China backs trilateral cooperation with Russia and India
This statement came a few hours after Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Andrey Rudenko said Moscow is holding discussions with its two key partners to revive the format.
'China-India-Russia cooperation not only serves the respective interests of the three countries, but also helps uphold peace and security and progress in the region and the world,' Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian said at a briefing in Beijing on Thursday. 'China stands ready to maintain communication with Russia and India on advancing the trilateral cooperation.'
The geopolitical troika was first conceptualized by Russian statesman and former prime minister Yevgeny Primakov in the 1990s to challenge the unipolar world order established by the United States. Although the idea was subsumed by BRICS, the foreign ministers of Russia, India and China have held 18 meetings in the RIC format.
🇷🇺🇮🇳🇨🇳RIC Troika Aligns with Respective Interests – Beijing 'China is willing to maintain communication with Russia and India to advance trilateral cooperation,' 🇨🇳FM spox Lin Jian said.The cooperation also 'contributes to regional and global peace, security, stability, and… https://t.co/Kjo4BOSUkEpic.twitter.com/trE5HGOU44
'We are interested in bringing this format back to life because these three countries are not only important partners but also founding members of BRICS,' Rudenko said on Thursday. 'The absence of the RIC mechanism seems inappropriate under current global conditions.'
New Delhi has also confirmed the talks with Moscow and Beijing.
'As to when this particular RIC format meeting is going to be held, it is something that will be worked out among the three countries in a mutually convenient manner, and we will let you know as and when that happens at an appropriate time when the meeting is to take place,' Indian Foreign Ministry spokesman Randhir Jaiswal said on Thursday.
In June, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said the recent thaw in relations between India and China presented a good opportunity to revive the trilateral group. 'Now that, as I understand it, an understanding is being reached between India and China on how to calm the border situation, I believe the time has come to revive the RIC trio,' he said at a Eurasian security conference.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
8 hours ago
- Russia Today
Modi's top adviser meets Putin in Moscow
Russian President Vladimir Putin received Ajit Doval, India's National Security Advisor and Prime Minister Narendra Modi's top security official, at the Kremlin on Thursday, the Kremlin announced. Also attending the meeting on the Russian side were Secretary of the Security Council Sergey Shoigu and presidential aide Yuri Ushakov. Representing India was Ambassador to Russia Vinay Kumar. Doval is visiting Moscow for high-level talks with defense and security officials. He previously met with Putin in St. Petersburg in September of 2024, where they discussed the growing partnership between the two nations. 'Our special privileged strategic partnership is gaining momentum and growing stronger, which we are delighted about. We are also pleased to see India's success in strengthening its statehood and advancing its economy under Prime Minister Modi's leadership,' Putin told Doval during their meeting last year. Earlier on Thursday, Doval held separate closed-door discussions with Sergey Shoigu and other officials. In his opening remarks before the meeting, Shoigu noted that Russia and India are 'linked by strong, trusting, time-tested bonds of friendship,' emphasizing that ties with India are 'of paramount importance' to Moscow. Shoigu stated that both countries aim to create 'a new, more just and sustainable world order, ensuring the supremacy of international law, while jointly combating modern challenges and threats.' For his part, Doval said that the Indian government will be 'delighted' to welcome Putin to New Delhi this year for the annual summit between the leaders of both countries. He added that the dates for the visit have been 'almost finalized.' Doval noted that 'the more important thing is that these summit meetings have always been watershed moments. They have consistently provided a new direction to our relations.' Doval's trip to Moscow comes amid rising tensions between New Delhi and Washington. The United States has imposed unprecedented sanctions on the nation of 1.4 billion people, accusing India of supporting 'Russia's war effort' by importing its oil. New Delhi called the move 'extremely unfortunate,' noting that the US has imposed additional tariffs on India 'for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest.' India has previously stressed that its imports of Russian oil align with its national interests and the country's economic and energy security needs. It has also criticized the US and EU for targeting its relationship with Moscow while continuing their own trade with Russia across multiple sectors, including gas, critical minerals, and fertilizers.
Russia Today
9 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump demands ‘conflicted' Intel CEO resign
US President Donald Trump has demanded the resignation of Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan following reports of his ties to China. Tan took over the chipmaker in March as the company struggled to recover from falling sales. In a post on Truth Social on Thursday, Trump called Tan 'conflicted' and said he must step down. 'The CEO of INTEL is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem,' he wrote, without elaborating. Trump's demand followed a letter on Wednesday from Republican Senator Tom Cotton to Intel board chair Frank Yeary, who raised concerns about Tan's alleged ties to Beijing. Cotton questioned Tan's integrity and the national security risks posed by his alleged investments in Chinese companies – including some linked to the military – which were reported by Reuters in April. The senator asked whether the board had required Tan to fully disclose his ties and divest from the companies, given Intel's federal funding under a US defense program. He also flagged Tan's previous role at Cadence Design, a California software firm that recently pleaded guilty to violating US export laws by selling chip designs to China's National University of Defense Technology (NUDT). 'The new CEO of Intel reportedly has deep ties to the Chinese Communists,' Cotton posted on X, linking the letter. 'US companies who receive government grants should be responsible stewards of taxpayer dollars and adhere to strict security regulations. The board of Intel owes Congress an explanation.' Intel and Tan have not responded to media requests for comment. Intel's shares dropped nearly 5% in premarket trading after Trump's post, though they later recovered. The controversy comes amid escalating tensions between Washington and Beijing. While both nations have long competed in the tech and semiconductor sectors, their rivalry turned into a full-scale trade war after Trump imposed sweeping tariffs on Chinese imports earlier this year, accusing Beijing of unfair trade practices. A temporary deal delayed most measures until August 12, but this week Trump threatened additional tariffs over China's energy ties with Russia. China has slammed Trump's tariff threats as violating international trade rules.
