side for presenting the bill for passage without having it referred to the relevant committee first. 'Heavens would not have fallen had this bill been referred to the committee,' he said. The bill was finally passed by the House by majority vote following which the PTI staged a walkout from the House in protest. The Section 3(a)(1) of the Anti-Terrorism (Amendment) Bill 2025 provides that the government or— the armed forces or civil armed forces - for a period not exceeding three months - issue an order for the preventative detention of any person who has been concerned in 'any offence under this Act relating to the security or defence of Pakistan or any part thereof, or public order relating to target killing, kidnapping for ransom, and extortion, bhatta, or the maintenance of supplies or services, or against whom a reasonable complaint has been made or credible information has been received, or a reasonable suspicion exists of his having been so concerned, for purpose of inquiry: Provided that the detention of such person, including detention for a further period after three months, shall be subject to the provision of Article l0 of the Constitution.' The Section 3(b) of the bill says, 'Provided that where the detention order has been issued by the armed forces or civil armed forces under Sub-section (1), the inquiry shall be conducted by a joint investigation team (JIT) comprising of a police officer not below the rank of superintendent of police, intelligence agencies, civil armed forces, armed forces, and other law enforcing agencies.' The Section 3(c) of this bill says that Anti-Terrorism (Amendment) Bill, 2025 shall remain in force for a period of three years from its commencement. Apart from Anti-Terrorism (Amendment) Act, 2025, the other two bills passed by the House were Petroleum (Amendment) Bill, 2025 and Pakistan Land Port Authority Bill, 2025. The Petroleum (Amendment) Bill, 2025 aims at introducing 'IT-based tracking of petroleum products, to curb the smuggling of petroleum products.' The Pakistan Land Port Authority Bill, 2025 aims to 'establish a land port authority to provide and administer an integrated system of facilities for cross-border movement of goods and passengers at land ports in Pakistan and to make provision for its operation, management, development of land port and matters connected therewith and ancillary matter.' Through resolutions, the Senate extended the Capital Development Authority Amendment Ordinance 2025 and the National Agri-Trade and Food Safety Authority Ordinance, 2025 for 120 days. Meanwhile, the Interior Ministry, in a written reply shared in the Senate Question House, said that the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) dismissed its 51 employees in the last three years for 'suspected collusion with human smugglers.' The Senate is prorogued. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Meetup highlights AI's role in software development
The Cursor team demonstrates its platform's features and answers the audience's questions at their first ever meetup in Pakistan held at the National Incubation Centre in Islamabad. PHOTO: ZUNAIRAH QURESHI/EXPRESS The Karachi community of Cursor AI — a platform designed to enhance the productivity of software and application developers through artificial intelligence — held a meetup on Sunday, drawing strong participation from young developers, IT professionals, and students both online and in person. The event focused on the latest features of Cursor AI, with developers sharing their experiences and exploring how the tool is transforming coding practices. Speaking to The Express Tribune, Yahya Qureshi, Cursor AI's ambassador in Pakistan, said the platform makes software development faster and more efficient. "Cursor is an AI tool that not only answers programming-related queries but can also generate new features. It simplifies coding while saving time," he explained. Qureshi noted that Cursor's growing community in Pakistan is being supported through free mentorship and guidance offered via WhatsApp groups. Highlighting its potential for the country's software industry, he said AI-assisted coding is helping accelerate research, streamline debugging, and enhance software trials. "Its popularity lies in its open-market policy," he added. During the session, Google Developer Expert for Android, Wajahat Karim, advised younger developers to first strengthen their foundational coding skills. "AI tools like Cursor are valuable, but they should be used by developers with at least five years of experience. Newcomers must not skip understanding code — AI should complement skills, not replace them," he cautioned. Juan Batista, a special guest from Anysphere, also joined the meetup via Zoom, responding to participants' queries about AI-powered development.