How saying yes to overwork can hinder success: 5 lessons professionals need to learn
For decades, this readiness has been celebrated as ambition, commitment, even loyalty. But a new report exposes the darker side of this culture: workers are paying a heavy price for carrying burdens that extend well beyond their job descriptions.
LiveCareer's Hidden Costs and Rewards of Extra Work Report (December 2024), based on a survey of 1,160 US employees, lays bare a paradox that defines today's labour force.
On the surface, saying 'yes' can open doors, sharpen skills, promotions beckon, and paychecks fatten. But beneath that thin layer of reward lies a corrosive truth: Overwork is pushing nearly all employees toward burnout, leaving them stretched, fatigued, and disillusioned.
The findings challenge one of the most enduring myths of modern careers, that extra work is always the highway to success. Instead, the survey paints a portrait of a workforce trapped in a cycle of pressure, compliance, and exhaustion, where the costs often outweigh the gains.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around
Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List
Undo
A culture of overextension
The numbers from the report paint a sobering picture. 77% of employees take on responsibilities outside their role at least weekly, with more than a third facing such requests daily. Only 3% say they are never asked to do more. The concept of 'extra' work, once seen as occasional, has become structurally embedded in workplace operations.
This isn't about 'going the extra mile,' it's about a workplace survival strategy that relies on stretching human capacity until boundaries blur.
Burnout: The hidden epidemic
The toll is undeniable. A staggering 93% of employees report burnout as a direct consequence of accepting extra work. Nearly 60% say they frequently feel drained because they cannot say no. Burnout has become less of a red flag and more of a badge employees are forced to wear, a silent marker of endurance in an unforgiving environment.
The normalization of this fatigue raises a critical question: When exhaustion becomes the default, is the system itself broken?
Why saying 'no' rarely happen
Despite the consequences, most employees still comply.
56% admit they feel pressured into saying yes, while 27% cite direct managerial influence. Recognition (24%), the desire to be seen as a team player (23%), and career ambitions (18%) also drive compliance. Only 11% set boundaries and refuse additional work.
This imbalance underscores a workplace psychology where declining requests is equated with jeopardizing one's future. In a precarious labour market, self-preservation often means self-sacrifice.
Where the work comes from
What makes this overextension even more insidious is its source. It isn't limited to one layer of authority: 23% of requests come from direct managers, 22% from senior leaders, 22% from coworkers, 21% from other team managers, and even 13% from HR. The expectation to do more is everywhere, woven into every layer of hierarchy.
The tasks themselves are telling, administrative duties, event planning, overtime, mentoring, or covering for absent colleagues.
These aren't career-advancing stretch projects; they're organizational gaps papered over by human labor.
The rewards that keep people hooked
Yet, the story isn't entirely bleak. One in three employees credits extra work with skill development, financial rewards, or closer colleague relationships. About 31% even report career advancement opportunities. In fact, 90% of respondents feel fairly compensated for their additional contributions, and more than half believe their efforts are critical to business survival.
But the benefits are uneven. Older workers (41+) are far more likely to see fairness and advancement opportunities than their younger counterparts, who often perceive the trade-off as thankless.
A question of sustainability
The dual reality is stark: Extra work brings rewards, but also crippling burnout. When nearly every employee admits to being overburdened, the problem ceases to be individual; it is systemic. The culture of relentless 'yes' may keep businesses afloat in the short term, but it breeds long-term instability, eroding mental health, engagement, and retention.
Redrawing the boundaries
What LiveCareer's report uncovers is more than statistics; it is a mirror held up to modern workplaces. Saying 'yes' has become a default response, not out of enthusiasm, but compulsion. Companies may celebrate it as commitment, but in truth, it reflects a structure built on overreliance and exhaustion.
The task ahead is twofold: Employees must find the courage to draw boundaries, and employers must confront their dependence on burnout economics.
Until then, the corporate culture of 'yes' will remain less about opportunity and more about erosion of energy, balance, and dignity at work.
Lessons professionals need to learn
In today's hyper-competitive workplace, many professionals believe that saying yes to every task is the surest way to climb the ladder. Yet, the reality is often the opposite. Overcommitment drains energy, blurs focus, and creates a cycle where effort outweighs achievement.
True success lies not in endless hustle, but in mastering balance and discernment.
Boundaries safeguard growth
Agreeing to every request leaves little room for strategic work. Setting boundaries allows professionals to channel time and energy into projects that drive meaningful results.