Russia Today
12 hours ago
- Russia Today
No more crutches: Russia's neighbours must now stand on their own
As global instability deepens, Russia's role in Eurasia – and the nature of its ties with neighboring states – is once again in sharp focus. Moscow is not driven by a mission to dominate its neighbors or enforce a privileged position over them. But it must ensure that future dependencies – economic, political, or security-related – do not come at the expense of its own national interests. This delicate balance is now being tested. The summer of 2025 has brought fresh tension to Eurasia. The worsening crisis surrounding Iran could easily spill over, affecting international cooperation and security throughout the region. Meanwhile, relations between Russia and long-standing partners such as Armenia – both a formal military and economic ally – are showing visible strain. Even frictions with Azerbaijan, though less dramatic, signal that the geopolitical fabric of southern Eurasia is shifting. Amid this turbulence, Russia's neighbors face a new set of choices. The ongoing standoff between Russia and the West, combined with uncertainty in the global economy, presents both risks and openings. These smaller states now must navigate a rapidly changing landscape – one where traditional alliances feel less reliable and new poles of influence emerge. Despite these pressures, Russia's influence remains evident. In July, Moscow formally recognized the Taliban government in Afghanistan, a move reflecting both realism and strategic calculation. While the United States still holds significant global clout, particularly through its Western military alliances and presence in the Middle East, Russia, China, and India continue to shape the regional dynamics of Eurasia. This is especially clear in the South Caucasus and Central Asia. These nations, already established as independent and sovereign players, are adapting to new realities – economic integration, demographic change, and environmental pressure. A notable example is the growing cohesion among Central Asia's five republics. Their cooperation may well enhance their regional agency in the years to come. Russia views this development positively. A more resilient Central Asia – capable of solving its own challenges – contributes to overall regional stability and makes cooperation more effective. Nonetheless, new challenges are on the horizon. First, the Middle East will remain volatile. The outcome of the Israel-Iran confrontation remains uncertain, but its destabilizing effects are already rippling outward. Türkiye's foreign policy, often unpredictable, adds further complexity. For countries like Armenia and Azerbaijan, these dynamics will pose a constant strategic test. Second, the energy economies of Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan remain vulnerable to global market shocks. A sustained drop in oil and gas prices – or the depletion of reserves – could threaten both countries with domestic turmoil. Managing this risk will demand careful economic planning and diversification. Third, climate change is poised to hit Central Asia hard. Rising temperatures and water shortages, paired with demographic pressures, may evolve into a genuine crisis within the next decade. Fourth, and perhaps most profoundly, Russia's neighbors are not insulated from the deepening instability of global politics and economics. Larger powers may weather volatility thanks to reserves and institutional strength. Smaller states may not be so lucky. They are aware of these vulnerabilities – and they are preparing for them. This, in turn, raises the question: what kind of relationship should these countries build with Russia? Geography, history, and shared infrastructure mean that Russia remains a central power in the former Soviet space. But the nature of this 'space' is evolving. The past three decades have seen the emergence of distinct, sovereign states with their own political trajectories. The idea of a unified 'post-Soviet' region is fading. Cooperation now depends less on shared ideology or past structures, and more on pragmatic interest. Russia does not seek to impose its will on these nations. But it must avoid any arrangement that allows others to benefit from Russian support – economic, security-related, or political – without reciprocity. This would be not only unfair, but strategically dangerous. In this light, the political regimes of neighboring countries are not of primary concern. What matters is that their partnerships with Russia do not undermine its sovereignty or long-term stability. Moscow welcomes genuine cooperation – built on mutual interest and equality – but cannot allow itself to become a crutch for governments unable or unwilling to manage their internal affairs. That principle applies across the board: in the South Caucasus, in Central Asia, and in Eastern Europe. What's required is a consistent, firm, and future-oriented approach to regional policy – one that encourages integration where possible but is unafraid to protect Russian interests when necessary. Of course, breaking away from old habits and assumptions will not be easy. The legacy of the Soviet Union still shapes expectations on both sides. Many governments in the region continue to treat Russia as a default provider of security and economic support – even while forging closer ties with other powers. This dual approach is unsustainable. It's time for a new model – one where Russia is not the guarantor of regional balance but a stakeholder among equals. A partner, not a patron. In such a system, cooperation would no longer rest on sentiment or historical inertia, but on clearly defined, reciprocal benefits. To succeed in this, Russia must act with strategic patience and clarity of purpose. It must support its neighbors where doing so serves mutual goals. But it must also draw clear boundaries – ensuring that its resources, prestige, and geopolitical position are not squandered on arrangements that yield little in return. In a world tilting towards greater uncertainty and multipolar competition, Russia's role in its own neighborhood remains vital. But it must be a role shaped not by nostalgia or charity, but by realism, prudence, and a firm defense of national interest. Only then can lasting, balanced partnerships emerge in the vast, shifting space of article was first published by Valdai Discussion Club, translated and edited by the RT team.