Productivity isn't about hours logged
Staying late may look impressive, but output matters more than optics. Professionals who focus on efficiency often deliver stronger results than those stuck in the cycle of overwork.
Burnout destroys long-term potential
Short-term wins earned through exhaustion come at the cost of health, creativity, and sustainability. Protecting well-being ensures careers last and flourish.
Selective commitments build credibility
Saying yes to everything dilutes quality. By prioritizing key responsibilities, professionals establish a reputation for reliability and excellence.
Rest is a competitive advantage
Recovery sharpens judgment, strengthens resilience, and boosts leadership potential. In a world that glorifies busyness, choosing rest can set professionals apart.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
15 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump's job cuts leave a profession looking for its next act
Betsy Wolf has a doctorate in education, a record of publishing research and a strong professional network. What she doesn't have is a full-time job. In March, Wolf was placed on leave at the research arm of the Education Department. She was officially let go from her position compiling evidence of what works in schools—along with many of her colleagues—at the beginning of this month. The dozens of applications she has submitted to find a new job have yielded just a handful of interviews and no offers. Wolf is among a highly specialized group of professionals trying to remake or salvage careers after federal cuts hit their tiny industry—in this case, the niche and government-dependent field of education research. The Trump administration has argued that the federal research infrastructure was ineffective, outdated and politically biased. Some workers are fishing for consulting gigs or competing for a shrinking number of roles in education. Others are trying to pivot to different lines of work, such as insurance or technology. Eric Hedberg, who has a Ph.D in sociology, had worked for nearly two decades on federal contracts to study education and other government programs. In February, many of those contracts vanished, as the Department of Government Efficiency tore through the Education Department. He changed his résumé to nix jargon common in the research world and instead pitched his statistical expertise elsewhere. Hedberg soon landed a job as a data scientist at an insurance company. Now, he isn't looking back at his old industry. 'It's an intellectual dust bowl—there are no crops coming out of this ground anymore," Hedberg said. The turmoil shows a striking way that federal cutbacks are cascading across the economy, as the job market softens. The government has also frozen funds at universities—another main source of employment for education researchers. 'It's not like I'm losing my job," Wolf said. 'It's like I'm losing my field, my entire career pathway." The few job postings are often inundated with applicants. The Center on Reinventing Public Education, an education think tank, attracted a roughly 50% rise in applications, compared with a prior search, for two recently open roles. 'My LinkedIn just was like a graveyard," said Elizabeth Tipton, a statistician at Northwestern University. 'When an entire field is laid off, where are they supposed to find jobs?" Tipton is the president of the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, whose members have been heavily affected by federal cuts, she said. With an annual budget of about $800 million, the Institute of Education Sciences, the Education Department's research arm, has produced basic facts about schools, supported studies of specific programs and run centers to help educators use research. Researchers say that if IES isn't rebuilt, educators and policymakers will be in the dark about how to improve and understand American schools. 'The Trump administration is committed to spending taxpayer dollars responsibly and on programs and activities that are best serving students, families and educators," said Madi Biedermann, a spokeswoman for the department. Eric Mason worked at IES managing contracts for research centers, known as Regional Educational Laboratories, designed to help schools solve difficult problems, such as filling teacher shortages. Since being placed on leave in March, Mason has put out 80 job applications and gotten zero interviews. A former teacher, he has started applying for teaching positions, after more than a decade outside the classroom. He has also looked for roles in sales or client success—'anything that would get me some kind of income," he said. At age 54, he is worried that potential employers will quickly pass him by. Former department staffers have been watching the courts, hoping for a lifeline. The Supreme Court recently undid a lower-court edict directing the Trump administration to retain Education Department workers. Three lawsuits from education-research groups have failed to win preliminary rulings. However, on Friday a federal district court ordered the Trump administration to restore the Regional Educational Laboratories at IES. The administration said that doing so might prove impracticable because contractors have already laid off staffers. In his recent budget request, President Trump is seeking to cut annual funding for IES by two-thirds, although Congress might not go along with that plan. The Education Department has brought on an adviser, Amber Northern, 'to re-envision" the institute's work. The impact of the research cuts extends beyond the department itself. Dan Frederking had been working at the American Institutes for Research, a private research firm that lost a number of federal contracts. He was among about 500 people, over 30% of the company, laid off earlier this year. He has landed a part-time role as an adjunct professor and is trying to drum up work as an independent consultant—where he is competing with other laid-off workers. Frederking is applying for data roles in school districts and professorships at small colleges in the Milwaukee area, where he lives. 'I personally feel I would be a great candidate but convincing people of that…that's always a challenge," he said. Write to Matt Barnum at
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
China's Wang Yi's 1st India Visit In 3 Years, 'Elephant', 'Dragon' To Dance?
New Delhi: China Foreign Minister Wang Yi met his counterpart S Jaishankar in Delhi Monday evening and will meet Prime Minister Narendra Modi later, hinting at a potential reset of fractured ties between two of the world's largest economies as they navigate being bashed by US President Donald Trump's trade tariffs. Mr Yi's visit signals the resumption of top-level Delhi-Beijing contact - this is his first visit to India in three years - a resumption to be cemented by the Prime Minister's trip August 31-September 1 trip to China's Tainjin for another meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. Wang Yi's visit to India and the PM's China trip are significant from a border and regional security standpoint. Any peaceful resolution to long-standing disputes in Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh, and any step towards a less geopolitically volatile Eurasia, will be widely welcomed. The Chinese minister's visit is expected to help restart not just frozen border dispute resolution mechanisms, but also more important people-to-people contact like visas and direct flights stopped in the early days of the Covid pandemic and kept on hold after the violence in Ladakh. The Tariff Background Donald Trump's tariffs had an effect the American President may not have expected. Ties between India and China, finding themselves in similar predicaments, began thawing. In March, shortly after Mr Trump doubled tariffs on China to 20 per cent, Mr Yi called on Delhi and Beijing to work together and "take the lead in opposing hegemonism and power politics". "... making the 'elephant' and 'dragon' dance together is the only right choice," the Chinese leader said then, "Supporting, instead of wearing each other down, and strengthening cooperation, instead of guarding (against) each other, is in our fundamental interests." Fast-forward five-six months. The 'elephant' and the 'dragon' haven't quite taken to the dance floor, but the intent is still there, even if the choreography has not been worked out so far. China, however, has made it clear it intends to pursue this path. In July Chinese Vice President Han Zheng said 'becoming partners that enable each other's success and achieving the "dragon-elephant tango" is the right choice for both sides. And last week the Global Times, a Chinese government mouthpiece, referred to a 'ballet dance between dragon and elephant' as it called for a joint pushback against Trump's tariffs. The bonhomie hasn't been one-sided. In March the Prime Minister spoke to US-based podcaster Lex Friedman and said normalcy had returned to the India-China border. "Our focus is to ensure these differences don't turn into disputes. Instead of discord, we emphasise dialogue, because only through dialogue can we build a stable, cooperative relationship that serves the best interests of both nations." China welcomed the statement and said again, "cooperation is the right choice." The Pakistan Angle But for complete India-China cooperation to happen, the Pakistan issue needs to be resolved. Beijing continues to back Islamabad, particularly in the context of the war on terrorism. In May, for example, it reportedly blocked a United Nations Security Council proposal to label five Pak-based Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammad individuals as 'global terrorists'. There was also a difficult moment in a SCO summit meet in June. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh refused to sign a joint statement there because it did not mention the Pahalgam attack. Worse, the document tacitly accused India of creating unrest in Pak's Balochistan province. This was reportedly done at Pakistan's behest. For India-China ties to be reset, both the border dispute and China's continuing support of Pakistan will have to be addressed. That could take time. But, till then, cooperation on multilateral platforms like the SCO and BRICS - to offset Trump's tariffs and benefit both economies will be a step forward. Mr Jaishankar made that point in July when he was in Beijing. "Our bilateral relationship, as you have pointed out, has been steadily improving since the meeting between Prime Minister Modi and President Jinping in Kazan last October...I am confident my discussions in this visit will maintain that positive trajectory," he said in televised remarks.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
allcargo group: ET Titan Talk: Factories without borders—Allcargo Chairman on India building global freight icons - The Economic Times Video
In an exclusive conversation, Shashi Kiran Shetty, Founder and Chairman of the logistics multinational, the Allcargo Group, says the rise of German and American global logistics giants and multinationals like DHL, Kuehne+Nagel and erstwhile DB Schenker is closely linked to domestic manufacturing looking to expand overseas. With schemes like Make in India and Indian factories looking to go global, homegrown logistics firms must use this opportunity to support Indian manufacturers in their international ambitions and create large supply chain champions.
